Search

Accelerated partial breast irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy treats early-stage carcinoma. Strut-adjusted volume implant applicators are inserted into the cavity post-lumpectomy. For an unstable applicator, changes in distance are seen each day between struts. If an applicator is asymmetrical with no strut movement on subsequent days, then it is stable. If an asymmetrical applicator continues to change strut distances, it is unstable. Waiting for applicator stabilization improves treatment reproducibility but increases infection risk. There is currently no consensus on stability, with ranges from 24 hours (h) to 72 h. Therefore, this study aims to determine when stability is achieved. We retrospectively reviewed 242 female breast cancer patients (2014–2022). CT was performed the same day as applicator insertion (Day 0) and repeated each treatment day. If applicators were initially asymmetrical, the distance between adjacent struts was measured, and the percentage change between the next and previous treatment day was calculated to determine how many applicators stabilized. Less than 5% change indicated stability. On Day 0, 208 out of 242 patients (86%) had stable and symmetrical applicators that maintained stability each treatment day, and 34 out of 242 patients (14%) had applicators with asymmetrical struts. Within 24 h post-insertion, 229 out of 242 (95%) patients had stabilized applicators that maintained stability on subsequent treatment days. Narrows previously suggested stability (24–72 h) to 24 h, leading to improved treatment efficiency and decreased infection risk as less time is needed to achieve applicator stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with electrons has revealed to have higher rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) than external beam radiotherapy in updated large-scale, randomized controlled trials in 2021. This study details the oncological outcomes of IORT with electron beams using our strict IORT policies. We have found new and important observations regarding the location of recurrence. Methods and materials: This is a single institution registry of early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy and electron beam IORT with appropriate cone size. All patients met our pre-excision requirements. The primary endpoint was 5-year IBTR rate, with secondary endpoints being 5-year locoregional failure rate, 5-year distant metastasis rate, 5-year overall survival and, importantly, the failure patterns. Results: Between January 2011 and December 2022, 124 patients were recruited. The median follow-up was 6.7 years. The 5-year IBTR rate was 1.87% (95% CI 0.47–7.29%), which is much lower than the ELIOT trial and comparable with other accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques. The 5-year locoregional failure rate was 3.68% (95% CI 1.40–9.52%), and the 5-year distant metastasis rate was 0.88% (95% CI 0.13–6.12%), while the 5-year overall survival rate was 97.52% (95% CI 92.44–99.19%). Six patients experienced IBTR. All recurrences were in surgical area, occurring superficial to the tumor bed and within 1 cm of the skin dermis. This failure pattern is very unique and might be explained by our hypothesis of the non-irradiated area beneath the skin. Conclusions: IORT with electron beams with strict patient selection criteria and strict large cone size is still an acceptable treatment for select patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, our new findings support extreme caution in the non-irradiated area beneath the skin around the tumor cavity. Given the constraints of our sample size, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant further investigation in larger, more comprehensive studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative breast-conserving therapy approach where radiation is delivered in less time compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience, less toxicity, and cost savings. This prospective randomized study compares the external beam APBI with commonly used moderate hypofractionated WBI in terms of feasibility, safety, tolerance, and cosmetic effects. Methods Early breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy were equally randomized into two arms– external APBI and moderate hypofractionated WBI. External beam technique using available technical innovations commonly used in targeted hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize irradiated volumes was used (cone beam computed tomography navigation to clips in the tumor bed, deep inspiration breath hold technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy dose application, using flattening filter free beams and the six degrees of freedom robotic treatment couch). Cosmetics results and toxicity were evaluated using questionnaires, CTCAE criteria, and photo documentation. Results The analysis of 84 patients with a median age of 64 years showed significantly fewer acute adverse events in the APBI arm regarding skin reactions, local and general symptoms during a median follow-up of 37 months (range 21–45 months). A significant difference in favor of the APBI arm in grade ≥ 2 late skin toxicity was observed (p = 0.026). Late toxicity in the breast area (deformation, edema, fibrosis, and pain), affecting the quality of life and cosmetic effect, occurred in 61% and 17% of patients in WBI and APBI arms, respectively. The cosmetic effect was more favorable in the APBI arm, especially 6 to 12 months after the radiotherapy. Conclusion External APBI demonstrated better feasibility and less toxicity than the standard regimen in the adjuvant setting for treating early breast cancer patients. The presented study confirmed the level of evidence for establishing the external APBI in daily clinical practice. Trial registration NCT06007118.

