Search

Many type systems have been presented in the literature for variants of the pi-calculus, but none of them are able to handle composite subjects such as those found in the language epi, which features polyadic synchronisation. The purpose of this paper is to address the question of how to type composite subjects in a general fashion. We assess the validity of our proposal by first proving the standard correctness results for a type system (i.e., subject reduction and type safety). Then, we follow the path opened by Sangiorgi in 1998 and show an encoding in epi of a minimal OO language called WC (While with \Classes) whose ``expectable'' type system exactly corresponds to the one induced by ours via the encoding. This comparison contributes to understanding the relationship between our types and conventional types for OO languages.

We continue the development of TinySol, a minimal object-oriented language based on Solidity, the standard smart-contract language used for the Ethereum platform. We first extend TinySol with exceptions and a gas mechanism, and equip it with a small-step operational semantics. Introducing the gas mechanism is fundamental for modelling real-life smart contracts in TinySol, since this is the way in which termination of Ethereum smart contracts is usually ensured. We then devise a type system for smart contracts guaranteeing that such programs never run out of gas at runtime. This is a desirable property for smart contracts, since a transaction that runs out of gas is aborted, but the price paid to run the code is not returned to the invoker.

Reactive software calls for instrumentation methods that uphold the reactive attributes of systems. Runtime verification imposes another demand on the instrumentation, namely that the trace event sequences it reports to monitors are sound -- that is, they reflect actual executions of the system under scrutiny. This paper presents RIARC, a novel decentralised instrumentation algorithm for outline monitors meeting these two demands. The asynchronous setting of reactive software complicates the instrumentation due to potential trace event loss or reordering. RIARC overcomes these challenges using a next-hop IP routing approach to rearrange and report events soundly to monitors. RIARC is validated in two ways. We subject its corresponding implementation to rigorous systematic testing to confirm its correctness. In addition, we assess this implementation via extensive empirical experiments, subjecting it to large realistic workloads to ascertain its reactiveness. Our results show that RIARC optimises its memory and scheduler usage to maintain latency feasible for soft real-time applications. We also compare RIARC to inline and centralised monitoring, revealing that it induces comparable latency to inline monitoring in moderate concurrency settings, where software performs long-running, computationally-intensive tasks, such as in Big Data stream processing.

Characteristic formulae give a complete logical description of the behaviour of processes modulo some chosen notion of behavioural semantics. They allow one to reduce equivalence or preorder checking to model checking, and are exactly the formulae in the modal logics characterizing classic behavioural equivalences and preorders for which model checking can be reduced to equivalence or preorder checking. This paper studies the complexity of determining whether a formula is characteristic for some finite, loop-free process in each of the logics providing modal characterizations of the simulation-based semantics in van Glabbeek's branching-time spectrum. Since characteristic formulae in each of those logics are exactly the consistent and prime ones, it presents complexity results for the satisfiability and primality problems, and investigates the boundary between modal logics for which those problems can be solved in polynomial time and those for which they become computationally hard. Amongst other contributions, this article also studies the complexity of constructing characteristic formulae in the modal logics characterizing simulation-based semantics, both when such formulae are presented in explicit form and via systems of equations., Comment: 67 pages, 1 figure

In this paper we focus on TinySol, a minimal calculus for Solidity smart contracts, introduced by Bartoletti et al. We start by rephrasing its syntax (to emphasise its object-oriented flavour) and give a new big-step operational semantics. We then use it to define two security properties, namely call integrity and noninterference. These two properties have some similarities in their definition, in that they both require that some part of a program is not influenced by the other part. However, we show that the two properties are actually incomparable. Nevertheless, we provide a type system for noninterference and show that well-typed programs satisfy call integrity as well; hence, programs that are accepted by our type system satisfy both properties. We finally discuss the practical usability of the type system and its limitations by means of some simple examples.

This paper focuses on the runtime verification of hyperproperties expressed in HypermuHML, an expressive yet simple logic for describing properties of sets of traces. To this end, we first consider a simple language of monitors that can observe sets of system executions and report verdicts w.r.t. a given HypermuHML formula. In this setting, a unique omniscient monitor observes all system traces, and, in this sense, it is 'centralized'. However, in a possibly distributed system, having a centralized entity is undesirable; hence, we also provide a language for 'decentralized' monitors, where each trace has its own monitor, and monitors for different traces can yield a unique verdict by communicating their observations. For both the centralized and the decentralized settings, we provide a synthesis procedure that, given a formula, yields a monitor that is correct (i.e., sound and violation complete). A key step in proving the correctness of the synthesis for decentralized monitors is a result showing that, for each formula, the synthesized centralized monitor and its corresponding decentralized one are weakly bisimilar for a suitable notion of weak bisimulation.

