Search

Demographic aging and extended working lives have prompted interest in the physiological changes that occur with age, particularly in the lumbar spine. Age-related declines in muscle quality and intervertebral disc alterations may reduce muscular endurance, strength, and postural stability, potentially increasing the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in older workers. As experienced workers play an important role in addressing labor shortages, understanding the impact of age-related physiological changes on the biomechanical properties of the lumbar spine is key to ensure safe and sustainable employment for aging individuals. This study aimed to compare the impact of daily work-related physical efforts on lumbar muscular endurance and fatigue, spine tissue properties, and postural stability between older and younger workers. A total of 40 participants, 20 in Group 1 (young workers: ≤50 years; mean age: 28.89 ± 7.23) and 20 in Group 2 (older workers: >50 years; mean age: 59.40 ± 5.29) were recruited. Measurements taken at the beginning and end of the workday included lumbar muscle endurance, maximal voluntary contraction, disc height and postural stability. Age groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVA across the two measurement times. No significant interaction between age and time of day was observed, indicating that, for similar workload, both age groups experienced similar changes. Despite age-related effects on maximal force production and postural stability, incorporating weight as a covariate revealed that these differences were partially explained by the weight discrepancy between older and younger workers. The study suggests that age may not be the primary determinant of the impact of a workday on older workers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study investigated the variability in lumbar neuromuscular adaptations to pain, the task dependency of pain adaptations and the effect of these adaptations on motor performance. Methods: Twenty-four healthy participants performed isometric back extension contractions at 45° and 90° trunk flexion under pain-free and experimental low back pain conditions induced by electrical stimulation. High-density surface electromyography recorded lumbar muscle activation strategies, and force steadiness was measured using a load cell. Results: While considerable variability in neuromuscular adaptations to lumbar pain was observed among participants, consistent patterns were found between tasks. In the 90° trunk flexion position, both sides exhibited greater magnitudes of pain adaptations for muscle activity redistribution in the mediolateral axis (p < 0.05, 86% increase) and muscle activity amplitude (p < 0.001, 183% increase) compared to the 45° trunk flexion position. A significant negative correlation was found between the magnitude of the mediolateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity and force steadiness on the left side (p = 0.045). Discussion: These findings highlight the intricate and task-dependent nature of neuromuscular adaptations to pain within lumbar muscles, and points toward a potential trade-off between pain adaptations and performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trunk position and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies. Nineteen healthy participants (10 men and 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 yr, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions (neutral, 45°, and 90° trunk flexion) and under three conditions (no pain, caudal pain, and cranial pain). Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain condition on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side (P < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with the no pain condition on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Changes in muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistribution of lumbar extensor muscles were observed in different trunk positions, potentially due to changes in their mechanical advantage. The results complement the current pain-adaptation theory by illustrating individual spatial redistributions of activation within lumbar extensor muscles during pain. The study found no clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With expertise, athletes develop motor strategies that enhance sports performance or reduce functional costs. Motor variability is known as a relevant way to characterize these strategies in athletes with different levels of expertise. The aim of this scoping review is to gather and discuss the latest advances in the impact of expertise on motor variability during sports‐related tasks. A search encompassing three databases, Medline, SportDiscus, and Academic Search Complete, was performed. Our research methodology included three core themes: motor variability, laboratory instruments, and sports. Motor variability metrics (e.g., standard deviation and approximate entropy) and laboratory instruments (e.g., motion capture system, EMG, and force plate) were compiled. Athletes' expertise was defined by the time of deliberate practice, the performance results, or the level in which they performed. Overall, 48 of the 59 included studies determined that higher‐skilled athletes had lesser motor variability than lower‐skilled athletes. This difference in motor variability between skill levels was present within individual athletes (intra‐individual) and between athletes (inter‐individual). This result was independent of the criteria used to define expertise, the type of instrumentation used, and the metrics used to quantify motor variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In patients with fibromyalgia, exercise and education are recommended to decrease pain level and improve pain management. The latest scientific evidence recommends to focus interventions on the upper limb. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the immediate effect of physical activity education vs. a control group on pain and muscle capacity in fibromyalgia patients. Method: Fifty-six participants with fibromyalgia were randomized into an experimental group and a control group. The intervention consisted in watching a five-minute video that provided information about fibromyalgia, pain, kinesiophobia and physical activity. The control group watched a neutral five-minute video about beavers in Quebec. Following the video, participants performed a muscular fatigue task consisting of a repeated unilateral shoulder abduction task. At baseline and following the muscular fatigue task, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in shoulder abduction was assessed as well as pain level and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the upper limb. Electromyographic activity was also assessed for upper trapezius and middle deltoid muscles. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the MVC, PPT, and pain level before and after the muscular fatigue task between groups. Results: The experimental group showed a significantly lower increase in pain than the control group in the middle deltoid muscle (p = 0.002) when assessed by verbal pain rating scale. No significant interaction or main effect of Group and Time were observed for the pain level at the upper trapezius and elbow extensor muscles nor for any of the PPT measures. According to electromyographic data, the median frequency values indicate that neither group experienced muscle fatigue during the repeated contraction task. Conclusions: The preliminary results suggest that a short physical activity education video positively influenced middle deltoid pain following repeated abduction in participants with fibromyalgia. Electromyographic analysis showed no evidence of objective muscle fatigue, suggesting that there might be a partial disconnection between the perception of muscle fatigue and the physiological biomarkers associated with muscle fatigue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite being studied for more than 50 years, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying vibration (VIB)-induced kinesthetic illusions are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate how corticospinal excitability tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is modulated during VIB-induced illusions. Twenty healthy adults received vibration over wrist flexor muscles (80 Hz, 1 mm, 10 s). TMS was applied over the primary motor cortex representation of wrist extensors at 120% of resting motor threshold in four random conditions (10 trials/condition): baseline (without VIB), 1 s, 5 s, and 10 s after VIB onset. Means of motorevoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and latencies were calculated. Statistical analysis found a significant effect of conditions (stimulation timings) on MEP amplitudes (P = 0.035). Paired-comparisons demonstrated lower corticospinal excitability during VIB at 1 s compared with 5 s (P = 0.025) and 10 s (P = 0.003), although none of them differed from baseline values. Results suggest a time-specific modulation of corticospinal excitability in muscles antagonistic to those vibrated, i.e., muscles involved in the perceived movement. An early decrease of excitability was observed at 1 s followed by a stabilization of values near baseline at subsequent time points. At 1 s, the illusion is not yet perceived or not strong enough to upregulate corticospinal networks coherent with the proprioceptive input. Spinal mechanisms, such as reciprocal inhibition, could also contribute to lower the corticospinal drive of nonvibrated muscles in short period before the illusion emerges. Our results suggest that neuromodulatory effects of VIB are likely time-dependent, and that future work is needed to further investigate underlying mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]