Search

Background: Self-expandable esophageal stents are increasingly used for palliation or as an adjunct to chemoradiation for esophageal neoplasia. The optimal esophageal stent design and material to minimize dose perturbation with external beam radiation are unknown. We sought to quantify the deviation from intended radiation dose as a function of stent material and mesh density design.Methods: A laboratory dosimetric film model was used to quantify perturbation of intended radiation dose among 16 different esophageal stents with varying material and stent mesh density design.Results: Radiation dose enhancement due to stent backscatter ranged from 0 % to 7.3 %, collectively representing a standard difference from the intended mean radiation dose of 1.9 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.5 - 2.2). This enhancement was negligible for polymer-based stents and approached 0 % for the biodegradable stents. In contrast, all metal alloy stents had significant radiation backscatter; this was largely determined by the density of mesh design and not by the type of alloy used.Conclusions: Stent characteristics should be considered when selecting the optimal stent for treatment and palliation of malignant esophageal strictures, especially when adjuvant or neo-adjuvant radiotherapy is planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Variants in the leptin-melanocortin pathway (LMP) are associated with severe obesity. We evaluated weight loss of patients with or without heterozygous LMP variants, with weight recurrence after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, who underwent endoscopic transoral outlet reduction (TORe)., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients genotyped for an LMP who had undergone TORe, classified as "carriers" or "non-carriers" of genetic variants., Results: We included 54 patients (22 carriers, 32 non-carriers). We identified 34 genetic variants in 21 different genes in 22 patients. Total body weight loss (%TBWL) after TORe was significantly different at 9 and 12 months (12 months: 0.68 ± 7.5% vs. 9.6 ± 8.2%, p < 0.01). This difference in weight loss was present even when analyzed in subgroups of patients who had undergone tubular TORe technique, and TORe plus APC. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the percentage of carriers achieving ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% TBWL was lower than non-carriers., Conclusions: Patients with LMP variant who underwent RYGB had decreased weight loss 1 year after undergoing TORe., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: In previous studies methylated DNA markers (MDMs) have been identified in pancreatic juice (PJ) for detecting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this prospective multicenter study, the sensitivity and specificity characteristics of this panel of PJ-MDMs was evaluated standalone and in combination with plasma CA 19-9., Methods: Paired PJ and plasma were assayed from 88 biopsy-proven treatment naïve PDAC cases and 134 controls (normal pancreas: 53, chronic pancreatitis (CP): 23, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN): 58). Bisulfite-converted DNA from buffered PJ was analyzed using long-probe quantitative amplified signal assay targeting 14 MDMs (NDRG4, BMP3, TBX15, C13orf18, PRKCB, CLEC11A, CD1D, ELMO1, IGF2BP1, RYR2, ADCY1, FER1L4, EMX1, and LRRC4) and a reference gene (methylated B3GALT6). Logistic regression was used to fit the previously identified 3-MDM PJ panel (FER1L4, C13orf18 and BMP3). Discrimination accuracy was summarized using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals., Results: Methylated FER1L4 had the highest individual AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89). The AUROC for the 3-MDM PJ + Plasma CA 19-9 model (0.95 (0.92-0.98))) was higher than both the 3-MDM PJ panel (0.87 (0.82-0.92)) and plasma CA 19-9 alone ((0.91 (0.87-0.96) (p=0.0002 and 0.0135, respectively). At a specificity of 88% (95% CI: 81-93%), the sensitivity of this model was 89% (80-94%) for all PDAC stages and 83% (64-94%) for stage I/II PDAC., Conclusion: A panel combining PJ-MDMs and plasma CA19-9 discriminates PDAC from both healthy and disease control groups with high accuracy. This provides support for combining pancreatic juice and blood-based biomarkers for enhancing diagnostic sensitivity and successful early PDAC detection., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Endoscopic suturing has been described in many applications, including the approximation of tissue defects, anchoring stents, hemostasis, and primary and secondary bariatric interventions. Primary endobariatric procedures use endoscopic suturing for gastric remodeling with the intention of weight loss. Currently, the only commercially available device in the United States is the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery). We describe devices of potential that are currently in design and/or trials as devices for weight loss by gastric remodeling, including USGI incisionless operating platform used for the primary obesity surgery endoluminal 2.0 procedure, Endomina used for the Endomina endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and EndoZip., Competing Interests: Disclosure B.K. Abu Dayyeh is a consultant for DyaMx, Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, and Endo-TAGSS; gets research support from Boston Scientific, United States, USGI Medical, United States, Apollo Endosurgery, Spatz Medical, GI Dynamics, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, and Medtronic; is a speaker for Johnson and Johnson, Endogastric Solutions, and Olympus. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) carries a 3-15% risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Rectal indomethacin reduces the risk of PEP, but its cost has increased more than 20-fold over the past decade. Rectal diclofenac is also used to prevent PEP but is not commercially available in the United States. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of PEP after administration of commercially available rectal indomethacin versus compounded rectal diclofenac and assess financial implications., Methods: ERCP cases at our institution with administration of 100 mg rectal indomethacin or 100 mg compounded rectal diclofenac between May 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence and severity of PEP was compared between the indomethacin (n = 728) and diclofenac (n = 304) groups. Risk factors (young age, female sex, history of pancreatitis or PEP, sphincterotomy during procedure, pancreatic indication, trainee involvement) and protective factors (prior sphincterotomy, pancreatic duct stenting) for PEP were compared between groups., Results: 60 patients (8.2%) in the rectal indomethacin group and 25 patients (8.2%) in the compounded rectal diclofenac group developed PEP, resulting in moderate or severe PEP in 9 (15.0%) and 2 (8.0%) patients, respectively. The compounded rectal diclofenac group had more trainee involvement (46.1% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.0001) and more prior sphincterotomy cases (15.8% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.0193) compared to the rectal indomethacin group; no statistically significant differences were observed in all other risk and protective factors. Following switch to compounded rectal diclofenac, institutional annual cost savings amounted to $441,460.62 and patient charge decreased 45-fold., Conclusion: This retrospective single-center real-world analysis showed similar efficacy of rectal indomethacin and compounded rectal diclofenac in preventing PEP but demonstrates substantial cost savings after switching to compounded rectal diclofenac., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: Although EUS is highly accurate for the evaluation of common bile duct (CBD) dilation, the yield of EUS in patients with incidental CBD dilation is unclear., Methods: Serial patients undergoing EUS for incidental, dilated CBD (per radiologist, minimum of >6 mm objectively) from 2 academic medical centers without active pancreaticobiliary disease or significantly elevated liver function test results were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of EUS with significant findings and a novel prediction model was derived from one center, internally validated with bootstrapping, and externally validated at the second center., Results: Of 375 patients evaluated, 31 (8.3%) had significant findings, including 26 choledocholithiasis, 1 ampullary adenoma, and 1 pancreatic mass. Predictors of significant findings with EUS included age of ≥70 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-10.0), non-biliary-type abdominal pain without chronic pain (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.3-17.3), CBD diameter of ≥15 mm or ≥17 mm with cholecystectomy (OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.7-18.7), and prior ERCP (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.1-22.5). A point-based novel clinical prediction model was created: age of ≥70 years = 1, non-biliary-type abdominal pain without chronic pain = 2, prior ERCP = 2, and CBD dilation = 2. A score of <1 had 93% (development) and 100% (validation) sensitivity and predicted a <2% chance of having a significant finding in both cohorts while excluding the need for EUS in ∼30% of both cohorts. Conversely, a score of ≥4 was >90% specific for the presence of significant pathology., Conclusions: Less than 10% of patients undergoing EUS for incidental CBD dilation had pathologic findings. This novel, externally validated, clinical prediction model may reduce low-yield, invasive evaluation in nearly one-third of patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Boston Scientific and Covidien LP, research funding from STARmed and Micro-tech, and equity interest in Nevakar Corporation. A. C. Storm: Research grant