Background: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative breast-conserving therapy approach where radiation is delivered in less time compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), resulting in improved patient convenience, less toxicity, and cost savings. This prospective randomized study compares the external beam APBI with commonly used moderate hypofractionated WBI in terms of feasibility, safety, tolerance, and cosmetic effects. Methods: Early breast cancer patients after partial mastectomy were equally randomized into two arms– external APBI and moderate hypofractionated WBI. External beam technique using available technical innovations commonly used in targeted hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize irradiated volumes was used (cone beam computed tomography navigation to clips in the tumor bed, deep inspiration breath hold technique, volumetric modulated arc therapy dose application, using flattening filter free beams and the six degrees of freedom robotic treatment couch). Cosmetics results and toxicity were evaluated using questionnaires, CTCAE criteria, and photo documentation. Results: The analysis of 84 patients with a median age of 64 years showed significantly fewer acute adverse events in the APBI arm regarding skin reactions, local and general symptoms during a median follow-up of 37 months (range 21–45 months). A significant difference in favor of the APBI arm in grade ≥ 2 late skin toxicity was observed (p = 0.026). Late toxicity in the breast area (deformation, edema, fibrosis, and pain), affecting the quality of life and cosmetic effect, occurred in 61% and 17% of patients in WBI and APBI arms, respectively. The cosmetic effect was more favorable in the APBI arm, especially 6 to 12 months after the radiotherapy. Conclusion: External APBI demonstrated better feasibility and less toxicity than the standard regimen in the adjuvant setting for treating early breast cancer patients. The presented study confirmed the level of evidence for establishing the external APBI in daily clinical practice. Trial registration: NCT06007118. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The strategy to anticipate radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, for breast cancer (BC) treatment, has recently generated a renewed interest. Historically, preoperative RT has remained confined either to highly selected patients, in the context of personalized therapy, or to clinical research protocols. Nevertheless, in the recent years, thanks to technological advances and increased tumor biology understanding, RT has undergone great changes that have also impacted the preoperative settings, embracing the modern approach to breast cancer. In particular, the reappraisal of preoperative RT can be viewed within the broader view of personalized and tailored medicine. In fact, preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) allows a more precise target delineation, with less variability in contouring among radiation oncologists, and a smaller treatment volume, possibly leading to lower toxicity and to dose escalation programs. The aim of the present review, which represents a benchmark study for the AIRC IG-23118, is to report available data on different technical aspects of preoperative RT including dosimetric studies, patient's selection and set-up, constraints, target delineation and clinical results. These data, along with the ones that will become available from ongoing studies, may inform the design of the future trials and representing a step toward a tailored APBI approach with the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm in early-stage BC. Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiotherapy omission is increasingly considered for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, with emerging data on the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy de-escalation with partial breast irradiation and accelerated treatment regimens for low-risk breast cancer, it is necessary to move beyond an all-or-nothing approach. Here, we review existing data for radiotherapy omission, including the use of age, tumor subtype, and multigene profiling assays for selecting low-risk patients for whom omission is a reasonable strategy. We review data for de-escalated radiotherapy, including partial breast irradiation and acceleration of treatment time, emphasizing these regimens’ decreasing biological and financial toxicities. Lastly, we review evidence of omission of endocrine therapy. We emphasize ongoing research to define patient selection, treatment delivery, and toxicity outcomes for de-escalated adjuvant therapies better and highlight future directions.