We present a unified rule format for structural operational semantics with terms as labels that guarantees that the associated labelled transition system has some bounded-nondeterminism property. The properties we consider include finite branching, initials finiteness and image finiteness.

The nominal transition systems (NTSs) of Parrow et al. describe the operational semantics of nominal process calculi. We study NTSs in terms of the nominal residual transition systems (NRTSs) that we introduce. We provide rule formats for the specifications of NRTSs that ensure that the associated NRTS is an NTS and apply them to the operational specification of the early pi-calculus. Our study stems from the recent Nominal SOS of Cimini et al. and from earlier works in nominal sets and nominal logic by Gabbay, Pitts and their collaborators., Comment: Conference version of arXiv:1807.02081

Input-output conformance simulation (iocos) has been proposed by Gregorio-Rodr\'iguez, Llana and Mart\'inez-Torres as a simulation-based behavioural preorder underlying model-based testing. This relation is inspired by Tretmans' classic ioco relation, but has better worst-case complexity than ioco and supports stepwise refinement. The goal of this paper is to develop the theory of iocos by studying logical characterisations of this relation, rule formats for it and its compositionality. More specifically, this article presents characterisations of iocos in terms of modal logics and compares them with an existing logical characterisation for ioco proposed by Beohar and Mousavi. It also offers a characteristic-formula construction for iocos over finite processes in an extension of the proposed modal logics with greatest fixed points. A precongruence rule format for iocos and a rule format ensuring that operations take quiescence properly into account are also given. Both rule formats are based on the GSOS format by Bloom, Istrail and Meyer. The general modal decomposition methodology of Fokkink and van Glabbeek is used to show how to check the satisfaction of properties expressed in the logic for iocos in a compositional way for operations specified by rules in the precongruence rule format for iocos ., Comment: Replaced conference version for extended version (this includes a change in the name of the paper plus additional sections and results)

In the setting of the modal logic that characterizes modal refinement over modal transition systems, Boudol and Larsen showed that the formulae for which model checking can be reduced to preorder checking, that is, the characteristic formulae, are exactly the consistent and prime ones. This paper presents general, sufficient conditions guaranteeing that characteristic formulae are exactly the consistent and prime ones. It is shown that the given conditions apply to various behavioural relations in the literature. In particular, characteristic formulae are exactly the prime and consistent ones for all the semantics in van Glabbeek's linear time-branching time spectrum., Comment: Updated conference version with the extended version

This paper studies the relationships between three notions of behavioural preorder that have been proposed in the literature: refinement over modal transition systems, and the covariant-contravariant simulation and the partial bisimulation preorders over labelled transition systems. It is shown that there are mutual translations between modal transition systems and labelled transition systems that preserve, and reflect, refinement and the covariant-contravariant simulation preorder. The translations are also shown to preserve the modal properties that can be expressed in the logics that characterize those preorders. A translation from labelled transition systems modulo the partial bisimulation preorder into the same model modulo the covariant-contravariant simulation preorder is also offered, together with some evidence that the former model is less expressive than the latter. In order to gain more insight into the relationships between modal transition systems modulo refinement and labelled transition systems modulo the covariant-contravariant simulation preorder, their connections are also phrased and studied in the context of institutions., Comment: Replaced conference version with the extended paper published in a journal (This update includes a change in the title of the paper)

This position paper on the (meta-)theory of Structural Operational Semantic (SOS) is motivated by the following two questions: (1) Is the (meta-)theory of SOS dying out as a research field? (2) If so, is it possible to rejuvenate this field with a redefined purpose? In this article, we will consider possible answers to those questions by first analysing the history of the EXPRESS/SOS workshops and the data concerning the authors and the presentations featured in the editions of those workshops as well as their subject matters. The results of our quantitative and qualitative analyses all indicate a diminishing interest in the theory of SOS as a field of research. Even though `all good things must come to an end', we strive to finish this position paper on an upbeat note by addressing our second motivating question with some optimism. To this end, we use our personal reflections and an analysis of recent trends in two of the flagship conferences in the field of Programming Languages (namely POPL and PDLI) to draw some conclusions on possible future directions that may rejuvenate research on the (meta-)theory of SOS. We hope that our musings will entice members of the research community to breathe new life into a field of research that has been kind to three of the authors of this article., Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS2023, arXiv:2309.05788