from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Enterasense, MGI Medical, OnePass, and SofTac; consultant for Ambu, Boston Scientific, Envision Endoscopy, Intuitive, Medtronic, Microtech, and Olympus. E. Rajan: Coinvestigator for Medtroic and Ruhoff and consultant for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity is intricately associated with type-2 diabetes (T2D) and other cardiovascular conditions, increasing morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) have shown promising results in significant weight loss and T2D remission, but existing predictive scores for post-MBS diabetes remission do not consider insulin dosage, potentially overlooking a critical factor., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with T2D who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The study focused on insulin dosage impact, divided into quartiles, on remission rates post-MBS. The effectiveness of RYGB vs SG was compared within insulin dose quartiles with up to 5 years of follow up., Results: A total of 508 patients (64% female, 94.9% White, mean age 53.5 ± 10.5 years, BMI (46.0 ± 8.3 kg/m 2 ) were included in the analysis. This study demonstrates a profound association between insulin dosage quartiles and T2D remission after MBS. Patients with lower insulin requirements showed superior remission rates; those in the lowest quartile had remission rates of 73%, 70%, and 62% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, compared to 34%, 37%, and 36% in the highest quartile ( P < 0.001 across all intervals). RYGB surgery showed a significantly better remission in the second and third insulin quartiles, suggesting its effectiveness over SG for patients with mid-range insulin requirements., Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of considering insulin dosage when predicting T2D remission post-MBS. The findings advocate for a more nuanced selection of MBS procedures based on individual insulin profiles, potentially enhancing diabetes remission outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The escalating obesity pandemic and its comorbidities necessitate adaptable and versatile treatment strategies. Endobariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) can be strategically employed in a multipronged approach to obesity management, analogous to the way chess systems are employed to seize opportunities and thwart threats. In this review, we explore the spectrum of established and developing EBMTs, examining their efficacy in weight loss and metabolic improvement and their importance for a tailored, patient-centric approach. The complexity of obesity management mirrors the intricate nature of a chess game, with an array of tactics and strategies available to address the opponent's moves. Similarly, the bariatric endoscopist employs a range of EBMTs to alter the gastrointestinal tract landscape, targeting critical anatomical regions to modify physiological reactions to food consumption and nutrient assimilation. Gastric-focused EBMTs aim to reduce stomach capacity and induce satiety. Intestinal-focused EBMTs target hormonal regulation and nutrient absorption to improve metabolic profiles. EBMTs offer unique advantages of reversibility, adjustability and minimal invasiveness, allowing them to be used as primary treatments, adjuncts to pharmacotherapy or tools to address post-bariatric surgery weight recidivism. However, sub-optimal adoption of EBMTs due to lack of awareness, perceived costs and limited training opportunities hinders their integration into standard obesity management practices. By strategically integrating EBMTs into the broader landscape of obesity care, leveraging their unique advantages to enhance outcomes, clinicians can offer a more dynamic and personalized treatment paradigm. This approach, akin to employing chess systems to adapt to evolving challenges, allows for a comprehensive, patient-centric management of obesity as a chronic, complex and relapsing disease., (© 2024. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) imposes a significant health burden, necessitating lifelong pharmacological interventions, with insulin being one of the cornerstone therapies. However, these regimens are associated with health risks and psychological stressors. This study aimed to examine the rates of insulin-treated T2D remission and cessation or reduction in the dosage of insulin therapy after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS)., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of insulin-treated T2D who underwent primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) with a minimum of 3 and up to 5 years of follow-up. The average daily dose for each type of insulin, measured in units, was calculated at annual intervals., Results: Among 287 patients included, 201 (70%) underwent RYGB, 66 (23%) underwent SG, and 20 (7%) underwent BPD/DS. The average follow-up period was 4.6 ± 0.7 years. At 5 years follow-up, the mean total weight loss was the highest in the BPD/DS subgroup at 37.5% ± 11.6%. Insulin usage decreased significantly from complete dependency at baseline to 36.2% just 1 year postoperatively, and the use of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs decreased from 79.4% initially to 26.1%. These results were sustained throughout the study period. The subgroup analysis indicated that, 5 years after surgery, T2D remission was the highest after BPD/DS (73.7%) compared with RYGB (43.2%) and SG (23.3%) (P < .001)., Conclusion: MBS is a transformative approach for achieving significant remission in insulin-treated T2D and reducing insulin requirements. Our findings reinforce the efficacy of these surgical interventions, particularly highlighting the promising potential of procedures that bypass the proximal small intestine, such as BPD/DS and RYGB., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest B.K.A. has received consulting fees from Endogenex, endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consulting fee and grant/research support from USGI, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; speaker honorarium from Olympus Corp and Johnson & Johnson; speaker honorarium and grant/research support from Medtronic and EndoGastric Solutions; and research support/grant from Apollo Endosurgery Inc and Spatz Medical. O.M.G. is a consultant for Olympus Corporation, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Medtronic. The other authors (K.A., W.G., Y.S., N.J., K.H., and M.S.M.) declare no competing interests. These disclosures have no effect on the results of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is an established safe endoscopic technique for the management of GERD but with variable efficacy. In the last decade, the TIF technology and technique have been optimized and more widely accepted but data on outcomes outside clinical trials are limited. We tracked patient-reported and clinical outcomes of GERD patients after TIF 2.0., Methods: Patients with BMI < 35, hiatal hernia < 2cm, and confirmed GERD with typical and/or atypical symptoms from 9 academic and community medical centers were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent after TIF 2.0 performed by gastroenterologists and surgeons. The primary outcomes were safety and clinical success (response in >2 of 4 endpoints). Secondary endpoints were symptom improvement, acid exposure time (AET), esophagitis healing, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed at last follow-up within 12 months., Results: 85 patients underwent TIF 2.0, 81 were included in the outcomes analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 94%, GERD-HRQL scores improved in 89%, and elevated RSI score normalized in 85% of patients with elevated baseline. Patient satisfaction improved from 8% to 79% (p <0.0001). At baseline, 81% were taking at least daily PPI, while 80% were on no or occasional PPI after TIF 2.0 (p<0.0001). Esophageal AET was normal in 72%, greater with an optimized TIF 2.0 valve >300 degree circumference, >3cm length (94% vs 57%, p=0.007). There were no TIF 2.0-related serious adverse events., Conclusion: TIF 2.0 is a safe and effective endoscopic outpatient treatment option for select patients with GERD., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs., Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs)., Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480)., Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

This article presents an overview of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) as emerging minimally invasive interventions for obesity and its related comorbidities. It explores various gastric and small-bowel endoscopic procedures, including their mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles., Competing Interests: Disclosure B.K. Abu Dayyeh: co-inventor of Endogenex (licensed technology by Mayo Clinic to Endogenex). Consultant for Endo-TAGSS, BFKW, USGI, Olympus, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, and Boston Scientific, and received research grants from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and EndoGastric Solutions. Co-inventor of Endogenex. Consultant for Endo-TAGSS, BFKW, USGI, Olympus, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, and Boston Scientific USA. Received research grants from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and EndoGastric Solutions., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an increasingly used rhythm control strategy that can damage adjacent structures in the mediastinum including the esophagus. Atrioesophageal fistulas and esophagopericardial fistulas are life-threatening adverse events that are believed to progress from early esophageal mucosal injury (EI). EUS has been proposed as a superior method to EGD to survey EI and damage to deeper structures. We evaluated the safety of EUS in categorizing postablation EI and quantified EUS-detected lesions and their correlation with injury severity and clinical course., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients between 2006 and 2020 who underwent AF ablation followed by EUS for the purpose of EI screening. The Kansas City classification was used to classify EI (type 1, type 2a/b, or type 3a/b)., Results: EUS identified pleural effusions in 31.6% of patients, mediastinal adventitia changes in 22.2%, mediastinal lymphadenopathy in 14.1%, pulmonary vein changes in 10.6%, and esophageal wall changes in 7.7%. EGD revealed 175 patients (75%) without and 59 (25%) with EI. Patients with type 2a/b EI and no EI were compared with multivariate logistic regression, and the presence of esophageal wall abnormality on EUS (odds ratio [OR], 72.