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the heart dose for left-sided breast cancer that can be achieved during daily practice in patients treated with multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) and deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) using a simultaneous integrated tumor bed boost (SIB)—two different concepts which nonetheless share some patient overlap. Materials and methods: We analyzed the nominal average dose (Dmean) to the heart as well as the biologically effective dose (BED) and the equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2) for an α/β of 3 in 30 MCBT-APBI patients and 22 patients treated with DIBH plus SIB. For further dosimetric comparison, we contoured the breast planning target volume (PTV) in each of the brachytherapy planning CTs according to the ESTRO guidelines and computed tangential field plans. Mean dose (Dmean), EQD2 Dmean, and BED Dmean for three dosing schemes were calculated: 50 Gy/25 fractions and two hypofractionated regimens, i.e., 40.05 Gy/15 fractions and 26 Gy/5 fractions. Furthermore, we calculated tangential field plans without a boost for the 22 cases treated with SIB with the standard dosing scheme of 40.05 Gy/15 fractions. Results: MCBT and DIBH radiation therapy both show low-dose exposure of the heart. As expected, hypofractionation leads to sparing of the heart dose. Although MCBT plans were not optimized regarding dose to the heart, Dmean differed significantly between MCBT and DIBH (1.28 Gy vs. 1.91 Gy, p < 0.001) in favor of MCBT, even if the Dmean in each group was very low. In MCBT radiation, the PTV–heart distance is significantly associated with the dose to the heart (p < 0.001), but it is not in DIBH radiotherapy using SIB. Conclusion: In daily practice, both DIBH radiation therapy as well as MCBT show a very low heart exposure and may thus reduce long term cardiac morbidity as compared to currently available long-term clinical data of patients treated with conventional tangential field plans in free breathing. Our analysis confirms particularly good cardiac sparing with MCBT-APBI, so that this technique should be offered to patients with left-sided breast cancer if the tumor-associated eligibility criteria are fulfilled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The subject of this trial was the introduction of adjuvant APBI. The radiation dose in the target volume and in organs at risk were evaluated retroactively, as was the acute toxicity. The exposure of the organs at risk was very low. Two out of three irradiated patients remained without any side effects. APBI is a very attractive treatment modality for patients with low-risk breast carcinoma. Purpose: For adjuvant radiotherapy of low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, there have been many trials of hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation (PBI) over the years, with proven mild long-term toxicity. The aim of this study was to introduce a short-course dose-adapted concept, proven in whole breast irradiation (WBI) for use in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), while monitoring dosimetric data and toxicity. Methods: From April 2020 to March 2022, 61 patients with low-risk breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were treated at a single institution with percutaneous APBI of 26 Gy in five fractions every other day after breast-conserving surgery. Dosimetric data for target volume and organs at risk were determined retrospectively. Acute toxicity was evaluated. Results: The target volume of radiotherapy comprised an average of 19% of the ipsilateral mamma. The burden on the heart and lungs was very low. The mean cardiac dose during irradiation of the left breast was only 0.6 Gy. Two out of three patients remained without any acute side effects. Conclusions: Linac-based APBI is an attractive treatment option for patients with low-risk breast cancer in whom neither WBI nor complete omission of radiotherapy appears to be an adequate alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiotherapy omission is increasingly considered for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, with emerging data on the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy de-escalation with partial breast irradiation and accelerated treatment regimens for low-risk breast cancer, it is necessary to move beyond an all-or-nothing approach. Here, we review existing data for radiotherapy omission, including the use of age, tumor subtype, and multigene profiling assays for selecting low-risk patients for whom omission is a reasonable strategy. We review data for de-escalated radiotherapy, including partial breast irradiation and acceleration of treatment time, emphasizing these regimens' decreasing biological and financial toxicities. Lastly, we review evidence of omission of endocrine therapy. We emphasize ongoing research to define patient selection, treatment delivery, and toxicity outcomes for de-escalated adjuvant therapies better and highlight future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundAccelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) yields similar rates of recurrence and cosmetic outcomes as compared to whole breast radiation therapy (RT) when patients and treatment techniques