Search

This exploratory study aimed to examine the impact of abatacept treatment on bone structure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). RA patients initiating either abatacept or newly introduced csDMARDs were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized, two-group study. Bone structure in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpal heads was assessed using HR-pQCT at 0, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. Synovitis was evaluated using musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI. The adjusted mean between-group differences (abatacept-csDMARDs group) were estimated using a mixed-effect model. Thirty-five patients (abatacept group: n = 15; csDMARDs group: n = 20) were analyzed. Changes in erosion volume, depth and width were numerically smaller in the abatacept group compared to the csDMARDs group (adjusted mean between-group differences: - 1.86 mm 3 , - 0.02 mm, and - 0.09 mm, respectively). Over a 12-month period, 5 erosions emerged in the csDMARDs group, while only 1 erosion appeared in the abatacept group. Compared to csDMARDs, abatacept better preserved bone microarchitecture; several components of bone microarchitecture were significantly worsened at 6 months in the csDMARDs group, but were not deteriorated at 6 months in the abatacept group. Changes in synovitis scores were similar between the two treatment groups. Our results indicate that abatacept prevented the progression of bone erosion including new occurrence, and also prevented worsening of bone strength independently with synovitis compared to csDMARDs including MTX. Thus, abatacept treatment may provide benefits not only in inhibiting the progress of bone erosion but also in preventing bone microarchitectural deterioration., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests Naoki Iwamoto and Atsushi Kawakami have received grant research support from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd and Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. Ethical approval and consent to participate This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Investigation and Ethics Committee at Nagasaki University. Patients gave their informed consent to be subjected to the protocol., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of baricitinib and abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: This study included 274 patients treated with abatacept and 241 treated with baricitinib who were followed for >52 weeks. Potential treatment selection bias was addressed by using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The paired t-test was used to assess differences in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score relative to baseline. A generalized estimating equation was used to compare the two treatment groups., Results: The estimated mean CDAI score was 18.2 at baseline and significantly decreased to 12.6 at 4 weeks, 8.9 at 12 weeks, 7.4 at 24 weeks, and 6.1 at 52 weeks in the abatacept group. The estimated mean CDAI score was 18.6 at baseline and significantly decreased to 9.5 at 4 weeks, 6.5 at 12 weeks, 5.7 at 24 weeks, and 5.5 at 52 weeks in the baricitinib group. The baricitinib group had significantly lower CDAI scores at 4, 12, and 24 weeks compared to the abatacept group. Subgroup analyses revealed that this difference was evident among patients with high disease activity and without concomitant use of methotrexate but was less pronounced among those with remission to moderate disease activity status with methotrexate use., Conclusion: Both baricitinib and abatacept were effective in reducing disease activity in patients with RA. Baricitinib demonstrated potential advantages over abatacept in terms of early disease control, particularly in patients with high disease activity and without methotrexate use., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of serum humoral factors in determining the therapeutic responses to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), especially TNF inhibitors (TNFis), in patients with RA., Methods: A cohort of 52 patients with RA who were treated with bDMARDs, including TNFis, abatacept, and tocilizumab, was analyzed. Serum samples were collected at baseline (t1), 5 ± 1 (t2), and 14 ± 2 weeks (t3) after treatment. A bead-based immunoassay was used to quantify serum cytokines/chemokines. Treatment response was determined 1 year after initiation., Results: Distinct patterns of IL-6 behaviors were observed among different bDMARDs. Patients exhibiting IL-6 rebound at 14 weeks were more likely to be non-responders to TNFi after 1 year, and this rebound appeared to be associated with increases in IFN-γ and IL-12 levels. IFN-β was more detectable than IFN-α2 in RA. Additionally, patients with measurable IFN-β at baseline tended to be TNFi responders., Conclusion: Monitoring serum humoral factors may offer valuable insights into the likelihood of therapeutic success of TNFi in patients with RA. IL-6 rebound at 14 weeks might serve as an early indicator of non-responsiveness to TNFi. These findings highlight the potential of personalized treatment strategies for RA based on serum humoral factor profiling. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and elucidate the underlying mechanisms., (© 2024 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objectives: To describe drug survival, safety and treatment response in sarcoidosis patients treated with abatacept or tofacitinib in routine care., Methods: We identified 41 sarcoidosis patients treated with abatacept and 12 patients treated with tofacitinib. Of the patients treated with tofacitinib 83% had previously been treated with abatacept. Drug survival and reasons for discontinuation of treatment was investigated. Treatment response was evaluated at least once within the first 6 months of treatment by at least one trained clinician and classified as responder or non-responder. No direct comparison of drugs was made., Results: Median (range) disease duration was 3.5 (1-27) and 3 (1-16) years for abatacept and tofacitinib. The patients had previously received a median of 1 DMARD and 1 biological DMARD in both groups. Nearly all patients had been treated with at least one TNFi (95%/92 %). After 6 months, 90% (95%CI 85-90%) of the 41 patients in the abatacept group and 89% (79-99%) of the 12 patients in the tofacitinib group-maintained treatment. At 12 months, it was 80% (73-87%) and 74% (58-90%). No serious adverse events were recorded. For abatacept and tofacitinib 71% and 67% of patients were characterised as responders. In both treatment groups, there was a significant reduction in prednisolone dosage and levels of soluble IL2-receptor at all time points., Conclusions: Sarcoidosis patients treated with abatacept and tofacitinib had long drug survival, achieved high response rates. Both drugs represent good and safe therapeutic options in sarcoidosis patient's refractory to previous TNFi therapy.

Alemtuzumab induction with belatacept/rapamycin-based maintenance immunotherapy (ABR) prevents kidney allograft rejection and specifically limits early costimulation blockade-resistant rejection (CoBRR). To evaluate the mechanisms by which this regimen alters CoBRR, we characterized the phenotype and functional response of preexisting memory cells to allogeneic endothelial cells using intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. IL-7-induced lymphocyte proliferation in the presence or absence of rapamycin was assessed to characterize the phenotype of proliferating cells. Lymphocytes from 40 recipients who underwent transplant using the ABR regimen were studied longitudinally. The rapid immunoresponses of preexisting alloreactive cells to allogeneic endothelial cells were predominantly CD8+TNF-α+/IFN-γ+ cells. These cells were effector memory (TEM) and terminally differentiated effector memory cells lacking CD28 expression, and most were CD57+PD1-. Neither rapamycin nor belatacept directly inhibited these cells. IL-7, a cytokine induced during lymphopenia postdepletion, provoked dramatic CD8+ TEM cell proliferation and a low level of CD8+CD57+PD1- cell expansion in vitro. The IL-7 stimulation induced CD8+ cell mTOR phosphorylation, and rapamycin treatment markedly inhibited IL-7-induced TEM and CD57+PD1- cell expansion. This effect was evident in patients receiving the ABR in that the repopulation of CD8+CD57+PD1- TEM cells was substantially suppressed for at least 36 mo after transplant. These findings help define one mechanism by which a costimulation blockade/rapamycin-based therapy following alemtuzumab induction minimizes CoBRR, namely that in the presence of rapamycin, costimulation-resistant alloreactive cells are disproportionately ineffective at repopulating following post-transplant T cell depletion., (Copyright © 2024 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.)