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9-380.7), female sex (OR, 3.97; 95% CI 1.3-12.3), and number of energy deliveries (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.003-1.03) were associated with EI type 2a or 2b. Preablation use of proton pump inhibitors was not associated with a decreased risk of EI., Conclusions: EUS safely assesses mediastinal damage after ablation for AF and may excel over EGD in evaluating mucosal lesions of uncertain significance, with a reduced risk of gas embolization in the setting of a full-thickness injury (enterovascular fistula). We propose an EUS-first guided approach to post-AF ablation examination, followed by EGD if it is safe to do so., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Boston Scientific; research support from STARMed and MicroTech Endoscopy; stock options with Nevakar Corporation. R. J. Law: Consultant Olympus America, Boston Scientific, Conmed, and Medtronic; research support from Olympus America and Boston Scientific; royalties form UpToDate. E. Rajan: Intellectual property with Medtronic and Ruhiff; consultant for Olympus and J&J. B. K. Abu Dayyeh: Consultant for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, BFKW, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; research support from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, Boston Scientific, Cairn Diagnostics, and GI Dynamics; speaker for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson. A. C. Storm: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, MGI Medical, Envision Endoscopy, Olympus Corporation, Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, and Micro-Tech Medical; research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGGS, EnteraSense Ltd, and OnePass Medical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are minimally invasive and safe procedures with favorable weight loss outcomes in obesity treatment. We aimed to present the weight loss mechanism of action of EBTs and an individualized selection method for patients with obesity. We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies on the topic from databases inception to July 1, 2023, written in English. We focused on EBTs potential mechanism of action to induce weight loss. We also present an expert opinion on a novel selection of EBTs based on their mechanism of action. EBTs can result in weight loss through variable mechanisms of action. They can induce earlier satiation, delay gastric emptying, restrict the accommodative response of the stomach, decrease caloric absorption, and alter the secretion of gastrointestinal hormones. Selecting EBTs may be guided through their mechanism of action by which patients with abnormal satiation may benefit more from tissue apposition devices and aspiration therapy while patients with fast gastric emptying may be better candidates for intragastric devices, endoscopic anastomosis devices, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. Consequently, the selection of EBTs should be guided by the mechanism of action which is specific to each type of therapy.

Background: The authors previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) to assist cytologists in the evaluation of digital whole-slide images (WSIs) generated from bile duct brushing specimens. The aim of this trial was to assess the efficiency and accuracy of cytologists using a novel application with this AI tool., Methods: Consecutive bile duct brushing WSIs from indeterminate strictures were obtained. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed all relevant information and provided a central interpretation for each WSI as being "positive," "negative," or "indeterminate." The WSIs were then uploaded to the AI application. The AI scored each WSI as positive or negative for malignancy (i.e., computer-aided diagnosis [CADx]). For each WSI, the AI prioritized cytologic tiles by the likelihood that malignant material was present in the tile. Via the AI, blinded cytologists reviewed all WSIs and provided interpretations (i.e., computer-aided detection [CADe]). The diagnostic accuracies of the WSI evaluation via CADx, CADe, and the original clinical cytologic interpretation (official cytologic interpretation [OCI]) were compared., Results: Of the 84 WSIs, 15 were positive, 42 were negative, and 27 were indeterminate after central review. The WSIs generated on average 141,950 tiles each. Cytologists using the AI evaluated 10.5 tiles per WSI before making an interpretation. Additionally, cytologists required an average of 84.1 s of total WSI evaluation. WSI interpretation accuracies for CADx (0.754; 95% CI, 0.622-0.859), CADe (0.807; 95% CI, 0.750-0.856), and OCI (0.807; 95% CI, 0.671-0.900) were similar., Conclusions: This trial demonstrates that an AI application allows cytologists to perform a triaged review of WSIs while maintaining accuracy., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Background and Aims: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) may recur after initial successful endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON), most commonly due to disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS). The primary aim of this study was to assess the role of MRCP for identifying DPDS to guide appropriate management and prevent PFC recurrence., Methods: Patients with WON undergoing lumen-apposing metal stent drainage of a PFC were retrospectively identified and categorized as those with MRCP versus those without MRCP before removal of transmural stents. Data on patient demographic characteristics, procedural details, cross-sectional imaging, and recurrence rates were collected through chart review., Results: A total of 121 patients with WON were identified, of whom 44 (36.4%) had an MRCP before transmural stent removal. In patients without MRCP, 13 (16.8%) of 77 had PFC recurrence versus 0 of 44 (0%; P = .003) in those with MRCP. MRCP identified DPDS in 12 (27.2%) patients, all of whom were managed with indefinite drainage with double-pigtail plastic stents without recurrence. In the group without MRCP, PFCs recurred at a median interval of 284 days (interquartile range, 182-618 days) after transmural stent removal. Among the 13 patients with PFC recurrence, 11 (85%) had undiagnosed DPDS detected on subsequent imaging, of whom 9 were subsequently managed with indefinite double-pigtail plastic stents, with no further PFC recurrence., Conclusions: Patients with WON who underwent MRCP before transmural stent removal had a lower rate of PFC recurrence largely due to the identification of DPDS with appropriate endoscopic management., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: V. Chandrasekhara: consultant for Boston Scientific; research support from StarMed and Micro-Tech Endoscopy; and shareholder in Nevakar Corporation. R. Law: consultant for ConMed and Medtronic; consultant and research support for Boston Scientific and Olympus America; and royalties from UpToDate. A.C. Storm: consultant and research support from Apollo Endosurgery and Boston Scientific; consultant for Olympus, Medtronic, MicroTech, and Intuitive; and research support from Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, EnteraSense, MGI Medical, OnePass, and SofTac. E.J. Vargas and J. Martin: research support from Philips Healthcare. B.T. Petersen: consultant for Olympus; and investigator for Boston Scientific and Ambu. S. Majumder: intellectual property development agreement–inventor for the Mayo Clinic and Exact Sciences. S. Vege: royalties from UpToDate. B.K. Abu Dayyeh: consultant for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consultant and grant research support from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; speaker for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson; and research support from Cairn Diagnostics. A. Bofill: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is indicated for the efficient management of specific complications such as bile reflux. Published literature on this topic remains scarce as we aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes (10 years) of RBS for bile reflux after RYGB., Material and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent primary RYGB complicated by bile reflux and had RBS between 2008 and 2023. Our cohort was divided into two groups based on the etiology of bile reflux. Long-term surgical outcomes and nutritional status were reported and compared between the groups., Results: A total of 41 patients (100% primary RYGB; 90.2% female, 97.6% white) were included. 56.1% (n = 23) of patients underwent Roux limb lengthening and the remaining 43.9% (n = 18) had a gastrogastric fistula takedown, with no significant differences in terms of intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss (p = 0.616), length of hospital stay (p = 0.099), and postoperative complications between the two groups. Long-term resolution of obesity-related medical conditions was demonstrated for all the evaluated comorbidities. Lastly, there was no reported mortality, bile reflux recurrence, or micro- and macro-nutrient deficiencies over the total follow-up period of 10 years., Conclusion: In our cohort, RBS after a primary RYGB for bile reflux management demonstrated safe and efficient short- and long-term surgical outcomes without any reported bile reflux recurrence or mortality. Adequate supplementation and close patient follow-up remain essential to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with RBS as further studies are required to support our findings., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: The Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot technology. While ChatGPT offers promising capabilities, concerns remain about its reliability and accuracy. