9 results on '"Ackenine, K"'
Search Results
2. Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study
- Author
-
Vivarelli, M, Cacciaguerra, A, Lerut, J, Lanari, J, Conte, G, Pravisani, R, Lambrechts, J, Iesari, S, Ackenine, K, Nicolini, D, Cillo, U, Zanus, G, Colledan, M, Risaliti, A, Baccarani, U, Rogiers, X, Troisi, R, Montalti, R, Mocchegiani, F, Vivarelli M, Cacciaguerra AB, Lerut J, Lanari J, Conte G, Pravisani R, Lambrechts J, Iesari S, Ackenine K, Nicolini D, Cillo U, Zanus G, Colledan M, Risaliti A, Baccarani U, Rogiers X, Troisi RI, Montalti R, Mocchegiani F, Vivarelli, M, Cacciaguerra, A, Lerut, J, Lanari, J, Conte, G, Pravisani, R, Lambrechts, J, Iesari, S, Ackenine, K, Nicolini, D, Cillo, U, Zanus, G, Colledan, M, Risaliti, A, Baccarani, U, Rogiers, X, Troisi, R, Montalti, R, Mocchegiani, F, Vivarelli M, Cacciaguerra AB, Lerut J, Lanari J, Conte G, Pravisani R, Lambrechts J, Iesari S, Ackenine K, Nicolini D, Cillo U, Zanus G, Colledan M, Risaliti A, Baccarani U, Rogiers X, Troisi RI, Montalti R, and Mocchegiani F
- Abstract
When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (<= 30 days) HAT was in 6.2% (4/64) in the SC-AHAR and 10.7% (6/56) IR-AHAR group (p = 0.512) whilst incidence of late HAT was significantly lower in the SC-AHAR group (4.7% (3/64) vs 19.6% (11/56) -p = 0.024). IR-AHAR was the only independent risk factor for HAT (exp[B] = 3.915; 95% CI 1.400-10.951;p = 0.009). When AHAR is necessary at liver transplantation, the use of the supraceliac aorta significantly reduces the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis and should therefore be recommended whenever possible.
- Published
- 2020
3. Tacrolimus (TAC) and single intra-operative high-dose of r-ATG induction vs. tacrolimus monotherapy as immunosuppression (IS) in adult liver transplantation (lt): one-year results of an investigator-driven, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT)
- Author
-
Iesari, Samuele, Ackenine, K., Foguenne, Maxime, Komuta, Mina, Ciccarelli, Olga, Coubeau, Laurent, Bonaccorsi Riani, Eliano, Lai, Q., De Reyck, Chantal, Gianello, Pierre, Lerut, Jan, 27th International Congress of the Transplantation Society (TTS), UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service de chirurgie et transplantation abdominale, UCL - SSS/IREC/GAEN - Pôle d'Hépato-gastro-entérologie, and UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anatomie pathologique
- Published
- 2018
4. Tacrolimus (TAC) and single intra-operative high-dose of r-ATG induction vs. tacrolimus monotherapy as immunosuppression (IS) in adult liver transplantation (lt): one-year results of an investigator-driven, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT)
- Author
-
UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service de chirurgie et transplantation abdominale, UCL - SSS/IREC/GAEN - Pôle d'Hépato-gastro-entérologie, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anatomie pathologique, Iesari, Samuele, Ackenine, K., Foguenne, Maxime, Komuta, Mina, Ciccarelli, Olga, Coubeau, Laurent, Bonaccorsi Riani, Eliano, Lai, Q., De Reyck, Chantal, Gianello, Pierre, Lerut, Jan, 27th International Congress of the Transplantation Society (TTS), UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service de chirurgie et transplantation abdominale, UCL - SSS/IREC/GAEN - Pôle d'Hépato-gastro-entérologie, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anatomie pathologique, Iesari, Samuele, Ackenine, K., Foguenne, Maxime, Komuta, Mina, Ciccarelli, Olga, Coubeau, Laurent, Bonaccorsi Riani, Eliano, Lai, Q., De Reyck, Chantal, Gianello, Pierre, Lerut, Jan, and 27th International Congress of the Transplantation Society (TTS)
- Published
- 2018
5. Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study
- Author
-
Roberto Troisi, Michele Colledan, J. Lambrechts, Jan Lerut, Giacomo Zanus, Federico Mocchegiani, Kevin Ackenine, G. Conte, Roberto Montalti, Marco Vivarelli, Andrea Risaliti, Umberto Baccarani, A. Benedetti Cacciaguerra, J. Lanari, Samuele Iesari, Riccardo Pravisani, Daniele Nicolini, Xavier Rogiers, Umberto Cillo, Vivarelli, M., Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., Lerut, J., Lanari, J., Conte, G., Pravisani, R., Lambrechts, J., Iesari, S., Ackenine, K., Nicolini, D., Cillo, U., Zanus, G., Colledan, M., Risaliti, A., Baccarani, U., Rogiers, X., Troisi, R. I., Montalti, R., Mocchegiani, F., UCL - SSS/IREC - Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service de chirurgie et transplantation abdominale, Vivarelli, M, Cacciaguerra, A, Lerut, J, Lanari, J, Conte, G, Pravisani, R, Lambrechts, J, Iesari, S, Ackenine, K, Nicolini, D, Cillo, U, Zanus, G, Colledan, M, Risaliti, A, Baccarani, U, Rogiers, X, Troisi, R, Montalti, R, and Mocchegiani, F
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction ,Hepatic artery ,Hepatic artery thrombosis ,Iliac conduit ,Liver transplantation ,Vessel graft ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Surgical ,Aorta, Abdominal ,Aorta ,Incidence ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Anastomosis, Surgical ,Middle Aged ,Hepatic artery thrombosi ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Vascular Surgical Procedures ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Anastomosis ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Abdominal ,Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ,Risk factor ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Thrombosis ,Retrospective cohort study ,Plastic Surgery Procedures ,Surgery ,Transplantation ,Hepatic Artery ,Liver Transplantation ,business - Abstract
