Search

Rationale: Meta-analyses have suggested the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events is significantly higher after a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. However, many of these studies have included a broad array of CVD events or have been limited to highly selected patient populations potentially not generalizable to the broader population of COPD. Objectives and Methods: We assessed the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization compared with before COPD hospitalization and identified patient factors associated with ASCVD hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization. This retrospective cohort study used claims data from 920,550 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD from 2016 to 2019 in the United States. The primary outcome was risk of an ASCVD hospitalization composite outcome (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) in the 30 days and 1 year after COPD hospitalization relative to the same time period before COPD hospitalization. Time in the before and after COPD hospitalization time periods to a composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome were modeled using an extension of the Cox proportional hazards model, the Anderson-Gill model, with adjustment for patient characteristics. Additional analyses evaluated for interactions in subgroups associated with the composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome. Results: Among 920,550 patients in the 30-day and 1-year cohorts (mean age, 73–74 yr) the hazard ratio estimate (95% confidence interval) for the composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome after COPD hospitalization versus before COPD hospitalization for the 30-day cohort was 0.99 (0.93, 1.05; P = 0.67), and for the 1-year cohort, it was 0.99 (0.97, 1.02; P = 0.53) after adjustment. We observed three subgroups that were significantly associated with higher risk for ASCVD hospitalizations 1 year after COPD hospitalization: 76+ years old, women, and COPD hospitalization severity. Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD, the risk of ASCVD hospitalization was not significantly increased 30 days or 1 year after COPD hospitalization relative to before COPD hospitalization. In subgroup analyses, we identified age 76+ years old, female sex, and COPD hospitalization severity as high-risk subgroups with increased risk of ASCVD events 1 year after COPD hospitalization. Further research is needed to characterize the COPD exacerbation populations at highest ASCVD hospitalization risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atherosclerosis, characterized by the accumulation of lipoproteins and lipids within the vascular wall, underlies a heart attack, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. Endothelial inflammation is the primary component driving atherosclerosis, promoting leukocyte adhesion molecule expression (e.g., E-selectin), inducing chemokine secretion, reducing the production of nitric oxide (NO), and enhancing the thrombogenic potential. While current therapies, such as statins, colchicine, anti-IL1β, and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, target systemic inflammation, none of them addresses endothelial cell (EC) inflammation, a critical contributor to disease progression. Targeting endothelial inflammation is clinically significant because it can mitigate the root cause of atherosclerosis, potentially preventing disease progression, while reducing the side effects associated with broader anti-inflammatory treatments. Recent studies highlight the potential of the APOA1 binding protein (AIBP) to reduce systemic inflammation in mice. Furthermore, its mechanism of action also guides the design of a potential targeted therapy against a particular inflammatory signaling pathway. This review discusses the unique advantages of repressing vascular inflammation or enhancing vascular quiescence and the associated benefits of reducing thrombosis. This approach offers a promising avenue for more effective and targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The prevalence of tendon rupture and tendinopathies (TRT) has not been determined in a large population of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We investigated TRT prevalence among patients with ASCVD and in the general population, using data from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse, a large US medical and pharmacy claims database. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years from the claims database during the identification period (January 2019 to December 2020) and 12 months of continuous enrollment. The primary outcome was evidence of TRT in the 12 months following the index date (first ASCVD diagnosis in the ASCVD cohort; first claim in the claims database in the overall population). Diagnostic codes (ICD-10 and/or CPT) were used to define ASCVD and TRT diagnosis. Results: The ASCVD cohort and overall population included 5,589,273 and 61,715,843 patients, respectively. In the ASCVD cohort, use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT was identified in 67.9% (statins), 17.7% (corticosteroids), and 16.7% (fluoroquinolones) of patients. Bempedoic acid use was reported in 1556 (< 0.1%) patients. TRT prevalence during 12-month follow-up was 3.4% (ASCVD cohort) and 1.9% (overall population). Among patients with ASCVD, 83.5% experienced TRT in only one region of the body. Factors most associated with TRT in the ASCVD cohort were increasing age, most notably in those aged 45–‍64 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07–2.32), obesity (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.50–1.53), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.45–1.79). Use of statins or bempedoic acid was not associated with increased TRT risk. Conclusion: Patients with ASCVD may have greater risk of TRT than the general population, which may be driven by an increased prevalence of comorbidities and use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT. Plain Language Summary: Patients with atherosclerosis, the main cause of heart attacks, strokes, and peripheral vascular disease, typically require several drugs to control the disease. Some of the drugs used to treat atherosclerosis have been linked to a higher occurrence of tendon tears (or ruptures) or swelling/inflammation of the tendons (tendinopathies). However, there may be other factors present in these patients that increase the risk of tendon injuries that are not related to these drugs. This study used the medical records of over 5.5 million patients with atherosclerosis and over 63 million patients reflecting the general population in the United States to determine the prevalence of tendon injury. Additionally, the researchers looked at other factors that might be related to a higher risk of tendon injury in each group. Over a 12-month period, tendon injuries occurred in 3.4% of patients with atherosclerosis and 1.8% of patients in the general population. In patients with atherosclerosis, factors such as being obese, older (45–64 years), or having rheumatoid arthritis were also linked to an increased risk of tendon injuries. There was no association seen between statin or bempedoic acid use and tendon injuries. These results may help healthcare providers to determine the underlying risk of tendon injuries and guide treatment of this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aimsLipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) but is not included in the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE). We aimed to assess how well the PCE predict 10-year event rates in individuals with elevated Lp(a), and whether the addition of Lp(a) improves risk prediction.MethodsWe compared observed versus PCE-predicted 10-year ASCVD event rates, stratified by Lp(a) level and ASCVD risk category using Poisson regression, and evaluated the association between Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL and ASCVD risk using Cox proportional hazards models in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We evaluated the C-index and net reclassification improvement (NRI) with addition of Lp(a) to the PCE.ResultsThe study population included 6639 individuals (20%, n = 1325 with elevated Lp(a)). The PCE accurately predicted 10-year event rates for individuals with elevated Lp(a) with observed event rates falling within predicted limits. Elevated Lp(a) was associated with increased risk of CVD events overall (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.60), particularly in low (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.40-4.31), and high-risk (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.96) individuals. Continuous NRI (95% CI) with the addition of Lp(a) to the PCE for CVD was 0.0963 (0.0158-0.1953) overall, and 0.2999 (0.0876, 0.5525) among low-risk individuals.ConclusionsThe PCE performs well for event rate prediction in individuals with elevated Lp(a). However, Lp(a) is associated with increased CVD risk, and the addition of Lp(a) to the PCE improves risk prediction, particularly among low-risk individuals. These results lend support for increasing use of Lp(a) testing for risk assessment.

Abstract Introduction The prevalence of tendon rupture and tendinopathies (TRT) has not been determined in a large population of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We investigated TRT prevalence among patients with ASCVD and in the general population, using data from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse, a large US medical and pharmacy claims database. Methods This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years from the claims database during the identification period (January 2019 to December 2020) and 12 months of continuous enrollment. The primary outcome was evidence of TRT in the 12 months following the index date (first ASCVD diagnosis in the ASCVD cohort; first claim in the claims database in the overall population). Diagnostic codes (ICD-10 and/or CPT) were used to define ASCVD and TRT diagnosis. Results The ASCVD cohort and overall population included 5,589,273 and 61,715,843 patients, respectively. In the ASCVD cohort, use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT was identified in 67.9% (statins), 17.7% (corticosteroids), and 16.7% (fluoroquinolones) of patients. Bempedoic acid use was reported in 1556 (

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a substantial burden to individuals, caregivers, and healthcare systems. CKD is associated with higher risk for adverse events, including renal failure, cardiovascular disease, and death. This study aims to describe comorbidities and complications in patients with CKD. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study linking administrative health databases in Alberta, Canada. Adults with CKD were identified (April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2019) and indexed on the first diagnostic code or laboratory test date meeting the CKD algorithm criteria. Cardiovascular, renal, diabetic, and other comorbidities were described in the two years before index; complications were described for events after index date. Complications were stratified by CKD stage, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) status at index. Results The cohort included 588,170 patients. Common chronic comorbidities were hypertension (36.9%) and T2DM (24.1%), while 11.4% and 2.6% had ASCVD and chronic heart failure, respectively. Common acute complications were infection (58.2%) and cardiovascular hospitalization (24.4%), with rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 29.4 (29.3–29.5) and 8.37 (8.32–8.42) per 100 person-years, respectively. Common chronic complications were dyslipidemia (17.3%), anemia (14.7%), and hypertension (11.1%), with rates (95% CI) of 11.9 (11.7–12.1), 4.76 (4.69–4.83), and 13.0 (12.8–13.3) per 100 person-years, respectively. Patients with more advanced CKD, ASCVD, and T2DM at index exhibited higher complication rates. Conclusions Over two-thirds of patients with CKD experienced complications, with higher rates observed in those with cardio-renal-metabolic comorbidities. Strategies to mitigate risk factors and complications can reduce patient burden.