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT's responses to patients' frequently asked questions about Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG)., Methods: Expert Gastroenterologists and Bariatric Surgeons, with experience in ESG, were invited to evaluate ChatGPT-generated answers to eight ESG-related questions, and answers sourced from hospital websites. The evaluation criteria included ease of understanding, scientific accuracy, and overall answer satisfaction. They were also tasked with discerning whether each response was AI generated or not., Results: Twelve medical professionals with expertise in ESG participated, 83.3% of whom had experience performing the procedure independently. The entire cohort possessed substantial knowledge about ESG. ChatGPT's utility among participants, rated on a scale of one to five, averaged 2.75. The raters demonstrated a 54% accuracy rate in distinguishing AI-generated responses, with a sensitivity of 39% and specificity of 60%, resulting in an average of 17.6 correct identifications out of a possible 31. Overall, there were no significant differences between AI-generated and non-AI responses in terms of scientific accuracy, understandability, and satisfaction, with one notable exception. For the question defining ESG, the AI-generated definition scored higher in scientific accuracy (4.33 vs. 3.61, p = 0.007) and satisfaction (4.33 vs. 3.58, p = 0.009) compared to the non-AI versions., Conclusions: This study underscores ChatGPT's efficacy in providing medical information on ESG, demonstrating its comparability to traditional sources in scientific accuracy., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort., Approach: Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.  Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology., Results: Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%-95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)., Conclusions: The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background and Aims: Balloons are used in EUS to improve visualization. However, data on the safety of latex balloons in patients with latex allergies are limited, and nonlatex alternatives can be costly. We investigated the safety of latex balloon use during EUS., Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Patients with reported latex allergies who underwent linear EUS were included. Baseline demographics, EUS characteristics, and adverse events were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse events., Results: Eighty-seven procedures were performed on 57 unique patients (mean age, 65.3 ± 14.5 years). Latex balloons were used in 59 procedures (67.8%), with only 8 procedures (13.6%) using prophylactic medications. No adverse events occurred during or after procedures, regardless of medication use or history of anaphylaxis., Conclusions: The use of EUS latex balloons in patients with a latex allergy was associated with no adverse events., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Covidien LP and Boston Scientific; research funding from Microtech Endoscopy; shareholder at Nevakar Corporation. R. J. Law: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Olympus, and ConMed; royalties from UpToDate; research support from Olympus and Boston Scientific. E. Rajan: Intellectual property with Medtronic and Ruhoff Corporation; consultant for Olympus and Ethicon; research support from Olympus, Steris, Fujifilm, CapsoVision, and Mirai. P. G. Iyer: Consultant for Pentax Medical, CSA Medical, Medtronic, CDx Medical, and Castle Biosciences; research support from Exact Sciences, Medtronic, and Pentax Medical. B. K. Abu Dayyeh: Consultant for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, BFKW, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Endogastric Solutions, and Spatz Medical; research support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Endogastric Solutions, Spatz Medical, and Cairn Diagnostics; speaker for Olympus, Johnson and Johnson, and EndoGastric Solutions. A. C. Storm: Research support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, and Enterasense; consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Erbe Elektromedizin, Intuitive, Medtronic, and Olympus. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) is the most effective management for patients with obesity and weight-related medical conditions. Nonetheless, some primary care physicians (PCPs) and surgeons from other specialties are reluctant to refer patients for MBS due to safety concerns., Objectives: To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent MBS with those who underwent other common operations., Setting: American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)., Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), classified as MBS, were compared to nine frequently performed procedures including hip arthroplasty and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, hysterectomy, and hernia repairs, among others. A multivariable logistic regression was constructed to compare outcomes including readmission, reoperation, extended length of stay (ELOS) (>75 th percentile or ≥3 days) and mortality., Results: A total of 1.6 million patients were included, with 11.1% undergoing MBS. The odds of readmission were marginally lower in the cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = .88, 95% confidence interval (CI) [.85, .90]) and appendectomy (aOR = .88, 95% CI [.85, .90]) cohorts. Similarly, odds of ELOS were among the lowest, surpassed only by same-day procedures such as cholecystectomies and appendectomies. The MBS group had significantly low odds of mortality, comparable to safe anatomical procedures such as hernia repairs. Infectious and thrombotic complications were exceedingly rare and amongst the lowest after MBS., Conclusions: MBS demonstrates a remarkably promising safety profile and compares favorably to other common procedures in the short-term. PCPs and surgeons from other specialties can confidently refer patients for these low-risk, lifesaving operations., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) are being increasingly utilized for the management of obesity. They work through multiple mechanisms, including restriction, malabsorption, and changes in the gastrointestinal hormonal and motility., Recent Findings: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) cause decrease in leptin, increase in GLP-1 and PYY, and variable changes in ghrelin (generally thought to decrease). RYGB and LSG lead to rapid gastric emptying, increase in small bowel motility, and possible decrease in colonic motility. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) causes decrease in leptin and increase in GLP-1, ghrelin, and PYY; and delayed gastric motility., Summary: Understanding mechanisms of action for MBS and EBT is critical for optimal care of patients and will help in further refinement of these interventions., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and study aims Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) has long been employed in treating weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, its impact on gut hormones and their relationship with weight loss remains unknown. Patients and methods This was a substudy of a previous randomized clinical trial. Adults with significant weight regain and dilated gastrojejunostomy underwent TORe with argon plasma coagulation (APC) alone or APC plus endoscopic suturing (APC-suture). Serum levels of ghrelin, GLP-1, and PYY were assessed at fasting, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after a standardized liquid meal. Results were compared according to allocation group, clinical success, and history of cholecystectomy. Results Thirty-six patients (19 APC vs. 17 APC-suture) were enrolled. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. In all analyses, the typical postprandial decrease in ghrelin levels was delayed by 30 minutes, but no other changes were noted. GLP-1 levels significantly decreased at 12 months in both allocation groups. Similar findings were noted after dividing groups according to the history of cholecystectomy and clinical success. The APC cohort presented an increase in PYY levels at 90 minutes, while the APC-suture group did not. Naïve patients had significantly lower PYY levels at baseline ( P = 0.01) compared with cholecystectomized individuals. This latter group experienced a significant increase in area under the curve (AUC) for PYY levels, while naïve patients did not, leading to a higher AUC at 12 months ( P = 0.0001). Conclusions TORe interferes with the dynamics of gut hormones. APC triggers a more pronounced enteroendocrine response than APC-suture, especially in cholecystectomized patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest VOB: none. GFAF: none. DTHM: Advisory board of Bariatec Advanced Solutions. MAS: none. BKAD: Consultant for Metamodix, BFKW, DyaMx, Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, and Endo-TAGSS; gets research support from Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, Apollo Endosurgery, Spatz Medical, GI Dynamics, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, and Medtronic; is speaker for Johnson and Johnson, Endogastric Solutions, and Olympus. CSF: none. LA: none. DLW: none. EGHM: Speaker for Boston Scientific and Olympus., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: To evaluate the weight loss outcomes of the large US cohort of patients undergoing endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) with or without concomitant anti-obesity (AOM) use., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ESG from seven different sites, from January 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022. Percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) and %excess weight loss (%EWL) were calculated based on baseline weight at the procedure. Medication use was considered if the subject received a prescribed AOM during the study period. SPSS (version 29.0) was used for statistical analyses., Results: A total of 1506 patients were included (1359 (90.2 %) no AOM use and 147 (9.8 %) AOM use). Patients who were on an active AOM at the time of the procedure had a significantly lower TBWL% as compared to patients not on AOMs at 6 months. At the 24-month visit, patients who were prescribed AOMs after the 12-month visit had a significantly higher TBWL% and EWL% as compared to patients who were on active AOM at the time of the procedure. There was no significant difference between classes of medications at any time point, however, patients on a GLP-1RA had a trend towards improved weight loss at 18 and 24 months., Conclusion: In this large, real-world cohort of patients from the United States, data signal that with the use of pharmacotherapy at the appropriate time, patients can achieve optimal results., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background and Aims: Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency associated with high resource utilization, morbidity, and mortality. Timely EGD can be challenging from personnel, resource, and access perspectives. PillSense (EnteraSense Ltd, Galway, Ireland) is a novel swallowed bleeding sensor for the detection of UGIB, anticipated to aid in patient triage and guide clinical decision-making for individuals with suspected UGIB., Methods: This prospective, open-label, single-arm comparative clinical trial of a novel bleeding sensor for patients with suspected UGIB was performed at a tertiary care center. The PillSense system consists of an optical sensor and an external receiver that processes and displays data from the capsule as "Blood Detected" or "No Blood Detected." Patients underwent EGD within 4 hours of capsule administration; participants were followed up for 21 days to confirm capsule passage., Results: A total of 126 patients were accrued to the study (59.5% male; mean age, 62.4 ± 14.3 years). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence of blood were 92.9% (P = .02) and 90.6% (P < .001), respectively. The capsule's positive and negative predictive values were 74.3% and 97.8%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 9.9 and .08. No adverse events or deaths occurred related to the PillSense system, and all capsules were excreted from patients on follow-up., Conclusions: The PillSense system is safe and effective for detecting the presence of blood in patients evaluated for UGIB before upper GI endoscopy. It is a rapidly deployed tool, with easy-to-interpret results that will affect the diagnosis and triage of patients with suspected UGIB. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05385224.)., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: B. K. Abu Dayyeh: Consultant for Endogenex, endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consultant and grant/research support from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; speaker roles with Olympus and Johnson & Johnson; and research support from Cairn Diagnostics and GI Dynamics. L. M. Wong Kee Song: Consultant for Steris Corporation, Noah Medical Corporation, and Olympus Corporation. D. H. Bruining: Consultant for Janssen; and research support from Medtronic and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. N. Coelho-Prabhu: Research support from Cook Medical and Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corporation. V. Chandrasekhara: Shareholder with Nevakar Corporation; consultant for Covidien, LP, and Boston Scientific; and research funding from Micro-Tech Endoscopy. C. L. Leggett: Consultant for Verily Life Sciences. R. J. Law: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and CONMED; research support from Olympus Corporation; and royalties from UpToDate. E. Rajan: Intellectual property counsel for Medtronic and Ruhof; consultant for Olympus and J&J; and research support from Mirai, Ireland. J. A. Alexander: Financial interest in Meritage Pharmacia; and consultant for Alimentiv. A.C. Storm: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, MGI Medical, Envision Endoscopy, Olympus Corporation, Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, and Micro-Tech Medical; research grants from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGGS, EnteraSense Ltd, and OnePass Medical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. This clinical study was sponsored & funded by EnteraSense, Ltd., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) demonstrates high rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission, a phenomenon hypothesized to be mediated mainly by weight loss. Compared with procedures that do not bypass the proximal small intestines, such as sleeve gastrectomy (SG), RYGB exhibits weight loss-independent intestinal mechanisms conducive to T2DM remission. We investigated continued diabetes remission (CDR) rates despite weight recurrence (WR) after RYGB compared with an SG cohort., Study Design: A retrospective review of patients who underwent successful primary RYGB or SG with a BMI value of 35 kg/m 2 or more and a preoperative diagnosis of T2DM was performed. Patients with less than 5 years of follow-up, absence of WR, or lack of T2DM remission at nadir weight were excluded. After selecting the optimal procedure for glycemic control, rates of CDR were then stratified into WR quartiles and compared., Results: A total of 224 RYGB and 46 SG patients were analyzed. The overall rate of CDR was significantly higher in the RYGB group (75%) compared with the SG group (34.8%; p < 0.001). The odds of T2DM recurrence were 5.5 times higher after SG compared with RYGB. Rates of CDR were stratified into WR quartiles (85.5%, <25%; 81.7%, 25% to 44.9%; 63.2%, 45% to 74.9%; and 60%, >75%). Baseline insulin use, higher preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin, and longer preoperative duration of T2DM were associated with T2DM recurrence, whereas WR was not., Conclusions: T2DM remission rates after RYGB are maintained despite WR, arguing for a concurrent weight loss-independent metabolic benefit likely facilitated by bypassing the proximal small intestine., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Visceral fat represents a metabolically active entity linked to adverse metabolic sequelae of obesity. We aimed to determine if celiac artery mesenteric fat thickness can be reliably measured during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and if these measurements correlate with metabolic disease burden., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent celiac artery mesenteric fat measurement with endosonography (CAMEUS) measurement at a tertiary referral center, and a validation prospective trial of patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who received paired EUS exams with CAMEUS measurement before and after six months of treatment with an intragastric balloon., Results: CAMEUS was measured in 154 patients [56.5% females, mean age 56.5 ± 18.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.8 ± 8.0 kg/m 2 ] and was estimated at 14.7 ± 6.5 mm. CAMEUS better correlated with the presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ( R 2  = 0.248, P  <   0.001) than BMI ( R 2  = 0.153, P  <   0.001), and significantly correlated with metabolic parameters and diseases. After six months of intragastric balloon placement, the prospective cohort experienced 11.7% total body weight loss, 1.3 points improvement in hemoglobin A1c ( P  =   0.001), and a 29.4% average decrease in CAMEUS (-6.4   ±   5.2 mm, P  <   0.001). CAMEUS correlated with improvements in weight ( R 2  = 0.368), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index ( R 2  = 0.138), and NAFLD activity score ( R 2  = 0.156) (all P  <   0.05)., Conclusions: CAMEUS is a novel measure that is significantly correlated with critical metabolic indices and can be easily captured during routine EUS to risk-stratify susceptible patients. This station could allow for EUS access to sampling and therapeutics of this metabolic region., Competing Interests: R.J.L. consults for ConMed, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. V.C. consults for Boston Scientific and Covidien, and serves as a shareholder in Nevakar Corporation. A.C.S. receives research grants from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, and EnteraSense, and consults for Apollo Endosurgery, ERBE Elektromedizin, GI Dynamics, Intuitive Surgical, and Olympus. E.R. consults for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson, and owns intellectual property for Medtronic. P.G.I. consults for Exact Sciences, Pentax Medical, CDx Medical, Castle Biosciences, Ambu, and Symple Surgical, and receives research funding from Exact Sciences, Pentax Medical, CDx Medical, and Castle Biosciences. B.K.A.D. consults for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, BFKW, USGI, and Boston Scientific, and received research grants from USGI, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and EndoGastric Solutions, and received research support from Apollo Endosurgery and Spatz Medical, and serves as a speaker for Olympus, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, and EndoGastric Solutions. Other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this study., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.)