Objective: The objective was to develop consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for patients with refractory moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)., Methods: The Biologics Workgroup of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance JDM Research Committee used case-based surveys, consensus framework, and nominal group technique to produce bDMARD CTPs for patients with refractory moderately severe JDM., Results: Four bDMARD CTPs were proposed: tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab. Each CTP has different options for dosing and/or route. Among 76 respondents, consensus was achieved for the proposed CTPs (93% [67 of 72]) as well as for patient characteristics, assessments, outcome measures, and follow-up. By weighted average, respondents indicated that they would most likely administer rituximab, followed by abatacept, TNFα inhibitor, and tocilizumab., Conclusion: CTPs for the administration of bDMARDs in refractory moderately severe JDM were developed using consensus methodology. The implementation of the bDMARD CTPs will lay the groundwork for registry-based prospective comparative effectiveness studies., (© 2024 American College of Rheumatology. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of chronic autoimmune disorders. Up to 40% of IIM patients have long-term sequelae and significant functional disability. Its management can be challenging and new therapies are badly needed. The small number of cases with diverse presentations and different diagnostic criteria significantly affect clinical trial results. Only IVIG has been internationally approved for IIM patients. Most clinical trials of new biologic therapies have failed to meet their primary endpoints in IIM, with only one biologic drug recommended for refractory IIM treatment (rituximab), although not approved. We review several new emerging biologic drugs, including B cell depletion therapies, abatacept, Janus kinase inhibitors, and aldesleukin. Encouragingly, some phase II randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in IIM, demonstrating an improvement in clinical and laboratory measures., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and drug tolerability of biological DMARD (bDMARD) and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) monotherapy in patients with RA in a multicentre cohort study., Methods: Patients with RA for whom bDMARD/JAKi monotherapy without conventional synthetic DMARDs has been initiated were included. Monotherapy regimens were categorized as IL-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig), JAKis, or TNF inhibitors (TNFis). Multiple propensity score-based inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce selection bias. Linear mixed-effect models with IPW were used to examine changes in the DAS in 28 joints using ESR (DAS28)-ESR at 24 weeks, and drug retention was compared between monotherapy groups using IPW Cox proportional hazards models., Results: A total of 849 treatment courses were included, involving 635 patients (IL-6Ris, 218; CTLA4Ig, 183; JAKis, 92; TNFis, 356). The change in DAS28-ESR at week 24 as the primary outcome was -0.93 (95% CI: -1.20 to -0.66) lower in the IL-6Ri group than in the TNFi group, while those of the CTLA4Ig and JAKi groups were similar to that of the TNFi group [-0.20 (-0.48 to 0.08), -0.25 (-0.67 to 0.16), respectively]. IL-6Ri use was associated with significantly lower overall drug discontinuation than that for TNFi use [hazard ratio = 0.55 (0.39-0.78), P = 0.001]. Similar retention rates were identified for the CTLA4Ig and JAKi groups to that of the TNFi group., Conclusion: In the analysis with IPW to reduce selection bias, IL-6Ri monotherapy was superior to TNFi monotherapy in terms of effectiveness and drug retention. No significant differences were identified between CTLA4Ig, JAKi and TNFi monotherapy., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Paraoxonase-1 (PON1) is a high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-associated enzyme, that has been implicated as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate how different biologic therapies affect levels of PON1 and oxylipins., Methods: 1213 adult patients with RA in the Comparative Effectiveness Registry to study Therapies for Arthritis and Inflammatory CoNditions cohort study with moderate-to-high disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10) who initiated a new biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), n=296; abatacept, n=374; tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, n=427; rituximab, n=116) were followed prospectively with serum specimens analysed for PON1 activity by arylesterase (ARYL), lactonase (LAC) and PON assays at baseline and after 6 months of biologic therapy. A targeted panel of oxylipins was evaluated by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry in a subset of patients with the lowest and highest 6-month Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) responses in each treatment group., Results: PON1 activity generally increased in the entire cohort after 6 months of new biologic therapy, showing the greatest, most consistent increases in the TCZ group. Increases in all three PON1 domains associated with significant decreases in disease activity in DAS28-CRP/CDAI (p<0.05), and increases in LAC/ARYL were significantly associated with the American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses (OR (95% CI) of 1.12 (1.04, 1.22) and 1.13 (1.04, 1.23), p<0.01, respectively), after controlling for other RA disease characteristics. Some oxylipins, including 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid correlated with RA disease activity measures., Conclusion: Improvement in disease activity across four classes of biologics is associated with enhanced PON1 activity, which has significant implications for cardiovascular safety., Competing Interests: Competing interests: There are no competing interests to disclose for AAR, JMW, AS, DAE, RG, DM, DS, EO'C or STR. JMK is a consultant for EL. DAP is an employee with equity interests and scientific director at CorEvitas (part of Thermo Fisher, formerly known as Corrona), is a board member of Corrona Research Foundation (CRF) and a consultant with Novartis, Sanofi, Genentech, Roche and AbbVie. JRC has received grant support from and is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Jannsen BMS, Genentech, Myriad, Pfizer, Lilly and Sanofi. CC-S has received grant support from Alexion, Priovant, CSL Behring, Janssen, Octapharma, Pfizer, AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and is a consultant for Octapharma, Pfizer, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Recludix and Galapagos., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Abstract: Abatacept plus calcineurin inhibitors/methotrexate (CNI/MTX) is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimen for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis during unrelated-donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (URD-HCT). Using Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data, we investigated its impact in patients receiving 7/8 HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) or 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) URD-HCT between 2011 and 2018. Primary outcomes included day-180, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX, CNI/MTX + antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis (PT-Cy). For 7/8 MMUDs, day-180 OS (primary end point supporting FDA approval) was significantly higher for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX (98% vs 75%; P = .0028). Two-year RFS was significantly higher for abatacept + CNI/MTX vs CNI/MTX (74% vs 49%; P = .0098) and CNI/MTX + ATG (77% vs 35%; P = .0002), and similar vs PT-Cy (72% vs 56%; P = .1058). For 8/8 MUDs, 2-year RFS for abatacept + CNI/MTX was numerically higher vs CNI/MTX (63% vs 52%; P = .1497), with an improved hazard ratio (HR) of 0.46 (0.25-0.86), and vs CNI/MTX + ATG (66% vs 55%; P = .1193; HR, 0.39 [0.21-0.73]), and was similar vs PT-Cy (68% vs 57%; P = .2356; HR, 0.54 [0.26-1.11]). For 7/8 MMUD and 8/8 MUD recipients, abatacept + CNI/MTX prophylaxis improved survival outcomes vs CNI/MTX and CNI/MTX + ATG; outcomes were similar to PT-Cy-based regimens. Abatacept + CNI/MTX may facilitate unrelated donor pool expansion for HCT., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The renal transplant scenario has changed profoundly in the last two decades in both the typology of donors and recipients. This phenomenon has not been accompanied by a significant renewal of the therapeutic arsenal in maintenance therapy, which needs to be more versatile and adapted to the new needs of personalized therapy. Compared to traditional drugs, the only concrete innovation is represented by lymphocyte costimulation inhibitors whose progenitor, and for now the only representative in current practice, is Belatacept with characteristics of absent nephrotoxicity and metabolic impact on dyslipidemia and glucose metabolism, and greater prevention compared to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the development of donor-specific antibodies. Data from randomized clinical trials clearly indicate a significant long-term GFR gain compared to CNIs. The risk of acute rejections post-conversion to Belatacept is averted by more recent imbrication protocols with CNI. The association with mTOR inhibitors appears promising, allowing us to exploit some peculiar characteristics of this class. In conclusion, new maintenance immunosuppressive regimens may benefit from the synergy of established drugs with belatacept possessing unique characteristics., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome, Italy.)