When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (
- Published
- 2020
6. The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.
- Author
-
Lai Q, Melandro F, Nowak G, Nicolini D, Iesari S, Fasolo E, Mennini G, Romano A, Mocchegiani F, Ackenine K, Polacco M, Marinelli L, Ciccarelli O, Zanus G, Vivarelli M, Cillo U, Rossi M, Ericzon BG, and Lerut J
- Subjects
- Adult, End Stage Liver Disease surgery, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Graft Rejection diagnosis, Graft Survival, Liver Transplantation, Primary Graft Dysfunction diagnosis, Research Design
- Abstract
In the last years, several scoring systems based on pre- and post-transplant parameters have been developed to predict early post-LT graft function. However, some of them showed poor diagnostic abilities. This study aims to evaluate the role of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) as a useful scoring system for accurately predicting 90-day and 1-year graft loss after liver transplantation. A training set (n = 1262) and a validation set (n = 520) were obtained. The study was registered at https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03723317). CCI exhibited the best diagnostic performance for 90 days in the training (AUC = 0.94; p < 0.001) and Validation Sets (AUC = 0.77; p < 0.001) when compared to the BAR, D-MELD, MELD, and EAD scores. The cut-off value of 47.3 (third quartile) showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 48.3 and 7.0 in the two sets, respectively. As for 1-year graft loss, CCI showed good performances in the training (AUC = 0.88; p < 0.001) and validation sets (AUC = 0.75; p < 0.001). The threshold of 47.3 showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.0 and 5.4 in the two sets, respectively. All the other tested scores always showed AUCs < 0.70 in both the sets. CCI showed a good stratification ability in terms of graft loss rates in both the sets (log-rank p < 0.001). In the patients exceeding the CCI ninth decile, 1-year graft survival rates were only 0.7% and 23.1% in training and validation sets, respectively. CCI shows a very good diagnostic power for 90-day and 1-year graft loss in different sets of patients, indicating better accuracy with respect to other pre- and post-LT scores.Clinical Trial Notification: NCT03723317.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The real incidence of biliary tract complications after adult liver transplantation: the role of the prospective routine use of cholangiography during post-transplant follow-up.
- Author
-
Navez J, Iesari S, Kourta D, Baami-Mariza K, Nadiri M, Goffette P, Baldin P, Ackenine K, Bonaccorsi-Riani E, Ciccarelli O, Coubeau L, Moreels T, and Lerut J
- Subjects
- Adult, Cholangiography, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Postoperative Complications diagnostic imaging, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Prospective Studies, Biliary Tract diagnostic imaging, Biliary Tract Diseases diagnostic imaging, Biliary Tract Diseases epidemiology, Liver Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Biliary tract complications (BTCs) still burden liver transplantation (LT). The wide reporting variability highlights the absence of systematic screening. From 2000 to 2009, simultaneous liver biopsy and direct biliary visualization were prospectively performed in 242 recipients at 3 and 6 months (n = 212, 87.6%) or earlier when indicated (n = 30, 12.4%). Median follow-up was 148 (107-182) months. Seven patients (2.9%) experienced postprocedural morbidity. BTCs were initially diagnosed in 76 (31.4%) patients; 32 (42.1%) had neither clinical nor biological abnormalities. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) was present in 27 (11.2%) patients and in 6 (22.2%) BTC patients. Nine (3.7%) patients with normal initial cholangiography developed BTCs after 60 (30-135) months post-LT. BTCs directly lead to 7 (2.9%) re-transplantations and 14 (5.8%) deaths resulting in 18 (7.4%) allograft losses. Bile duct proliferation at 12-month biopsy proved an independent risk factor for graft loss (P = 0.005). Systematic biliary tract and allograft evaluation allows the incidence and extent of biliary lesions to be documented more precisely and to avoid erroneous treatment of ACR. The combination 'abnormal biliary tract-canalicular proliferation' is an indicator of worse graft outcome. BTCs are responsible for important delayed allograft and patient losses. These results underline the importance of life-long follow-up and appropriate timing for re-transplantation., (© 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Secondary non-resectable liver tumors: A single-center living-donor and deceased-donor liver transplantation case series.