Background and Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) is a novel modality for liver stiffness measurement. The aims of this study are to evaluate the performance and reliability of EUS-SWE for detecting advanced liver disease in a prospective cohort., Methods: EUS-SWE measurements were prospectively obtained from patients undergoing EUS between August 2020 and March 2023. Liver stiffness measurements were compared between patients with and without advanced liver disease (ALD), defined as stage ≥3, to determine diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables that impact the reliability of EUS-SWE readings. Select patients underwent paired magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for liver fibrosis correlation., Results: Patients with ALD demonstrated higher liver stiffness compared to healthy controls (left lobe: 17.6 vs. 12.7 kPa, P<0.001; median right lobe: 24.8 vs. 11.0 kPa, P<0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) for the detection of ALD was 0.73 and 0.80 for left and right lobe measurements, respectively. General anesthesia was associated with reliable EUS-SWE liver readings (odds ratio: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.07-7.39, P=0.040). Left lobe measurements correlated significantly with MRE with an increase of 0.11 kPa (95% CI: 0.05-0.17 kPA) for every 1 kPa increase on EUS-SWE. D., Conclusions: SWE is a promising technology that can readily be incorporated into standard EUS examinations for the assessment of ALD., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 70 kg/m 2 are considered a high-risk group. There is limited literature to guide surgeons on the perioperative safety as well as the different procedural outcomes of MBS in this cohort. Our aim is to compare the safety profiles, early- and medium-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and duodenal switch (DS) in patients with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m 2 . A total of 156 patients with BMI ≥ 70kg/m 2  underwent MBS (SG = 40, RYGB = 40, and DS = 76). Mean baseline BMI was 75.5 kg/m 2 . Total weight loss (%TWL) at 24 months was highest in the DS group compared to RYGB (40.6% versus 33.8%, P value = .03) and SG (40.6% versus 28.5%, P value = .006). There was no significant difference in %TWL between RYGB and SG (33.8% versus 28.5%, P value = .20). The 30-day complication rates were similar [SG (7.5%), RYGB (10%), and DS (9.2%) (P value = 1.0)]. There was one reported leak (DS). The 30-day mortality was zero. MBS is safe and effective in patients with BMI ≥ 70 kg/m 2 . All procedures had comparable safety profiles and complication rates. While DS achieved the highest %TWL at 24 months, similar comorbidity resolution rates among the procedures attenuate its clinical significance., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Multiple scores validate long-term type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). However, studies comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) have not adequately controlled for certain parameters, which may influence procedure selection., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients with T2DM who underwent RYGB or SG between 2008 and 2017. Data on demographics, clinical, laboratory, and metabolic values were collected annually for up to 14 years. Each eligible RYGB patient was individually matched to an eligible SG patient based on diabetes severity, weight loss, and follow-up duration., Results: Among 1149 T2DM patients, 467 were eligible for matching. We found 97 matched pairs who underwent RYGB or SG. RYGB showed significantly higher T2DM remission rates (46.4%) compared to SG (33.0%) after matching. SG patients had higher insulin usage (35.1%) than RYGB patients (20.6%). RYGB patients also experienced greater decreases in HbA1c levels and diabetes medication usage than SG patients., Conclusions: RYGB demonstrates higher efficacy for T2DM remission compared to SG, regardless of baseline characteristics, T2DM severity, weight loss, and follow-up duration. Further studies are needed to understand the long-term metabolic effects of MBS and the underlying pathophysiology of T2DM remission after MBS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Pearl Ma is a consultant for Ethicon, Medtronic and Intuitive. Dr Andres Acosta reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study; holding stock in Gila Therapeutics and Phenomix Sciences; and serving as a consultant for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, General Mills, and Amgen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Barham Abu Dayyeh has received consulting fee from Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consulting fee and grant/research support from USGI, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, Boston Scientific; speaker honorarium from Olympus, Johnson and Johnson; speaker honorarium and grant/research support from Medtronic, Endogastric solutions; and research support/grant from Apollo Endosurgery, and Spatz Medical. Dr Kelvin Higa is a consultant for Medtronic and Ethicon. Dr Karl Hage, Dr Wissam Ghusn, Kayla Ikemiya, Robert A. Vierkant, and Dr Omar M. Ghanem declare no conflict of interest.

Background and Aims: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective, minimally invasive gastric remodeling procedure to treat mild and moderate obesity. Early adoption of ESG may be desirable to try to halt progression of obesity, but there are few data on its efficacy and safety for overweight patients., Methods: This was a multicenter, international, analytical case series. Six U.S., 1 Brazilian, 1 Mexican, and 1 Indian center were included. Overweight patients according to local practice undergoing ESG were considered eligible for the study. The end points were percent total weight loss (%TWL), body mass index (BMI) reduction, rate of BMI normalization, and rate of adverse events., Results: One hundred eighty-nine patients with a mean age of 42.6 ± 14.1 years and a mean BMI of 27.79 ± 1.17 kg/m 2 were included. All procedures were successfully accomplished, and there were 3 intraprocedural adverse events (1.5%). The mean %TWL was 12.28% ± 3.21%, 15.03% ± 5.30%, 15.27% ± 5.28%, and 14.91% ± 5.62% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, 76% and 86% of patients achieved normal BMI, with a mean BMI reduction of 4.13 ± 1.46 kg/m 2 and 4.25 ± 1.58 kg/m 2 . There was no difference in mean %TWL in the first quartile versus the fourth quartile of BMI in any of the time points. However, the BMI normalization rate was statistically higher in the first group at 6 and 12 months (6 months, 100% vs 48.5% [P < .01]; 12 months, 86.2% vs 50% [P < .01]; 24 months, 84.6% vs 76.1% [P = .47]; 36 months, 86.3% vs 66.6% [P = .26])., Conclusions: ESG is safe and effective in treating overweight patients with high BMI normalization rates. It could help halt or delay the progression to obesity., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: A. C. Hoff: consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. P. Kedia: consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Olympus. R. Z. Sharaiha: consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, and Lumendi. M. Bhandari: consultant for Intuitive, Ethicon, and Allurion. B. VanderWel: consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. M. G. Neto: consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, GI Dynamics, and Keyron. M. B. Ujiki: board member for Boston Scientific; paid consultant for Olympus and Cook; and receives payment for lectures from Medtronic, Gore, and Erbe. C. McGowan: consultant for Boston Scientific. B. K. A. Dayehh: consultant for DyaMx, Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, and Endo-TAGSS; research support from Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, Apollo Endosurgery, Spatz Medical, GI Dynamics, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, and Medtronic; and speaker for Johnson & Johnson, EndoGastric Solutions, and Olympus. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and study aims Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is performed in clinical practice by gastroenterologists and bariatric surgeons. Given the increasing regulatory approval and global adoption, we aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes in multidisciplinary practices involving bariatric surgeons and gastroenterologists across the United States. Patients and methods We included adult patients with obesity who underwent ESG from January 2013 to August 2022 in seven academic and private centers in the United States. Patient and procedure characteristics, serious adverse events (SAEs), and weight loss outcomes up to 24 months were analyzed. SPSS (version 29.0) was used for all statistical analyses. Results A total of 1506 patients from seven sites included 235 (15.6%) treated by surgeons and 1271 (84.4%) treated by gastroenterologists. There were no baseline differences between groups. Gastroenterologists used argon plasma coagulation for marking significantly more often than surgeons ( P <0.001). Surgeons placed sutures in the fundus in all instances whereas gastroenterologist placed them in the fundus in less than 1% of the cases ( P <0.001>). Procedure times were significantly different between groups, with surgeons requiring approximately 20 minutes more during the procedure than gastroenterologists ( P <0.001). Percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) and percent responders achieving >10 and >15% TBWL were similar between the two groups at 12, 18, and 24 months. Rates of SAEs were low and similar at 1.7% for surgeons and 2.7% for gastroenterologists ( P >0.05). Conclusions Data from a large US cohort show significant and sustained weight loss with ESG and an excellent safety profile in both bariatric surgery and gastroenterology practices, supporting the scalability of the procedure across practices in a multidisciplinary setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest AS has research grants