Search

Chromosomal instability (CIN) and epigenetic alterations have been implicated in tumor progression and metastasis; yet how these two hallmarks of cancer are related remains poorly understood. By integrating genetic, epigenetic, and functional analyses at the single cell level, we show that progression of uveal melanoma (UM), the most common intraocular primary cancer in adults, is driven by loss of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) in a subpopulation of tumor cells. This leads to transcriptional de-repression of PRC1-target genes and mitotic chromosome segregation errors. Ensuing CIN leads to the formation of rupture-prone micronuclei, exposing genomic double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to the cytosol. This provokes tumor cell-intrinsic inflammatory signaling, mediated by aberrant activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. PRC1 inhibition promotes nuclear enlargement, induces a transcriptional response that is associated with significantly worse patient survival and clinical outcomes, and enhances migration that is rescued upon pharmacologic inhibition of CIN or STING. Thus, deregulation of PRC1 can promote tumor progression by inducing CIN and represents an opportunity for early therapeutic intervention.

The spectrum of germline predisposition in pediatric cancer continues to be realized. Here we report 751 solid tumor patients who underwent prospective matched tumor-normal DNA sequencing and downstream clinical use (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01775072). Germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were reported. One or more P/LP variants were found in 18% (138/751) of individuals when including variants in low, moderate, and high penetrance dominant or recessive genes, or 13% (99/751) in moderate and high penetrance dominant genes. 34% of high or moderate penetrance variants were unexpected based on the patient's diagnosis and previous history. 76% of patients with positive results completed a clinical genetics visit, and 21% had at least one relative undergo cascade testing as a result of this testing. Clinical actionability additionally included screening, risk reduction in relatives, reproductive use, and use of targeted therapies. Germline testing should be considered for all children with cancer.

Intraarterial chemotherapy (Ophthalmic Artery Chemosurgery/OAC) for retinoblastoma has transformed management of retinoblastoma worldwide since Pierre Gobin MD and I introduced it in 2006. Case reports, institutional series, meta-analyses, and randomized trials have validated its effectiveness and safety. It allows more eyes to be saved (at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) as a result, we have gone from removing 96% of retinoblastoma eyes that presented with leukocoria (comparable to modern day International Classification “D” and “E” eyes) to saving 95% of these eyes with primary OAC management allows the majority of advanced intraocular eyes to be salvaged (both “D” and “E” eyes) prior to the chemoreduction era to saving 95% of these eyes with primary OAC management. OAC attains cures faster than intravenous protocols, has fewer systemic side effects, and is overall cheaper than intravenous approaches (because of the absence of side effects which are the main driver of cost in pediatric oncology). Unlike systemic chemotherapy no ports are needed (and no removal of ports for life threatening infections), it does not alter the immune system (so children can be immunized), it does not affect patient growth (and children who had received systemic chemotherapy catch up in growth during OAC), it does not affect hearing (which systemic Carboplatin does-especially in children <6 months of age), it eliminates the second cancers caused by radiation and systemic chemotherapy and does not compromise survival with all series showing patient survival >98%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Retinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common primary ocular malignancy of childhood. Left untreated, it is 100% fatal and carries a substantial risk of impaired vision and removal of one or both eyes. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has become a pillar in the treatment paradigm for Rb that allows for better eye salvage and vision preservation without compromising survival. We describe the evolution of our technique over 15 years. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of 571 patients (697 eyes) and 2391 successful IAC sessions over 15 years. This cohort was separated into three 5-year periods (P1, P2, P3) to assess trends in IAC catheterization technique, complications, and drug delivery. Results From a total of 2402 attempted IAC sessions, there were 2391 successful IAC deliveries, consistent with a 99.5% success rate. The rate of successful super-selective catheterizations over the three periods ranged from 80% in P1 to 84.9% in P2 and 89.2% in P3. Catheterization-related complication rates were 0.7% in P1, 1.1% in P2, and 0.6% in P3. Chemotherapeutics used included combinations of melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin. The rate of patients receiving triple therapy among all groups was 128 (21%) in P1, 487 (41.9%) in P2, and 413 (66.7%) in P3. Conclusions The overall rate of successful catheterization and IAC started high and has improved over 15 years, and catheterization-related complications are rare. There has been a significant trend towards triple chemotherapy over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite improvements in the treatment of primary uveal melanoma (UM), patients with metastatic disease continue to exhibit poor survival. Methods: A retrospective review of metastatic UM patients at Yale (initial cohort) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (validation cohort) was conducted. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine baseline factors that are associated with overall survival, including sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, laboratory measurements, metastasis location, and use of anti‐CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD‐1 therapies. Differences in overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: A total of 89 patients with metastatic UM were identified; 71 and 18, in the initial and validation cohorts, respectively. In the initial cohort, median follow‐up was 19.8 months (range, 2–127 months) and median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI, 16.6–31.3). Female sex, anti–CTLA‐4, and anti–PD‐1 therapy were associated with better survival outcomes with adjusted death hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20–0.78), 0.44 (0.20–0.97), and 0.42 (0.22–0.84), respectively, whereas development of hepatic metastases and ECOG score ≥1 (per 1 U/L) were associated with worse survival outcomes with HRs of 2.86 (1.28–7.13) and 2.84 (1.29–6.09), respectively. In both the initial and validation cohorts, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with improved overall survival after adjusting for sex and ECOG score, with death HRs of 0.22 (0.08–0.56) and 0.04 (0.002–0.26), respectively. Conclusions: Development of extrahepatic‐only metastases, ECOG of 0, immune checkpoint therapy, and female sex were each associated with more than 2‐fold reductions in risk of death. Plain Language Summary: Metastatic uveal melanoma patients face limited treatment options and poor survival rates. Results from this retrospective analysis indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti–CTLA‐4 and anti–PD‐1 therapies, were associated with improved survival outcomes. Factors such as extrahepatic‐only metastases, better baseline performance status, and female sex contributed to a more than 2‐fold reduction in death risk. These findings highlight the potential of immunotherapy in treating metastatic uveal melanoma. Despite advancements in treatment, metastatic uveal melanoma outcomes remain poor. Female sex, higher baseline performance status, extrahepatic‐only metastases, and immune checkpoint therapy are associated with improved survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]