The design of water structures is crucial for efficient hydraulic performance. Open irrigation canals are designed with specific inside slopes to ensure maximum stability, while the wing walls of water structures constructed across the canal are designed to maximize hydraulic performance. Therefore, ensuring compatibility between the canal inside slopes and the wing wall types used on both the upstream and downstream sides is of great importance for achieving optimum hydraulic performance. However, our literature review indicates that this necessary compatibility between the canal inside slope and the wing wall type has not been adequately researched and studied. This present study aims to numerically investigate the relationship between open canals inside slopes and wing wall types, as well as examine the impact of using different wing wall types with varying canals inside slopes on hydraulic performance efficiency. Four canal inside slope ratios (Z) (H: V = 2:1, 1.5:1, 1:1, and 0.75:1) are simulated using the HEC-RAS program, along with two types of water structure wing walls (box and broken). The HEC-RAS numerical model provides accurate and reliable estimations of the hydraulic characteristics of flowing water through the structure, and the results are verified using previous experimental measurements available in the literature. The variation (ε%) between the measured and computed results is consistent for estimating specific energy, velocity, heading (afflux), and water depths. The simulation results demonstrate that changing the canal inside slope (Z) from 0.75:1 to 2:1 results in a relative increase of approximately 27.84% in heading up and 15.06% in velocity. Additionally, the broken wing wall proves to be more effective than the box type. The study confirms that the optimal configuration for the most efficient performance of water structures involves utilizing broken-type wing walls on the upstream side, along with a 1H:1V canal inside slope. This configuration reduces the relative velocity and relative heading by approximately 12% and 20%, respectively, which is considered highly favorable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]