Search

We conducted a retrospective case-control study in patients presenting a perineal tear (second degree or higher) or episiotomy complicated by wound breakdown during maternity stay to identify risk factors associated with wound breakdown in early postpartum with a view to improving the quality of care. We collected ante- and intrapartum characteristics and outcomes at the postpartum visit. In all, 84 cases and 249 control subjects were included. In univariate analysis, primiparity, absence of history of vaginal delivery, a longer second phase of labour, instrumental delivery, and a higher degree of laceration emerged as risk factors for early perineal suture breakdown postpartum. Gestational diabetes, peripartum fever, streptococcus B, and suture technique did not emerge as risk factors for perineal breakdown. Multivariate analysis confirmed that instrumental delivery (OR = 2.18 [1.07; 4.41], p = 0.03) and a longer second phase of labour (OR = 1.72 [1.23; 2.42], p = 0.001) were risk factors for early perineal suture breakdown.

Background: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin decreases time between induction of labor and delivery (TID) as compared to a vaginal dinoprostone insert in cases of premature rupture of membranes at term. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial including patient undergoing labor induction for PROM at term with an unfavorable cervix in Clermont-Ferrand university hospital. We compared the double balloon catheter over a period of 12 h with adjunction of oxytocin 6 h after catheter insertion versus dinoprostone vaginal insert. After device ablation, cervical ripening continued only with oxytocin. The main outcome was TID. Secondary outcomes concerned delivery mode, as well as maternal and fetal outcome, and were adjusted for parity. Results: 40 patients per group were randomized. Each group had similar baseline characteristics. The study failed to demonstrate reduced TID (16.2 versus 20.2 h, ES = 0.16 (−0.27 to 0.60), p = 0.12) in the catheter group versus dinoprostone except in nulliparous women (17.0 versus 26.5 h, ES = 0.62 (0.10 to 1.14), p = 0.006). The rate of vaginal delivery <24 h significantly increased with combined induction (88.5% versus 66.6%, p = 0.03). No statistical difference was observed concerning caesarean rate (12.5% versus 17.5%, p > 0.05), chorioamnionitis (0% versus 2.5%, p = 1), postpartum endometritis, or maternal or neonatal outcomes. Procedure-related pain and tolerance to devices were found to be similar for the two methods. Interpretation: The double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin is an alternative for cervical ripening in case of PROM at term, and may reduce TID in nulliparous women.