- Author
-
Lerut J, Iesari S, Vandeplas G, Fabbrizio T, Ackenine K, Núñez MEI, Komuta M, Coubeau L, Ciccarelli O, and Bonaccorsi-Riani E
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Graft Survival, Hepatectomy adverse effects, Humans, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Living Donors, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications etiology, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Tissue and Organ Harvesting adverse effects, Intestinal Neoplasms pathology, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Liver Transplantation adverse effects, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Neuroendocrine Tumors secondary, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Tissue and Organ Procurement
- Abstract
Background: During the last decades, deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has gained a place in the therapeutic algorithm of well-selected patients harbouring non-resectable secondary liver tumors. Living-donor LT (LDLT) might represent a valuable means to further expand this indication for LT., Methods: Between 1985 and 2016, twenty-two adults were transplanted because of neuroendocrine (n = 18, 82%) and colorectal metastases (n = 4, 18%); 50% received DDLT and 50% LDLT. In LDLT, 4 (36%) right and 7 (64%) left grafts were used; the median graft-to-recipient-weight ratios (GRWR) were 1.03% (IQR 0.86%-1.30%) and 0.59% (IQR 0.51%-0.91%), respectively. Median post-LT follow-up was 64 months (IQR 17-107) in the DDLT group and 40 months (IQR 35-116) in the LDLT group. DDLT and LDLT recipients were compared in terms of overall survival, graft survival, postoperative complications and recurrence., Results: The 1- and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 82% and 55% after DDLT, 100% and 100% after LDLT, respectively (P < 0.01). One- and 5-year actuarial graft survivals were 73% and 36% after DDLT, 91% and 91% after LDLT (P < 0.01). The outcomes of right or left LDLT were comparable. Donor hepatectomy proved safe, and one donor experienced a Clavien IIIb complication. Bilirubin peak was significantly lower after left hepatectomy compared with that after right hepatectomy [1.3 (IQR 1.2-2.2) vs. 3.3 (IQR 2.3-5.2) mg/dL; P = 0.02]., Conclusions: The more recent LDLT series compared favorably to our DDLT series in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies. The absence of portal hypertension and the use of smaller left grafts make recipient and donor surgeries safe. The safety of the procedures and lack of interference with the scarce allograft pool are expected to lead to a more frequent use of LDLT in the field of transplant oncology., (Copyright © 2019 First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in China. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Tacrolimus and Single Intraoperative High-dose of Anti-T-lymphocyte Globulins Versus Tacrolimus Monotherapy in Adult Liver Transplantation: One-year Results of an Investigator-driven Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Author
-
Iesari S, Ackenine K, Foguenne M, De Reyck C, Komuta M, Bonaccorsi Riani E, Ciccarelli O, Coubeau L, Lai Q, Gianello P, and Lerut J
- Subjects
- Adult, Biopsy, Female, Graft Survival, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Steroids administration & dosage, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Antilymphocyte Serum administration & dosage, Graft Rejection prevention & control, Immunosuppressive Agents administration & dosage, Intraoperative Care methods, Liver Transplantation, Tacrolimus administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether intra-operative induction with anti-lymphocytic serum (ALS) is superior to no induction in adult liver transplantation (LT)., Background: The efficacy of ALS induction remains inconclusive in LT, because of poorly designed trials., Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, including 206 adults (>15 years) and comparing tacrolimus monotherapy (TAC, n = 109) and tacrolimus plus a single, intraoperative, high-dose (9 mg/kg), rabbit anti-T-lymphocyte globulins (ATLG; n = 97). All patients had similar follow-up, including Banff-scored biopsies. Rejection was considered clinically relevant and treated if pathologic and biochemical changes were concordant. The primary endpoint was immunosuppression minimization to monotherapy; secondary endpoints were biopsy-proven rejection, clinical rejection, patient (PS) and graft (GS) survival., Results: At 1 year, 79/81 (96.3%) ATLG and 101/102 (99.0%) TAC patients were steroid-free (P = 0.585); 28 (34.6%) ATLG, and 31 (30.4%) TAC patients were on double-drug immunosuppression (P = 0.633). One-year PS and GS of ATLG and TAC patients were 84% and 92% (P = 0.260) and 76% and 90% (P = 0.054).Despite significantly a fewer day-7 moderate-to-severe acute cellular rejections (ACR) in ATLG group (10.0% vs 24.0% in TAC group, P = 0.019), cumulative proportion of patients experiencing steroid-sensitive (11.3% ATLG vs 14.7% TAC, P = 0.539), steroid-resistant (2.1% ATLG vs 3.7% TAC, P = 0.686) and chronic rejection (1.0% ATLG vs 0.9% TAC, P = 1.000) were similar. ATLG administration brought about greater hemodynamic instability and blood products use (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: At 1 year from LT, ATLG induction did not significantly affect immunosuppressive load, treated rejection, patient, and graft survival. The observed adverse events justify a modification of dosing and timing of ATLG infusion. Long-term results are required to judge the ATLG possible benefits on immunosuppressive load and tolerance induction.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.