Search

This work is a benchmark study for quantum-classical computing method with a real-world optimization problem from industry. The problem involves scheduling and balancing jobs on different machines, with a non-linear objective function. We first present the motivation and the problem description, along with different modeling techniques for classical and quantum computing. The modeling for classical solvers has been done as a mixed-integer convex program, while for the quantum-classical solver we model the problem as a binary quadratic program, which is best suited to the D-Wave Leap's Hybrid Solver. This ensures that all the solvers we use are fetched with dedicated and most suitable model(s). Henceforth, we carry out benchmarking and comparisons between classical and quantum-classical methods, on problem sizes ranging till approximately 150000 variables. We utilize an industry grade classical solver and compare its results with D-Wave Leap's Hybrid Solver. The results we obtain from D-Wave are highly competitive and sometimes offer speedups, compared to the classical solver., Comment: Accepted at IEEE QCE 2024 Workshop

We study a job shop scheduling problem for an automatized robot in a high-throughput laboratory and a travelling salesperson problem with recently proposed digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (DCQO) algorithms. In DCQO, we find the solution of an optimization problem via an adiabatic quantum dynamics, which is accelerated with counterdiabatic protocols. Thereafter, we digitize the global unitary to encode it in a digital quantum computer. For the job-shop scheduling problem, we aim at finding the optimal schedule for a robot executing a number of tasks under specific constraints, such that the total execution time of the process is minimized. For the traveling salesperson problem, the goal is to find the path that covers all cities and is associated with the shortest traveling distance. We consider both hybrid and pure versions of DCQO algorithms and benchmark the performance against digitized quantum annealing and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). In comparison to QAOA, the DCQO solution is improved by several orders of magnitude in success probability using the same number of two-qubit gates. Moreover, we experimentally implement our algorithms on superconducting and trapped-ion quantum processors. Our results demonstrate that circuit compression using counterdiabatic protocols is amenable to current NISQ hardware and can solve logistics scheduling problems, where other digital quantum algorithms show insufficient performance., Comment: 14 pages, 9 figures

In variational quantum algorithms, constraints are usually added to the problem objective via penalty terms. For linear inequality constraints, this procedure requires additional slack qubits. Those extra qubits tend to blow up the search space and complicate the parameter landscapes to be navigated by the classical optimizers. In this work, we explore approaches to model linear inequalities for quantum algorithms without these drawbacks. More concretely, our main suggestion is to omit the slack qubits completely and evaluate the inequality classically during parameter tuning. We test our methods on QAOA as well as on Trotterized adiabatic evolution, and present empirical results. As a benchmark problem, we consider different instances of the multi-knapsack problem. Our results show that removing the slack bits from the circuit Hamiltonian and considering them only for the expectation value yields better solution quality than the standard approach. The tests have been carried out using problem sizes up to 26 qubits. Our methods can in principle be applied to any problem with linear inequality constraints, and are suitable for variational as well as digitized versions of adiabatic quantum computing.

We present a comprehensive case study comparing the performance of D-Waves' quantum-classical hybrid framework, Fujitsu's quantum-inspired digital annealer, and Gurobi's state-of-the-art classical solver in solving a transport robot scheduling problem. This problem originates from an industrially relevant real-world scenario. We provide three different models for our problem following different design philosophies. In our benchmark, we focus on the solution quality and end-to-end runtime of different model and solver combinations. We find promising results for the digital annealer and some opportunities for the hybrid quantum annealer in direct comparison with Gurobi. Our study provides insights into the workflow for solving an application-oriented optimization problem with different strategies, and can be useful for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches.

Optimization problems are ubiquitous in various industrial settings, and multi-knapsack optimization is one recurrent task faced daily by several industries. The advent of quantum computing has opened a new paradigm for computationally intensive tasks, with promises of delivering better and faster solutions for specific classes of problems. This work presents a comprehensive study of quantum computing approaches for multi-knapsack problems, by investigating some of the most prominent and state-of-the-art quantum algorithms using different quantum software and hardware tools. The performance of the quantum approaches is compared for varying hyperparameters. We consider several gate-based quantum algorithms, such as QAOA and VQE, as well as quantum annealing, and present an exhaustive study of the solutions and the estimation of runtimes. Additionally, we analyze the impact of warm-starting QAOA to understand the reasons for the better performance of this approach. We discuss the implications of our results in view of utilizing quantum optimization for industrial applications in the future. In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems., Comment: 20 pages

This paper presents a novel idea for the general case of the Common Due-Date (CDD) scheduling problem. The problem is about scheduling a certain number of jobs on a single or parallel machines where all the jobs possess different processing times but a common due-date. The objective of the problem is to minimize the total penalty incurred due to earliness or tardiness of the job completions. This work presents exact polynomial algorithms for optimizing a given job sequence for single and identical parallel machines with the run-time complexities of $O(n \log n)$ for both cases, where $n$ is the number of jobs. Besides, we show that our approach for the parallel machine case is also suitable for non-identical parallel machines. We prove the optimality for the single machine case and the runtime complexities of both. Henceforth, we extend our approach to one particular dynamic case of the CDD and conclude the chapter with our results for the benchmark instances provided in the OR-library., Comment: Book Chapter 22 pages

This paper considers the problem of scheduling jobs on single and parallel machines where all the jobs possess different processing times but a common due date. There is a penalty involved with each job if it is processed earlier or later than the due date. The objective of the problem is to find the assignment of jobs to machines, the processing sequence of jobs and the time at which they are processed, which minimizes the total penalty incurred due to tardiness or earliness of the jobs. This work presents exact polynomial algorithms for optimizing a given job sequence or single and parallel machines with the run-time complexities of $O(n \log n)$ and $O(mn^2 \log n)$ respectively, where $n$ is the number of jobs and $m$ the number of machines. The algorithms take a sequence consisting of all the jobs $(J_i, i=1,2,\dots,n)$ as input and distribute the jobs to machines (for $m>1$) along with their best completion times so as to get the least possible total penalty for this sequence. We prove the optimality for the single machine case and the runtime complexities of both. Henceforth, we present the results for the benchmark instances and compare with previous work for single and parallel machine cases, up to $200$ jobs., Comment: 15th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing

In this paper, we investigate a special case of the static aircraft landing problem (ALP) with the objective to optimize landing sequences and landing times for a set of air planes. The problem is to land the planes on one or multiple runways within a time window as close as possible to the preferable target landing time, maintaining a safety distance constraint. The objective of this well-known NP-hard optimization problem is to minimize the sum of the total penalty incurred by all the aircraft for arriving earlier or later than their preferred landing times. For a problem variant that optimizes a given feasible landing sequence for the single runway case, we present an exact polynomial algorithm and prove the run-time complexity to lie in $O(N^3)$, where $N$ is the number of aircraft. The proposed algorithm returns the optimal solution for the ALP for a given feasible landing sequence on a single runway for a common practical case of the ALP described in the paper. Furthermore, we propose a strategy for the ALP with multiple runways and present our results for all the benchmark instances with single and multiple runways, while comparing them to previous results in the literature., Comment: 16th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE 2013)