Search

Objective: To compare the three-dimensional echocardiographic analysisof left ventricular (LV) synchrony to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) as measuredby two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography(ECHO). Methods: This is a prospective study of 71 patients (41 males,aged 49 ± 11 years), 40 of whom with normal cardiac anatomy (ECHO) andelectrocardiography (ECG) (Group N), and 31 with dilated cardiomyopathy(Group DCM). LVEF, volumes and 16-segment dyssynchrony index % (DI)were measured using 3D-ECHO. LVEF (Simpson’s rule) and volumes weremeasured using 2D-ECHO. Data were compared using Pearson correlationcoefficient (r), 95% CI, linear regression equation and Bland-Altman analysis,p < 0.05. Results: DI% ranged from 0.32 to 21.7% (5.94 ± 6.46), 3D LVEFfrom 0.16 to 0.73 (0.51 ± 0.15); and 2D LVEF from 0.2 to 0.7 (0.47 ± 0.17).The correlation coefficient (r) for DI and 3D LVEF was (r): -0.8203, p

A case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a 49-year-oldwoman is presented. She did not present the classical cardiovascular riskfactors. Etiology and treatment are discussed. She underwent primarypercutaneous coronary intervention of the left anterior descendingartery with no stenting and had complete angiographic resolution.

Background: Physical therapy remains a ubiquitous treatment modality for the management of frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) despite limited high-level evidence supporting its use. Leveraging patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and healthcare costs, this study compared patient outcomes and value achieved through watchful waiting (WW) vs. physical therapy (PT) for conservative management of frozen shoulder., Methods: Patients in this prospective, parallel randomized controlled trial who were diagnosed with frozen shoulder were randomized 1:1 to WW or PT. All patients were offered therapeutic, intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs). The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score. Secondary outcomes included patient value (ie, 12-month American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score divided by healthcare costs), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale pain. Due to the confidentiality of internal hospital data, all economic outcomes were divided by an undisclosed constant to set the normalized study mean for direct costs to 1000; similarly, patient value was normalized to set the study mean to 100. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months using mixed-effects models, with sensitivity analyses adjusting for nonlinear improvement trajectories and CSIs., Results: Between November 2014 and November 2022, 175 patients were screened, 61 of whom (34.9%) were randomized to WW (31 patients) or PT (30 patients). Forty-seven patients (96%) received at least one CSI, with no significant difference in CSI administration between cohorts (P = .29). Relative to baseline scores, patients from both cohorts improved significantly at each time point for all PROMs (P < .05 for all), with no significant differences in PROMs between groups at any time point (P > .05 for all). However, compared to those assigned WW, patients randomized to PT incurred 10.0× higher costs (normalized mean difference: 1636; 95% CI: 967, 2304; P < .001) and achieved only 16.9% of the patient value (normalized mean difference: -147.0; 95% CI: -207.5, -86.5; P < .001). These results held across all sensitivity analyses., Conclusion: Relative to WW, patients randomized to PT reported similar PROMs but incurred significantly higher direct costs (10.0×) and imposed a greater economic burden on the healthcare system (3.4-6.0×). Accordingly, WW resulted in significantly higher (5.9×) patient value than PT. Although additional high-level, multicenter studies are needed to corroborate these findings, the present study may support physicians and patients in pursuing the most appropriate treatment plan for each patient based on their individualized needs and preferences., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The indications for hip arthroscopy in patients aged ≥40 years remain controversial, as observational studies have suggested that advanced age portends poor functional outcomes, poor durability of improvement, and high rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty., Purpose: To compare hip arthroscopy versus nonoperative management for symptomatic labral tears in patients aged ≥40 years with limited radiographic osteoarthritis., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: This single-surgeon, parallel randomized controlled trial included patients aged ≥40 years with limited osteoarthritis (Tönnis grades 0-2) who were randomized 1:1 to arthroscopic surgery with postoperative physical therapy (SPT) or physical therapy alone (PTA). Patients who received PTA and achieved unsatisfactory improvement were permitted to cross over to SPT after completing ≥14 weeks of physical therapy (CO). The primary outcomes were the International Hip Outcome Tool-33 score and modified Harris Hip Score at 24 months after surgery, and secondary outcomes included other patient-reported outcome measures and the visual analog scale for pain. The primary analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis using linear mixed-effects models. Sensitivity analyses included modified as-treated and treatment-failure analyses., Results: A total of 97 patients were included, with 52 (53.6%) patients in the SPT group and 45 (46.4%) patients in the PTA group. Of the patients who underwent PTA, 32 (71.1%) patients crossed over to arthroscopy at a mean of 5.10 months (SD, 3.3 months) after physical therapy initiation. In both intention-to-treat and modified as-treated analyses, the SPT group displayed superior mean patient-reported outcome measure and pain scores across the study period for nearly all metrics relative to the PTA group. In the treatment-failure analysis, the SPT and CO groups showed greater improvement across all metrics compared with PTA; however, post hoc analyses revealed no significant differences in improvement between the SPT and CO groups. No significant differences were observed between groups in rates of total hip arthroplasty conversion., Conclusion: In patients ≥40 years of age with limited osteoarthritis, hip arthroscopy with postoperative physical therapy led to better outcomes than PTA at a 24-month follow-up. However, additional preoperative physical therapy did not compromise surgical outcomes and allowed some patients to avoid surgery. When surgery is indicated, age ≥40 years should not be considered an independent contraindication to arthroscopic acetabular labral repair., Registration: NCT03909178 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)., Competing Interests: Presented at the annual meeting of the AOSSM, Denver, Colorado, July 2024.One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: The Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation provided research support. S.D.M. has received education payments from Kairos Surgical and honoraria from Allergan. N.J.Q. has received fees from Stryker and Medical Device Business Services, grants from Arthrex, and hospitality payments from Encore Medical. K.A. has received hospitality payments from Stryker Corp. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Background: Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and symptomatic labral tears confers short- to midterm benefits, yet further long-term evidence is needed. Moreover, despite the physiological and biomechanical significance of the chondrolabral junction (CLJ), the clinical implications of damage to this transition zone remain understudied., Purpose: To (1) report minimum 8-year survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures after hip arthroscopy for FAI and (2) characterize associations between outcomes and patient characteristics (age, body mass index, sex), pathological parameters (Tönnis angle, alpha angle, type of FAI, CLJ breakdown), and procedures performed (labral management, FAI treatment, microfracture)., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2013. All patients were ≥18 years of age with minimum 8-year follow-up and available preoperative radiographs. The primary outcome was conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and secondary outcomes included revision arthroscopy, patient-reported outcome measures, and patient satisfaction. CLJ breakdown was assessed using the Beck classification. Kaplan-Meier estimates and weighted Cox regression were used to estimate 10-year survivorship (no conversion to THA) and identify risk factors associated with THA conversion., Results: In this study of 174 hips (50.6% female; mean age, 37.8 ± 11.2 years) with mean follow-up of 11.1 ± 2.5 years, the 10-year survivorship rate was 81.6% (95% CI, 75.9%-87.7%). Conversion to THA occurred at a mean 4.7 ± 3.8 years postoperatively. Unadjusted analyses revealed several variables significantly associated with THA conversion, including older age; higher body mass index; higher Tönnis grade; labral debridement; and advanced breakdown of the CLJ, labrum, or articular cartilage. Survivorship at 10 years was inferior in patients exhibiting severe (43.6%; 95% CI, 31.9%-59.7%) versus mild (97.9%; 95% CI, 95.1%-100%) breakdown of the CLJ ( P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified worsening CLJ breakdown (weighted hazard ratio per 1-unit increase, 6.41; 95% CI, 3.11-13.24), older age (1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14), and higher Tönnis grade (4.59; 95% CI, 2.13-9.90) as independent negative prognosticators ( P < .001 for all)., Conclusion: Although most patients achieved favorable minimum 8-year outcomes, several pre- and intraoperative factors were associated with THA conversion; of these, worse CLJ breakdown, higher Tönnis grade, and older age were the strongest predictors., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study was supported by the Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation. C.W. has received support for education from Smith & Nephew and hospitality payments from Exactech. S.D.M. has received support for education from Kairos Surgical and a gift from Allergan. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Background: Patients with partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) often present with concurrent pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). To address both conditions simultaneously, long head of the biceps (LHB) tenotomy or tenodesis can be performed at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). This study aims to compare postoperative shoulder active range of motion (AROM) and complications following transtendinous RCR with concurrent LHB tenodesis or tenotomy., Methods: A total of 90 patients with PTRCTs met inclusion criteria for this study. Patients who underwent tear-completion-and-repair, revision surgery, or open repair of the LHB tendon were excluded. Patients were stratified into tenotomy, arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis, or no biceps operation cohorts and were propensity matched 1:1:1 on age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status. Primary outcome measures included AROM in forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The development of severe stiffness and rates of rotator cuff retear at final follow-up were recorded as secondary outcomes., Results: When comparing the tenotomy and tenodesis cohorts, tenotomy patients were found to have increased AROM at 3 months in forward flexion (153.2° vs. 130.1°, P  = .004), abduction (138.6° vs. 114.2°, P  = .019), and external rotation (60.4° vs. 43.8°, P  = .014), with differences in forward flexion remaining significant at 6 months (162.4° vs. 149.4°, P  = .009). There were no significant differences in interval rates of recovery in any plane between cohorts. Additionally, there were no significant differences in rates of symptomatic retears between groups ( P  = .458). Rates of severe postoperative stiffness approached but did not achieve statistical significance between tenotomy (4.2%) and tenodesis (29.2%) cohorts ( P  = .066). Smoking status was a significant predictor of severe stiffness (odds ratio, 13.69; P  = .010)., Conclusion: Despite significant differences in absolute AROM between cohorts, the decision to perform tenotomy or tenodesis was not found to differentially affect rates of AROM recovery for patients undergoing arthroscopic transtendinous RCR for PTRCT. Notably, however, transient stiffness complications were more commonly observed in smokers, and data trends suggested an increased risk of stiffness for patients undergoing LHB tenodesis. Overall, postoperative stiffness is likely multifactorial and attributable to both patient- and procedure-specific factors, and LHB tenotomy may be more appropriate for patients with risk factors for developing stiffness postoperatively., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Custom total joint replacement (TJA) implants, specifically designed and manufactured for each patient, have emerged as surgeons seek to improve functional outcomes of primary total joint replacement, as well as treat patients with complex primary deformities, bone defects, and revision surgeries. The purpose of this review is to present the various custom total hip and knee arthroplasty implants available in the United States for primary and revision cases, so that surgeons can understand the design considerations and manufacturing processes of custom implants, as well as their performance compared to standard implants., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: R. Schwarzkopf receives royalties from Smith & Nephew; is a paid consultant for Smith & Nephew, Intelijoint, and Zimmer-Biomet; has stock or stock options in Intelijoint and PSI; receives research support from Smith & Nephew and Intelijoint; is in the editorial/governing board of The Journal of Arthroplasty and Arthroplasty Today; and is a board member in