Search

Physical examination is a critical component of medical practice yet the focus on efficient patient turnover has impacted the availability of patients with clinical findings willing to be examined by students and skills' teaching is not consistent across clinical rotations. This work evaluates simulation methodologies for teaching of the peripheral arterial examination and evaluates whether skills learnt are transferable to clinical practice.Second-year medical students were taught peripheral arterial examination on a SimMan 3G or with simulated patients (SPs). Both groups were assessed by Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with outpatients who have been diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease.There was no difference in the pass rate at OSCE between the two groups. SimMan better facilitated repeated practice, group learning, peer teaching and discussion, which were highly valued by the students. Students felt that the SImMan tutorial did not facilitate development of spatial cognition or pattern recognition. They also felt less well prepared to deal with real patients in terms of having practised appropriate language, issuing instructions and attempting to reassure patients.Both methods of simulation teaching have distinct merits and the ideal approach maybe to use the SimMan in combination with SPs.

Background Acute pancreatitis is a commonly encountered emergency but accurately predicting that subset of patients who will become systemically unwell has proven difficult. Simple haematological prognostic markers, such as red cell distribution width (RDW) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), could identify such patients. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of RDW and NLR measured on admission as predictors of mortality and intensive care (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) admission in patients with acute pancreatitis. Materials and methods All patient who presented to our institution with acute pancreatitis between August 2013 and August 2016 were retrospectively identified using the prospectively maintained Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) discharge audit. Data on survival, admission to HDU or ICU, length of stay and haematological parameters including RDW and NLR on presentation to the emergency department were collected. Results A total of 185 patients with acute pancreatitis were included of which 23 (12%) patients had a RDW above the upper limit of normal (ULN), which was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of admission to ICU or HDU (RR3.5; p = 0.01); 117 (63%) patients had a NLR above 5 on presentation, which also increased the risk of ICU or HDU admission (RR 8.1; p = 0.01). Patients who had both a RDW above the ULN and a raised NLR had an increased risk of inpatient mortality (RR 9.9; p = 0.04). Conclusion RDW and NLR can identify patients at increased risk of severe acute pancreatitis on presentation to the Emergency Department.

For many years, open gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was the gold standard treatment for gastric cancer. In recent years, however, laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy with associated D2 lymphadenectomy has gained in popularity. It has a similar oncological outcome to open resection, but has all of the added advantages of a laparoscopic procedure, such as early mobilisation, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. This article describes the operative techniques, including key procedure steps, as well as a guide for using the new OrVil device for the laparoscopic creation of the oesophago-jejunal anastomosis. A video of a laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy is presented.

Penetrating trauma—the classical presentation of disorganised crime—can pose a challenge in their management due to their complexity and unpredictability. We examined the experience of one urban unit in the management of penetrating injuries to draw conclusions pertinent to other Irish centres. A retrospective study was performed of all penetrating injuries presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of Connolly Hospital, Dublin between January 2009 and December 2012. Information was collected from the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry database, theatre logbooks and ED records. One hundred and four patients presented with penetrating injuries in the given period. Four mortalities were recorded. Abdominal injury was recorded in 22 % of patients; 26 % had multiple injuries not involving the abdomen; 11 % had an isolated thoracic injury. Fifty-seven percent required surgery, of which 40 % required emergency or early surgical intervention. Laparotomy and laparoscopy were required in 14 and 7 %, respectively; 5 % required thoracotomy of which two had penetrating cardiac injuries, both of whom survived. Although many patients with penetrating trauma can be safely managed conservatively, our study shows that over half required surgical intervention. These data highlight the need for a trauma team in each Irish centre receiving trauma with a clear need for general surgeons on emergency on-call rotas to be experienced in trauma management. There is an urgent need to centralise the management of trauma to a limited number of designated trauma centres where expertise is available by surgeons with a special interest in trauma management.