This review explores the many barriers to accessing lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) for the prevention and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Geographical, knowledge, and regulatory barriers significantly impede access to LLTs, exacerbating disparities in healthcare infrastructure and affordability. We highlight the importance of policy reforms, including pricing regulations and reimbursement policies, for enhancing affordability and streamlining regulatory processes. Innovative funding models, such as value-based pricing and outcome-based payment arrangements, have been recommended to make novel LLTs more accessible. Public health interventions, including community-based programs and telemedicine, can be utilized to reach underserved populations and improve medication adherence. Education and advocacy initiatives led by patient advocacy groups and healthcare providers play a crucial role in raising awareness and empowering patients. Despite the barriers to access, novel LLTs present a big opportunity to reduce the burden of ASCVD, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts among policymakers, healthcare providers, industry stakeholders, and patient advocacy groups to address these barriers to improve access to LLTs globally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In both industrialized and developing nations, diabetic nephropathy is a major contributor to renal failure and the primary cause of death for those with diabetes. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) mainly regulates metabolism to improve cellular glucose absorption, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism. It also plays a crucial role in maintaining β-cell activities. Moreover, in individuals with type 2 diabetes, FGF21 levels rise in direct proportion to the advancement of the albuminuria stage. Aim: This study aimed to investigate relation of serum level of FGF21 to different degrees of albuminuria in T2DM and to detect its impact on cardiovascular risk in those patients. Patients and methods: This case-control study included 120 volunteer subjects who were divided into: Group A that included 30 healthy control subjects and group B that included 90 T2DM patients. Group B was further classified according to urinary albumin excretion into: Group B1: with normoalbuminuria, group B2: microalbuminuria and group B3: with macroalbuminuria. FGF21 was measured by ELISA and ASCVD risk score was calculated for all subjects. Results: Highly statistically significant increase in serum FGF21 levels and ASCVD risk were found in group B1, B2 & B3 compared to group A, in group B3 compared to group B1 & B2 and in group B2 compared to group B1. Serum level of FGF21 is positively correlated with the ASCVD risk score in type 2 diabetic patients. Conclusion; Elevated FGF21 and prolonged duration of diabetes are the main independent predictors of albuminuria in T2D patients. Increased FGF21 was associated with the ASCVD risk in type 2 diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The present study was planned to access CAD risk in T2 DM patients with erectile dysfunction. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study 100 diabetic patients (who visited to hospital attending medicine OPD) recruited which was diagnosed according to ADA revised criteria. Results: Out of 100 diabetic patient ED (Erectile Dysfunction) was present in 36 (36%) and ED was absent in 64 (64%). Maximum frequency of moderate ED 43% was found then severe ED 33%, mild to moderate ED-17% and mild ED-7%. The age showed insignificant (p>0.05) relation with ED. Prevalence of ED was 36% in diabetic population. Duration of the diabetes, FB(Fasting Blood Sugar) and PPBS(Post prandial Blood Sugar) showed a significant correlation (p<0.05) with ED. Age, HbA1C, ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular disease) risk showed insignificant (p>0.05) relation with ED. Chi square statistical analysis revealed a significant relation (p<0.05) between presence of severe V in relation with age. Maximum patients aged 46-55 years in moderate ED, severe ED found maximum in 35-45 years age group. BMI showed insignificant (p>0.05) relation with ED. Conclusion: Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for ED. Fasting blood sugar and postprandial blood sugar showed significant (p<0.05) relation with ED. HbA1c show an insignificant correlation (p>0.05) with ED. Duration of diabetes have been associated with an increased risk of ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Lipid lowering treatments (LLTs) can reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite the availability of potent LLTs, our clinical observations suggest an inadequate use of such agents. To evaluate this treatment deficit, we designed the present study. Methods: We reviewed the charts of all patients with a history of ASCVD (coronary artery disease—CAD; carotid stenosis—CS; or peripheral artery disease—PAD) diagnosed prior to their first visit to one of our clinics. We recorded their gender, age, ASCVD risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, body mass index), lipid values during that visit and the LLT used. We estimated the rates of the attainment of guideline-specific lipid goals by year, and assessed factors influencing the likelihood of treatment success. Results: Overall, n = 1003 subjects were recruited: CAD n = 703 (70.1%), PAD n = 168 (16.8%), CS n = 325 (32.4%); age 64.7 ± 11.2 years; n = 376 (37.5%) females; n = 642 (64.0%) had diabetes; n = 740 (73.8%) had hypertension; n = 299 (29.8%) were former and n = 367 (36.6%) were current smokers. An appropriate LLT was used in 361 (36.0%) subjects, n = 159 (15.9%) were on no treatment, n = 483 (48.2%) were receiving inadequate therapy, n = 434 (43.3%) were on a high-intensity LLT and n = 361 (36.0%) had achieved the year-specific LDL goals. Success rates ranged from 5.7% to 81.5%, with the lowest being 2020–2023 (5.7–14.5%), p < 0.001. The use of a combination of LLTs and PCSK9 inhibitors led to higher rates of LDL-C goals achievement (p < 0.001). Discussion: Recent secondary ASCVD risk prevention guidelines' goals are rarely achieved in daily clinical practice, producing a major treatment deficit in this population. Newer systematic interventions are needed to curb this public health issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To construct a risk prediction model for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients with hyperuricemia. Methods: Data in this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2007–2010). Participants from Huashan Hospital were included as an external validation. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relevant factors of ASCVD in patients with hyperuricemia. The discriminability of the model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) statistic of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Hosmer–Lemeshow test, correction curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model. Results: A total of 389 patients collected from the NHANES were included in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, creatinine (Cr), glucose (Glu), serum uric acid (SUA), and history of gout were predictive factors for ASCVD in hyperuricemia (HUA) patients. These predictive factors were used to construct a nomogram. And 157 patients from NHANES were in the internal validation group and 136 patients from Huashan Hospital were in the external validation group. The AUC values of the three groups were 0.943, 0.735, and 0.664. The p values of the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were.568,.600, and.763. The calibration curve showed consistency between the nomogram and the actual observed values. The DCA curve indicated that the model has good clinical practicality. Conclusion: This study constructed the ASCVD risk prediction model for HUA patients, which is beneficial for medical staff to detect high‐risk populations of ASCVD in the early stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with polyvascular disease (PVD) are at very high cardiovascular risk and require intensive lipid-lowering therapy. This analysis describes the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus placebo in patients with and without PVD. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 trials, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 284 mg inclisiran (300 mg inclisiran sodium) or placebo on day 1, day 90, and 6-monthly thereafter. Percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to day 510 and corresponding time-adjusted change from day 90 and up to day 540 were evaluated per patients' PVD status. Safety was assessed over 540 days. Results: Of 3454 patients, 470 (13.6%) had PVD, and 2984 (86.4%) did not. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment arms in both cohorts. A greater proportion of patients with PVD had comorbidities versus those without. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) placebo-corrected LDL-C percentage change from baseline to day 510 was −48.9% (−55.6 to −42.2) in patients with PVD and −51.5% (−53.9 to −49.1) in patients without. Proportions of patients with reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events were similar between treatment arms, irrespective of PVD status, except for an excess of mild or moderate clinically relevant TEAEs at the injection site with inclisiran. Conclusion: Twice-yearly inclisiran dosing (after the initial and 3-month doses) was well tolerated and provided effective and sustained lipid-lowering in patients, irrespective of PVD status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association updated their joint guidelines stating low-dose aspirin should not be used on a routine basis for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among people older than 70 years of age because of increased bleeding risk.1 In addition to these updated guidelines, a statement released by the US Preventive Services Task Force in April 2022 recommends against the initiation of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people 60 years of age or older.2 Despite these updated recommendations, aspirin continues to be a common medication older patients take, providing an opportunity for a clinical pharmacist deprescribing intervention. OBJECTIVE: To identify the role of a pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing intervention within a safety-net health system in the outpatient setting. METHODS: This project included patients 70 years of age and older who had aspirin listed as an active medication without documented ASCVD. This project assessed aspirin deprescribing rates, time spent on pharmacist outreach, and reasons for patient and/or provider refusal to discontinue aspirin. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one eligible patients were contacted. Of those, 78 (60%) patients discontinued aspirin after speaking with the pharmacist, and 8 patients discontinued aspirin after a clinical pharmacist recommendation to the patient's primary care provider (PCP). The median time spent on outreach was approximately eight minutes. Of the 6 patients who consented to the project but declined to discontinue aspirin therapy based on pharmacist intervention, 5 preferred to discuss the issue with their PCP, while 1 patient was told by an outside provider to take aspirin. CONCLUSION: Results indicate the successful impact a clinical pharmacist may have in deprescribing aspirin in a high-risk population. These data may also suggest that an active and intentional approach to deprescribing is likely to be more effective than a written recommendation to providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveElevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and has no approved pharmacotherapies. Limited real-world data exists on the proportion of patients with available Lp(a) test results, characteristics of these patients, and their use of lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) for secondary prevention (SP) and primary prevention (PP) of ASCVD.MethodsPatients with measured Lp(a) receiving LLTs for SP or PP of ASCVD were identified in the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart database. Lp(a) distribution and LLT utilization including persistence and adherence were assessed. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after index LLT, adjusting for baseline characteristics.ResultsOverall, 2154 SP and 7179 PP patients met eligibility criteria. Of patients with available laboratory data, only 0.7% (SP) and 0.6% (PP) had Lp(a) test results. In the SP cohort, Lp(a) levels ≥125 nmol/L and ≥175 nmol/L were 26.4% and 17.6%, respectively, and the mean (SD) Lp(a) levels (overall SP cohort 90.4 [97.9] nmol/L) were highest in Black patients (123.4 [117.4]; p