are appropriately selected. APBI combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising technique for precisely delivering high levels of radiation while avoiding uninvolved breast tissue. Here we investigate the feasibility of automatically generating high quality APBI plans in the Ethos adaptive workspace with a specific emphasis on sparing the heart.MethodsNine patients (10 target volumes) were utilized to iteratively tune an Ethos APBI planning template for automatic plan generation. Twenty patients previously treated on a TrueBeam Edge accelerator were then automatically replanned using this template without manual intervention or reoptimization. The unbiased validation cohort Ethos plans were benchmarked via adherence to planning objectives, a comparison of DVH and quality indices against the clinical Edge plans, and qualitative reviews by two board-certified radiation oncologists.Results85% (17/20) of automated validation cohort plans met all planning objectives; three plans did not achieve the contralateral lung V1.5Gy objective, but all other objectives were achieved. Compared to the Eclipse generated plans, the proposed Ethos template generated plans with greater evaluation planning target volume (PTV_Eval) V100% coverage (p = 0.01), significantly decreased heart V1.5Gy (p< 0.001), and increased contralateral breast V5Gy, skin D0.01cc, and RTOG conformity index (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively). However, only the reduction in heart dose was significant after correcting for multiple testing. Physicist-selected plans were deemed clinically acceptable without modification for 75% and 90% of plans by physicians A and B, respectively. Physicians A and B scored at least one automatically generated plan as clinically acceptable for 100% and 95% of planning intents, respectively.ConclusionsStandard left- and right-sided planning templates automatically generated APBI plans of comparable quality to manually generated plans treated on a stereotactic linear accelerator, with a significant reduction in heart dose compared to Eclipse generated plans. The methods presented in this work elucidate an approach for generating automated, cardiac-sparing APBI treatment plans for daily adaptive RT with high efficiency.

In selected low-risk breast cancer patients, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may represent an alternative option to the whole breast irradiation to reduce the volume of irradiated breast and total treatment duration. In the last few years, preliminary data from clinical trials showed that stereotactic partial breast radiotherapy may have the advantage to be less invasive compared to other APBI techniques, with preliminary good results in terms of local toxicity and cosmesis: the use of magnetic resonance, fiducial markers in the tumor bed, and new breast devices support both a precise definition of the target and radiation planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) can reduce the volume of treatment and number of treatment sessions in low-risk breast cancer patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows the administration of high doses per fraction thereby reducing the number of fractions and reducing the dose to the surrounding tissues. The objective of this study is to review the literature on the use of SBRT in PBI using the Cyberknife® (CK) unit. Material and methods: In this review, we analysed the literature in PubMed and MEDLINE with articles published in the last 10 years. All citations were evaluated for relevant content and validity. Results: We include articles in the English language with information about PBI, SBRT in PBI, the use of the CK unit in PBI and other applications of SBRT in breast carcinoma. A total of 68 articles were found and 28 articles were selected for inclusion in this review. Conclusions: The treatment of PBI using the CK unit has clear advantages in reducing the treatment volume, and therefore theoretically reducing side effects and good cosmetic results with adequate tumour control. However, the placement of fiducial markers is necessary, requiring an adequate learning curve for the placement of the markers and longer treatment times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In selected low-risk breast cancer patients, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may represent an alternative option to the whole breast irradiation to reduce the volume of irradiated breast and total treatment duration. In the last few years, preliminary data from clinical trials showed that stereotactic partial breast radiotherapy may have the advantage to be less invasive compared to other APBI techniques, with preliminary good results in terms of local toxicity and cosmesis: the use of magnetic resonance, fiducial markers in the tumor bed, and new breast devices support both a precise definition of the target and radiation planning.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021257856, identifier CRD42021257856.