Background: The effect of belatacept on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) control remains largely unknown., Methods: This is a propensity matched retrospective cohort study in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTR) transplanted between 2016-2020 who received a belatacept- versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen. A continuous time multi-state Markov model was used to evaluate BKPyV replication dynamics (BKPyV-dyn). Three BKPyV-dyn states were defined: BKPyV-dyn1 (viral load <3 log 10 ), BKPyV-dyn2 (viral load ≥ 3 log 10 and ≤4 log 10 ), and BKPyV-dyn3 (viral load >4 log 10 )., Results: Two hundred eighty KTR on belatacept- and 280 KTR on tacrolimus-based regimens were compared. The probability of transitioning between BKPyV-dyn states and time spent in each state in both groups was comparable. Total duration in BKPyV-dyn-1 was 632.1 days (95% CI 612.1, 648.5) for belatacept versus 615.2 days (95% CI 592.5, 635.8) for tacrolimus, BKPyV-dyn-2 was 49.2 days (95% CI 41.3, 58.4) for belatacept versus 55.6 days (95% CI 46.5, 66.8) for tacrolimus, and BKPyV-dyn-3 was 48.7 days (95% CI 37.1, 363.1) for belatacept versus 59.2 days (95% CI 45.8, 73.5) for tacrolimus. BKPyV associated nephropathy (PyVAN) occurred in 3.9% in belatacept- and 3.9% tacrolimus-treated KRT (P > .9)., Conclusions: Compared with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, belatacept based immunosuppression was not associated with increased risk of BKPyV-DNAemia or nephropathy., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Background: Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ABA in RA-ILD patients according to the route of administration., Methods: National retrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD patients on treatment with ABA. They were divided into 2 groups: a) IV, and b) SC. The following outcomes were analysed from baseline to final follow-up using linear mixed models: a) forced vital capacity (FVC), b) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), c) chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), d) dyspnoea, e) RA activity, and f) sparing corticosteroids effect., Results: A total of 397 patients were included (94 IV-ABA and 303 SC-ABA), median follow-up of 24 [10-48] months. After adjustment for possible confounders, FVC and DLCO remained stable during the first 24 months without differences between IV-ABA and SC-ABA (p = 0.6304 and 0.5337). Improvement/ stability of lung lesions in HRCT was observed in 67 % of patients (75 % IV-ABA, 64 % SC-ABA; p = 0.07). Dyspnoea stabilized/ improved in 84 % of patients (90 % IV-ABA, 82 % SC-ABA; p = 0.09). RA - disease activity improved in both groups. No statistically significant differences regarding any of the variables studied between the two groups were found. ABA was withdrawn in 87 patients (21.9 %), 45 % IV-ABA and 37 % SC-ABA (p = 0.29). ILD worsening and articular inefficacy were the most common reasons for ABA discontinuation., Conclusion: In patients with RA-ILD, ABA seems to be equally effective regardless of the route of administration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Disclosures that may be interpreted as constituting of possible conflict(s) of interest for the study: B. A.-M. received grants/research supports from Abbvie and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Pfizer, Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB and Lilly, outside the submitted work; N.V.-R. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau and research supports from AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, Nordic Pharma, MSD and Rubió; L.C.D.-C has received research supports and participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly and Celgene; J.L.M has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Galapagos and had consultation fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; G.B has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); A.U.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Galápagos, Novartis, GSK, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Pfizer and Amgen; C.F.-D. has received fees in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from: Janssen, Galápagos, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); I. F.-A. has received grants/research supports from Abbott, MSD, Janssen, and Roche, as well as consultation fees from company sponsored speakers bureaus associated with Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Celgene, and MSD; S.C. has received research supports from MSD and Pfizer and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker's bureau from Amgen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Roche, and UCB. S. C. is also assistant professor of the cátedra EPID-Future, funded by UAM-Roche, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain; R. B. received grants/research support from AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in a company-sponsored speaker's bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD. The rest of the authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD)., Methods: This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation., Results: The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable., Conclusion: Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Torque Teno Virus (TTV) is a non-pathogenic anellovirus, highly prevalent in healthy populations. Variations in its viral load have been associated with states of diminished immunity, as occurs after organ transplantation. It is hypothesized that TTV-load might be used as a diagnostic tool to guide prescription and dosing of immunosuppressive drugs. Not much is known about the effects of combined immunosuppressive drugs on TTV replication in renal transplantation. Belatacept was introduced to counter side-effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). It was never widely adopted, mainly because its association with increased risk of rejection. To investigate the differential effects of a regimen based on calcineurin inhibitors versus belatacept on TTV-loads, we measured TTV-levels in 105 patients from two randomized controlled trials in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We observed that time after transplantation was inversely related to TTV-levels of patients that remained on a CNI-containing regime, whereas this decline over time was diminished after conversion to belatacept. In addition, a correlation with tacrolimus-trough levels and age were found. Our study is the first report on the impact of conversion from CNI to belatacept on TTV-levels in KTR. In conclusion, the time-related decline in TTV-levels is mitigated after conversion from CNI to belatacept., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Seven of the 11 newer medications recently or soon to be approved to treat rheumatologic diseases discussed in this article are biologic agents and reflect the current ability of science to target specific components of the immune system. The other agents are molecules that are directed against specific immune pathway targets as well. All have shown superiority to placebo and in some cases have been compared to currently accepted therapies. Safety issues are generally centered around infections due to the immune-interrupting nature of these therapies., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to report the interim 5-year safety and effectiveness of abatacept in patients with JIA in the PRINTO/PRCSG registry., Methods: The Abatacept JIA Registry (NCT01357668) is an ongoing observational study of children with JIA receiving abatacept; enrolment started in January 2013. Clinical sites enrolled patients with JIA starting or currently receiving abatacept. Eligible patients were assessed for safety (primary end point) and effectiveness over 10 years. Effectiveness was measured by clinical 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS10) in patients with JIA over 5 years. As-observed analysis is presented according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines., Results: As of 31 March 2020, 587 patients were enrolled; 569 are included in this analysis (including 134 new users) with 1214.6 patient-years of safety data available. Over 5 years, the incidence rate (IR) per 100 patient-years of follow-up