Search

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Mitral regurgitation (MR) due to commissural prolapse or flail represents a pattern of valve dysfunction that can be treated, among other techniques, by suturing the margins of the anterior and posterior leaflets in the commissural area (commissural closure). The very long-term results of this technique have not been reported so far and represent the objective of this study. METHODS A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried on querying for patients who underwent commissural closure and ring annuloplasty within the time frame 1997–2007 to provide a robust long-term assessment. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) using death as a competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death and reoperation for mitral valve replacement. To describe the time course of MR, we performed a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations with a random intercept for correlated data. RESULTS A total of 125 patients were included. At 15 years, the CIF for cardiac death, with non-cardiac death as a competitive event, was 8.0 ± 2.57% (95% confidence interval [3.88–13.93]). At 15 years, the CIF for reintervention for a mitral valve replacement with death as a competitive event was 5.0 ± 1.98%, 95% confidence interval [2.04–9.89]. No significant predictors of reintervention for mitral valve replacement were identified. At 5 years, the predicted rate of MR ≥3+ recurrence was 2.53% while it was 8.22% at 15 years. In no case a more than mild mitral stenosis was detected. CONCLUSIONS Severe MR due to commissural prolapse/flail can be effectively treated with commissural closure and ring annuloplasty. In our series, the rate of reoperation in the very long term was extremely low. Similarly, longitudinal analysis demonstrated a very low rate of MR ≥3+ recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES After mitral repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), no or mild (≤1+/4+) residual MR should remain. Occasionally patients are left with more than mild residual MR (>1+/4+) for a number of reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the late implications of such a suboptimal repair in a matched cohort study. METHODS From 2006 to 2013, a total of 2158 patients underwent mitral repair for degenerative MR in our institution. Fifty patients (2.3%) with residual MR >1+ at hospital discharge (study group) were matched up to 1:2 with 91 patients operated on during the same period who were discharged with MR ≤1+ (control group). The median follow-up was 8 years (interquartile range 6.3–10.1, longest 12.7 years). A comparative analysis of the outcomes in the 2 groups was performed. RESULTS Overall survival at 8 years was 87 ± 8% in the study group and 92 ± 3% in the control group (P  = 0.23). There were 3 late deaths (6.0%) in the study group and 6 deaths (6.6%) in the control group. Freedom from reoperation was similar (P  = 1.0). At 8 years the prevalence of MR ≥3+ was significantly higher in the study group (15.6% vs 2.1%, P  < 0.001) as was the use of diuretics, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blockers. Interestingly, even in the control group, a gradual progression of MR was observed because 13.3% of the patients had MR ≥2+ at 8 years with a significant increase over time (P  < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Residual MR more than mild at hospital discharge is associated with lower durability of mitral repair and the need for more medical therapy in the long term. However, even an initial optimal result does not completely arrest the progression of the degenerative process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]