Background Lipoprotein (a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, lipoprotein (a) testing remains variable and it is unclear what factors influence testing and if testing changes clinical management. Methods and Results A retrospective study using electronic medical record data from 5 health systems identified an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease cohort divided into those with and without a lipoprotein (a) test between 2019 and 2021. Baseline characteristics and lipid‐lowering therapy patterns were assessed. Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with lipoprotein (a) testing. Among 595 684 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, only 2587 (0.4%) were tested for lipoprotein (a). Those who were older or Black individuals were less likely to have lipoprotein (a) testing, while those with familial hypercholesterolemia, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease, prior lipid‐lowering therapy, or low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥130 mg/dL were more likely to be tested. Those with a lipoprotein (a) test, regardless of the lipoprotein (a) value, were more frequently initiated on any statin therapy (30.3% versus 10.6%, P

BackgroundThe triglyceride (TG) content of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-TG) has been shown to be more predictive of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events than the cholesterol content of LDL (LDL-C). The goal of our study was to develop an equation for estimating LDL-TG (eLDL-TG) based on the standard lipid panel and to compare it to estimated LDL-C as an ASCVD risk biomarker.MethodsUsing least-square regression analysis, the following eLDL-TG equation was developed: eLDL-TG=TG38.5+NonHDL-C5.75+9.75TGNonHDL-C+244HDL-C−2.95. LDL-TG was measured by the β-quantification (BQ) reference method (N = 40,202). LDL-C was calculated by the Sampson-NIH equation. The association of LDL-C and eLDL-TG with ASCVD risk markers was performed in the National Heart and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (N = 37,053) and with ASCVD events in a primary prevention cohort from the UK Biobank (UKB) (N = 429,367) and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (N = 14,632).ResultseLDL-TG showed better ASCVD risk stratification of UKB participants than LDL-C (Wilcoxon Chi-Square: 2,099.6 vs. 418.7, respectively). Receiving-operating characteristics analysis revealed that eLDL-TG had a stronger association with ASCVD events than LDL-C (AUC: 0.596 vs. 0.542, respectively) and other conventional lipid markers. Similar findings were found in ARIC. Discordance analysis in UKB showed that the group with low LDL-C/high eLDL-TG had a similar risk as the high LDL-C/high eLDL-TG group. Furthermore, these same two groups with the highest eLDL-TG levels and the highest ASCVD event rate also had higher mean levels of systolic blood pressure, Body Mass Index, hemoglobin A1C, and C-reactive protein than the two lower eLDL-TG groups. Using eLDL-TG > 44.6 mg/dl (80th percentile) as a cut-point leads to a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% CI, 1.29–1.36) for ASCVD events, which remained significant after adjustment for LDL-C and apoB. Furthemore, using eLDL-TG as a risk-enhancer test leads to reclassification of 50% more high-risk individuals than current lipid-enhancer test rules.ConclusionsLike LDL-C, LDL-TG can also be calculated from the results of the standard lipid panel. Compared to estimated LDL-C, eLDL-TG was a better risk marker for primary prevention and hence could improve initial ASCVD risk stratification.

Introduction: Lower statin utilization is reported among women compared to men, however large-scale studies evaluating gender disparities in LDL-C management in individuals with ASCVD and its subtypes remain limited, particularly across age and racial/ethnic subgroups. In this study, we address this knowledge gap using data from a large US healthcare system. Methods: All adult patients with established ASCVD in the Houston Methodist Learning Health System Registry during 2016–2022 were included. Statin use and dose were extracted from the database. The association between gender and statin utilization was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analyses in patients with ASCVD overall, across ASCVD subtypes, and by age, racial/ethnic subgroups, and socioeconomic risk factors. Results: A total of 97,819 patients with prevalent ASCVD were included. Women with ASCVD had lower utilization of any statin (64.3% vs 72.6 %; p < 0.001) and high-intensity statin (29.8% vs 42.5 % p < 0.001) compared with men. In fully adjusted models, women had 40 % lower odds of any (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:0.58, 95 % CI 0.57–0.60) and high-intensity statin use (aOR:0.59, 0.57–0.61) relative to men. Women were also less likely to have guideline-recommended LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (30.2% vs 42.7 %; p < 0.01). These differences persisted across age, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic subgroups. Conclusion: Significant gender disparities exist in contemporary lipid management among patients with ASCVD, with women being less likely to receive any and high-intensity statin and achieving guideline defined LDL-C goal compared with men across age and racial/ethnic subgroups. These disparities underscore the need to further understand potential socioeconomic drivers of the observed lower statin uptake in women.

BackgroundThere is controversy regarding the relationship between serum iron levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between serum iron levels and ASCVD among older adults using data from the 2009–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis involving 8,682 participants aged 60 years and older, with complete data on serum iron levels and confirmed ASCVD status, sourced from the 2009–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between serum iron levels and ASCVD. To assess the consistency of this association across different demographic groups, subgroup analyses, and interaction tests were performed.ResultsThe group with the highest serum iron levels (fourth quartile, 100–369 μg/dL) exhibited several distinct characteristics: they were the youngest on average (69.57 ± 6.91 years), had the highest proportion of males (61.42%), and the highest hemoglobin levels (14.43 ± 1.33 g/dL). This group also showed the lowest iron supplement usage (19.71 ± 12.85 mg/30 days), white blood cell counts (6.73 ± 2.41 1,000 cells/μL), and serum creatinine levels (0.98 ± 0.45 mg/dL). Moreover, they had higher levels of education and income, a higher likelihood of being married, and a lower body mass index (BMI). Additionally, they had significantly lower rates of diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and heart attacks (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, a linear relationship between serum iron levels and ASCVD was initially observed (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95–0.99, p < 0.05). However, further analysis using a two-part logistic regression model with an inflection point at 131 μg/dL revealed more nuanced results. For serum iron levels below 131 μg/dL, each 10 μg/dL increase was associated with a 4% decrease in the odds of ASCVD (OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.98, p < 0.001). Conversely, for serum iron levels above 131 μg/dL, each 10 μg/dL increase corresponded to a 1% increase in the odds of ASCVD, though this finding was not statistically significant (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98–1.08, p > 0.05).ConclusionIn the US elderly population, serum iron levels are negatively associated with ASCVD, particularly when serum iron levels are below 131 μg/dL.