Background Physical examination is a critical component of medical practice yet skills are falling into disuse resulting in unfamiliarity with signs and an increased reliance on laboratory and imaging tests. 1,2 The focus on safety and quality of care and efficient patient turnover has significantly impacted on the availability of patients with clinical findings willing to be examined by students. It is our experience and reported by others that skills’ teaching is not consistent across clinical rotations. 2 The need for standardisation and a shortage of training capacity have contributed to the increasing use simulation techniques. Methodology 2nd year students were divided into two groups, one taught peripheral arterial examination on a SimMan 3G and the second group on simulated patients (SPs) and assessed by OSCE with patients presenting with peripheral arterial disease. Feedback was obtained from students in focus group discussions. Results (Tables with results to be presented in the poster) There was no difference in the pass rate at OSCE between the two groups. SimMan better facilitated repeated practice, group learning, peer teaching and discussion which were highly valued by the students. Students felt that their spatial cognition, pattern recognition and development of mental spatial signs were not best facilitated during the SimMan tutorial. They also felt unprepared to deal with real patients in terms of having practiced appropriate language to issue commands, to put patients at ease or to reassure patients and felt embarrassed when faced with an intimate examination of a real patient for the first time. Conclusion Both methods of simulation teaching have distinct merits and the ideal approach maybe to use the SimMan in combination with SP tutorials. References Schwind CJ, Boehler ML, Folse R, Dunnington G, Markwell SJ. Development of physical examination skills in a third-year surgical clerkship. Am J Surg. 2001;181:338–40 Mangione S, Burdick WP, Peitzman SJ. Physical diagnosis skills of physicians in training: a focused assessment. Acad Emerg Med.1995;2:622–9 Ramani S. Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching. Med Teach. 2008;30:851–856

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery and the use of laparoscopic techniques have significantly improved patient outcomes and have offered a new range of options for the restoration of intestinal continuity. Various reconstruction techniques have been described and various devices employed but none has been established as superior. This study evaluates our experience with, and modifications of, the orally inserted anvil (OrVil™). We conducted a prospective observational study on 72 consecutive patients who underwent OrVil™-assisted oesophago-gastric or oesophago-jejunal anastomosis between September 2010 and September 2013. We collected data including patient demographics, disease site, type of procedure, location of the anastomosis, involvement of resection margins and peri-operative complications. Seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years (median ± SD = 69 ± 10 years). Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis was the most-commonly performed procedure (n = 41; 57 %). R 0 resection was achieved in 67 patients (93 %). There were no Orvil™-related clinical leaks during the study period, and just two patients (2.8 %) demonstrated radiological evidence of leak, both of whom were managed conservatively. There were three in-hospital mortalities during the study period; these were unrelated to the anastomotic technique. Despite a steep learning curve, the OrVil™ device is safe and reliable. It also permits the creation of higher trans-hiatal anastomoses without resorting to thoracotomy in high-risk patients with cardia tumours. Certain shortcomings of the device, that had implications for patient safety, were identified and addressed by intra-operative modification during the study period. We commend the use of a prepared OrVil™ device, as a game changer, for upper gastrointestinal reconstruction.

Introduction: Ambulatory surgery is a standard of care for many surgical procedures due to cost-effectiveness and benefits to patients including the reduced risk of contracting hospital infection by reducing the hospital stay. However, late cancellations can be costly. We examined the utilisation of the surgical day ward in our institution over a four-year period. Methods: A retrospective study of surgical day ward records from September 2007 to September 2011 in one institution. Parameters investigated included the number of planned admissions. Reasons for cancellations were also collected. Results: A total of 17,461 procedures were intended as a day ward admission during the study interval. There were 3,539 procedures that were cancelled (20.3%). The prevalent proportion of cancellations (n = 1,367) (38.6%) were due to patients not showing up for their procedures (7.8% of planned admissions); 1,188 (33.6%) patients were cancelled by the admissions office due to bed shortages, accounting for 6.8 % of planned admissions and 650 (18.4%) of cases were due to last minute cancellations by patients, accounting for 3.7% of all planned admission. The remaining 334 (9.4%) of cases were cancelled on medical grounds including patients who were considered unfit for the intended procedure, or anti-coagulations not appropriately ceased prior to surgery, accounting for 1.9% of all planned admissions. Conclusion: The cancellation rate in this study was high, mainly due to failure of patients to attend or signal their intentions, inadequate bed capacity and bed closure strategies. The ring fencing and protection of day beds and a more active patient management interaction would have had the greatest impact on increased efficiency.