Search

Purpose: To report structural changes observable in in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in keratoconic corneas

Purpose To report structural changes observable in in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in keratoconic corneas

Choroidal granuloma is a rare presentation of tuberculosis especially in immunocompetent individuals. We present a case of a young female with marked decrease in visual acuity of the left eye and a choroidal lesion on fundus examination however with no systemic manifestation of tuberculosis except a positive Mantoux test. A presumptive diagnosis of tuberculosis was made and the patient was put on anti tubercular treatment with corticosteroids to which she showed drastic improvement. Thus it is important to have a high index of suspicion for the diagnosis and treatment in these eyes. [J Contemp Med 2014; 4(1.000): 36-40]

Importance In vivo confocal microscopy could be useful in cases of fungal or acanthamoeba keratitis to determine the depth of infectious elements, but its accuracy in determining corneal thickness relative to more traditional techniques has not been well characterized. Observations In this cross-sectional observational case series, central corneal thickness was determined by in vivo confocal microscopy, ultrasonic pachymetry, and Scheimpflug topography in 47 normal corneas and 23 keratoconic corneas from November 2014 to July 2015. Analyses undertaken from July 2015 to August 2015 showed that confocal microscopy overestimated the central corneal thickness in nonkeratoconic eyes, measuring on average 5 μm thicker (95% limits of agreement [LoA], 54-64) than ultrasonic pachymetry and 14 μm thicker (95% LoA, 47-76) than Scheimpflug topography. The bias was more pronounced in keratoconic eyes, where confocal microscopy overestimated central corneal thickness by 50 μm relative to ultrasonic pachymetry (95% LoA, 77-178) and 52 μm relative to Scheimpflug topography (95% LoA, 69-174). Conclusions and Relevance Confocal microscopy overestimated central corneal thickness relative to the other instruments, but the magnitude of the differences were small, especially in nonkeratoconic eyes. This level of measurement bias is acceptable to us for determining the depth of fungal filaments and acanthamoeba cysts in infectious keratitis.

Cataract surgery is aimed at restoring sight to near normal vision. This study, conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, is an attempt to determine the causes of subnormal vision in patients following cataract surgery at a tertiary hospital in Kashmir. One hundred patients who underwent cataract surgery with an unaided visual acuity of

Purpose: To determine the success rate of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in various age groups. Methods: One hundred children (118 eyes) aged 4 to 48 months diagnosed with CNLDO were included and divided into 6 groups; group 1: infants 4-6 months of age, group 2: infants from 7 to 12 months, group 3: toddlers 13-18 months of age, group 4: older toddlers 19-24 months old, group 5: children from 25 to 36 months, and group 6: children 37-48 months of age. Probing was performed under general anesthesia in all subjects. All patients were followed at regular intervals up to 6 months postoperatively. Successful probing was documented as complete remission of symptoms 2 weeks following the procedure. Results: The success rate of probing was 100% (2 eyes) in group 1, 94% (47 eyes) in group 2, 84.4% (27 eyes) in group 3, 83.3% (15 eyes) in group 4, 61.5% (8 eyes) in group 5 and 33.3% (1 eye) in group 6; the overall success rate was 84.7% (100 eyes). The majority of eyes, 87.3% (103 eyes), had membranous obstruction while 12.7% (15 eyes) had firm obstruction. The success rate was 92.2% (95 eyes) in eyes with membranous obstruction and 33.3% (5 eyes) in those with firm obstruction. Conclusion: Probing of the nasolacrimal duct under general anesthesia is a safe and viable option as a primary treatment modality for CNLDO. The success rate decreases with increasing age; membranous obstruction resolves in the majority of cases whereas firm obstruction has a poorer outcome.