from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Enterasense, OnePass, and is a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, MGI Medical, Olympus, Intuitive, Medtronic, Microtech. MU is a board member for Boston Scientific, is a paid consultant for Olympus and Cook, and receives payment for lectures from Medtronic, Gore and Erbe. PK is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Olympus. RS is consultant for Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, and Lumendi. BV is consultant for Apollo Endosurgery. DM is consultant for Apollo Endosurgery BAD is consultant for DyaMx, Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, and Endo-TAGSS; gets research support from Boston Scientific, USGI Medical, Apollo Endosurgery, Spatz Medical, GI Dynamics, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, and Medtronic; is speaker for Johnson and Johnson, Endogastric Solutions, and Olympus. Other authors do not have a conflict of interest or disclosures., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has demonstrated excellent glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission for patients with obesity and T2DM. Duration of T2DM is a consistent negative predictor of remission after RYGB. However, the exact timing to offer surgical intervention during the course of the disease is not well elucidated., Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study between 2008-2020 to establish the exact association between duration of T2DM and remission after RYGB. We divided our cohort into quartiles of preoperative disease duration to quantify the change in remission rates for each year of delay between T2DM diagnosis and RYGB. We also compared the average time to remission and changes in glycemic control parameters., Results: A total of 519 patients (67.2% female; age 53.4±10.7 y; BMI 46.6±8.4 kg/m2) with a follow-up period of 6.6±3.8 years were included. Remission was demonstrated in 51% of patients. Longer duration of T2DM was a significant negative predictor of remission with an estimated decrease in remission rates of 7% for each year of delay ([OR=0.931 (95% CI 0.892-0.971)]; P<0.001). Compared to patients with <3 years of T2DM, remission decreased by 37% for patients with 3-6 years, 64% for those with 7-12 years and 81% for patients with more than 12 years (P<0.001). Half of the patients reached T2DM remission after 0.5 and 1.1 years respectively for the first and second quartiles, while patients in the other quartiles never reached 50% remission. Lastly, we noted an overall improvement in all glycemic control parameters for all quartiles at last follow-up., Conclusion: Patients with a recent history of T2DM who undergo early RYGB experience significantly higher and earlier T2DM remission compared to patients with a prolonged history of preoperative T2DM, suggesting potential benefit of early surgical intervention to manage patients with obesity and T2DM., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Despite the increasing number of bariatric procedures over the recent years, the physiological changes in secondary esophageal motility and distensibility parameters after surgery remain unknown., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study comparing esophageal planimetry and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) distensibility in post-bariatric surgery patients (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and conversion/revisional patients (DH)) and native-anatomy patients with obesity (NAC). Distensibility refers to the area achieved with a certain amount of pressure, and secondary peristalsis represents the esophageal response to an intended obstruction. Patients with pre-surgical dysmotility symptoms were excluded from the study., Results: From November 2018 to January 2023, 167 patients were evaluated and eligible for this study (RYGB = 87, SG = 33, NAC = 22, DH = 25). In NAC cohort, 17/22 (77%) patients presented normal motility patterns compared to 35/87 (40%) RYGB, 12/33 (36%) SG, and 5/25 (20%) DH (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The most common abnormal motility pattern for all three bariatric cohorts was absent contractions. DH patients generally had the highest mean maximum distensibility index averages, followed by SG, RYGB, and NAC., Conclusion: Bariatric surgery affects esophageal and GEJ physiology, and it is associated with higher rates of secondary dysmotility. DH patients have even higher rates of dysmotility. Further studies assessing clinical data and their correlation with manometric and pH-metric findings are needed., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Obesity is on the rise within the inflammatory bowel disease population. The impact obesity has on the natural history of Crohn's disease (CD) is not well-understood. We aimed to describe the prevalence of obesity in a population-based cohort of newly diagnosed patients with CD, and the impact obesity had on disease phenotype and outcomes of corticosteroid use, hospitalization, intestinal resection, and development of fistulizing or penetrating disease., Materials and Methods: A chart review was performed on Olmsted County, Minnesota residents diagnosed with CD between 1970 and 2010. Data were collected on demographics, body mass index, CD location and behavior, CD-related hospitalizations, corticosteroid use, and intestinal resection. The proportion of individuals considered obese at the time of CD diagnosis was evaluated over time, and CD-associated complications were assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis., Results: We identified 334 individuals diagnosed with CD between 1970 and 2010, of whom 156 (46.7%) were either overweight (27.8%) or obese (18.9%) at the time of diagnosis. The proportion of patients considered obese at the time of their diagnosis of CD increased 2-3 fold over the course of the study period. However, obesity did not have a significant impact on the future risk of corticosteroid use, hospitalization, intestinal resection, or development of penetrating and stricturing complications., Conclusions: Obesity is on the rise in patients with CD, although in this cohort, there did not appear to be any negative association with future CD-related outcomes. Further prospective studies, ideally including obesity measures such as visceral adipose tissue assessment, are warranted to understand the implications of the rising prevalence of obesity on CD outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is considered one of the most effective interventions for weight loss and associated type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission. Multiple scores including the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS), DiaRem, advanced DiaRem, and Robert et al. scores, have been developed predict T2DM remission after MBS. We aim to validate each of these scores in our cohort of patients undergoing MBS with long-term follow-up and assess their efficacy based on procedure type and preoperative BMI., Methods: We conducted a multicenter cohort study including patients with T2DM undergoing either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the discriminatory ability of the four models to detect T2DM remission., Results: A total of 503 patients (67 % females, mean age 53.5 [11] years, BMI 46.2 [8.8] kg/m 2 ) with T2DM were included. The majority (78 %) underwent RYGB, while the rest (28 %) had SG. All four scores predicted T2DM remission in our cohort with an ROC AUC of 0.79 for IMS, 0.78 for both DiaRem and advanced-DiaRem, and 0.75 for Robert et al. score. Specific subgroups for each of these scores demonstrated higher T2DM remission rates after RYGB compared to SG., Conclusion: We demonstrate the ability of the IMS, DiaRem, advanced-DiaRem and Robert et al. scores to predict T2DM remission in patients undergoing MBS. T2DM remission rates was demonstrated to decrease with more severe IMS, DiaRem and advanced-DiaRem scores and lower Robert et al. scores., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity worsens various gastrointestinal pathologies. While bariatric surgery ameliorates obesity, it substantially modifies the gastrointestinal system depending on surgery type, with limited data on subsequent impact on obesity-related gastrointestinal admissions., Methods: Using the 2012-2014 Nationwide Readmission Database, we included individuals with obesity who received vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or hernia repair (HR-control surgery). Our main focus was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for gastrointestinal inpatient admissions within 6 months following surgery compared to the 6 months preceding it, while controlling for several confounding factors. Gastrointestinal admissions were grouped into postoperative complications or obesity-associated gastrointestinal conditions., Results: Our cohort included 140,103 adults with RYGB, 132,253 with VSG, and 12,436 HR controls. Postoperative gastrointestinal complications were most common after RYGB, prominently obstruction (aOR = 33.17, 95%CI: 18.01, 61.10), and Clostridium difficile infection (aOR: 12.52, 95%CI: 6.22, 25.19). VSG also saw significantly increased but less frequent similar conditions. Notably, for gastrointestinal conditions associated with obesity, acute pancreatitis risk was higher post-VSG (aOR = 6.26, 95%CI: 4.02, 9.73). Post-RYGB patients were most likely to be admitted for cholelithiasis with cholecystitis (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 3.24, 5.31), followed by chronic liver disease (aOR: 3.00, 95% CI: 2.33, 3.87). The risk of noninfectious colitis admissions was threefold higher after RYGB and VSG. No gastrointestinal conditions showed an increase after HR., Conclusion: Despite weight loss, bariatric surgery was associated with an increased risk of hepato-pancreatobiliary and colitis admissions related to obesity in the first six postoperative months, with considerable variations in rates of gastrointestinal conditions by surgery type., (© 2023 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).)