of serious adverse events was 5.52 (95% CI: 4.27, 7.01) and of events of special interest was 3.62 (95% CI: 2.63, 4.86), with 18 serious infections [IR 1.48 (95% CI: 0.88, 2.34)]. As early as month 3, 55.9% of patients achieved cJADAS10 low disease activity and inactive disease (20.3%, 72/354 and 35.6%, 126/354, respectively), sustained over 5 years. Disease activity measures improvement over 5 years across JIA categories., Conclusion: Abatacept was well tolerated in patients with JIA, with no new safety signals identified and with well-controlled disease activity, including some patients achieving inactive disease or remission., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01357668., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To evaluate the survival of different biologic or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) administered after fulfilling difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) criteria, and to assess factors related to treatment discontinuation., Methods: Retrospective study including D2TRA patients. Drug retention of the b/tsDMARD administered after fulfilling D2TRA was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. Cox hazard models were used to identify factors affecting treatment discontinuation., Results: Of the 122 patients included, 75 maintained active treatment (61.5%) with a subsequent line after D2T compared to 47 (38.5%) who discontinued and required more successive lines of b/tsDMARDs. The median survival of the treatments was 78.3(7.6) months and the treatment after D2T with the better rate of survival was rituximab, followed by JAKi and IL6Ri, while worse survival rates were associated with abatacept and TNFi. Significant differences were noted among b/tsDMARDs (log-rank p < 0.01) and to evaluate these differences, a Cox regression was performed, taking each b/tsDMARD as a reference and comparing it with the others. DAS28 values 6-months after initiation of treatment were higher in those patients who discontinued treatment [4.4(1.2) vs 3.5(1.3), p = 0.01]. The multivariate cox regression model revealed that treatment choice after D2T [HR = 1.26(95%CI 1.06-1.05)] and lower DAS28 values at 6 months [HR = 1.49(95%CI 1.16-1.52)] were independent risk factors associated with treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: Once patients met the D2TRA criteria, the subsequent line of b/tsDMARDs with the best survival rates were rituximab, JAKi and IL6Ri. Moreover, DAS28 at 6-months of treatment after D2T was an independent risk factor for drug discontinuation. Key Points • Rituximab, IL6Ri and JAKi have better retention rates in patients after fulfilling D2TRA criteria • Clinical disease activity in the first six months after fulfillment of D2TRA criteria is an independent risk factor of subsequent treatment survival., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy of infliximab, abatacept, and cenicriviroc in treating patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The patient's clinical status was assessed daily on an 8-point ordinal scale. We evaluated the totality of evidence on the efficacy of the 3 immunomodulators by considering all possible changes in the clinical status of each patient over time. We demonstrated that infliximab accelerated improvement and reduced deterioration of clinical status when added to standard of care. There was also evidence for the benefit of abatacept. There was no evidence for the benefit of cenicriviroc., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Lin: Nothing to report. Wang: Nothing to report. Anstrom: Research grants from Merck, Bayer, NIH, and Pfizer. LaVange: Nothing to report. Wen: Nothing to report. Bozzette: Employee of NIH. Powderly: Research grants from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; personal fees from Merck Laboratories., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study examines the effect of belatacept based salvage regimens on kidney transplant outcomes., Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all adult kidney transplant recipients between 2011 and 2022 who were converted to belatacept salvage therapy during their follow up. eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, histology and DSA data were collected through systematic review of the medical record., Results: Patients were divided into 3 groups based on salvage regimen: Mycophenolate mofetil/belatacept (MMF/Bela) (n = 28), low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/belatacept (CNI/Bela) (n = 22), and low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/ Mycophenolate mofetil /belatacept (CNI/MMF/Bela) (n = 13). Patients with antibody-mediated rejection were more likely to receive CNIs in addition to belatacept (low-dose CNI/MMF/Bela 54%, low-dose CNI/Bela 45%, MMF/Bela 3.6%, p < 0.001). DSA decreased in all groups after transition to belatacept by 15.67% (p = 0.15). No difference in Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time was observed between the groups, and eGFR remained stable over the first year after transition to belatacept. The incidence of death and allograft failure was similar between the groups (low- dose CNI/MMF/Bela n = 3, low-dose CNI/Bela n = 7, MMF/Bela n = 4; p = 0.41). Patients in the low-dose CNI/Bela cohort who were transitioned to belatacept within 6 months from transplant showed a decline in eGFR over the first year after transition, while the other treatment cohorts demonstrated stable or slight increase in eGFR., Conclusions: The present study demonstrates comparable transplant outcomes in terms of eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, rejection rate and donor specific antibody (DSA) in three belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression regimens supporting the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Registry-based observational prospective study aimed at describing the use of biologic drugs in pediatric-onset scleritis. Data were collected at baseline, at 3-, 6-, 12-month follow-up and at last assessment. Scleral inflammation was graded according to Sen classification. Five patients (9 eyes) treated with adalimumab, infliximab, abatacept and secukinumab were included. All patients were previously treated with conventional immunosuppressors and glucocorticoids. Median biologic treatment duration was 28 (IQR = 118) months. At 6-months, scleritis resolved in all eyes. At 12-months, complete disease control was observed in 7/9 eyes (77.8%). The number of relapses 12 months before and after treatment initiation was 17 and 2, respectively. Mean BCVA was 0.83 (range 0.3-1.0) at baseline and 1.0 for all eyes after 12 months. Glucocorticoids had been withdrawn in 4/5 patients.In conclusion, biological agents proved to be effective in pediatric-onset scleritis, allowing a noticeable steroid-sparing effect and preserving visual function and bulbar integrity.

Objectives: To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of two academic centres over a 10-year period. Joint response to targeted therapies was measured according to EULAR criteria based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28. In addition, changes in CRP level and glucocorticoid consumption were recorded., Results: Nineteen patients were included. Methotrexate (n=11) and hydroxychloroquine (n=4) were the most used first-line treatments. Targeted therapies were frequently used (n=14). Tocilizumab was the most selected therapy (n=8), then rituximab (n=5), abatacept and anti-tumour necrosis factor (n=4). Twenty-one treatment sequences were assessed, including 18 with EULAR response criteria. Responses were "good" or "moderate" in 100% (4/4) of patients treated with abatacept, 80% (4/5) with rituximab, 40% (2/5) with tocilizumab, and 25% (1/4) with anti-TNF. T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies (abatacept, rituximab) resulted more frequently in a "good" or "moderate" response compared to cytokine inhibitors (tocilizumab, etanercept, infliximab) with a significant decrease in DAS-28 at 6 months (-1.75; p=0.016) and a trend to a lower consumption of glucocorticoids., Conclusions: In patients with RA/SSc overlap syndrome refractory to conventional synthetic-DMARDs, T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies seem to be a promising therapeutic option to control joint activity.

