1. Bioinspired Nanofiber Scaffold for Differentiating Bone Marrow-Derived Neural Stem Cells to Oligodendrocyte-Like Cells: Design, Fabrication, and Characterization [Corrigendum]
- Author
-
Rasti Boroojeni F, Mashayekhan S, Abbaszadeh HA, Ansarizadeh M, Khoramgah MS, and Rahimi Movaghar V
- Subjects
nanofibers scaffold ,oligodendrocyte cells ,controlled triiodothyronine release ,central nervous system ,polyaniline graphene ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Rasti Boroojeni F, Mashayekhan S, Abbaszadeh HA, Ansarizadeh M, Khoramgah MS, Rahimi Movaghar V. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3903–3920. Page 3908, left column, Isolation and Characterization of BMSCs section, the text “Afterward, PBS was used to wash the fixed cells twice and the cells were incubated at 4°C with antibodies specific for the following antigens: CD34, CD45, CD90, CD44, Nestin, NF68, GFAP for 30 mins” should read “Afterward, PBS was used to wash the fixed cells twice and the cells were incubated at 4°C with antibodies specific for the following antigens: CD45, CD29, CD73, CD105, Nestin, NF68, GFAP for 30 mins”. Page 3909, right column, the section heading “Static Analysis” should read “Statistical Analysis”. Figure 2 on page 3910, the scale bar in part E shows “2 ìM” it should read “10 ìm”. The text “(the condition and concentration of PCL nanofibers was exactly the same for all four groups, thus the same SEM image was used to show the PCL nanofibers for all groups)” has also been added to the figure caption. The correct Figure 2 is shown. Page 3911, BMSCs Characterization section, the text “In this analysis, CD44, CD90, and CD 106 markers as mesenchymal stem cell markers and CD45 as hematopoietic stem cells marker were used” should read “In this analysis, CD29, CD73, and CD 105 markers as mesenchymal stem cell markers and CD45 as hematopoietic stem cells marker were used”. Figure 3 on page 3912, the scale bar in part C shows “20 μM” it should read “20 μm”. The correct Figure 3 is shown. Figure 5 on page 3914, the scale bar in part A shows “10 μM” it should read “10 μm”. The text “(the condition and concentration of gelatin nanofibers was exactly the same for PG/PAG 2, PG/PAG 2/1% NP, PG/PAG 2/2% NP, and PG/PAG 2/3% NP %, thus the same SEM image was used to show the gelatin nanofibers for all groups)” has also been added to the figure caption. The correct Figure 5 is shown. The authors have advised there is an error in the caption of Figure 7 on page 3916. The text “scale bar = 20 μM” should read “scale bar = 20 μm”. Figure 8 on page 3917, the scale bars in part B shows “μM” they should read “μm”. The correct Figure 8 is shown. The authors apologize for these errors. Read the original article
- Published
- 2020