The standard partial breast postoperative treatment for early breast carcinomas with multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) requires 7–8 fractions in 4–5 days as used in the APBI GEC-ESTRO phase III trial. In 2017 the GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group started a Phase I-II trial to study if very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) using 3–4 fractions could be equivalent. 81 patients with low-risk invasive carcinomas underwent high dose rate MIBT. Mean age was 68 (51–90); 33 women received 4 fractions of 6.25 Gy in 2–3 days, and 48 subsequent patients 3 fractions of 7.45 Gy in 2 days, 36 perioperatively and 45 postoperatively. Median follow-up was 62 months, with 5-year actuarial breast recurrence of 3.4 % (two cases). One patient died due to metastasis. Pigmentation changes in the entrance of tubes remained visible only in 12.3 % in long term (skin G1 toxicity). Fibrosis or slight induration (G1) in 22.2 % and G2 in 9.9 %. No case of telangiectasia has been described. Cosmetic outcome is good or excellent in 95 % and fair in 5 %. Four tumors located in the retroareolar area showed nipple retraction. VAPBI with MIBT using four fractions of 6.25 Gy or three fractions of 7.45 Gy in two or three days offers good local control, with a 5-year rate of fibrosis G2 similar to the GEC ESTRO phase III trial. VAPBI in two days is a good choice to decrease the total time of treatment, which is beneficial for the patient and reduces the workload. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate dosimetric implications of biodegradable Biozorb (BZ) markers for proton accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) plans. Materials and Methods: Six different BZs were placed within in-house breast phantoms to acquire computed tomography (CT) images. A contour correction method with proper mass density overriding for BZ titanium clip and surrounding tissue was applied to minimize inaccuracies found in the CT images in the RayStation planning system. Each breast phantom was irradiated by a monoenergetic proton beam (103.23 MeV and 8×8 cm2) using a pencil-beam scanning proton therapy system. For a range perturbation study, doses were measured at 5 depths below the breast phantoms by using an ionization chamber and compared to the RayStation calculations with 3 scenarios for the clip density: the density correction method (S1: 1.6 g/cm3), raw CT (S2), and titanium density (S3: 4.54 g/cm3). For the local dose perturbation study, the radiographic EDR2 film was placed at 0 and 2 cm below the phantoms and compared to the RayStation calculations. Clinical effects of the perturbations were retrospectively examined with 10 APBI plans for the 3 scenarios (approved by our institutional review board). Results: In the range perturbation study, the S1 simulation showed a good agreement with the chamber measurements, while excess pullbacks of 1~2 mm were found in the S2 and S3 simulations. The film study showed local dose shadowing and perturbation by the clips that RayStation could not predict. In the plan study, no significant differences in the plan quality were found among the 3 scenarios. However, substantial range pullbacks were observed for S3. Conclusion: The density correction method could minimize the dose and range difference between measurement and RayStation prediction. It should be avoided to simply override the known physical density of the BZ clips for treatment planning owing to overestimation of the range pullback.

The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife (CK) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) especially concerning the dose of organs at risk (OAR-s).

Simple Summary: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the female population. Adjuvant radiotherapy has become increasingly important as conservative treatment. Muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy is a type of radiation technique wherein the radioactive sources are directly implanted into or close to the target tissue and may be considered an extremely precise, versatile, and variable radiation technique. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique. Breast cancer represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the female population, despite continuing advances in treatment options that have significantly accelerated in recent years. Conservative treatments have radically changed the concept of healing, also focusing on the psychological aspect of oncological treatments. In this scenario, radiotherapy plays a key role. Brachytherapy is an extremely versatile radiation technique that can be used in various settings for breast cancer treatment. Although it is invasive, technically complex, and requires a long learning curve, the dosimetric advantages and sparing of organs at risk are unequivocal. Literature data support muticatheter interstitial brachytherapy as the only method with strong scientific evidence to perform partial breast irradiation and reirradiation after previous conservative surgery and external beam radiotherapy, with longer follow-up than new, emerging radiation techniques, whose effectiveness is proven by over 20 years of experience. The aim of our work is to provide a comprehensive view of the use of