Background: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication., Objective: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery., Methods: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery., Results: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease., Conclusion: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Feldman has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alvotech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Samsung, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, Sun Pharma, Almirall, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Ortho Dermatology, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient, Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Teladoc, BMS, Ono, Micreos, Eurofins, Informa, UpToDate, and the National Psoriasis Foundation and is a founder and part owner of Causa Research and holds stock in Sensal Health. Dr Wu is or has been an investigator, consultant, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Aristea Therapeutics, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, DermTech, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, EPI Health, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Mindera, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi Genzyme, Solius, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB, and Zerigo Health. Dr Hsu has served on the advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, LEO Pharma, and Sanofi and has served on the registries/clinical trials for CorEvitas, PROSE, Argenx, and Cabaletta. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Almirall, Arcutis, ASLAN, Beiersdorf, BI, BMS, EPI, Incyte, Leo, UCB, Janssen, Lilly, Mindera, Nimbus, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Dermira, Sanofi, Regeneron, and Pfizer. Dr Wallace has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Pfizer, Target RWE, Kyowa, Amgen, Arcutis, and Argenx. Dr Lee has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer, Trevi Therapeutics, AbbVie, Mayne Pharmaceuticals, Incyte Corp, Castle Creek, Pyramid Bioscience, Amyrt, Krystal Biotech, Arcutis, Celgene, Target Pharma, Amgen, Novartis, UCB, Galderma, Kiniksa, Avita, Janssen, MoonLake Pharmaceuticals, and Timber Pharmaceuticals. Dr Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sanofi Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer, and LEO Pharma. Dr Schwartzman has served as a speaker and/or consultant to AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Myriad, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, Stelexis, Jubilant, and Teijin and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Gladman has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Liu has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Sanofi Regeneron, Arcutis, Dermavant, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB, Incyte, Amgen, and Evelo. Dr Koo has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Dermavant, Incyte, Janssen, Eli Lilly, EPI, Leo, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics/Valeant, Pfizer, Regeneron/Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB. Dr Hawkes has served on the advisory board/consultant for AbbVie, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Janssen, LearnSkin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi Genzyme, and UCB, has served on the medical/scientific board for the National Psoriasis Foundation and International Psoriasis Council (IPC), and has stock ownership/equity in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Dr Reddy has served on the advisory board/consultant UCB, Novartis, Fresenius, Amgen, AbbVie, Janssen, and Pfizer. Dr Prussick has served as a scientific adviser and/or speaker to of Amgen, Janssen, AbbVie, and Novartis and has served as a board member to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Yamauchi has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Sun Pharma, BMS, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, and Novartis. Dr Lewitt has received grants/research support from Novan, Galderma, Leo, Lilly, DermTech, and Amgen and has served as a speaker’s bureau/consultant/advisory board for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Galderma, Pfizer, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Dermavant, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Soung has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to Celgene, Amgen, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatologics, National Psoriasis Foundation (non-profit), LEO, Novartis, Regeneron/Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Dermavant, Bristol Myers Squibb, Arcutis, KoBioLabs, and Castle Biosciences. Dr Weinberg has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Dermavant, Lilly, Janssen, BMS, Amgen, and UCB and has received research grants from Arcutis, Dermavant, AbbVie, UCB, Janssen, and Lilly. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai, has received research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Avotres, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Dermavant Sciences, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Inozyme, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Regeneron, and UCB, Inc, and is a consultant for AnaptysBio, Arcutis, Inc, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aristea Therapeutics, Avotres Therapeutics, BioMX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brickell Biotech, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, CorEvitas, Dermavant Sciences, Evommune, Inc, Facilitation of International Dermatology Education, Forte Biosciences, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Hexima Ltd, Incyte, Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera, National Society of Cutaneous Medicine, New York College of Podiatric Medicine, Pfizer, Seanergy, SUN Pharma, Verrica, and Vial. Dr Glick has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, and/or speaker to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Galderma, Sun Pharma, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Dermavant Sciences, Incyte, EPI/Novan, BMS, Nimbus Lakshmi, Cara Therapeutics, Dermira, Sanofi/Genzyme, Regeneron, Pfizer, ChemoCentryx, Ortho Dermatologics, UCB, Brickell, Biotech, CorEvitas Registry PSO, CorEvitas Registry AD, PROSE Registry for AD. Dr Kircik has served as a research investigator, scientific adviser, board member, and/or speaker to Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Allergan, Inc, Almirall, Amgen, Inc, Arcutis, Biogen-Idec, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Breckinridge Pharma, Celgene, Centocor, Inc, Cellceutix, Cipher, Combinatrix, Connetics Corporation, Coria, Dermavant, Dermira, Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, PLC, Idera, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Maruho, Merck, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, Novartis AG, Promius, PharmaDerm, Pfizer, Serono (Merck Serono International SA), Stiefel Laboratories, Inc, Sun Pharma, Taro, UCB, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl, and XenoPort. Dr Desai has served on the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation and holds multiple other leadership positions in dermatologic organizations, and has served as a researcher and/or consultant for Pfizer, Lilly, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galderma, and other organizations. Drs James and Zaino and Author Rosenberg have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Predicting the efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is challenging. In this study, we aimed to explore markers that predict the efficacy of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: Thirty RA patients receiving abatacept were recruited, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the participants were subjected to DNA microarray analysis. The expression of CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which was selected by the result of DNA microarray, was determined by flow cytometry in 16 newly diagnosed treatment-naïve RA patients. CCR4 expression on each helper T-cell subset was also measured., Results: CCR4 was upregulated in the abatacept responder. The expression levels of CCR4 were significantly correlated with the improvement of the Clinical Disease Activity Index. CCR4 expression was predominantly observed in CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The percentage of CCR4-expressing CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy individuals. Interestingly, Th17 and Treg cells expressed high levels of CCR4 compared to non-Th17-related helper T cells., Conclusions: CCR4 is a Th17- and Treg-related gene, and the high CCR4 expression in peripheral blood samples may predict the efficacy of abatacept in RA., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To address improvements in quality of life, we analysed the relative contributions of factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in abatacept-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study., Methods: Patients who were evaluable for disease activity through to  Week 52 in the ORIGAMI study were divided into those achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index-remission/low disease activity (remission/LDA; n = 178) and patients with moderate disease activity/high disease activity (MDA/HDA; n = 99). We compared the changes in EQ-5D and other outcomes through to Week 52. Focusing on the remission/LDA group, the contribution of each factor to the variance of EQ-5D at baseline and Week 52 was examined using analysis of variance., Results: The remission/LDA group showed greater improvements than the MDA/HDA group in EQ-5D, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain (Pain VAS), and patient's global assessment (PtGA). In the remission/LDA group, factors significantly contributing to EQ-5D were sex, C-reactive protein, and Pain VAS at baseline, and PtGA and age at Week 52., Conclusions: In rheumatoid arthritis patients who achieved remission/LDA during abatacept treatment, PtGA and age at Week 52 contribute to the variance of EQ-5D, suggesting that the identification of factors associated with PtGA may be important to address improvements in quality of life., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Immune checkpoint therapies (ICT) improve overall survival of patients with cancer but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as myocarditis. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA-4 Ig), an inhibitor of T cell costimulation through CD28, reverses irAEs in animal models. However, concerns exist about potentially compromising antitumor response of ICT. In mouse tumor models, we administered CTLA-4 Ig 1) concomitantly with ICT or 2) after ICT completion. Concomitant treatment reduced antitumor efficacy, while post-ICT administration improved efficacy without affecting frequency and function of CD8 T cells. The improved response was independent of the ICT used, whether CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade. The frequency of Tregs was significantly decreased with CTLA-4 Ig. The resulting increased CD8/Treg ratio potentially underlies the enhanced efficacy of ICT followed by CTLA-4 Ig. This paradoxical mechanism shows that a CTLA-4 Ig regimen shown to reduce irAE severity does not compromise antitumor efficacy., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:J.P.A. reports consulting, advisory roles, and/or stocks/ownership for Achelois, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Akoya Biosciences, Apricity, Bectas, BioAtla, BioNTech, Candel Therapeutics, Dragonfly, Earli, Enable Medicine, Hummingbird, ImaginAb, Lava Therapeutics, Lytix, Marker, Osteologic, PBM Capital, Phenomic AI, Polaris Pharma, Time Bioventures, Trained Therapeutix, Two Bear Capital, and Venn Biosciences.