American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. D. H. Wiznia is a paid consultant for Globus. The remaining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (© 2024 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of arthroscopic labral repair with capsular augmentation on blood flow in vivo with use of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) to measure microvascular perfusion of the labrum and autograft tissue., Methods: The present prospective case series included patients ≥18 years old who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair with capsular augmentation; all procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 2018 and 2022. The LDF probe measured microvascular blood flow flux within 1 mm 3 of the surrounding labral and capsular tissue of interest. Mean baseline measurements of flux were compared with readings immediately following capsular elevation and after completing labral augmentation. Blood flux changes were expressed as the percent change from the baseline measurements., Results: The present study included 41 patients (24 men [58.5%] and 17 women [41.5%]) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 31.3 ± 8.4 years, a mean BMI of 24.6 ± 3.4 kg/m 2 , a mean lateral center-edge of angle 35.3° ± 4.9°, a mean Tönnis angle of 5.8° ± 5.8°, and a mean arterial pressure of 93.7 ± 10.9 mm Hg. Following capsular elevation, the mean percent change in capsular blood flow flux was significantly different from baseline (-9.24% [95% confidence interval (CI), -18.1% to -0.04%]; p < 0.001). Following labral augmentation, the mean percent change in labral blood flow flux was significantly different from baseline both medially (-22.3% [95% CI, -32.7% to -11.9%]; p < 0.001) and laterally (-32.5% [95% CI, -41.5% to -23.6%]; p = 0.041). There was no significant difference between the changes in medial and lateral perfusion following repair (p = 0.136)., Conclusions: Labral repair with capsular augmentation sustains a reduced blood flow to the native labrum and capsular tissue at the time of fixation. The biological importance of this reduction is unknown, but these findings may serve as a benchmark for other labral preservation techniques and support future correlations with clinical outcomes., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A556)., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: The most common surgical approaches in hip arthroscopy are interportal and T-capsulotomy. However, these methods may introduce capsular instability. Puncture capsulotomy preserves capsuloligamentous integrity by avoiding iatrogenic transection of the iliofemoral capsular ligament., Purpose: To present minimum 2-year functional outcomes for patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for acetabular labral tears and concomitant femoroacetabular impingement using the puncture capsulotomy technique., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral tear treatment between December 2013 and May 2019. Included were patients aged ≥18 years who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon and completed a minimum of 2 years of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) surveys. Intraoperatively, patients underwent hip arthroscopy via puncture capsulotomy to treat labral tears and any concomitant femoroacetabular impingement. Clinical outcome data consisted of PROMs., Results: A total of 163 hips were included; the mean patient follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 24-60 months; 95% CI, 28.5-32.3 months). Patients had a mean age of 37.9 years (range, 36.1-39.6 years), with a mean body mass index of 25.9 (range, 25.2-26.5). There were significant improvements in mean [95% CI] baseline to final follow-up scores for the 33-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (39.6 [36.8-42.4] vs 76.1 [72.7-79.6]), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (70.0 [67.0-73.0] vs 89.3 [87.3-91.3]), modified Harris Hip Score (60.1 [57.9-62.4] vs 84.9 [82.5-87.2]), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (41.8 [37.9-45.6] vs 75.7 [71.7-79.7]) ( P < .001 for all). Additionally, the mean [95% CI] visual analog scale pain scores were noted to significantly improve throughout the duration of the postoperative period (from 6.3 [5.9-6.7] to 2.2 [1.8-2.6]; P < .001). There were no incidences of infection, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, dislocation/instability, or femoral neck fracture. At the 2-year follow-up, 81.0%, 62.0%, and 58.9% of hips achieved previously published clinically meaningful iHOT-33 thresholds for minimally clinically important difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom Score, and substantial clinical benefit, respectively., Conclusion: Puncture capsulotomy demonstrated significantly improved functional and clinically meaningful outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up, along with a minimal complication rate., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Support was received from the Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation (to S.D.M.). W.K.C. has received education payments from Liberty Surgical. S.D.M. has received education payments from Kairos Surgical and honoraria from Allergan. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Objective: To analyze shoulder strength and function in patients presenting with possible supraspinatus pathology and to ascertain if these clinical findings are associated with severity of supraspinatus pathology on MRI., Materials and Methods: In total, 171 patients with presumptive rotator cuff pathology and with preserved strength on standard rotator cuff examination were prospectively recruited. Patients were subjected to bilateral shoulder strength testing employing dynamometry; this included isometric strength testing at 90° of abduction, followed by eccentric assessment of isotonic strength from full abduction through the full range of motion until the arm rested at the patient's side. We calculated absolute strength and symptomatic-to-asymptomatic arm (S/A) strength ratios. On subsequent shoulder MRI, supraspinatus pathology was designated into one of seven categories. The association between strength measurements and MRI findings was analyzed., Results: Increasing lesion severity on MRI was associated with both decreasing absolute strength (no tear [59.9 N] to full-thickness tear [44.2 N]; P = 0.036) and decreasing S/A strength ratios during isotonic testing (no tear [91.9%] to full-thickness tear [65.3%]; P = 0.022). In contrast, there were no significant relationships between imaging severity and absolute strength or S/A strength ratios on isometric testing., Conclusion: Severity of supraspinatus pathology on MRI was associated with dynamic clinical function. These results validate the clinical correlation between MRI designations of supraspinatus pathology and function and suggest the need for future work to investigate utility of dynamic (versus isometric) rotator cuff physical examination maneuvers., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).)