Introduction: Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs at term in 8% of pregnancies. Several studies have demonstrated that the risk of chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis increases with duration of PROM. Decreasing the time interval between PROM and delivery is associated with lower rates of maternal infections. In case of an unfavourable cervix, the use of prostaglandin for cervical maturation demonstrates some advantages over oxytocin. The use of double balloon catheter in reduction of PROM duration has not been evaluated in the literature., Methods and Analysis: We are conducting a prospective, monocentric, randomised clinical trial on pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix showing PROM at term (RUBAPRO).After 12-24 hours of PROM, women are randomly assigned to one group treated with a double balloon catheter for 12 hours, with oxytocin administered after 6 hours or to the control group treated with 24 hours of vaginal prostaglandin followed by oxytocin infusion alone. Patients (n=80) are randomised at a 1:1 ratio with stratification on parity.The inclusion criteria are a Bishop score of <6, cephalic presentation at term and confirmed PROM. Women with suspected chorioamnionitis; group B streptococcus (GBS) carrier; a history of caesarean delivery or any contraindication for vaginal delivery are excluded.The time from induction to delivery is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, maternofetal morbidity and the effect of parity on strategies for reduction of PROM duration.To sufficiently demonstrate a difference (10 hours) between groups-with a statistical power of 90% and a two-tailed α of 5%-40 patients per group will be required., Ethics and Dissemination: Written informed consent is required from participants.National Ethics Committee approval was obtained in August 2017. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. Access to raw data will be available only to members of the research team., Trial Registration Number: NCT03310333., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rupture of membranes (ROM) depends on mechanical stretch, extracellular matrix components imbalance and increased apoptosis. It occurs in 2 to 3% of all pregnancies before 37 weeks' gestation (WG) and in up to 10% at term. Main consequences are labor induction and risk of maternal-fetal infection. ROM is associated with one third of preterm births and about 20% of perinatal mortality. This review deals with recent knowledge concerning ROM including diagnosis and management. In many cases, ROM is easily identified by clinical examination. In other cases, the use of vaginal pH appears to be less efficient than the use of immunochromatographic strips based on IGFBP-1 or PAMG-1 detection. Before 34WG, conservative management consists in in utero transfer, antibioprophylaxis and corticosteroids. After 37WG, delivery is the most appropriate option. Between 34 and 37WG, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labour does not improve pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, expectant management can be the first option between 34 and 37WG when no active infection is suspected especially in case of unfavourable cervix., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To precise key elements concerning facilities and patient information prior to trial of labour in the context of scarred womb., Method: Bibliographic search restricted to French and English languages using Medline database and recommendations of medical societies., Results: Only expert's opinions are available. Patient information should present both trial of labour and elective cesarean section. Counselling should be influenced by individual risk of failed vaginal birth and uterine rupture. Mode of delivery should be planned the latest at 8 months of gestation. Patient should be aware of obstetrical and anesthetic facilities. Trial of labour should be presented as the first option for patients with no additional risk factors. Immediate presence of obstetrician and anesthesiologist is not required except in the context of increased risk for failed trial of labour or uterine rupture. Elective cesarean section on maternal request is acceptable after extensive counselling and delay of reflexion., Conclusion: Individual patient information should be initiated early and mode of delivery should be planned at 8 months of gestation. Resources and facilities recommendations aim to facilitate prompt cesarean section., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine if perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is improved by a planned caesarean section for twins before and at term., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline between May 2001 and December 2008. Randomised controlled studies and meta-analysis were researched at first., Results: There is no evidence to support a policy of planned caesarean section or vaginal delivery for twins before term or at term whatever the presentation of the first twin. There is also no evidence to support a policy of caesarean section or vaginal delivery for a patient with a history of prior caesarean section. Vaginal delivery must be made in the presence of an obstetrician, an anaesthesiologist, and a paediatrician in a level maternity adapted to the risks of the future newborn., Conclusion: Otherwise, there is no evidence to support a policy of planned caesarean delivery for twins but the type of delivery has to be decided with the informed patient., (Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe invasive diagnostic procedures (amniocentesis/choriocentesis) and subsequent risks in twin pregnancies., Material and Methods: PubMed and Cochrane database investigations were conducted using following key words: twin gestation, amniocentesis, chorionic villous sampling, karyotype. Guidelines for twin management edicted by different societies were reviewed., Results: Risk of pregnancy loss after invasive diagnostic procedure in twin pregnancies seems to be slightly higher to singletons, i.e about 1.5-2% after mid-trimester amniocentesis and about 2% after first trimester choriocentesis. Dual sampling is not always mandatory but can be performed on parent's request. Specific risks are associated with twins: redundant sampling, permutation or misidentification of affected twin in case of discordant status. Procedures should be performed by highly-skilled operators under permanent ultrasound-guidance. A scheme describing placental locations and funicular insertions appears to be useful for correct identification. If foeticide can be anticipated, diagnostic procedure and foeticide should be performed by the same operators. For amniocentesis, one or two needles can be used except for cases with infectious disease (two needles and two separate insertions required). For choriocentesis, sampling should be performed close to funicular insertions., Conclusion: First-trimester choriocentesis makes earlier diagnosis and earlier foeticide possible compared with mid-trimester amniocentesis. Both techniques require highly-skilled operators to reduce subsequent risks in the context of twin pregnancies., (Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the lurning curve of young residents for vacuum extraction., Materials and Methods: All vacuum extractions performed in our department by five residents (< or =5th semester) during a study period of nine months were systematically supervised by a senior who fulfilled an assessment questionnaire from which was calculated a score reflecting the quality of the extraction., Results: Fifty-four vacuum extractions were assessed with a mean of 10.8+/-2.9 (range, 10-13) procedures by resident. We compared the group including the six first procedures performed by each resident (group 1, n = 30) with the group including the following procedures (group 2, n = 24). We observed in the group 2 compared to the group 1, a significant improvement of the scores mean (12.3+/-5.4 vs 8.4+/-6.2, p = 0.016) and a significant reduction of the need for manual assistance by the senior (12.5% vs 40%, p = 0.034)., Conclusion: We report a method for the learning and assessment of vacuum extraction feasible at "the bed" of the patient. This approach allows to observe a significant progression of the resident for the technique of vacuum extraction on a dozen of procedures.

Benign cystic teratomas in pregnant women may be responsible for complications such as torsion, rupture and obstruction of labor. A woman in her 31st week of pregnancy with torsion of a large dermoid cyst and lipogranulomatosis peritonitis due to spilled cyst contents was managed laparoscopically with a favorable outcome. Trocar sites were selected according to the uterine size. Open laparoscopy allowed protection of the gravid uterus from penetrative injuries. Laparoscopic management of a voluminous adnexal mass may be safely performed during advanced pregnancy.