Seasonal influenza immunization reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. Patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) derive a greater benefit than those without, yet up to 50 % do not take up the immunization. Patient perceptions and beliefs are known to inform immunization behaviors, yet the immunization related beliefs of patients with CVD have not been described. Objective: To describe beliefs, perceptions and behaviors regarding influenza immunization in patients with CVD. Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional, voluntary and anonymous survey of 181 cardiology inpatients and outpatients attending three large hospitals in Victoria. Results: Median age was 64, 35.0 % were female and 24.2 % spoke a language other than English at home. Over one-third-(34.5 %) of respondents did not receive the seasonal influenza immunization in the prior year. Only half (54.2 %) of patients agreed that their heart condition placed them at higher risk of complications and serious illness if they contracted influenza. Nearly a quarter of patients (24.0 %) were concerned about side effects while 1 in 10 patients raised cost as a barrier despite being free-of-charge in Australia. If asked to receive the seasonal influenza immunization, 86 % patients would agree if their cardiologist recommended it. Conclusion: Despite guideline recommendations, most cardiology patients are uninformed of the cardiovascular benefits of seasonal influenza immunization with many unaware they are at higher risk of influenza-related illness. The vast majority of patients would accept the immunization if recommended by their cardiologist highlighting their important role in improving uptake.

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-Fei Xia,1 Jing-Bo Li,2 Guo-Sheng Tian,2 Wei-Ran Jiang,3 Yao-Shuang Li,1 Chen-Ying Lin,1 Hui-Na Qiu,2 Fan Wu,4 Jun-Jia Wang,5 Chun-Jun Li,2 Jing-Na Lin2 1Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Endocrinology, Health Management Center, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, 300121, People’s Republic of China; 3Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; 4School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, People’s Republic of China; 5Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jing-Na Lin; Chun-Jun Li, Email 13207628978@163.com; li_chunjun@126.comObjective: To investigate the impact of sarcopenia on the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: This study included the clinical, laboratory, and body composition data of 1491 patients with T2DM who were admitted to the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Tianjin Union Medical Center from July 2018 to July 2023. The China-PAR model was utilized to evaluate cardiovascular disease risk. Associations between ASCVD risk and various clinical parameters were analyzed, and the relationship between body composition parameters and ASCVD risk was assessed using logistic regression.Results: The analysis revealed that T2DM patients with sarcopenia had a higher 10-year ASCVD risk compared to those without sarcopenia, with reduced muscle mass independently predicting an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This association was significant among female T2DM patients, while male T2DM patients with sarcopenia showed a marginally higher median ASCVD risk compared to their non-sarcopenic counterparts. ASCVD risk inversely correlated with body muscle parameters and positively correlated with fat content parameters. Specifically, height- and weight-adjusted fat mass (FM, FM%, FMI) were identified as risk factors for ASCVD. Conversely, muscle parameters adjusted for weight and fat (ASM%, SMM%, FFM%, ASM/FM, SMM/FM, FMM/FM) were protective against ASCVD risk. These findings highlight the critical role of sarcopenia in influencing cardiovascular disease risk among Chinese patients with T2DM, as predicted by the China-PAR model.Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of sarcopenia in T2DM patients, not only as an indicator of ASCVD risk, but possibly as an independent risk factor in this demographics.Keywords: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ASCVD, type 2 diabetes, T2DM, sarcopenia, fat content, muscle mass

Purpose: Lipid lowering treatments (LLTs) can reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite the availability of potent LLTs, our clinical observations suggest an inadequate use of such agents. To evaluate this treatment deficit, we designed the present study. Methods: We reviewed the charts of all patients with a history of ASCVD (coronary artery disease—CAD; carotid stenosis—CS; or peripheral artery disease—PAD) diagnosed prior to their first visit to one of our clinics. We recorded their gender, age, ASCVD risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, body mass index), lipid values during that visit and the LLT used. We estimated the rates of the attainment of guideline-specific lipid goals by year, and assessed factors influencing the likelihood of treatment success. Results: Overall, n = 1003 subjects were recruited: CAD n = 703 (70.1%), PAD n = 168 (16.8%), CS n = 325 (32.4%); age 64.7 ± 11.2 years; n = 376 (37.5%) females; n = 642 (64.0%) had diabetes; n = 740 (73.8%) had hypertension; n = 299 (29.8%) were former and n = 367 (36.6%) were current smokers. An appropriate LLT was used in 361 (36.0%) subjects, n = 159 (15.9%) were on no treatment, n = 483 (48.2%) were receiving inadequate therapy, n = 434 (43.3%) were on a high-intensity LLT and n = 361 (36.0%) had achieved the year-specific LDL goals. Success rates ranged from 5.7% to 81.5%, with the lowest being 2020–2023 (5.7–14.5%), p < 0.001. The use of a combination of LLTs and PCSK9 inhibitors led to higher rates of LDL-C goals achievement (p < 0.001). Discussion: Recent secondary ASCVD risk prevention guidelines’ goals are rarely achieved in daily clinical practice, producing a major treatment deficit in this population. Newer systematic interventions are needed to curb this public health issue.

Zhang Wang,1 Xue Yang,1 Longxin Li,1 Xiaobo Zhang,2 Wenlin Zhou,1 Sixue Chen1 1Department of Geriatrics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2The Third People’s Hospital of Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County, Mianyang, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Zhang Wang, Department of Geriatrics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, No. 270 Rongdu Road, Chengdu, 610083, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18981780413, Email 969281094@qq.comPurpose: To evaluate the performance of the Framingham cardiovascular risk score (FRS)/pooled cohort equations (PCE)/China prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk (China-PAR model) in a prospective cohort of Chinese older adults.Patients and Methods: We assessed 717 older adults aged 75– 85 years without ASCVD at the baseline from the Sichuan province of China. The participants were followed annually from 2011 to 2021. We obtained the participants’ information through the medical records of physical examination and evaluated their 10-year ASCVD risk using FRS, PCE, and China-PAR. We further evaluated the predictive abilities of three assessment models.Results: During the 10-year follow-up, 206 participants developed ASCVD, with an incidence rate of 28.73%. The FRS and China-PAR moderately underestimated the risk of ASCVD (22.1% and 12.4%, respectively), but while PCE overestimated the risk (36.1%). FRS and China-PAR were found to underestimate the risk of ASCVD (26% and 63%, respectively) for men, while PCE overestimated the risk by 8%; For women, FRS and China-PAR were found to underestimate the risk of ASCVD (14% and 35%, respectively), while PCE overestimated the risk by 88%.Conclusion: The 10-year ASCVD risk was found to be overestimated by PCE. China-PAR had the most accurate predictions in women, while FRS was particularly well-calibrated in males. All three risk models have good discrimination, with FRS and PCE being well-calibrated in men and all three being well-calibrated in women. Therefore, accurate risk models are warranted to facilitate the prevention of ASCVD at the baseline among Chinese older adults.Keywords: ASCVD, risk prediction model, FRS, PCE, China-PAR