Background: Arthroscopic treatment for labral tears includes debridement and repair. Long-term studies have failed to demonstrate a difference between these treatments in terms of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA)., Purpose: To investigate 2 different labral treatments, debridement and repair, using an adjusted analysis to evaluate long-term conversion to THA., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon between April 2007 and October 2014. Postoperative follow-up information included conversion to THA, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures (modified Harris Hip Score; Hip Outcome Score, Activities of Daily Living and Sports Specific subscales; International Hip Outcome Tool; Nonarthritic Hip Score; and Lower Extremity Functional Scale)., Results: Of the 204 hips included in the study, 99 (48.5%) underwent labral repair, and 105 (51.5%) underwent debridement. In total, 28 (13.7%) of the 204 patients underwent conversion to THA within 10 years after hip arthroscopy (labral repair: 5 [5.0%] vs labral debridement: 23 [21.9%]). Labral repair was associated with a significantly lower risk of conversion to THA compared with debridement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.74; P = .014). Additional factors associated with risk of conversion to THA included older age at the time of arthroscopy (HR = 1.06 per year; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .002) and Tönnis grade (HR = 2.39; CI, 1.14-5.41; P = .026). Abrasion chondroplasty, acetabuloplasty, body mass index, Outerbridge grade, and radiographic femoroacetabular impingement were not found to be significantly associated with risk of THA. No significant difference in patient satisfaction was found between treatment groups, and for patients who did not convert to THA, there was no difference in mean patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up., Conclusion: Patients who underwent labral repair were less likely to convert to THA compared with patients who underwent labral debridement, despite adjustment for differences in baseline patient characteristics and preexisting pathology. Additional factors associated with a lower rate of hip survival were older age and osteoarthritis at the time of hip arthroscopy., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Support was received from the Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Background: Although intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are a cornerstone in the nonoperative management of hip pathology, recent reports have raised concerns that they may cause osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, these studies might have been limited by nonrepresentative patient samples. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of ONFH after CSI and compare it with the incidence in a similar patient population that received a non-CSI injection., Methods: This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study of patients in the MarketScan database who underwent an intra-articular hip injection from 2007 to 2017. Patients receiving hip CSIs were matched 4:1 with patients receiving hip hyaluronic acid injections (HAIs) based on age, sex, geographic region, comorbidities, type of hip pathology, injection year, and baseline and follow-up time using propensity scores. The patients' first injections were identified, and the time to development of ONFH was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards models. Patients with a history of osteonecrosis or those who received both types of injections were excluded., Results: A total of 3,710 patients undergoing intra-articular hip injection were included (2,968 CSIs and 742 HAIs; mean [standard deviation] age, 53.1 [9.2] years; 55.4% men). All baseline factors were successfully matched between the groups (all p > 0.57). The estimated cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of ONFH for CSI and HAI patients was 2.4% (1.8% to 3.1%) versus 2.1% (1.1% to 3.5%) at 1 year and 2.9% (2.2% to 3.7%) versus 3.0% (1.7% to 4.8%) at 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.84; p = 0.88). The results held across a range of sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: The incidence of ONFH after intra-articular hip injection was similar between patients who received CSIs and those who received HAIs. Although this study could not determine whether intra-articular injections themselves (regardless of the drug that was used) lead to ONFH, the results suggest that ONFH after CSI often may be due, in part, to the natural course of the underlying disease. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively answer this question; in the interim, clinicians may be reassured that they may continue judicious use of CSIs as clinically indicated., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G966)., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears that remain symptomatic despite conservative management can be repaired operatively through a transtendinous approach. Although transtendinous repairs have been linked to superior long-term biomechanical outcomes compared with other surgical techniques, they are classically associated with early postoperative stiffness and a slower rate of recovery., Purpose: To examine the impact of expediting the physical therapy (PT) regimen after transtendinous repair on postoperative range of motion and complications., Methods: The first 61 patients to receive accelerated PT after transtendinous repair were compared with a historical cohort of 61 patients who underwent standard postoperative management. The patients were propensity matched on age, sex, smoking status, and biceps procedure performed at the time of rotator cuff repair. Primary outcome measures included active range of motion (AROM) in forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included development of severe stiffness or symptomatic rotator cuff retear at 1-year follow-up. Patients with full-thickness tears and those undergoing revision surgery or tear-completion and repair were excluded., Results: The accelerated PT cohort showed significantly increased AROM at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. At 6 weeks, AROM in forward flexion (137.0° vs. 114.9°; P < .001), abduction (126.1° vs. 105.3°; P = .009), and external rotation (51.7° vs. 36.5°; P = .005) were all significantly higher in the accelerated PT cohort. A similar increase was seen at 3 months, with superior forward flexion (147.5° vs. 134.0°; P = .01) and external rotation (57.7° vs. 44.0°; P = .008) in patients who received accelerated PT. Severe postoperative stiffness was significantly less common in the accelerated PT cohort (3.3% vs. 18.0%; P = .02), and there were no symptomatic retears (0.00%) in the accelerated PT cohort as compared with 1 symptomatic retear (1.64%) in the standard PT cohort (P = 1.00)., Conclusion: Accelerated PT after transtendinous rotator cuff repair is associated with significant improvement in AROM at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Further, the early motion may help obviate the development of severe postoperative stiffness without any evidence of higher rotator cuff retear rates., Level of Evidence: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