interstitial brachytherapy to perform breast lumpectomy boost, breast-conserving accelerated partial breast irradiation, and salvage reirradiation for ipsilateral breast recurrence, with particular focus on the implant description, limits, and advantages of the technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• APBI use is stable since 2008, but with a drop in brachytherapy and a rise in IORT. • There is a steady rise in patients considered "suitable" by ASTRO APBI guidelines. • Trends in APBI modality utilization appears to be influenced by available literature. To examine recent modality utilization trends in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) based on the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines. A total of 58,194 patients treated with APBI were identified. Patients were segregated by APBI modality (brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], and intraoperative radiotherapy ([IORT]). These patients were then further classified by suitability to receive APBI based on ASTRO guidelines. Temporal trends in utilization were evaluated using linear regression. Logistic regression was applied to study factors contributing to APBI modality choice and treatment within the ASTRO suitability groups. Patients treated with brachytherapy, EBRT, and IORT comprised 70.5%, 17.5%, and 12.0% of patients treated with APBI. From 2008 to 2017, total APBI cases remained relatively stable (−54.1 cases/year, p = 0.161) while brachytherapy cases decreased by 258.7 cases/year (p < 0.001). EBRT and IORT increased by 51.5 cases/year (p = 0.019) and 153.1 cases/year (p < 0.001), respectively. 40.0% of patients treated with APBI were classified as "suitable", which increased from 2010 to 2017 from 35.3% to 45.3% (slope = 1.51%/year, r 2 = 0.61, p = 0.022). In comparison, 36.0% (36.1% in 2010 to 33.1% in 2017) of patients were classified as "cautionary" (slope = −0.33%/year, r 2 = 0.63, p = 0.019) and 23.9% (28.6% in 2010 to 21.6% in 2017) of patients were classified as "unsuitable" (slope = −1.18%/year, r 2 = 0.67, p = 0.012). While overall APBI utilization has remained stable since 2008, this has been accompanied by a decline in brachytherapy and a rise in IORT. The causes of these trends should be the topic of future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of the study was to dosimetrically compare multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife (CK) for accelerated partial breast irradiation with special focus on dose to organs at risk (OARs). Materials and methods: Treatment plans of thirty-one patients treated with MIBT were selected and additional CK plans were created on the same CT images. The OARs included ipsilateral non-target and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, skin, ribs, and heart for left sided cases. The fractionation was identical (4 × 6.25 Gy). Dose-volume parameters were calculated for both techniques and compared. Results: The D90 of the PTV for MIBT and CK were similar (102.4% vs. 103.6%, p = 0.0654), but in COIN the MIBT achieved lower value (0.75 vs. 0.91, p < 0.001). Regarding the V100 parameter of non-target breast CK performed slightly better than MIBT (V100: 1.1% vs. 1.6%), but for V90, V50 and V25 MIBT resulted in less dose. Every examined parameter of ipsilateral lung, skin, ribs and contralateral lung was significantly smaller for MIBT than for CK. Protection of the heart was slightly better with MIBT, but only the difference of D2cm³ was statistically significant (17.3% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.0311). There were no significant differences among the dose-volume parameters of the contralateral breast. Conclusion: The target volume can be properly irradiated by both techniques with high conformity and similar dose to the OARs. MIBT provides more advantageous plans than CK, except for dose conformity and the dosimetry of the heart and contralateral breast. More studies are needed to analyze whether these dosimetrical findings have clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Prospective dosimetric outcomes for stereotactic MR-guided stereotactic APBI. • In both the 1 and 3 fraction trials, 88.53% of the dosimetric objectives were met. • SBRT-style dosimetry for APBI is feasible using MR-guidance. • Guide for other institutions for clinical implementation of MRg-SAPBI. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) seeks to reduce irradiated volumes and radiation exposure for patients while maintaining acceptable clinical outcomes. Magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) provides excellent soft-tissue contrast for treatment localization, which can reduce setup uncertainty, thus reducing margins in the external beam setting. Additionally, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)-style regimens with high gradients can also be executed. This MR-guided stereotactic APBI (MRgS-APBI) approach can be utilized for a lower number of fractions and spare a greater volume of healthy tissues compared to conventional 3D external beam APBI. Our MRgS-APBI program was developed for two prospective non-randomized phase I/II clinical trials (20Gyx1 and 8.5Gyx3). Both breast SBRT treatment planning and MRgRT delivery techniques were described in this study. Simulation included