Personalizing risk assessment and treatment decisions for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) rely on pooled cohort equations and increasingly coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. A growing body of evidence supports that elevated CAC scores correspond to progressively elevated ASCVD risk, and that scores of ≥100, ≥300, and ≥1000 denote risk that is equivalent to certain secondary prevention populations. This has led consensus guidelines to incorporate CAC score thresholds for guiding escalation of preventive therapy for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, initiation of non-statin lipid lowering medications, and use of low-dose daily aspirin. As data on CAC continues to grow, more decision pathways will incorporate CAC score cutoffs to guide management of blood pressure and cardiometabolic medications. CAC score is also being used to enrich clinical trial study populations for elevated ASCVD risk, and to screen for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients who received chest imaging for other diagnostic purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Among 762 patients with LDL-C≥190 mg/dL without a history of ASCVD or heart failure, coronary artery calcification (CAC), and thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) scores were associated with increased rates of HF hospitalizations. However, only CAC demonstrated an independent association with HF hospitalizations. • EAT, and NAFLD are known cardiometabolic risk factors but were not associated with increased HF hospitalizations in this cohort. • Adding ordinal CAC score to traditional risk factors improved risk stratification for HF hospitalizations. • Given the number of non-cardiac chest CT scans performed in clinical practice, this could represent an opportunity to capitalize on risk information. Coronary artery calcium (CAC), thoracic aorta calcification (TAC), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) are associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heart failure (HF). We aimed to determine whether these cardiometabolic and atherosclerotic risk factors identified by non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) are associated with HF hospitalizations in patients with LDL-C≥ 190 mg/dL. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, aged ≥40 years without established ASCVD or HF, who had a non-contrast chest CT within 3 years of LDL-C measurement. Ordinal CAC, ordinal TAC, EAT, and NAFLD were measured. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were built to ascertain the association with HF hospitalization. We included 762 patients with median age 60 (53–68) years, 68% (n=520) female, and median LDL-C level of 203 (194–216) mg/dL. Patients were followed for 4.7 (interquartile range 2.75–6.16) years, and 107 (14%) had a HF hospitalization. Overall, 355 (47%) patients had CAC=0, 210 (28%) had TAC=0, 116 (15%) had NAFLD, and median EAT was 79 mL (49-114). Moderate-Severe CAC (log-rank p <0.001) and TAC (log-rank p=0.006) groups were associated with increased HF hospitalizations. This association persisted when considering myocardial infarction (MI) as a competing risk. NAFLD and EAT volume were not associated with HF. In patients without established ASCVD and LDL-C≥190 mg/dL, CAC was independently associated with increased HF hospitalizations while TAC, NAFLD, and EAT were not. Association of cardiometabolic and atherosclerotic markers on non-contrast Chest CT with Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients with Severe Hypercholesterolemia. * Unadjusted Hazard Ratio for the moderate-to-severe category. ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, CAC: coronary artery calcification. HF: heart failure, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, TAC: thoracic aorta calcification. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an established casual risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It remains unknown whether dietary fat modifies the association of Lp(a) with cardiovascular death. Aim: To understand if dietary fat modifies the association between Lp(a) and cardiovascular death. Methods: We utilized the Atherosclerotic Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III cohorts and used multivariate cox proportional hazard modeling to test the association between Lp(a), dietary fats, and cardiovascular death. Results: The sample (n = 22,805) had average age 51.3 years and was mostly female (55.4%). Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL was associated with CV death in both ARIC (1.36, p = 0.001) and NHANES (1.31, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, no categorical or individual fatty acids modified the association between Lp(a) and CV death. Conclusion: There was no evidence that baseline dietary fat intake modified the association between Lp(a) and CV death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Inflammation is pivotal in atherosclerosis development. The dietary inflammatory index (DII) is a tool to quantify the overall inflammatory potential of diet. The association between DII and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in ASCVD patients remains undetermined. Participants included individuals with ASCVD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2018. A total of 5006 participants were included, during a median of 6.6 years of follow-up, of which 2220 (44.4 %) were dead. The Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the association between DII and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Participants in the higher DII quartile exhibited a higher mortality of ASCVD. Compared with the patients in quartile 1, those in quartile 4 had a 34 % increased risk for all-cause mortality (HR = 1.34, 95 % CI = 1.21–1.61, p = 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality showed a similar trend, however the correlation is not significant. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) showed that the relationship between DII and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was linear. Subgroup analysis revealed a persistently positive association between DII and all-causemortality across population subgroups. However, an interaction was detected between DII and alcohol history in relation to cardiovascular mortality. DII was positively correlated with the all-cause mortality of ASCVD patients. The intake of a pro-inflammatory diet may increase mortality in ASCVD patients. • Using dietary inflammatory index to evaluated the inflammatory potential of a diet. • Dietary inflammatory index was positively correlated with the all-cause mortality of ASCVD patients. • The intake of a pro-inflammatory diet may increase mortality in ASCVD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Managing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) often involves a combination of lifestyle modifications and medications aiming to decrease the risk of cardiovascular outcomes, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. The aim of this article is to discuss possible omega-3 (n-3) fatty acid–statin interactions in the prevention and treatment of ASCVD and to provide evidence to consider for clinical practice, highlighting novel insights in this field. Statins and n-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)) are commonly used to control cardiovascular risk factors in order to treat ASCVD. Statins are an important lipid-lowering therapy, primarily targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, while n-3 fatty acids address triglyceride (TG) concentrations. Both statins and n-3 fatty acids have pleiotropic actions which overlap, including improving endothelial function, modulation of inflammation, and stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques. Thus, both statins and n-3 fatty acids potentially mitigate the residual cardiovascular risk that remains beyond lipid lowering, such as persistent inflammation. EPA and DHA are both substrates for the synthesis of so-called specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), a relatively recently recognized feature of their ability to combat inflammation. Interestingly, statins seem to have the ability to promote the production of some SPMs, suggesting a largely unrecognized interaction between statins and n-3 fatty acids with relevance to the control of inflammation. Although n-3 fatty acids are the major substrates for the production of SPMs, these signaling molecules may have additional therapeutic benefits beyond those provided by the precursor n-3 fatty acids themselves. In this article, we discuss the accumulating evidence that supports SPMs as a novel therapeutic tool and the possible statin–n-3 fatty acid interactions relevant to the prevention and treatment of ASCVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP-1RA) is commonly used in patients with cardiovascular disease due to its significant improvement in the prognosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, previous studies have primarily focused on obese patients, leaving uncertainty regarding whether GLP-1RA can yield similar cardiovascular benefits in individuals with normal or low body weight. Methods: In this study, we enrolled patients with ASCVD to establish a retrospective cohort. Patients receiving GLP-1RA treatment were assigned to the GLP-1RA group, while a control group was formed by matching age and body mass index (BMI) among patients not receiving GLP-1RA treatment. Each group was further divided into subgroups based on baseline BMI levels: normal weight, overweight, and obesity. A six-month follow-up was conducted to assess changes in patient weight, metabolic indicators, and cardiac structure and function. Results: Among the normal weight subgroup, no significant weight change was observed after six months of GLP-1RA treatment (57.4 ± 4.8 vs. 58.7 ± 9.2, p = 0.063). However, significant weight reduction was observed in the other two subgroups (Overweight group: 70.0 ± 9.1 vs. 73.1 ± 8.2, p = 0.003, Obesity group: 90.5 ± 14.3 vs. 95.5 ± 16.6, p<0.001). Regardless of baseline BMI levels, GLP-1RA demonstrated significant glucose-lowering effects in terms of metabolic indicators. However, GLP-1RA have a more significant effect on improving blood lipids in overweight and obese patients. The effects of GLP-1RA on cardiac structure exhibited variations among patients with different baseline BMI levels. Specifically, it was observed that the improvement in atrial structure was more prominent in patients with normal body weight(LAD: 33.0 (30.3, 35.5) vs. 35.0 (32.5, 37.1), p = 0.018, LAA (18.0 (16.0, 21.5) vs. 18.5 (16.5, 20.5), p = 0.008), while the enhancement in ventricular structure was more significant in obese subjects(LEVDD: 49.8 ± 5.8 vs. 50.2 ± 5.0, p < 0.001, LVMI: 65.1 (56.2, 71.4) vs. 65.8 (58.9, 80.4), p < 0.039). Conclusion: According to the study, it was found that the administration of GLP-1RA can have different effects on cardiac structure in patients with different baseline BMI, In obese patients, improvements in ventricular remodeling may be more associated with weight loss mechanisms, while in patients with normal or low BMI, GLP-1RA may directly improve atrial remodeling through GLP-1 receptors in atrial tissue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent development of artificial intelligence–guided quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography analysis (AI-QCT) has enabled rapid analysis of atherosclerotic plaque burden and characteristics. This study set out to investigate the 10-year prognostic value of atherosclerotic burden derived from AI-QCT and to compare the spectrum of plaque to manually assessed coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS), and clinical risk characteristics. This was a long-term follow-up study of 536 patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease. CCTA scans were analyzed with AI-QCT and plaque burden was classified with a plaque staging system (stage 0: 0% percentage atheroma volume [PAV]; stage 1: >0%-5% PAV; stage 2: >5%-15% PAV; stage 3: >15% PAV). The primary major adverse cardiac event (MACE) outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. The mean age at baseline was 58.6 years and 297 patients (55%) were male. During a median follow-up of 10.3 years (IQR: 8.6-11.5 years), 114 patients (21%) experienced the primary outcome. Compared to stages 0 and 1, patients with stage 3 PAV and percentage of noncalcified plaque volume of >7.5% had a more than 3-fold (adjusted HR: 3.57; 95% CI 2.12-6.00; P < 0.001) and 4-fold (adjusted HR: 4.37; 95% CI: 2.51-7.62; P < 0.001) increased risk of MACE, respectively. Addition of AI-QCT improved a model with clinical risk factors and CACS at different time points during follow-up (10-year AUC: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.78-0.87] vs 0.73 [95% CI: 0.68-0.79]; P < 0.001; net reclassification improvement: 0.21 [95% CI: 0.09-0.38]). Furthermore, AI-QCT achieved an improved area under the curve compared to Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0 (10-year AUC: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73-0.83; P = 0.023) and manual QCT (10-year AUC: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73-0.83; P = 0.040), although net reclassification improvement was modest (0.09 [95% CI: −0.02 to 0.29] and 0.04 [95% CI: −0.05 to 0.27], respectively). Through 10-year follow-up, AI-QCT plaque staging showed important prognostic value for MACE and showed additional discriminatory value over clinical risk factors, CACS, and manual guideline-recommended CCTA assessment. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2022, multiple original research studies were conducted highlighting the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) imaging in young individuals and provided further evidence for the role of CAC to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. Mean calcium density was shown to be a more reliable predictor than peak density in risk assessment. Additionally, in light of the ACC/AHA/Multispecialty Chest Pain Guideline's recent elevation of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to a Class I (level of evidence A) recommendation as an index diagnostic test for acute or stable chest pain, several studies support the utility of CCTA and guided future directions. This review summarizes recent studies that highlight the role of non-invasive imaging in enhancing ASCVD risk assessment across different populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionThe association between a plant-based diet and weight loss and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has not been fully elucidated. We performed a pooled analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate this question.MethodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials on the effects of a plant-based diet on weight loss compared with a non-plant-based diet. In addition, a two-sample MR study was conducted. IVs were obtained from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on the exposures, and we obtained summary statistics on the outcomes. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the main analysis and other MR methods were performed as supplementary analyses.ResultsIndividuals on the plant-based diet lost more weight than the non-plant-based diet group (WMD −0.96 kg; 95% CI: −1.32 to −0.60). Population conditions and energy restriction were identified as the study-level factors that influenced the pooling results in the subgroup analyses. Increased consumption of raw vegetables was significantly associated with lower BMI (IVW, β −0.35, 95% CI: −0.62 to −0.08, p = 0.012) and lower risk of obesity (IVW, OR 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.99, p = 0.048), coronary heart disease (IVW, OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.92, p = 0.029) and myocardial infarction (IVW, OR 0.39,95% CI: 0.15 to 0.98, p = 0.045) and a higher HDL-C (IVW, β 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.70, p = 4×10−5).DiscussionThe present findings suggest that raw vegetable intake is beneficial for weight loss and prevention of ASCVD.