This study aims to identify factors influencing the alleviation of knee joint symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic or target synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Among 2321 patients who started b/tsDMARDs between 2010 and 2023, we focused on 295 patients who had knee swelling or tenderness at the initiation of b/tsDMARDs and continued b/tsDMARDs at least 3 months, with recorded knee symptoms 6 months later. Symptom relief after 6 months was 78.2% for interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibitors, 68.6% for Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, 65.8% for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and 57.6% for cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-Ig (CTLA4-Ig). The initial use of b/tsDMARDs and the use of IL-6 inhibitors in comparison to CTLA4-Ig emerged as a significant factor associated with the improvement of knee joint symptoms. Among 141 patients who underwent knee radiography at baseline and two years later, the deterioration in knee joint radiographs was 7.7% for IL-6 inhibitors, 6.3% for JAK inhibitors, 21.9% for TNF inhibitors, and 25.9% for CTLA4-Ig. The use of IL-6 inhibitors was a significant factor associated with the improvement of knee joint symptoms and the inhibition of joint destruction compared to CTLA4-Ig., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate if and how the incidence of serious infection (SI) and active tuberculosis (TB) differ among seven biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA considering the line of therapy., Methods: Patients with RA from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) cohort who initiated etanercept, certolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab from the first to fifth line of therapy were included. Follow-up extended up to 3 years. The primary outcome was SI and the secondary outcome was TB. Event rates were calculated and compared using Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. Comparisons were made overall and stratified by line of therapy. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to all treatment courses from 2009 (tocilizumab availability) until the end of the study (2018)., Results: Among 33 897 treatment courses (62 513 patient-years) the incidence of SI was 4.4/100 patient-years (95% CI 4.2, 4.5). After adjustment, hazards ratios (HRs) of SI were slightly higher with adalimumab and infliximab compared with etanercept. However, no clear pattern was observed when stratifying by line of therapy in terms of incidence rate or HR. Sensitivity analyses showed similar HRs among these treatments. Regarding TB, all 49 cases occurred during the first three lines of treatment and rarely since 2009., Conclusion: The risk of serious infections does not appear to be influenced by the line of therapy in patients with RA. However, the risk of TB seems to be more frequent during the initial lines of treatment or prior to 2009., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Source Citation: Rech J, Tascilar K, Hagen M, et al. Abatacept inhibits inflammation and onset of rheumatoid arthritis in individuals at high risk (ARIAA): a randomised, international, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2024;403:850-859. 38364841., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosure forms are available with the article online.

Aim: To evaluate real-world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan., Methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real-world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis., Results: A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%-66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD-naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow-up (6.1%). Abatacept was well-tolerated with no new safety signals., Conclusion: The 24-month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting in Taiwan., (© 2024 Bristol‐Myers Squibb and The Author(s). International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises a heterogeneous group of conditions that can cause marked disability and diminished quality of life. Data on predictors of clinical response are insufficient to guide selection of the appropriate biologic agent for individual patients. This study aimed to investigate the propensity of S100A8/9 and S100A12 as predictive biomarkers of abatacept response in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA)., Methods: Data from a phase 3 trial (NCT01844518) of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with active pJIA (n = 219) were used in this exploratory analysis. Association between biomarker levels at baseline and improvements in JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses or baseline disease activity (measured by Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 27 joints using C-reactive protein [JADAS27-CRP]) were assessed. Biomarker level changes from baseline to month 4 were assessed for disease outcome prediction up to 21 months., Results: At baseline, 158 patients had available biomarker samples. Lower baseline S100A8/9 levels (≤ 3295 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-5.18]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.72 [95% CI: 1.48-9.37]), JIA-ACR inactive disease (ID; OR: 4.25 [95% CI: 2.03-8.92]), JADAS27-CRP ID (OR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.02-5.39]) at month 4, and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.01 [95% CI: 1.57-5.78]) at month 16. Lower baseline S100A12 levels (≤ 176 ng/mL) were associated with greater odds of achieving JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.52 [95% CI: 1.23-5.13]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 3.68 [95% CI: 1.46-9.28]), JIA-ACR ID (OR: 3.66 [95% CI: 1.76-7.61]), JIA-ACR90 (OR: 2.03 [95% CI: 1.07-3.87]), JIA-ACR100 (OR: 2.14 [95% CI: 1.10-4.17]), and JIA-ACR ID (OR: 4.22 [95% CI: 2.15-8.29]) at month 16. From baseline to month 4, decreases in S100A8/9 and S100A12 generally exceeded 50% among JIA-ACR90/100/ID responders., Conclusion: Lower baseline levels of S100A8/9 and S100A12 proteins predicted better response to abatacept treatment than higher levels and may serve as early predictive biomarkers in pJIA. Decreases in these biomarker levels may also predict longer-term response to abatacept in pJIA., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Data from trials demonstrated that abatacept (ABA) has a good safety and efficacy profile in treating rheumatoid arthritis. We have studied the retention rate of ABA in a real-life cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: This is a monocentric, retrospective study including patients with rheumatoid arthritis classified by the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria who started treatment with ABA. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to evaluate the ABA retention rate., Results: This analysis was conducted on 161 patients [male/female 21/140, median age 65 years, interquartile range (IQR) 18.7, median disease duration 169 months, IQR 144.0]. 111 patients (68.9%) received ABA subcutaneously. ABA was associated with methotrexate in 61.9% of patients and was the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in 41%. We observed a median ABA survival of 66 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 57.3-74.7], with a retention rate of 88% at 6 months and 50.9% at 5 years. Drug survival was significantly higher in patients treated with ABA subcutaneously and in male patients (p=0.039 and p=0.018, respectively). Adjusted for main confounders, female gender was the main predictor of withdrawal (hazard ratio 5.1, 95% CI 1.2-21.3)., Conclusions: Our study shows that better survival is associated with subcutaneous administration and male gender, confirming ABA effectiveness.