This paper studies the complexity of classical modal logics and of their extension with fixed-point operators, using translations to transfer results across logics. In particular, we show several complexity results for multi-agent logics via translations to and from the $\mu$-calculus and modal logic, which allow us to transfer known upper and lower bounds. We also use these translations to introduce terminating and non-terminating tableau systems for the logics we study, based on Kozen's tableau for the $\mu$-calculus and the one of Fitting and Massacci for modal logic. Finally, we describe these tableaux with $\mu$-calculus formulas, thus reducing the satisfiability of each of these logics to the satisfiability of the $\mu$-calculus, resulting in a general 2EXP upper bound for satisfiability testing., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2209.10377

This paper studies the complexity of classical modal logics and of their extension with fixed-point operators, using translations to transfer results across logics. In particular, we show several complexity results for multi-agent logics via translations to and from the mu-calculus and modal logic, which allow us to transfer known upper and lower bounds. We also use these translations to introduce a terminating tableau system for the logics we study, based on Kozen's tableau for the mu-calculus, and the one of Fitting and Massacci for modal logic., Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2022, arXiv:2209.09333

In this paper we investigate the equational theory of (the restriction, relabelling, and recursion free fragment of) CCS modulo rooted branching bisimilarity, which is a classic, bisimulation-based notion of equivalence that abstracts from internal computational steps in process behaviour. Firstly, we show that CCS is not finitely based modulo the considered congruence. As a key step of independent interest in the proof of that negative result, we prove that each CCS process has a unique parallel decomposition into indecomposable processes modulo branching bisimilarity. As a second main contribution, we show that, when the set of actions is finite, rooted branching bisimilarity has a finite equational basis over CCS enriched with the left merge and communication merge operators from ACP.

This paper presents an extension of the safety fragment of Hennessy-Milner Logic with recursion over sets of traces, in the spirit of Hyper-LTL. It then introduces a novel monitoring setup that employs circuit-like structures to combine verdicts from regular monitors. The main contribution of this study is the monitors and their semantics themselves, as well as a monitor-synthesis procedure from formulae in the logic that yields `circuit-like monitors' of this type that are sound and violation complete over a finite set of infinite traces., Comment: 10 pages, 1 tikz figure, 1 table of semantics, accepted for FORTE 2022

Runtime enforcement is a dynamic analysis technique that instruments a monitor with a system in order to ensure its correctness as specified by some property. This paper explores bidirectional enforcement strategies for properties describing the input and output behaviour of a system. We develop an operational framework for bidirectional enforcement and use it to study the enforceability of the safety fragment of Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion (sHML). We provide an automated synthesis function that generates correct monitors from sHML formulas, and show that this logic is enforceable via a specific type of bidirectional enforcement monitors called action disabling monitors.

This survey reviews some of the most recent achievements in the saga of the axiomatisation of parallel composition, along with some classic results. We focus on the recursion, relabelling and restriction free fragment of CCS and we discuss the solutions to three problems that were open for many years. The first problem concerns the status of Bergstra and Klop's auxiliary operators left merge and communication merge in the finite axiomatisation of parallel composition modulo bisimiliarity: We argue that, under some natural assumptions, the addition of a single auxiliary binary operator to CCS does not yield a finite axiomatisation of bisimilarity. Then we delineate the boundary between finite and non-finite axiomatisability of the congruences in van Glabbeek's linear time-branching time spectrum over CCS. Finally, we present a novel result to the effect that rooted weak bisimilarity has no finite complete axiomatisation over CCS., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2010.01943, arXiv:2102.11166

The runtime analysis of decentralised software requires instrumentation methods that are scalable, but also minimally invasive. This paper presents a new algorithm that instruments choreographed outline monitors. Our instrumentation algorithm scales and reorganises monitors dynamically as the system executes. We demonstrate the implementability of choreographed outline instrumentation and compare it to inline instrumentation, subject to rigorous and comprehensive benchmarking. Our results debunk the general notion that outline monitoring is necessarily infeasible, and show that our implementation induces runtime overhead comparable to that of its inline counterpart for many practical cases.