BackgroundAlthough evidence-based guidelines and effective treatments exist for dyslipidemia, a significant disparity remains between guidelines and clinical practice. In this study, we investigated adherence to statin therapy per the 2018 ACC/AHA Guideline recommendations.MethodsThis is a retrospective, descriptive-analytical study involving 1,224 individuals who presented to the laboratories located in Birjand, Eastern Iran, from June 2022 to March 2023. Analyses were conducted on 700 patients. Data collection utilized a checklist and serum value measurements of laboratory factors deemed necessary for the study.ResultsTreatment was administered per the guidelines for 348 out of the 700 patients (49.7%). With 60.7%, the diabetes group exhibited the highest level of adherence to guidelines. In the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) group, 31.7% followed the recommendations. The lowest adherence rates were in groups with a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥20% and severe hypercholesterolemia, respectively (0% and 2.8%). In our study, atorvastatin was the most frequently prescribed statin, with the majority of patients consuming a moderate-intensity statin. None of the severely hypercholesterolemic patients achieved the LDL goal. Moreover, LDL-C goal achievement was low among the ASCVD group and those with an ASCVD risk score of ≥20%.ConclusionPatients with hypercholesterolemia adhere inadequately to the AHA Guideline. Consequently, training courses are needed to inform medical doctors, particularly general practitioners, of the latest dyslipidemia treatment recommendations as the AHA advises.

Background: Statins are a cost-effective therapy for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Guidelines on statins for primary prevention are unclear for older adults (>75 years). Objective: Investigate statin utility in older adults without ASCVD events, by risk stratifying in a large healthcare network. Methods: We included 8,114 older adults, without CAD, PVD or ischemic stroke. Statin utilization based on ACC/AHA 10-year ASCVD risk calculation, was evaluated in intermediate (7.5%-19.9%) and high-risk patients (≥ 20%); and categorized using low and ‘moderate or high’ intensity statins with a follow up period of ∼7 years. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios for incident ASCVD and mortality across risk categories stratified by statin utilization. Data was adjusted for competing risk using Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Results: Compared with those on moderate or high intensity statins, high-risk older patients not on any statin had a significantly increased risk of MI [HR 1.51 (1.17–1.95); p < 0.01], stroke [HR 1.47 (1.14–1.90); p < 0.01] and all-cause mortality [HR 1.37 (1.19–1.58); p < 0.001] in models adjusted for Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. When comparing the no statin group versus the moderate or high intensity statin group in the intermediate risk cohort, although a trend for increased risk was seen, it did not meet statistical significance thresholds for MI, stroke or all-cause mortality. Conclusion: Lack of statin use was associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality in high-risk older adults. Given the benefits appreciated, statin use may need to be strongly considered for primary ASCVD prevention among high-risk older adults. Future studies will assess the risk-benefit ratio of statin intervention in older adults.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a modified U.S. (MUS) model for risk prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events in Asian patients and compare it to European and Japanese models. Methods: The MUS model, based on the US ACC/AHA 2018 lipid treatment guideline, was employed to stratify patients under primary or secondary prevention. Two multi-center prospective observational registry cohorts, T-SPARCLE and T-PPARCLE, were used to validate the scoring system, and the primary outcome was the time to first occurrence/recurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The MUS model's performance was compared to other models from Europe and Japan. Results: A total of 10,733 patients with the mean age of 64.2 (SD: 11.9) and 36.5% female were followed up for a median of 5.4 years. The MUS model was validated, with an AUC score of 0.73 (95% CI 0.68–0.78). The European and Japanese models had AUC scores ranging from 0.6 to 0.7. The MUS model categorized patients into four distinct CV risk groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) as follows: very high- vs. high-risk group (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.53–2.39), high- vs. moderate-risk group (HR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.60–2.69), and moderate- vs. low-risk group (HR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.63–6.03). After adjusting for the MUS model, a history of atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) was not a significant predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within each risk group. Conclusion: The MUS model is an effective tool for risk stratification in Asian patients with and without ASCVD, accurately predicting MACEs and performing comparably or better than other established risk models. Our findings suggest that patient management should focus on background risk factors instead of solely on primary or secondary prevention.

BackgroundCardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Despite the complexity of cardiovascular disease etiology, we do not fully comprehend the interactions between non-modifiable factors (e.g., age, sex, and race) and modifiable risk factors (e.g., health behaviors and occupational exposures).ObjectiveWe examined proximal and distal drivers of cardiovascular disease and elucidated the interactions between modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.MethodsWe used a machine learning approach on four cohorts (2005–2012) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data to examine the effects of risk factors on cardiovascular risk quantified by the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE). We estimated a network of risk factors, computed their strength centrality, closeness, and betweenness centrality, and computed a Bayesian network embodied in a directed acyclic graph.ResultsIn addition to traditional factors such as body mass index and physical activity, race and ethnicity and exposure to heavy metals are the most adjacent drivers of PCE. In addition to the factors directly affecting PCE, sleep complaints had an immediate adverse effect on FRS. Exposure to heavy metals is the link between race and ethnicity and FRS.ConclusionHeavy metal exposures and race/ethnicity have similar proximal effects on cardiovascular disease risk as traditional clinical and lifestyle risk factors, such as physical activity and body mass. Our findings support the inclusion of diverse racial and ethnic groups in all cardiovascular research and the consideration of the social environment in clinical decision-making.

