Search

Aims: The single-freeze strategy using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be as effective as the recommended double-freeze approach in several single-centre studies. In this retrospective, international, multicentre study, we compare the 3-min single-freeze strategy with the 4-min single-freeze strategy.Methods and results: Four hundred and thirty-two patients having undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of CB-A using a single-freeze strategy were considered for this analysis. A cohort of patients who were treated with a 3-min strategy (Group 1) was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who underwent a 4-min strategy (Group 2). Pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved in all the veins using the 28-mm CB-A. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were lower in Group 1 (67.8 ± 17 vs. 73.8 ± 26.3, P < 0.05; 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. 24.2 ± 10.6 min, P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was PNP, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period of 3 months, 85.6% of patients in Group 1 and 87% of patients in Group 2 were free from arrhythmia recurrence at final follow-up (P = 0.67).Conclusion: There is no difference in acute success, rate of complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrences during the follow-up between 3-min and 4-min per vein freeze strategies. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in 3-min per vein strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: There is still sparse information regarding phrenic nerve injury (PNI) during ablation of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) by means of the second-generation cryoballoon advance (CB-A). The aim of this study was to describe the procedural, anatomical, and clinical characteristics of patients who experienced PNI during the RIPV ablation.Methods and results: Consecutive patients who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using CB-A and suffered PNI during RIPV ablation were retrospectively included in our study. A cohort of patients who did not suffer any PNI was randomly included in a 1:3 ratio as a control group. The incidence of PNI during RIPV cryoapplication was 3.5%, (34 of 979 patients). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with and without PNI. The prevalence of right common ostium (RCO) was significantly higher in patients with a PNI [4 patients (11.8%) vs. 1 patient (1.0%); P < 0.01]. A temperature drop velocity from the basal temperature to - 20 °C of 2.38 °C/s rendered a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 51.0% with a negative predictive value of 89.7%. Temperature drop velocity from basal to - 20 °C and the presence of an RCO were predictors of PNI in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.54-20.80; P < 0.01 and OR 18.41, 95%CI 1.87-181.23; P = 0.01, respectively).Conclusion: PNI during RIPV freeze might occur in around 3.5% of cases. The presence of an RCO and a fast temperature drop must prompt a careful monitoring of the phrenic nerve function during cryoapplications on the RIPV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The predictive value of induction studies after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is still debatable. To date, these studies have not been implemented in patients after cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Our aim was to analyse the clinical value of AF induction in patients treated by second generation CB for paroxysmal AF.Methods and results: Seventy patients underwent at first an isoproterenol challenge after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to assess AF induction and early PV reconnections (EPVR). Patients without EPVR were evaluated for premature atrial contraction (PAC) induction; atrial ectopy was considered frequent (PAC+) if >1/10 cycles or >6/min. After restitution of baseline heart rate, rapid atrial pacing (RAP) was performed on all patients. AF induction by isoproterenol occurred only in 3/70 (4%) patients of whom 2/3 (66%) patients with an EPVR of a triggering vein. In the 62 patients without EPVR, PAC+ occurred in 17 patients (27%). RAP could induce AF in 23/70 (33%) patients. At a mean follow-up of 13.5 months, there were 11/70 (16%) AF recurrences. There was no significant difference in the AF recurrence rate between RAP inducible vs. non-inducible patients (log-rank P = 0.33). A 41% recurrence rate (7/17 patients) was seen in the PAC+ group with significantly different AF-free survival for PAC+ vs. PAC- patients (log rank P < 0.0001). PAC+ was the only independent determinant to predict AF recurrence after multivariate analysis.Conclusion: PAC occurrence in response to isoproterenol could predict AF recurrence after PV isolation by CB, while RAP showed no prognostic implication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Real Time Recordings (RTR) of pulmonary vein (PV) activity provide important information in the setting of the 2nd generation Cryoballoon (CB-A), as a funcion of time to isolation. Visualization of RTR with the standard inner lumen mapping catheter (ILMC) 20mm Achieve (AC) is possible in roughly 50% of PVs. A novel 25mm-Achieve Advance (AC-A) has been developed with the aim of increasing the detection of RTR. The purpose of this study is to compare the AC-A with the AC, to feasibility and improvement of RTR. Methods: We assigned 50 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation to CB-A PVI, using the AC-A as ILMC. We compared this group with 50 patients, matched for age and left atrial volume, who previously underwent the CB-A PVI using the AC. Results: RTR were more frequently observed with the AC-A than with the AC (74% vs 49%; p= 0.02). RTR in the left superior PVs was similar in both groups (74% vs 72%, p= 0.8). RTR with the AC-A were equally appreciated in left or right sided, superior or inferior PVs. No significant differences were found in terms of feasibility, procedure fluoroscopy and freezing times, nadir temperatures, and acute PVI. Conclusions: CB-A PVI with the AC-A is feasible and safe in all PVs. The AC-A has proven significantly superior in visualising RTR if compared to the AC, affording RTR in 74% of PVs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To define predictors of long-term outcome of a first repeat ablation solely consisting of re-isolation of reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs)., Methods: Three hundred seven patients (age 59 ± 9%, 77% males, non-paroxysmal AF 43%) with recurrent AF after first PVI were studied. Re-isolation of reconnected PVs was guided by a circular mapping catheter and 3D mapping system using RF ablations. A PV was defined as "triggering" in case of spontaneous ectopy or AF paroxysms originating from the PV., Results: After a mean follow-up of 5.05 ± 2.21 years, 194 (63.2%) patients (73.0% in PAF vs 50.4% in non-PAF, log Rank <0.001) were free from AF. A "triggering" PV was present in 48 (15.6%) during the first PVI and in 52 (16.9%) at repeat. Independent predictors of recurrence were a non-PAF type (HR: 1.814, 95%CI: 1.090 - 3.018, p=0.022) and early recurrence (≤ 3 months) after first PVI (HR: 1.632, 95%CI: 1.091 - 2.443, p=0.017) while a "triggering" PV at first or repeat was a predictor of good outcome (HR: 0.574; 95%CI: 0.344 - 0.959; p=0.034) in the multivariable analysis., Conclusions: A repeat ablation solely consisting of re-isolation of reconnected PVs results in a high degree of long-term AF freedom, especially in PAF and in case of a PV trigger at index or repeat. Patients with non-PAF or experiencing early AF recurrence after first PVI are less responsive.