This paper studies the existence of finite equational axiomatisations of the interleaving parallel composition operator modulo the behavioural equivalences in van Glabbeek's linear time-branching time spectrum. In the setting of the process algebra BCCSP over a finite set of actions, we provide finite, ground-complete axiomatisations for various simulation and (decorated) trace semantics. We also show that no congruence over BCCSP that includes bisimilarity and is included in possible futures equivalence has a finite, ground-complete axiomatisation; this negative result applies to all the nested trace and nested simulation semantics.

Bergstra and Klop have shown that bisimilarity has a finite equational axiomatisation over ACP/CCS extended with the binary left and communication merge operators. Moller proved that auxiliary operators are necessary to obtain a finite axiomatisation of bisimilarity over CCS, and Aceto et al. showed that this remains true when Hennessy's merge is added to that language. These results raise the question of whether there is one auxiliary binary operator whose addition to CCS leads to a finite axiomatisation of bisimilarity. We contribute to answering this question in the simplified setting of the recursion-, relabelling-, and restriction-free fragment of CCS. We formulate three natural assumptions pertaining to the operational semantics of auxiliary operators and their relationship to parallel composition, and prove that an auxiliary binary operator facilitating a finite axiomatisation of bisimilarity in the simplified setting cannot satisfy all three assumptions.

Monitors are a key tool in the field of runtime verification, where they are used to verify system properties by analyzing execution traces generated by processes. Work on runtime monitoring carried out in a series of papers by Aceto et al.$~$has specified monitors using a variation on the regular fragment of Milner's CCS and studied two trace-based notions of equivalence over monitors, namely verdict and $\omega$-verdict equivalence. This article is devoted to the study of the equational logic of monitors modulo those two notions of equivalence. It presents complete equational axiomatizations of verdict and $\omega$-verdict equivalence for closed and open terms over recursion-free monitors. It is also shown that verdict equivalence has no finite equational axiomatization over open monitors when the set of actions is finite and contains at least two actions., Comment: Preprint submitted to Journal of logical and algebraic methods in programing 2020

Monitorability delineates what properties can be verified at runtime. Although many monitorability definitions exist, few are defined explicitly in terms of the guarantees provided by monitors, i.e., the computational entities carrying out the verification. We view monitorability as a spectrum: the fewer monitor guarantees that are required, the more properties become monitorable. We present a monitorability hierarchy and provide operational and syntactic characterisations for its levels. Existing monitorability definitions are mapped into our hierarchy, providing a unified framework that makes the operational assumptions and guarantees of each definition explicit. This provides a rigorous foundation that can inform design choices and correctness claims for runtime verification tools.

We compare the succinctness of two monitoring systems for properties of infinite traces, namely parallel and regular monitors. Although a parallel monitor can be turned into an equivalent regular monitor, the cost of this transformation is a double-exponential blowup in the syntactic size of the monitors, and a triple-exponential blowup when the goal is a deterministic monitor. We show that these bounds are tight and that they also hold for translations between corresponding fragments of Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion over infinite traces., Comment: 22 pages

This paper establishes a comprehensive theory of runtime monitorability for Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion, a very expressive variant of the modal $\mu$-calculus. It investigates the monitorability of that logic with a linear-time semantics and then compares the obtained results with ones that were previously presented in the literature for a branching-time setting. Our work establishes an expressiveness hierarchy of monitorable fragments of Hennessy-Milner logic with recursion in a linear-time setting and exactly identifies what kinds of guarantees can be given using runtime monitors for each fragment in the hierarchy. Each fragment is shown to be complete, in the sense that it can express all properties that can be monitored under the corresponding guarantees. The study is carried out using a principled approach to monitoring that connects the semantics of the logic and the operational semantics of monitors. The proposed framework supports the automatic, compositional synthesis of correct monitors from monitorable properties., Comment: Published in POPL 2019. 54 pages, including the appendix

The nominal transition systems (NTSs) of Parrow et al. describe the operational semantics of nominal process calculi. We study NTSs in terms of the nominal residual transition systems (NRTSs) that we introduce. We provide rule formats for the specifications of NRTSs that ensure that the associated NRTS is an NTS and apply them to the operational specifications of the early and late pi-calculus. We also explore alternative specifications of the NTSs in which we allow residuals of abstraction sort, and introduce translations between the systems with and without residuals of abstraction sort. Our study stems from the Nominal SOS of Cimini et al. and from earlier works in nominal sets and nominal logic by Gabbay, Pitts and their collaborators.