3D printing is revolutionizing the medical device landscape through its ability to rapidly create patient-specific anatomic models, surgical instruments, and implants. Recent advances in 3D printing technology have allowed for the creation of point-of-care (PoC) 3D printing centers. These PoC centers blur the line between healthcare provider, medical center, and device manufacturer, creating regulatory ambiguity. The United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) currently regulates 3D printed devices through existing medical device regulations. However, the FDA is increasingly interested in developing guidelines and regulations specifically for PoC 3D printing due to its rapid adoption across the healthcare institutions. In this article, we review the regulatory framework that governs medical devices, discuss how PoC 3D printing falls within this framework, and describe a novel conceptual framework that the FDA has proposed. Finally, through analysis of the aforementioned regulations and discussions with industry medical 3D printing regulatory experts, we provide recommendations for PoC medical 3D printing best practices so that institutions are best positioned to utilize this revolutionary technology safely and effectively., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is a debilitating condition associated with inferior outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. To provide symptom relief and improve outcomes in these patients, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has been applied as an adjuvant therapy with the hope of halting progression of cartilage damage. The current study examined the clinical efficacy of BMAC application in patients undergoing arthroscopic acetabular labral repair by comparing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between groups with and without BMAC application., Methods: Patients who received BMAC during arthroscopic acetabular labral repair from December 2016 to June 2019 were compared with a control cohort that underwent the same procedure but did not receive BMAC from November 2013 to November 2016. Patients in both cohorts were asked to prospectively complete PROMs prior to surgery and at 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up intervals; those who completed the PROMs at enrollment and the 12-month follow-up were included in the study. An a priori subgroup analysis was performed among patients with moderate cartilage damage (Outerbridge grade 2 or 3). The analyses were adjusted for any differences in baseline factors between groups., Results: Sixty-two patients with BMAC application were compared with 62 control patients without BMAC application. When compared with the no-BMAC cohort, the BMAC cohort did not report significantly different mean International Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores at any postoperative time point. However, when patients with moderate cartilage damage were compared across groups, the BMAC cohort reported significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) scores than the no-BMAC cohort at the 12-month (78.6 [72.4 to 84.8] versus 69.2 [63.3 to 75.2]; p = 0.035) and 24-month (82.5 [73.4 to 91.6] versus 69.5 [62.1 to 76.8]; p = 0.030) follow-up. Similarly, these patients reported greater score improvements at 12 months (37.3 [30.3 to 44.3] versus 25.4 [18.7 to 32.0]; p = 0.017) and 24 months (39.6 [30.4 to 48.7] versus 26.4 [19.1 to 33.8]; p = 0.029)., Conclusions: Patients with moderate cartilage injury undergoing arthroscopic acetabular labral repair with BMAC application reported significantly greater functional improvements when compared with similar patients without BMAC application., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G751)., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with full-thickness chondral flaps undergoing hip arthroscopy is controversial., Purpose: To compare functional outcomes of patients who underwent bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) application with those of patients who underwent microfracture., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This was a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair by 1 surgeon between June 2014 and April 2020. The inclusion criteria for this study were age ≥18 years, preoperative radiographs of the pelvis, arthroscopic acetabular labral repair, exposed subchondral bone with overlying chondral flap seen at the time of hip arthroscopy, microfracture or BMAC to address this lesion, and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (International Hip Outcome Tool-33 [iHOT-33], Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living [HOS-ADL], Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale [HOS-Sport], modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain) at enrollment and 12-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using PROM scores., Results: A total of 81 hips with full-thickness chondral flaps were included in this study: 50 treated with BMAC and 31 treated with microfracture. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, body mass index, tear size, radiographic osteoarthritis, or radiographic femoroacetabular impingement. In the BMAC cohort, all PROM scores improved significantly from preoperatively to follow-up: 41.7 to 75.6 for iHOT-33, 67.6 to 91.0 for HOS-ADL, 41.5 to 72.3 for HOS-Sport, 59.4 to 87.2 for mHHS, and 6.2 to 2.2 for VAS pain ( P < .001 for all). In the microfracture cohort, the score improvements were 48.0 to 65.1 for iHOT-33 ( P = .001), 80.5 to 83.3 for HOS-ADL ( P = .275), 59.2 to 62.4 for HOS-Sport ( P = .568), 70.4 to 78.3 for mHHS ( P = .028), and 4.9 to 3.6 for VAS pain ( P = .036). Regarding clinically meaningful outcomes, 77.6% of the BMAC group and 50.0% of the microfracture group met the minimal clinically important difference for iHOT-33 at the 12-month follow-up ( P = .013)., Conclusion: Patients with full-thickness chondral flaps at the time of hip arthroscopy experienced greater improvements in functional outcome scores at the 12-month follow-up when treated with BMAC as opposed to microfracture., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding was received from the Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation for BMAC harvesting and application (S.D.M). S.D.M. has received education payments from Kairos Surgical and honoraria from Allergan. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background: Recent studies have suggested there is an increased risk of avascular necrosis (AVN), subchondral insufficiency fracture (SIF), femoral head collapse, and osteoarthritis (OA) progression in the 12-month period after hip corticosteroid/anesthetic injection (CSI); however, these studies have failed to account for preinjection OA severity or preexisting AVN/SIF., Purpose: To compare these complication rates in patients treated with versus without hip CSI, while minimizing the aforementioned forms of selection bias present in previous investigations., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: For all patients who had undergone a single hip CSI and hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the preceding 12 months at a single institution (CSI cohort), 2 musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively graded OA severity (modified Kellgren-Lawrence classification) and femoral head collapse on hip radiographs taken within 12 months before, and 1 to 12 months after, CSI. Using identical methodology, radiographs from a control cohort (composed of hips that had never undergone CSI and had undergone hip MRI with hip radiographs taken within 12 months before, and 1-12 months after, MRI) were also graded. The cohorts were matched for age, sex, body mass index, and OA severity. Readers were blinded to cohort and time point. OA progression was defined as an increase in modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥1 between radiographs., Results: Included were 141 matched pairs. After exclusion of 48 matched pairs with at least 1 incidence of preexisting AVN or SIF on index MRI, CSI (n = 93; mean time between CSI and final hip radiograph, 5.43 months) and control (n = 93; mean time between MRI and final hip radiograph, 4.87 months), groups did not significantly differ in rates of OA progression (3.2% vs 3.2%) or new femoral head collapse (3.2% vs 2.2%)., Conclusion: In contrast to the findings of recent retrospective investigations, we did not find that patients treated with hip CSI had significantly higher rates of short-term OA progression or femoral head articular surface collapse after controlling for baseline OA severity and preexisting AVN or SIF. Future randomized trials investigating safety of hip CSI are needed to determine its exact short-term risk profile., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study was supported by the Conine Family Fund for Joint Preservation. K.M.S. has received research support from Pfizer. N.H. has received research support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. S.D.M. has received education payments from Kairos Surgical and honoraria from Allergan. The AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). The AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background: There is a paucity of literature on arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction., Purpose: To report midterm functional outcomes for patients undergoing acetabular labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: This is a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair by the senior surgeon between March 2013 and August 2018. The inclusion criteria for this study were adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for arthroscopic capsular autograft labral reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were <2 years of postoperative follow-up, elective disenrollment from study before 2-year follow-up, or repeat ipsilateral hip surgery before 2-year follow-up. Intraoperatively, patients underwent capsular autograft hip labral reconstruction if they were found to have a labrum with hypoplastic tissue (width <5 mm), complex tearing, or frank degeneration of native tissue. Clinical outcome data consisted of patient-reported outcome measures., Results: A total of 97 hips (94 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean final follow-up of 28.2 months (95% CI, 26.0-30.4). Patients had a mean age of 39.0 years (95% CI, 36.8-41.2) with a mean body mass index of 25.8 (95% CI, 24.9-26.7). When compared with baseline (40.4 [95% CI, 36.7-44.2]), the mean international Hip-Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33) scores were significantly greater at 3-month (60.9 [95% CI, 56.8-64.9]; P < .001), 6-month (68.8 [95% CI, 64.7-72.9]; P < .001), 12-month (73.2 [95% CI, 68.9-77.5]; P < .001), and final (76.6 [95% CI, 72.4-80.8]; P < .001) follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, 76.3%, 65.5%, and 60.8% of patients' iHOT-33 scores exceeded clinically meaningful outcome thresholds for minimally clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptomatic state, and substantial clinical benefit, respectively., Conclusions: In this study of 97 hips undergoing arthroscopic labral repair with capsular autograft labral reconstruction, we found favorable outcomes that exceeded the MCID thresholds in the majority of patients at a mean 28.2 months' follow-up. Future studies should compare outcomes between this technique and other methods of autograft and allograft reconstruction to determine differences in patient-reported outcomes, donor-site morbidity, and complications.

Background: Although intra-articular injections are important in the management of patients who may later undergo hip arthroscopy, conflicting data are available regarding the safety of such injections when administered within 3 months of surgery. Furthermore, despite the increasing use of image-guided intra-articular hip injections, it is unknown whether the type of imaging modality used is associated with infection after hip arthroscopy., Purpose: To assess the risk of infection associated with image-guided intra-articular injections before hip arthroscopy and, secondarily, compare that risk between ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopic (FL) guidance., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in a large national insurance database who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2007 and 2017. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment from at least 1 year before to 6 months after hip arthroscopy. Patient age, sex, geographic region, medical history, surgical details, and hip injections were collected. Patients who underwent injection ≤3 months preoperatively and >3 to ≤12 months preoperatively were compared with patients who did not undergo preoperative injection. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between ipsilateral preoperative hip injection and surgical site infection within 6 months of surgery., Results: We identified 17,987 patients (36.3% female; mean ± SD age, 37.6 ± 14.0 years) undergoing hip arthroscopy, 2276 (12.7%) of whom had an image-guided hip injection in the year preceding surgery (53.0% FL). Patients who underwent intra-articular injection ≤3 months preoperatively had similar infection rates to patients who did not undergo preoperative injection in the year before surgery for both the FL (0.46% vs 0.46%; P ≥ .995) and the US cohorts (0.50% vs 0.46%; P = .76). Results persisted in adjusted analysis (FL ≤3 months: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.32-3.37; P = .94; US ≤3 months: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.36-3.90; P = .78). Similar results were seen for patients undergoing injections >3 to ≤12 months preoperatively., Conclusion: Postoperative infection was rare in patients undergoing intra-articular hip injection ≤3 months before hip arthroscopy and was no more common than in patients not undergoing preoperative injection. Moreover, no differences were seen in infection risk between US and FL guidance. Although intra-articular hip injections should always be administered with careful consideration, these results do not suggest that these injections are uniformly contraindicated in the 3 months preceding hip arthroscopy.