The efficacy of costimulation blockade with CTLA4-Ig (belatacept) in transplantation is limited due to T cell-mediated rejection, which also persists after induction with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). Here, we investigate why ATG fails to prevent costimulation blockade-resistant rejection and how this barrier can be overcome. ATG did not prevent graft rejection in a murine heart transplant model of CTLA4-Ig therapy and induced a pro-inflammatory cytokine environment. While ATG improved the balance between regulatory T cells (Treg) and effector T cells in the spleen, it had no such effect within cardiac allografts. Neutralizing IL-6 alleviated graft inflammation, increased intragraft Treg frequencies, and enhanced intragraft IL-10 and Th2-cytokine expression. IL-6 blockade together with ATG allowed CTLA4-Ig therapy to achieve long-term, rejection-free heart allograft survival. This beneficial effect was abolished upon Treg depletion. Combining ATG with IL-6 blockade prevents costimulation blockade-resistant rejection, thereby eliminating a major impediment to clinical use of costimulation blockers in transplantation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Though belatacept is administered with a weight-based dosing schema, there has been higher clearance reported in obese patients. Therefore, we evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI) and transplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients who were randomized to cyclosporine- or belatacept-based immunosuppression in the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT randomized clinical trials. A total of 666 and 543 patients underwent randomization and transplantation in BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT, respectively, of which 1056 had complete data and were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped categorically according to BMI: <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30 kg/m 2 . BMI did influence both the incidence and severity of acute rejection. Obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m 2 in the low intensity belatacept group experienced significantly more rejection at 12 months than did patients with BMI <25 kg/m 2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m 2 . In both the moderate intensity belatacept and low intensity belatacept groups, obese patients with BMI >30 kg/m 2 experienced significantly more severe acute rejection than did patients with BMI < 25 kg/m 2 or BMI 25 to <30 kg/m 2 . These results suggest that obese kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk for acute rejection when under belatacept-based immunosuppression when compared to nonobese patients., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant disease (NMD) carries inherent challenges of both alloreactivity and graft failure. Building on promising results from pilot studies in which abatacept was combined with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and sirolimus (AbaCyS) in younger NMD patients undergoing haplo-HCT, we present the long-term outcomes of this protocol. On the back of uniform disease-specific conditioning regimens containing antithymocyte globulin 4.5 mg/kg from day -9 to day -7, GVHD prophylaxis with AbaCyS consisted of abatacept administered on days 0, +5, +20, +35, and monthly until 180 days with PTCy and sirolimus. The patients were followed up with longitudinal assessment of immune reconstitution, growth, and reproductive development and quality of life (QoL) analyses. Among 40 patients (aplastic anemia, n = 24; hemoglobinopathies, n = 14; and primary immunodeficiencies, n = 2) with a median age of 10 years (range, 2 to 25 years), 95% achieved sustained engraftment. Post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome was detected in 3 patients, leading to graft failure in 2 cases. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 2.6%, and that of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 14.3%. Cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus infections were observed in 45%, 5%, and 0% respectively. Rates of nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, event-free survival, and GVHD-free, event-free survival were 5%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 4.6 years. Absence of cGVHD correlated with younger patient age and early sustained recovery of regulatory T cells and mature natural killer cells, which in turn was associated with improved QoL and lack of late infections. The AbaCyS protocol was associated with excellent long-term survival, with attenuation of both early and late alloreactivity in >80% of younger patients undergoing haplo-HCT for NMD. This study sheds light on predispositions to cGVHD and its impact on QoL, warranting further optimization of this approach., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for RA-ILD is not yet well defined. Reliable prognostic indicators are largely byproducts of prior ILD progression, including low or decreasing forced vital capacity and extensive or worsening fibrosis on imaging. In the absence of validated tools to predict treatment response, decisions about whether to initiate or augment treatment are instead based on clinical judgment. In general, treatment should be initiated in patients who are symptomatic, progressing, or at high risk of poor outcomes. Retrospective data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab are likely effective therapies for RA-ILD. Abatacept is also emerging as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with RA-ILD. Further, recent data demonstrate that immunosuppression may be beneficial even in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on imaging, suggesting that immunosuppression should be considered irrespective of imaging pattern. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that antifibrotic medications, such as nintedanib and likely pirfenidone, slow forced vital capacity decline in RA-ILD. Consideration can be given to antifibrotic initiation in patients progressing despite immunosuppression, particularly in patients with a UIP pattern. Future research directions include developing tools to predict which patients will remain stable from patients who will progress, discriminating patients who will respond to treatment from nonresponders, and developing algorithms for starting immunosuppression, antifibrotics, or both as first-line therapies., Competing Interests: J.V.P. reports no conflicts. J.S.L. reports receiving grants from the NIH and Boehringer Ingelheim, an unrestricted research gift from Pliant, and consulting fees from Blade, Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and Eleven P15, outside the submitted work. J.S.L. is/has been on the DSMB for United Therapeutics and Avalyn and is an advisor for the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, outside the submitted work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Conversion to a belatacept-based immunosuppression is currently used as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) avoidance strategy when the CNI-based standard-of-care immunosuppression is not tolerated after kidney transplantation. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term benefit and safety after conversion to belatacept., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 311 kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2020 from two referral centers, converted from CNI to belatacept after transplant according to a prespecified protocol. Patients were matched at the time of conversion to patients maintained with CNIs, using optimal matching. The primary end point was death-censored allograft survival at 7 years. The secondary end points were patient survival, eGFR, and safety outcomes, including serious viral infections, immune-related complications, antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell-mediated rejection, de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibody, de novo diabetes, cardiovascular events, and oncologic complications., Results: A total of 243 patients converted to belatacept (belatacept group) were matched to 243 patients maintained on CNIs (CNI control group). All recipient, transplant, functional, histologic, and immunologic parameters were well balanced between the two groups with a standardized mean difference below 0.05. At 7 years post-conversion to belatacept, allograft survival was 78% compared with 63% in the CNI control group ( P < 0.001 for log-rank test). The safety outcomes showed a similar rate of patient death (28% in the belatacept group versus 36% in the CNI control group), active antibody-mediated rejection (6% versus 7%), T-cell-mediated rejection (4% versus 4%), major adverse cardiovascular events, and cancer occurrence (9% versus 11%). A significantly higher rate of de novo proteinuria was observed in the belatacept group as compared with the CNI control group (37% versus 21%, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This real-world evidence study shows that conversion to belatacept post-transplant was associated with lower risk of graft failure and acceptable safety outcomes compared with patients maintained on CNIs., Clinical Trial Registry Name and Registration Number: Long-term Outcomes after Conversion to Belatacept, NCT04733131 ., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Purpose of Review: This review discusses updates in the prediction and prevention of future rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Recent Findings: In individuals with musculoskeletal symptoms and elevated antibodies to citrullinated proteins (ACPA) without clinical inflammatory arthritis (IA), a 'simple' score has a positive predictive value (PPV) of ∼28% for clinical IA/RA within 1 year, and a comprehensive score (including ultrasound) has a PPV of ∼71% for clinical RA within 5 years. Controlled clinical trials in individuals at-risk for future RA have been performed using corticosteroids, rituximab, atorvastatin, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and abatacept. Abatacept modestly reduced rates of incident clinical RA and imaging inflammation within the trials, rituximab delayed clinical IA, and methotrexate improved function, symptoms and imaging inflammation. Vitamin D with or without omega 3 fatty acids reduced incidence of autoimmune diseases, including RA. While not proven in controlled clinical trials, observational studies suggest exercise, weight loss and smoking cessation may reduce progression to clinical RA., Summary: Prediction and prevention of RA is advancing although there are no currently approved interventions for prevention. Future studies should include deeper evaluation of the pathophysiology of RA development to improve prediction and identify key pathways to target in future clinical trials, as well as develop infrastructure to support prevention-related research., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) offers a curative option for patients with certain non-malignant hematological diseases. High-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (200 mg/kg) and sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (HiC) synergistically induce stable mixed chimerism. Further, sirolimus and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig), also known as Abatacept (Aba), promote immune tolerance and allograft survival. Here, in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched allo-HCT murine model, we combined Aba and/or T-cell depleting anti-Thy1.2 (Thy) with a lower dose of PT-Cy (50 mg/kg) and Sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (LoC). While mice in the LoC group showed graft rejection, the addition of Thy to LoC induced similar donor chimerism levels when compared to the HiC group. However, the addition of Aba to LoC led to graft acceptance only in younger mice. When Thy was added to the LoC+Aba setting, graft acceptance was restored in both age groups. Engrafted groups displayed significantly reduced frequencies of recipient-specific interferon-γ-producing T cells as well as an increased frequency in regulatory T cells (Tregs) except in the LoC+Aba group. Splenocytes from engrafted mice showed no proliferation upon restimulation with Balb/c stimulators. Collectively, in combination with Aba or Thy, LoC may be considered to reduce graft rejection in patients who undergo allo-HCT., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Exhausted CD8 T cells (T EX ) are associated with worse outcome in cancer yet better outcome in autoimmunity. Building on our past findings of increased TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX with teplizumab therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D), in the absence of treatment we found that the frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX is stable within an individual but differs across individuals in both T1D and healthy control (HC) cohorts. This TIGIT + KLRG1 + CD8 T EX population shares an exhaustion-associated EOMES gene signature in HC, T1D, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and cancer subjects, expresses multiple inhibitory receptors, and is hyporesponsive in vitro , together suggesting co-expression of TIGIT and KLRG1 may broadly define human peripheral exhausted cells. In HC and RA subjects, lower levels of EOMES transcriptional modules and frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX were associated with RA HLA risk alleles (DR0401, 0404, 0405, 0408, 1001) even when considering disease status and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity. Moreover, the frequency of TIGIT + KLRG1 + T EX was significantly increased in RA HLA risk but not non-risk subjects treated with abatacept (CTLA4Ig). The DR4 association and selective modulation with abatacept suggests that therapeutic modulation of T EX may be more effective in DR4 subjects and T EX may be indirectly influenced by cellular interactions that are blocked by abatacept., Competing Interests: SL has past and current research projects sponsored by Janssen and SonomaBio. She is a member of the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. VM is currently employed by The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. HU is currently employed by Anocca AB. VW is currently employed by Notch Therapeutics. JT is currently employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. PL is a consultant for Link Therapeutics. JB is a Scientific Co-Founder and Scientific Advisory Board member of GentiBio, a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Neoleukin Therapeutics and Hotspot Therapeutics, and has past and current research projects sponsored by Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. She is a member of the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, a partner of the Allen Institute for Immunology, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, and BMS Immunology. JB also has a patent for tenascin-C autoantigenic epitopes in rheumatoid arthritis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Long, Muir, Jones, Wall, Ylescupidez, Hocking, Pribitzer, Thorpe, Fuchs, Wiedeman, Tatum, Lambert, Uchtenhagen, Speake, Ng, Heubeck, Torgerson, Savage, Maldonado, Ray, Khaychuk, Liu, Linsley and Buckner.)