Runtime enforcement is a dynamic analysis technique that uses monitors to enforce the behaviour specified by some correctness property on an executing system. The enforceability of a logic captures the extent to which the properties expressible via the logic can be enforced at runtime. We study the enforceability of Hennessy-Milner Logic with Recursion (muHML) with respect to suppression enforcement. We develop an operational framework for enforcement which we then use to formalise when a monitor enforces a muHML property. We also show that the safety syntactic fragment of the logic, sHML, is enforceable by providing an automated synthesis function that generates correct suppression monitors from sHML formulas., Comment: 38 pages

The ubiquitous reliance on software systems increases the need for ensuring that systems behave correctly and are well protected against security risks. Runtime enforcement is a dynamic analysis technique that utilizes software monitors to check the runtime behaviour of a software system with respect to a correctness specification. Whenever the runtime behaviour of the monitored system is about to deviate from the specification (either due to a programming bug or a security hijack attack), the monitors apply enforcement techniques to prevent this deviation. Current Runtime Enforcement techniques require that the correctness specification defines the behaviour of the enforcement monitor itself. This burdens the specifier with not only having to define property that needs to be enforced, but also with having to specify how this should be enforced at runtime; we thus relieve the specifier from this burden by resorting to a highly expressive logic. Using a logic we allow the specifier to define the correctness specification as a logic formula from which we can automatically synthesise the appropriate enforcement monitor. Highly expressive logics can, however, permit for defining a wide variety of formulae, some of which cannot actually be enforced correctly at runtime. We thus study the enforceability of Hennessy Milner Logic with Recursion for which we identify a subset that allows for defining enforceable formulae. This allows us to define a synthesis function that translates enforceable formulae into enforcement monitors. As our monitors are meant to ensure the correct behaviour of the monitored system, it is imperative that they work correctly themselves. We thus study formal definitions that allow us to ensure that our enforcement monitors behave correctly.

Runtime Monitoring is a lightweight and dynamic verification technique that involves observing the internal operations of a software system and/or its interactions with other external entities, with the aim of determining whether the system satisfies or violates a correctness specification. Compilation techniques employed in Runtime Monitoring tools allow monitors to be automatically derived from high-level correctness specifications (aka. properties). This allows the same property to be converted into different types of monitors, which may apply different instrumentation techniques for checking whether the property was satisfied or not. In this paper we compare and contrast the various types of monitoring methodologies found in the current literature, and classify them into a spectrum of monitoring instrumentation techniques, ranging from completely asynchronous monitoring on the one end and completely synchronous monitoring on the other., Comment: In Proceedings PrePost 2017, arXiv:1708.06889

We examine the determinization of monitors for HML with recursion. We demonstrate that every monitor is equivalent to a deterministic one, which is at most doubly exponential in size with respect to the original monitor. When monitors are described as CCS-like processes, this doubly exponential bound is optimal. When (deterministic) monitors are described as finite automata (as their LTS), then they can be exponentially more succinct than their CCS process form.

We study algebraic synchronization trees, i.e., initial solutions of algebraic recursion schemes over the continuous categorical algebra of synchronization trees. In particular, we investigate the relative expressive power of algebraic recursion schemes over two signatures, which are based on those for Basic CCS and Basic Process Algebra, as a means for defining synchronization trees up to isomorphism as well as modulo bisimilarity and language equivalence. The expressiveness of algebraic recursion schemes is also compared to that of the low levels in Caucal's pushdown hierarchy., Comment: 48 pages

We present an empirical study in which model-based testing (MBT) was applied to a mobile system: the Android client of QuizUp, the largest mobile trivia game in the world. The study shows that traditional MBT approaches based on extended finite-state machines can be used to test a mobile app in an effective and efficient way. Non-trivial defects were detected on a deployed system that has millions of users and was already well tested. The duration of the overall testing effort was of three months, including the construction of the models. Maintaining a single behavioral model for the app was key in order to test it in an efficient way., Comment: In Proceedings PrePost 2016, arXiv:1605.08096

The PrePost (Pre- and Post-Deployment Verification Techniques) workshop aimed at bringing together researchers working in the field of computer-aided validation and verification to discuss the connections and interplay between pre- and post-deployment verification techniques. Examples of the topics covered by the workshop are the relationships between classic model checking and testing on the one hand and runtime verification and statistical model checking on the other, and between type systems that may be checked either statically or dynamically through techniques such as runtime monitoring.