Background: Previous observational studies have suggested poor results of arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of acetabular labral tears in patients older than 40 years., Purpose: To compare hip arthroscopy versus nonoperative management for symptomatic labral tears in patients older than 40 years who have limited radiographic osteoarthritis., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1., Methods: In this single-surgeon, parallel randomized controlled trial, patients older than 40 years who had symptomatic, MRI-confirmed labral tears and limited radiographic osteoarthritis (Tönnis grades 0-2) were randomized 1:1 to arthroscopic surgery with postoperative physical therapy (SPT) or physical therapy alone (PTA) using an electronic randomization program. PTA patients who achieved unsatisfactory improvement were permitted to cross over to SPT after completing ≥14 weeks of physical therapy. The primary outcomes were International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 12 months after randomization, and secondary outcomes included other patient-reported outcome measures and the visual analog scale. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. Primary analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis using linear mixed-effect models. Sensitivity analyses included modified as-treated analysis and treatment-failure analysis. Due to infeasibility, patients and health care providers were both unblinded., Results: The study enrolled 90 patients (46 [51.1%] SPT; 44 [48.9%] PTA); of these, 81 patients (42 [51.9%] SPT; 39 (48.1%) PTA) completed 12-month follow-up. A total of 28 of the 44 PTA patients crossed over to SPT within the study period (63.6% crossover). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significantly greater iHOT-33 scores (+12.11; P = .007) and mHHS scores (+6.99 points; P = .04) in the SPT group than the PTA group at 12 months. Modified as-treated analysis revealed that these differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 10.0 points (SPT-PTA iHOT-33, +11.95) and 8.0 points (SPT-PTA mHHS, +9.76), respectively., Conclusion: In patients older than 40 years with limited osteoarthritis, arthroscopic acetabular labral repair with postoperative physical therapy led to better outcomes than physical therapy alone. Thus, age over 40 years should not be considered a contraindication to arthroscopic acetabular labral repair., Registration: NCT03909178 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Case: A 27-year-old man with coxa profunda and a right acetabular labral tear presented for surgical re-evaluation after a postless arthroscopic labral repair was attempted at an outside institution and aborted because of inadequate distraction during portal placement. Arthroscopic labral repair with a perineal post was subsequently performed without complications., Conclusion: Indications and limitations of postless hip distraction are seldom discussed in the literature. This report examines possible limitations of postless hip distraction for a patient with coxa profunda. Careful radiographic evaluation of hip anatomy may be essential for patients with deep hip sockets to determine the best-suited distraction technique., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/B373)., (Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Traditional shoulder physical examination (PE) tests have suboptimal sensitivity for detection of supraspinatus full-thickness tears (FTTs). Therefore, clinicians may continue to suspect FTTs in some patients with negative rotator cuff PE tests and turn to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for definitive diagnosis. Consequently, there is a need for a secondary screening test that can accurately rule out FTTs in these patients to better inform clinicians which patients should undergo MRI. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of 2 new dynamic PE tests to detect supraspinatus pathology in patients for whom traditional static PE tests failed to detect pathology., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 171 patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology with negative findings on traditional rotator cuff PE, who underwent 2 new dynamic PE tests: first, measurement of angle at which the patient first reports pain on unopposed active abduction and, second, the dynamic isotonic manipulation examination (DIME). Patients then underwent shoulder magnetic resonance arthrogram. Data from the new PE maneuvers were compared with outcomes collected from magnetic resonance arthrogram reports., Results: Pain during DIME testing had a sensitivity of 96.3% and 92.6% and a negative predictive value of 96.2% and 94.9% in the coronal and scapular planes, respectively. DIME strength ≤86.0 N had a sensitivity of 100% and 96.3% and a negative predictive value of 100% and 95.7% in the coronal and scapular planes, respectively. Pain at ≤90° on unopposed active abduction in the coronal plane had a specificity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 100% for supraspinatus pathology of any kind (ie, tendinopathy, "fraying," or tearing)., Conclusion: DIME is highly sensitive for supraspinatus FTTs in patients with negative traditional rotator cuff PE tests for whom there is still high clinical suspicion of FTTs. Thus, this test is an excellent secondary screening tool for supraspinatus FTTs in patients for whom clinicians suspect rotator cuff pathology despite negative traditional static PE tests. Given its high sensitivity, a negative DIME test rules out supraspinatus FTT well in these patients, and can therefore better inform clinicians which patients should undergo MRI. In addition, the angle at which patients first report pain on unopposed active shoulder abduction is highly specific for supraspinatus pathology., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of endoscopic repair of full-thickness gluteus medius and minimus tendon tears with a minimum of 2-year follow-up and add to the paucity of literature on abductor tendon tears., Methods: All patients who underwent endoscopic abductor tendon repair between December 2013 and August 2017 were prospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria for this study were primary full-thickness gluteal tendon tears and at least 2-years of follow-up. Clinical outcome data consisted of visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, hip abduction strength, Trendelenburg sign, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, Non-arthritic Hip Scale, International Hip Outcome Tool-33, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale., Results: A total of 15 hips, all full-thickness tears, met inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 31.2 months, with no patients being excluded. On physical examination, there was a significant improvement in VAS pain score from 5.36 to 2.43 (P = .0243), hip abduction strength with 8 (53.3%) hips improving by at least 1 point (P = .02056), and resolution of Trendelenburg sign in all 15 hips at 2-years (P = .0019). The mean difference for all 6 PROMs was statistically significant, even after Bonferroni adjustment, with the majority of patient improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds: modified Harris Hip Score: 86.67%, Hip Outcome Score-ADL: 86.67%, Hip Outcome Score-SSS: 66.67%, Non-arthritic Hip Scale: 93.33%, and International Hip Outcome Tool-33: 80%. Greater Goutallier grade was associated with a greater VAS pain score. There were no complications, including no retears., Conclusions: In this study of 15 hips with full-thickness gluteal tendon tears managed endoscopically, we found excellent outcomes that exceeded the MCID thresholds in the majority of patients at an average of 31.2 months follow-up, while offering the potential advantages of less tissue violation, ambulatory day surgery, and fewer complications compared with open repair., Level of Evidence: Level 4, Case Series., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze mid-term outcomes after arthroscopic synovectomy of both diffuse and nodular hip pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS)., Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients that underwent hip arthroscopy for hip PVNS with a single senior surgeon between 2007 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were magnetic resonance imaging evidence, arthroscopic visualization, and/or histologic confirmation of PVNS; and a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Concomitant