Objectives: Risk stratification is a cornerstone for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Ghana has yet to develop a locally derived and validated ASCVD risk model. A critical first step towards this goal is assessing how the commonly available risk models perform in the Ghanaian population. This study compares the agreement and correlation between four ASCVD risk assessment models commonly used in Ghana. Methods: The Ghana Heart Study collected data from four regions in Ghana (Ashanti, Greater Accra, Northern, and Central regions) and excluded people with a self-declared history of ASCVD. The 10-year fatal/non-fatal ASCVD risk of participants aged 40–74 was calculated using mobile-based apps for Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), laboratory-based WHO/ISH CVD risk, laboratory-based Framingham risk (FRS), and Globorisk, categorizing them as low, intermediate, or high risk. The risk categories were compared using the Kappa statistic and Spearman correlation. Results: A total of 615 participants were included in this analysis (median age 55 [Inter quartile range 46, 64]) years with 365 (59.3 %) females. The WHO/ISH risk score categorized 504 (82.0 %), 58 (9.4 %), and 53 (8.6 %) as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. The PCE categorized 345 (56.1 %), 181 (29.4 %), and 89 (14.5 %) as low-, intermediate- and high-risk, respectively. The Globorisk categorized 236 (38.4 %), 273 (44.4 %), and 106 (17.2 %) as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. Significant differences in the risk categorization by region of residence and age group were noted. There was substantial agreement between the PCE vs FRS (Kappa = 0.8, 95 % CI 0.7 – 0.8), PCE vs Globorisk (Kappa = 0.6; 95 % CI 0.6 – 0.7), and FRS vs Globorisk (Kappa = 0.6; 95 % CI 0.6 – 0.7). However, there was only fair agreement between the WHO vs Globorisk (Kappa = 0.3; 95 % CI 0.3–0.4) and moderate agreement between the WHO vs PCE and WHO vs FRS. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the ASCVD risk prediction tools in the Ghanaian population, posing a threat to primary prevention. Therefore, there is a need for locally derived and validated tools.

Objective: Current guidelines for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) recommend targeting a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of < 70 mg/dL. However, temporal trends and racial/ethnic- and sex-differences in achievement of LDL-C targets are not well described. We assessed trends and racial/ethnic- and sex-differences in achievement of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2008 to 2017-March 2020. Methods: We combined NHANES cycles into 4 periods: 2005–2008, 2009–2012, 2013–2016, and 2017-March 2020 and included participants ≥ 40 years with self-reported ASCVD. We estimated LDL-C < 70 mg/dL prevalence over time and further stratified by sex and race/ethnicity. We used multivariable logistic regression adjusted for social determinants of health and clinical covariates to model LDL-C target attainment. Results: Among 1,826 NHANES participants representing 7,161,221 US adults with self-reported ASCVD (59.6% ≥ 65 years, 56.4% male, 74.8% White), LDL-C target attainment increased from 19.0% (95% CI, 15.3%-23.3%) in 2005–2008 to 26.3% (95% CI, 20.4%-33.1%) in 2017-March 2020 (P = 0.012 for trend). Achievement of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL significantly rose among men from19.5% (95% CI, 15.1%-24.8%) to 29.4% (95% CI, 20.7%-29.9%) without significant change in women (from 18.3% [95% CI, 13.6%-24.2%] to 22.5% [95% CI, 13.0%-35.9%]; P = 0.241 for trend). Improvement in LDL-C target attainment was similar among White, Black, and Hispanic individuals (∼5–7% increase) and was greatest among individuals of other (non-White, Hispanic, or Black) race/ethnicity (23.1% increase). In our multivariable analysis, comorbid diabetes and ages 65–75 and > 75 years were associated with LDL-C target attainment. Conclusion: LDL-C control modestly improved between 2005 and 2008 and 2017-March 2020; however, only ∼1/4 of individuals met guideline-directed LDL-C treatment targets by 2017-March 2020. Women had lower LDL-C control and lesser magnitude of improvement in LDL-C control than men, highlighting a need for targeted interventions to improve lipid-lowering therapy utilization in this population.

Background and aimsWe aimed to determine the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk stratification in women with and without early menopause (EM).MethodsTo examine the association between CAC and incident ASCVD, we performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling using data from 2,456 postmenopausal women in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) with or without EM, defined as occurring at 50% of middle-aged postmenopausal women with EM had CAC = 0, similar to those without EM. Among women with CAC = 0, those with EM had a low to borderline 10-year risk of ASCVD, but the 15-year risk was significantly higher for women with EM versus those without EM. When CAC ≥ 1, the incidence of ASCVD was similar for women with and without EM. These findings support the use of CAC to help improve ASCVD risk stratification in women with EM.Condensed abstractThis study investigated the association between coronary artery calcium (CAC) and incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in postmenopausal women with and without early menopause (EM). We found that >50% of women had CAC = 0 and an associated low-to-borderline 10-year cumulative incidence of ASCVD. However, the risk for ASCVD was significantly higher for women with EM after 15-years follow-up. Additional research is needed to better understand the differences in long-term ASCVD risk between women with and without EM who have CAC = 0.

ABSTRACTLow-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) play a pivotal role by regulating plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels. Dihydromyricetin (DMY), the most abundant natural flavonoid in rattan tea, has proven anti-atherogenic effects, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the effects of DMY on LDLR and PCSK9. The results showed DMY promoted LDLR protein and mRNA expression and increased LDL uptake in HepG2 cells. DMY inhibited intracellular PCSK9 protein and mRNA expression. And it also significantly reduced PCSK9 levels in the cell culture medium. Furthermore, DMY inhibited the expression of PCSK9 through the liver nuclear transcription factor 1 A (HNF1A) and increased the protein expression of LDLR. Taken together, our results support the idea that DMY regulates LDL-c metabolism through PCSK9/LDLR signaling. This study reveals the potential mechanism of DMY’s anti-atherogenic effect and provides a theoretical basis for dietary DMY supplementation.

Atherosclerosis, characterized by the accumulation of lipoproteins and lipids within the vascular wall, underlies a heart attack, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. Endothelial inflammation is the primary component driving atherosclerosis, promoting leukocyte adhesion molecule expression (e.g., E-selectin), inducing chemokine secretion, reducing the production of nitric oxide (NO), and enhancing the thrombogenic potential. While current therapies, such as statins, colchicine, anti-IL1β, and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, target systemic inflammation, none of them addresses endothelial cell (EC) inflammation, a critical contributor to disease progression. Targeting endothelial inflammation is clinically significant because it can mitigate the root cause of atherosclerosis, potentially preventing disease progression, while reducing the side effects associated with broader anti-inflammatory treatments. Recent studies highlight the potential of the APOA1 binding protein (AIBP) to reduce systemic inflammation in mice. Furthermore, its mechanism of action also guides the design of a potential targeted therapy against a particular inflammatory signaling pathway. This review discusses the unique advantages of repressing vascular inflammation or enhancing vascular quiescence and the associated benefits of reducing thrombosis. This approach offers a promising avenue for more effective and targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Despite numerous advances in all areas of cardiovascular care, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States (US). There is compelling evidence that interventions to improve diet are effective in cardiovascular disease prevention. This clinical practice statement emphasizes the importance of evidence-based dietary patterns in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and ASCVD risk factors, including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. A diet consisting predominantly of fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, plant protein and fatty fish is optimal for the prevention of ASCVD. Consuming more of these foods, while reducing consumption of foods with saturated fat, dietary cholesterol, salt, refined grain, and ultra-processed food intake are the common components of a healthful dietary pattern. Dietary recommendations for special populations including pediatrics, older persons, and nutrition and social determinants of health for ASCVD prevention are discussed.

