Search

Abnormal and indeterminate electrocardiographic (ECG) changes during cardiac stress imaging are not uncommon. While the prognostic importance of abnormal ECG despite normal imaging has been previously studied, prognosis of indeterminate stress ECG changes is uncertain.We studied the prognostic value of stress ECG changes in symptomatic patients without known CAD and normal stress imaging from the PROMISE trial. Patients with normal ECG (concordant), indeterminate ECG and abnormal ECG (discordant) were identified among those with negative exercise imaging stress test (EIST) and negative vasodilator nuclear stress test (PIST). Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular endpoint (MACE, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina hospitalization) and likelihood of coronary revascularization.In EIST, indeterminate stress ECG [1.1% vs. 0.2% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.2, (95% CI 1.11-15.6), p = 0.034] and discordant ECG [7.2% vs. 0.2% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 27.6, (95% CI 9.6-79.8), p 0.0001] were associated with increased likelihood of revascularization compared to normal stress ECG. Similar findings were observed with PIST [indeterminate vs concordant [1.7% vs. 0.5% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 5.9, (95% CI 1.1-31.7), p = 0.041; discordant vs concordant 15.4% vs. 0.5% adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 24.2, (95% CI 4.6-127.7), p = 0.0002]. MACE rates were similar between ECG subgroups, in both EIST and PIST.In symptomatic patients without known CAD undergoing stress imaging, indeterminate and discordant ECG changes results may indicate presence of obstructive CAD despite normal imaging results and predict increased likelihood of coronary revascularization despite no significant difference in MACE.

Aims Right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) is an important determinant of outcomes in heart failure (HF) cohorts. While the quantitative assessment of RV function is challenging using 2D-echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard with its high spatial resolution and precise anatomical definition. We sought to investigate the prognostic value of CMR-derived RV systolic function in a large cohort of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results Study cohort comprised of patients enrolled in the CarDiac MagnEtic Resonance for Primary Prevention Implantable CardioVerter DefibrillAtor ThErapy registry who had HFrEF and had simultaneous baseline CMR and echocardiography (n = 2449). RVSD was defined as RV ejection fraction (RVEF) Conclusion RV systolic dysfunction is an independent predictor of ACM in HFrEF, with a more pronounced prognostic value in select subgroups, likely reflecting the importance of RVSD in the early stages of HF progression.

Over the past decade, several trials have questioned the efficacy of vasodilator therapy in acute heart failure (AHF) in the absence of uncontrolled hypertension. In this article, we provide a unique review of the most valuable four trials that present the role of vasodilator therapy in the management of patients with AHF. These four trials have evaluated the efficacy of different types of vasodilators such as nesiritide, ulatritide, and serelaxin in the setting of AHF. Also, we compared comprehensive vasodilator therapy versus standard therapy to see if there is any effect on mortality and re-hospitalization.