pathology such as femoroacetabular impingement also was treated at the time of surgery. Primary outcome measures were recurrence of hip PVNS and the rate of revision hip surgery. Secondary outcomes were complications, visual analog scale pain score, pain relief, and patient satisfaction, and 6 patient-reported outcome measures were collected at latest follow-up., Results: In a case series of 14 patients consisting of 6 (42.9%) male and 8 (57.1%) female patients, the mean operative age was 32.69 ± 12.73 years with a mean follow-up was 6.66 ± 1.87 years. PVNS type was determined intraoperatively: 5 (35.7%) patients had diffuse hip PVNS and 9 (64.3%) had nodular type. There was only 1 case (7.14%) of recurrence that was treated arthroscopically and no cases (0%) progressed to revision open synovectomy or arthroplasty. Mean patient-reported outcome measure scores were notable for a modified Harris Hip Score of 74.08 ± 16.84. The mean visual analog scale pain score decreased by 4.9 ± 1.7, which was significant with a P < .001, with a larger decrease in patients with localized type., Conclusions: This study presents a large case series of hip PVNS managed arthroscopically with mid-term follow-up of slightly over 6.5 years. The survival rate was 93%, with only 1 (7%) recurrence and 0 (0%) progression to revision open synovectomy or arthroplasty with 0 (0%) complications. We conclude that arthroscopic synovectomy is a reliable and effective treatment of hip PVNS., Level of Evidence: Case Series, Level IV., (Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although sickle cell disease has long been viewed as a contraindication to free flap transfer, little data exist evaluating complications of microsurgical procedures in the sickle cell trait patient. Reported is the case of a 55-year-old woman with sickle cell trait who underwent a deep inferior epigastric perforator microvascular free flap following mastectomy. The flap developed signs of venous congestion on postoperative day 2 but was found to have patent arterial and venous anastomoses on exploration in the operating room. On near-infrared indocyanine green angiography, poor vascular flow was noted despite patent anastomoses and strong cutaneous arterial Doppler signals. Intrinsic microvascular compromise or sickling remains a risk in the sickle cell trait population as it does for the sickle cell disease population. Just like in sickle cell disease patients, special care should be taken to optimise anticoagulation and minimise ischaemia-induced sickling for patients with sickle cell trait undergoing microsurgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: De novo or rare transmitted mutations in the SMAD6 gene affect 7 percent of midline nonsyndromic synostosis patients. This study aimed to determine the neurocognitive sequelae of SMAD6 synostosis., Methods: Nonsyndromic synostosis patients 6 years or older with SMAD6 mutations and non-SMAD6 nonsyndromic synostosis controls were recruited. All patients completed a double-blinded neurodevelopmental battery (i.e., Wechsler Fundamentals, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental test), and parents/guardians completed behavioral surveys (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and Behavior Rating System for Children)., Results: Twenty-eight patients participated: 10 known SMAD6 patients (average age, 10 years; 1 female; eight metopic and two sagittal; nine treated with cranial vault remodeling and one treated with strip craniectomy) and 18 non-SMAD6 controls (age, 9.5 years; three female; 12 metopic and six sagittal; 17 treated with cranial vault remodeling and one treated with strip craniectomy). There were no differences between any demographics. Testing age, surgical age, parental education, and household income correlated with cognition (p < 0.05). After controlling for these factors, SMAD6 patients performed worse on numerical operations (p = 0.046), performance intelligence quotient (p = 0.018), full-scale intelligence quotient (p = 0.010), and motor coordination (p = 0.043) compared to age/race/gender/synostosis/operation-matched controls. On behavioral surveys, SMAD6 patients scored worse on 14 assessments, including aggression, communication, and behavior., Conclusions: This prospective double-blinded study revealed that neuropsychiatric development of nonsyndromic synostosis may be under genetic control. SMAD6 mutations led to poorer mathematics, performance intelligence quotient, full-scale intelligence quotient, and motor coordination, even after controlling for exogenous factors. Genetic testing may be critical for advocating early adjunctive neurodevelopmental therapy., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II.

Purpose: Limited cross-institutional studies compare strip craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for craniosynostosis management. Given competing surgical preferences, the authors conducted a large-scale analysis of socioeconomic differences, costs, and complications between treatment options., Methods: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients receiving strip craniectomies or CVR were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database for years 2000 to 2009. Demographics, socioeconomic background, hospital characteristics, charge, and outcomes were tabulated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for comparison., Results: Two hundred fifty-one strip craniectomies and 1811 CVR patients were captured. Significantly more strip craniectomy patients were White while more CVR patients were Hispanic or Black (P < 0.0001). Strip craniectomy patients more often had private insurance and CVR patients had Medicaid (P < 0.0001). Over time, CVR trended toward treating a higher proportion of Hispanic and Medicaid patients (P = 0.036). Peri-operative charges associated with CVR were $27,962 more than strip craniectomies, and $11,001 after controlling for patient payer, income, bedsize, and length of stay (P < 0.0001). Strip craniectomies were performed more frequently in the West and Midwest, while CVR were more common in the South (P = 0.001). Length of stay was not significant. Postsurgical complications were largely equivocal; CVR was associated with increased accidental puncture (P = 0.025) and serum transfusion (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Our national longitudinal comparison demonstrates widening socioeconomic disparities between strip craniectomy and CVR patients. Cranial vault remodeling is more commonly performed in underrepresented minorities and patients with Medicaid, while strip craniectomy is common in the White population and patients with private insurance. While hospital charges and complications were higher among CVR, differences were smaller than expected.

Objective: The authors performed a review of double-blind, controlled studies of psychotropic drugs to evaluate the evidence base supporting their use in treatment of borderline personality disorder., Methods: English language literature cited in Medline and published between 1970 and 2006 was searched using the following terms: anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, benzodiazepines, borderline personality disorder, lithium, medication, mood stabilizers, pharmacotherapy, and psychotropics. Only reports of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials were included., Results: Twenty eight double-blind, randomized, controlled trials were identified which included anticonvulsants, classical neuroleptics, the benzodiazepine alprazolam, lithium, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, the novel antipsychotic olanzapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and omega-3 fatty acids. All but three were placebo-controlled. With the exception of alprazolam and tricyclics, the data from these trials revealed evidence of improvements, although often circumscribed and variable. The novel antipsychotic olanzapine appeared to have the most empirical support for having a favorable effect on borderline personality disorder., Conclusion: A growing body of data suggests that there are psychotropic agents which appear to be well tolerated, and which to varying degrees may be expected to ameliorate the domains of psychopathology associated with borderline personality disorder. The research literature, on which practice should be optimally based, appears to suggest a need for a shift from antidepressants to anticonvulsants and atypical antipsychotics.