Importance: The pharmacokinetics of abatacept and the association between abatacept exposure and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 are unknown., Objective: To characterize abatacept pharmacokinetics, relate drug exposure with clinical outcomes, and evaluate the need for dosage adjustments., Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a secondary analysis of data from the ACTIV-1 (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) Immune Modulator (IM) randomized clinical trial conducted between October 16, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The trial included hospitalized adults who received abatacept in addition to standard of care for treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia. Data analysis was performed between September 2022 and February 2024., Exposure: Single intravenous infusion of abatacept (10 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 1000 mg)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality at day 28 was the primary outcome of interest, and time to recovery at day 28 was the secondary outcome. Drug exposure was assessed using the projected area under the serum concentration time curve over 28 days (AUC0-28). Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze the association between drug exposure and 28-day mortality, adjusted for age, sex, and disease severity. The association between time to recovery and abatacept exposure was examined using Fine-Gray modeling with death as a competing risk, and was adjusted for age, sex, and disease severity., Results: Of the 509 patients who received abatacept, 395 patients with 848 serum samples were included in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Their median age was 55 (range, 19-89) years and most (250 [63.3%]) were men. Abatacept clearance increased with body weight and more severe disease activity at baseline. Drug exposure was higher in patients who survived vs those who died, with a median AUC0-28 of 21 428 (range, 8462-43 378) mg × h/L vs 18 262 (range, 9628-27 507) mg × h/L (P < .001). Controlling for age, sex, and disease severity, an increase of 5000 units in AUC0-28 was associated with lower odds of mortality at day 28 (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35-0.79]; P = .002). For an AUC0-28 of 19 400 mg × h/L or less, there was a higher probability of recovery at day 28 (hazard ratio, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.70-4.08] for every 5000-unit increase; P < .001). Controlling for age, sex, and disease severity, every 5000-unit increase in AUC0-28 was also associated with lower odds of a composite safety event at 28 days (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.33-0.63]; P < .001). Using the dosing regimen studied in the ACTIV-1 IM trial, 121 of the 395 patients (30.6%) would not achieve an abatacept exposure of at least 19 400 mg × h/L, particularly at the extremes of body weight. Using a modified, higher-dose regimen, only 12 patients (3.0%) would not achieve the hypothesized target abatacept exposure., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients who were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and achieved higher projected abatacept exposure had reduced mortality and a higher probability of recovery with fewer safety events. However, abatacept clearance was high in this population, and the current abatacept dosing (10 mg/kg intravenously with a maximum of 1000 mg) may not achieve optimal exposure in all patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04593940.

Purpose: Evaluate the benefit of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F] FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the therapeutic assessment of Abatacept (ABA) as first-line therapy in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients., Methods: This was an ancillary study of ALORS trial (Abatacept in earLy Onset polymyalgia Rheumatica Study) assessing the ability of ABA versus placebo to achieve low disease activity (C-Reactive Protein PMR activity score (CRP PMR-AS) ≤ to 10) without glucocorticoid (GC) at week 12 in patients with early-onset PMR. The patients underwent [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Responses to treatments were evaluated according to CRP PMR-AS, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) PMR-AS, Clin PMR-AS, and CRP-Imputed (Imput-CRP) PMR-AS. Quantitative score by maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and combined qualitative scores according to liver uptake (Leuven, Leuven/Groningen, and Besançon Scores) were used for assessment of [ 18 F] FDG uptake in regions of interest (ROI) usually affected in PMR. Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the clinical, biological, and [ 18 F] FDG uptake variation difference in ABA and placebo groups between W0 and W12. Subgroup analysis by GC rescue was performed., Results: At W12, there was no significant difference according to SUVmax between the ABA and the placebo groups in all ROI. Subgroup analysis according to GC administration demonstrated a significant (p 0.047) decrease in SUVmax within the left sternoclavicular joint ROI in the ABA group (- 0.8) compared to the placebo group (+ 0.6) without GC rescue. Other results did not reveal any significant difference between the ABA and placebo groups. According to combined qualitative scores, there was no significant difference between ABA and placebo groups for the direct comparison analysis and subgroup analysis according to GC rescue., Conclusion: [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT uptake did not decrease significantly after ABA compared to placebo in anatomical areas usually affected in PMR patients. These results are correlated with the clinical-biological therapeutic assessment., Clinical Trial Registration: The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est II Ref CPP: 2018-33), and all patients gave their written informed consent before study enrollment. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03632187)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: We assess the clinical and structural impact at two years of progressively spacing tocilizumab (TCZ) or abatacept (ABA) injections versus maintenance at full dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission., Methods: This multicenter open-label noninferiority (NI) randomized clinical trial included patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission receiving ABA or TCZ at a stable dose. Patients were randomized to treatment maintenance (M) at full dose (M-arm) or progressive injection spacing (S) driven by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints every 3 months up to biologics discontinuation (S-arm). The primary end point was the evolution of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score in 44 joints during the 2-year follow-up analyzed per protocol with a linear mixed-effects model, evaluated by an NI test based on the one-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the slope difference (NI margin 0.25). Other end points were flare incidence and structural damage progression., Results: Overall, 202 of the 233 patients included were considered for per protocol analysis (90 in S-arm and 112 in M-arm). At the end of follow-up, 16.2% of the patients in the S-arm could discontinue their biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, 46.9% tapered the dose and 36.9% returned to a full dose. NI was not demonstrated for the primary outcome, with a slope difference of 0.10 (95% CI 0.10-0.31) between the two arms. NI was not demonstrated for flare incidence (difference 42.6%, 95% CI 30.0-55.1) or rate of structural damage progression at two years (difference 13.9%, 95% CI -6.7 to 34.4)., Conclusion: The Towards the Lowest Efficacious Dose trial failed to demonstrate NI for the proposed ABA or TCZ tapering strategy., (© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)