Aims: The single-freeze strategy using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A, Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been reported to be as effective as the recommended double-freeze approach in several single-centre studies. In this retrospective, international, multicentre study, we compare the 3-min single-freeze strategy with the 4-min single-freeze strategy., Methods and Results: Four hundred and thirty-two patients having undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by means of CB-A using a single-freeze strategy were considered for this analysis. A cohort of patients who were treated with a 3-min strategy (Group 1) was compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who underwent a 4-min strategy (Group 2). Pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved in all the veins using the 28-mm CB-A. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were lower in Group 1 (67.8 ± 17 vs. 73.8 ± 26.3, P < 0.05; 14.9 ± 7.8 vs. 24.2 ± 10.6 min, P < 0.05). The most frequent complication was PNP, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months, taking into consideration a blanking period of 3 months, 85.6% of patients in Group 1 and 87% of patients in Group 2 were free from arrhythmia recurrence at final follow-up (P = 0.67)., Conclusion: There is no difference in acute success, rate of complications, and freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrences during the follow-up between 3-min and 4-min per vein freeze strategies. The procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter in 3-min per vein strategy.

Aims: There is still sparse information regarding phrenic nerve injury (PNI) during ablation of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) by means of the second-generation cryoballoon advance (CB-A). The aim of this study was to describe the procedural, anatomical, and clinical characteristics of patients who experienced PNI during the RIPV ablation., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using CB-A and suffered PNI during RIPV ablation were retrospectively included in our study. A cohort of patients who did not suffer any PNI was randomly included in a 1:3 ratio as a control group. The incidence of PNI during RIPV cryoapplication was 3.5%, (34 of 979 patients). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between patients with and without PNI. The prevalence of right common ostium (RCO) was significantly higher in patients with a PNI [4 patients (11.8%) vs. 1 patient (1.0%); P < 0.01]. A temperature drop velocity from the basal temperature to - 20 °C of 2.38 °C/s rendered a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 51.0% with a negative predictive value of 89.7%. Temperature drop velocity from basal to - 20 °C and the presence of an RCO were predictors of PNI in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.54-20.80; P < 0.01 and OR 18.41, 95%CI 1.87-181.23; P = 0.01, respectively)., Conclusion: PNI during RIPV freeze might occur in around 3.5% of cases. The presence of an RCO and a fast temperature drop must prompt a careful monitoring of the phrenic nerve function during cryoapplications on the RIPV.