ObjectiveTo explore the population health impact of treating all US adults eligible for the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) with icosapent ethyl (IPE), we estimated (1) the number of ASCVD events and healthcare costs that could be prevented; and (2) medication costs.MethodsWe derived REDUCE-IT eligible cohorts in (1) the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009-2014 and (2) the Optum Research Database (ORD). Population sizes were obtained from NHANES and observed first event rates (composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, or coronary revascularization) were estimated from the ORD. Hazard ratios from REDUCE-IT USA estimated events prevented with IPE therapy. The National Inpatient Sample estimated event costs (facility and professional) and daily IPE treatment cost was approximated at $4.59.ResultsWe estimate 3.6 million US adults to be REDUCE-IT eligible, and the observed five-year first event rate without IPE of 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.6%-19.5%) could be lowered to 13.1% (95% CI 12.8%-13.5%) with five years of IPE treatment, preventing 212,000 (uncertainty range 163,000-262,000) events. We projected the annual IPE treatment cost for all eligible persons to be $6.0 billion (95% CI $4.7-$7.5 billion), but saving $1.8 billion annually due to first events prevented (net annual cost $4.3 billion). The total five-year event rate (first and recurrent) could be reduced from 42.5% (95% CI 39.6%-45.4%) to 28.9% (95% CI 26.9-30.9%) with five years of IPE therapy, preventing 490,000 (uncertainty range 370,000-609,000) events (net annual cost $2.6 billion).ConclusionsTreating all REDUCE-IT eligible US adults has substantial medication costs but could prevent a substantial number of ASCVD events and associated direct costs. Indirect cost savings by preventing events could outweigh much of the incurred direct costs.

Risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) shows considerable heterogeneity both in generally healthy persons and in those with known ASCVD. The foundation of preventive cardiology begins with assessing baseline ASCVD risk using global risk scores based on standard office-based measures. Persons at low risk are generally recommended for lifestyle management only and those at highest risk are recommended for both lifestyle and pharmacologic therapy. Additional "risk enhancing" factors, including both traditional risk factors and novel biomarkers and inflammatory factors can be used to further assess ASCVD risk, especially in those at borderline or intermediate risk. There are also female-specific risk enhancers, social determinants of health, and considerations for high-risk ethnic groups. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis, especially with the use of coronary calcium screening, can further inform the treatment decision if uncertain based on the above strategies. Persons with pre-existing ASCVD also have variable risk, affected by the number of major ASCVD events, whether recurrent events have occurred recently, and the presence of other major risk factors or high-risk conditions. Current guidelines define high to very high risk ASCVD accordingly. Accurate ASCVD risk assessment is crucial for the appropriate targeting of preventive therapies to reduce ASCVD risk. Finally, the clinician-patient risk discussion focusing on lifestyle management and the risks and benefits of evidence-based pharmacologic therapies to best lower ASCVD risk is central to this process. This clinical practice statement provides the preventive cardiology specialist with guidance and tools for assessment of ASCVD risk with the goal of appropriately targeting treatment approaches for prevention of ASCVD events.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the prevalence of FH among a general population remains unknown, and it is unclear if FH is associated with other cardiovascular complications, including heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Analyses were conducted on individuals without a prior history of cardiovascular disease using a nationwide health claims database collected in the JMDC Claims Database between 2005 and 2022 (n = 4,126,642; median age, 44 years; 57.5% men). We defined FH as either LDL cholesterol ≥250 mg/dL or LDL cholesterol ≥175 mg/dL under the lipid‐lowering medications under the assumption that lipid‐lowering medications reduced LDL cholesterol by 30%. We assessed the associations between FH and composite outcomes, including, ASCVD (myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke), HF, and AF using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: We identified 11,983 (.29%) FH patients. In total, 181,150 events were recorded during the mean follow‐up period of 3.5 years. The status FH was significantly associated with composite outcomes after adjustments (hazard ratio [HR]; 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–1.47, p <.001). Interestingly, the status FH was significantly associated with HF (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.36–1.61, p <.001) and AF (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.08–1.64, p <.001) in addition to angina pectoris (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.33–1.58, p <.001) and stroke (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.36, p <.001). Conclusion: We found that the prevalence of FH was.29% in a general population. FH was significantly associated with a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, HF and AF. Lay summary: We sought to identify the prevalence of FH among a general population, and to clarify whether FH increases the risk of not only ASCVD but also HF and AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the effect of tirzepatide on long‐term risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among people with obesity or overweight without diabetes from SURMOUNT‐1. Materials and Methods: SURMOUNT‐1, a phase 3 trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in adults with body mass index ≥30 or ≥27 kg/m2 and at least one weight‐related complication, excluding diabetes. Participants were randomly assigned to tirzepatide (5/10/15 mg) or placebo. Changes from baseline in cardiometabolic variables were assessed. The predicted 10‐year ASCVD risk scores were calculated (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association risk engine) at baseline, week 24, and week 72 in SURMOUNT‐1 participants without a history of ASCVD. Percent change in risk scores from baseline to weeks 24 and 72 was compared between tirzepatide and placebo using mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Analyses were also conducted in participants with intermediate to high risk at baseline. Results: Tirzepatide‐treated groups demonstrated reductions in cardiometabolic variables over 72 weeks. In participants without a history of ASCVD (N = 2461), the baseline median risk score was low and did not differ across groups (1.5%–1.6%). Relative change in risk from baseline to week 72 was greater for tirzepatide (−23.5% to −16.4%) than placebo (12.7%; P < 0.001). Relative change among participants with intermediate‐to‐high baseline risk was significantly greater for tirzepatide (P < 0.05). Intermediate‐to‐high‐risk participants demonstrated similar relative change but greater absolute risk reduction compared to the overall population. Conclusion: Tirzepatide treatment significantly reduced the 10‐year predicted risk of ASCVD versus placebo in patients with obesity or overweight without diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA agent to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The purpose of this study was to provide reliable evidence to date on the long-term safety profile of inclisiran. This post hoc analysis comprised patients treated with 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo in the completed (ORION-1, -3, -5, -9, -10, and -11) and ongoing (ORION-8) trials. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates and Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence of reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), abnormal laboratory measurements, and incidence of antidrug antibodies were analyzed. This analysis included 3,576 patients treated with inclisiran for up to 6 years and 1,968 patients treated with placebo for up to 1.5 years, with 9,982.1 and 2,647.7 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that TEAEs that were serious or led to discontinuation; hepatic, muscle, and kidney events; incident diabetes; and elevations of creatine kinase or creatinine accrued at a comparable rate between groups for up to 1.5 years, with similar trends continuing for inclisiran beyond this period. Numerically fewer major cardiovascular events reported as TEAEs occurred with inclisiran during this period. Treatment-induced antidrug antibodies were uncommon with inclisiran (4.6%), with few of these persistent (1.4%) and not associated with greater incidence of TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation or serious TEAEs. Long-term treatment with inclisiran was well tolerated in a diverse population, without new safety signals, supporting the safety of inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Immunology Quaterly / Immunológia Szemle is the property of Medicina Konyvkiado Zrt. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) plasma levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The aim of this analysis was to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of patients potentially eligible for Lp(a)-lowering therapies in a real-world setting (i.e., patients with ASCVD and Lp(a) levels > 70 mg/dL). For this reason, we pooled data from a large cohort of Italian outpatients (N = 5961; men: 2879, women: 3982) with dyslipidemia. A binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significant predictors of ASCVD in the cohort, which were age (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.158, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.114 to 1.203, p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at entry (OR: 1.989, 95% CI: 1.080 to 1.198, p = 0.020) and Lp(a) (OR: 1.090, 95% CI: 1.074 to 1.107, p < 0.001). In our cohort, almost half of patients with ASCVD (44.7%) may be eligible to be treated with Lp(a)-lowering agents. Interestingly, patients who do not meet the treatment criteria despite high Lp(a) (50–70 mg/dL), respectively, account for 4.7% and 7.3% of those in primary and secondary ASCVD prevention. In conclusion, in our large cohort of outpatients with dyslipidemia, the prevalence of individuals with ASCVD and very high Lp(a) plasma levels is quite high, even with a conservative estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]