Background and Aims: Coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) placement is often performed within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to prevent adverse events (AEs) such as stent occlusion and bleeding. This study compares the safety and outcomes of LAMSs alone versus LAMSs with coaxial DPPSs for PFC management., Methods: Patients undergoing drainage of a PFC with LAMSs were retrospectively identified and categorized as LAMS or LAMS/DPPS based on initial drainage strategy. The AE rate, AE type, and clinical success were extracted by chart review., Results: One hundred eighty-five individuals (83 LAMS, 102 LAMS/DPPS) were identified. No significant differences were found in rates of clinical success (75.9% LAMS vs 69.6% LAMS/DDPS, P = .34) or overall AEs (15.7% LAMS vs 15.7% LAMS/DPPS, P = .825)., Conclusions: In this comparative single-center study, placement of a coaxial DPPS for drainage of PFCs with LAMSs did not affect rates of AEs or clinical success., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: R. Law: Consultant for ConMed and Medtronic; royalties from UpToDate. A. C. Storm: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery; research support from Apollo Endosurgery and Boston Scientific. B. T. Petersen: Consultant for Olympus America; investigator for Boston Scientific and Ambu. B. K. Abu Dayyeh: Consultant for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, BFKW, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; research support from Cairn Diagnostics, USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, and Boston Scientific; speaker for Olympus and Johnson & Johnson. V. Chandrasekhara: Consultant for Covidien LP and Boston Scientific; shareholder in Nevakar Corporation. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to altered anatomy., Objective: To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of 4 different ERCP techniques in RYGB patients., Setting: Academic tertiary referral center in the United States., Methods: A retrospective cohort study including patients with RYGB anatomy who underwent an ERCP between January 2015 and September 2020. We compared procedural success and adverse events (AEs) rates of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), gastrostomy-assisted ERCP (GAE), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), and rendezvous guidewire-assisted ERCP (RGA)., Results: Seventy-eight RYGB patients underwent a total of 132 ERCPs. The mean age was 60 ± 11.8 years, with female predominance (85.7%). The ERCP procedures performed were BAE (n = 64; 48.5%), GAE (n = 18; 13.7%), EDGE (n = 25; 18.9%), and RGA (n = 25; 18.9%), with overall procedure success rates of 64.1%, 100%, 89.5%, and 91.7%, respectively. All approaches were superior to BAE (GAE versus BAE, P = .003; EDGE versus BAE, P = .034; RGA versus BAE, P = .011). The overall AE rates were 10.9%, 11.1%, 15.8 %, and 25.0%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in AEs. There were also no differences in bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and perforation rates between the 4 approaches., Conclusion: Procedure success was similar between GAE, RGA, and EDGE, but superior to BAE. AE rates were similar between approaches., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has gained popularity over the past decade and has been adopted in both academic and private institutions globally. We present outcomes of the largest cohort of patients from the United States undergoing ESG and evaluate these according to obesity class., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ESG. Medical information was abstracted from the electronic record with weight records up to 2 years after ESG. Percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was calculated based on baseline weight at the procedure. SPSS (version 29.0) was used for all statistical analyses., Results: A total of 1,506 patients from 7 sites were included (501 Class I obesity, 546 Class II, and 459 Class III). Baseline demographics differed according to obesity class due to differences in age, body mass index (BMI), height, sex distribution, and race. As early as 6 months post-ESG, mean BMI for each class dropped to the next lower class and remained there through 2 years. %TWBL achieved in the Class III group was significantly greater when compared with other classes at all time points. At 12 months, 83.2% and 60.9% of patients had ≥10% and ≥15% TBWL for all classes. There were no differences in adverse events between classes., Discussion: Real-world data from a large cohort of patients of all BMI classes across the United States shows significant and sustained weight loss with ESG. ESG is safe to perform in a higher obesity class with acceptable midterm efficacy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Bariatric surgery, although highly effective, may lead to several surgical complications like ulceration, strictures, leaks, and fistulas. Newer endoscopic tools have emerged as safe and effective therapeutic options for these conditions. This article reviews post-bariatric surgery complications and the role of endoscopy in their management., Competing Interests: Disclosure B.K. Abu Dayyeh Consulting for Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consultant and grant/research support from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Medtronic, Spatz Medical, EndoGastric Solutions, Aspire Bariatrics, Boston Scientific, United States; Speaker roles with Olympus, Johnson and Johnson; and research support from Cairn Diagnostics, GI Dynamics. Other authors have no relevant disclosures. There were no funding sources for this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with short- and mid-term type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission. Long-term outcomes and predictive parameters associated with remission following RYGB have not been well elucidated., Objective: Determining the overall long-term T2D remission rates following RYGB and identifying predictive variables associated with remission., Setting: Multicentered study including patients who underwent RYGB at 3 tertiary referral centers for bariatric surgery., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study between 2008-2017 to allow a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. We evaluated long-term T2D remission rates and annual T2D clinical and metabolic parameters up to 14 years after surgery. Predictors of remission were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on quartiles of total body weight loss percentage (%TBWL) to compare remission rates between groups., Results: A total of 815 patients were included (68.9% female, age 52.1 ± 11.5 yr; body mass index 45.1 ± 7.7 kg/m 2 ) with a follow-up of 7.3 ± 3.8 years. Remission was demonstrated in 51% of patients. Predictors of remission included pre-operative duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1C, insulin use prior to surgery, number of antidiabetic medications and %TBWL (all P < .01). Remission rates were proportionally associated with %TBWL quartile (Q1, 40.9%; Q2, 52.7%; Q3, 53.1%; Q4, 56.1%) (P = .02)., Conclusions: Longer duration and higher severity of T2D were negatively associated with remission while higher %TBWL had a positive association. A significant proportion of patients in all quartiles experienced long-term remission after RYGB with a greater likelihood of remission correlated with greater weight loss., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 3% of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) are receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy (CAT) prior to operation. The management of these patients is complex, as it involves balancing the potential risk of thrombosis against that of bleeding. Our primary objective is to assess the long-term bleeding risk in patients undergoing MBS. We also aim to observe the trends in anticoagulant dosing after MBS., Methods: A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent either primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with preoperative CAT between 2008 and 2022 was performed. Data on baseline demographics, indication for anticoagulation, type of CAT, and dosing were collected. Events of bleeding and the CAT at event were subsequently evaluated., Results: A total of 132 patients (82 RYGB and 50 SG) initially on CAT were identified, with atrial fibrillation being the most common indication. Incidence of long-term bleeding was significantly higher in the RYGB group (18.3%) compared to the SG group (4%) (p = 0.017) over a total of 5.2 ± 3.8 years. Bleeding marginal ulcer (MU) was the most common cause of bleeding in the RYGB group (13.4%). 84.2% of all bleeding events occurred in patients on chronic Warfarin therapy., Conclusion: Long-term CAT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding in RYGB patients, particularly MU bleeds. Patients on CAT seeking MBS should be counseled regarding this risk and potential implications. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants offer promise as an alternative to Warfarin in these patients; further research is necessary to better understand their safety., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) within 72 h is suggested for patients presenting with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) and biliary obstruction without cholangitis. This study aimed to identify if urgent ERCP (within 24 h) improved outcomes compared to early ERCP (24-72 h) in patients admitted with predicted mild ABP., Methods: Patients admitted for predicted mild ABP defined as a bedside index of severity in acute pancreatitis score < 3 and underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction within 72 h of presentation during the study period were included. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy or surgically altered anatomy preventing conventional ERCP were excluded. The primary outcome was the development of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, the need for ICU admission, and ERCP-related adverse events (AEs)., Results: Of the identified 166 patients, baseline characteristics were similar between both the groups except for the WBC count (9.4 vs. 8.3/µL; p < 0.044) and serum bilirubin level (3.0 vs. 1.6 mg/dL; p < 0.0039). Biliary cannulation rate and technical success were both high in the overall cohort (98.8%). Urgent ERCP was not associated with increased development of moderately severe pancreatitis (10.4% vs. 15.7%; p = 0.3115). The urgent ERCP group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay [median 3 (IQR 2-3) vs. 3 days (IQR 3-4), p < 0.01]., Conclusion: Urgent ERCP did not impact the rate of developing more severe pancreatitis in patients with predicted mild ABP but was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and a lower rate of hospital readmission., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)