both CT and MRI with specialized immobilization to accommodate MR-guided setup and cine-MRI treatment gating. Dosimetry data from 48 single-fraction and 19 three-fraction patients were collected and evaluated. This included planning objectives and SBRT-specific indices. During treatment, setup errors were calculated to evaluate setup reproducibility and duty cycle was calculated using cine-MRI data during gated delivery. In both the single- and three- fraction trials combined, 88.5% of the possible dosimetric objectives across all patients were met during planning. The majority of the planning objectives were easily achievable indicating the potential for stricter objectives for subsequent S-APBI treatments. The average magnitude of setup uncertainties was 1.0 cm ± 0.6 cm across all treatments. In the three-fraction trial, the average beam-on duty-cycle for the MRI-gated delivery was 83.0 ± 13.0%. There were no technical MRgS-APBI related issues that resulted in discontinuation of treatment across all patients. SBRT-style dosimetry and delivery for APBI is feasible using MR-guidance. The program development and dosimetric outcomes reported here can serve as a guide for other institutions considering the clinical implementation of MR-guided stereotactic APBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: angiosarcoma may rarely complicate radiotherapy of breast cancer. This so-called radiation-induced angiosarcoma (RIAS) occurs in less than 0.3% of patients that underwent breast conservation surgeries, usually years after completion of radiotherapy. Case presentation: we introduce two cases of invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as an alternative protocol to whole breast irradiation (WBI). They received adjuvant partial breast radiotherapy on tumor cavity for a total dose of 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions in 5 days using 3D-external-beam RT. In both cases, RIAS occurred eight years after radiotherapy, in the sub-cicatricial area in one patient and outside the irradiated area in the other one. They both underwent radical surgery and chemotherapy was performed in one patient. Discussion: the underlying mechanism for development of RIAS is not well known, but its incidence seems to be increasing. RIAS after partial breast irradiation is very rare and has been reported in two cases so far. As it may be suggested in case 2, it is still a matter of debate if the risk of radiation-induced sarcoma is radiation-dose dependent. Although mastectomy is considered as a standard treatment, choice of treatment should be made according to the patient's specifications. Conclusion: there are very few studies in the literature that report RIAS after APBI. Present study is the only one reporting two cases after the external 3D technique APBI. Prognosis of RIAS remains poor. Only a careful evaluation in a multidisciplinary context can offer to the patients the best result in terms of local control and survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported quality of life (QOL) scores after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy vs. external beam whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) for breast cancer. Material and methods: Women with breast cancer treated with WBRT or APBI after breast conservation surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Single cross-sectional QOL assessment was performed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23 questionnaires. Patients treated with APBI were propensity-score matched to similar cohort of patients treated with WBRT. QOL scores were analyzed for the entire unmatched cohort and compared between the two matched cohorts using Student's two-tailed t-test. P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a 10-point difference between mean scores was considered clinically meaningful. Results: A total of 64 APBI patients were matched with 99 WBRT patients out of the entire study cohort of 320 cases. QOL scores for functional scales of QLQ-C30 were similar between the two groups for both matched and unmatched cohorts, while symptom scores of QLQ-C30 did not show any clinically significant difference. Functional scales of BR-23 did not show any clinical or statistically significant difference. Among symptom scales of BR-23, scores were similar for APBI and WBRT groups except for a worse score of "upset by hair loss" sub-scale in the brachytherapy group of the matched cohort (51.9 vs. 22.7, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Patients undergoing APBI reported similar QOL compared to WBRT when matched for various factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Accelerated and hypofractionated regimens offer de-escalation radiation therapy. • Very accelerated partial breast irradiation dramatically decrease transportations. • Very accelerated partial breast irradiation in 3, 2 or 1 day is well tolerated. • Very accelerated partial breast irradiation in 1 or 2/3 days have a similar toxicity profile. • Very accelerated partial breast irradiation early oncological outcome appear promising. To analyze late toxicity after very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) for low-risk breast cancer. Methods : In this retrospective, observational, international multicenter study (HDH F20220713143949), patients with low-risk breast cancer underwent lumpectomy + vAPBI (high-dose rate multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy-MIBT). VAPBI was performed with 4(4x6.2 Gy/2d), 3(3x7.45 Gy/2d) or 1 fraction (1x16Gy or 1x18Gy/1d). Primary endpoint was late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were cumulative incidence of breast cancer local relapse (LR) and distant metastatic relapse (DMR) and specific (SS) and overall (OS) survivals. Prognostic factors for late toxicity were analyzed. From 01/2012 to 06/2022, 516 pts with early breast cancer were enrolled. Median follow-up was 44 months [95 %CI 39–46]. Median age was 71 years [40–100]. Median tumor size was 12 mm [1–35]. VAPBI delivered 1, 3 and 4 fractions for 205pts (39.7 %), 167pts (32.4 %) and 144pts (28 %) respectively. 221 late toxicity events were observed in 168pts (32.6 %) (Fibrosis, dyschromia, pain and telangiectasia). Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were observed in 7.2 and 0.6 % respectively (no G4) with no difference between 1 and ≥ 2 treatment days. CTV > 50 cc (p = 0.007) and V150 > 40 % (p = 0.027) were prognostic factors for G ≥ 2 late toxicity. Four-year cumulative incidence rates of LR and DMR were 2 % [95 %CI 0–3] and 1 % [95 %CI 0–2] respectively. VAPBI based on 1 or ≥ 2 days of MIBT represents an attractive de-escalation of irradiation approach for low-risk breast cancer. Late toxicity profile appears acceptable while early oncological outcome shows encouraging local control. Longer follow-up is warranted in order to confirm these preliminary results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) technique is a novel noninvasive yet targeted method for accelerated partial breast irradiation. We established a multi-institutional registry to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this technique across various practice settings. Institutions using the NIBB technique were invited to participate. Data for acute/late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and tumor recurrence were collected. Toxicity and cosmetic outcome were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 and NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, respectively. Treatment variables were analyzed for association with outcomes. A total of 252 patients from eight institutions were analyzed. The median age was 69 years. The mean tumor size was 1.1 cm (0.1–4.0 cm). Treatment was delivered 10 fractions (34–36 Gy) in 75% and five fractions (28.5 Gy) in 22%. B.i.d. fractionation was used in 9%. Acute radiation dermatitis was Grade 0–1, 2, and 3 in 77%, 19%, and 4%, respectively. One hundred ninety-one patients with a median followup of 18 months (4–72 months) were evaluable for late outcomes. Late toxicity Grades 2 and 3 were observed in 8.8% and 1%, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 62%, 36%, and 2%, respectively. B.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher acute and late toxicity. Second-generation applicators were associated with lower late toxicity and better cosmetic outcome. Actuarial freedom from ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and true recurrence were 98.3% and 98.3% at 2 years and 90.9% and 95.4% at 5 years, respectively. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using NIBB was well tolerated with a low rate of acute and late toxicity across various practice settings. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and cosmetic outcomes were favorable. b.i.d. fractionation was associated with higher toxicity. Longer followup is needed to confirm late endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To quantify mean heart dose (MHD) and doses to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left ventricle (LV) in a retrospective series of patients who underwent perioperative accelerated partial breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB-APBI). Methods: Sixty-eight patients with low-risk left breast cancer were treated with MIB-APBI at our institution between 2012 and 2017. Interstitial tubes were inserted during the tumorectomy and sentinel node biopsy and APBI was started 6 days later. The prescribed dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions (twice a day) to the clinical target volume (CTV). The heart, LAD, and LV were contoured and the distance between each structure and the CTV was measured. The MHD, mean and maximum LAD doses (LAD mean/max), and mean LV doses (LV mean) were calculated and corrected to biologically equivalent doses in 2‑Gy fractionation (EQD2). We also evaluated the impact of the distance between the cardiac structures and the CTV and of the volume receiving the prescribed dose (V100) and high-dose volume (V150) on heart dosimetry. Results: Mean EQD2 for MHD, LAD mean/max, and mean LV were 0.9 ± 0.4 Gy (range 0.3–2.2), 1.6 ± 1.1 Gy (range, 0.4–5.6), 2.6 ± 1.9 Gy (range, 0.7–9.2), and 1.3 ± 0.6 Gy (range, 0.5–3.4), respectively. MHD, LAD mean/max, and LV mean significantly correlated with the distance between the CTV and these structures, but all doses were below the recommended limits (German Society of Radiation Oncology; DEGRO). The MHD and LV mean were significantly dependent on V100. Conclusion: Perioperative MIB-APBI resulted in low cardiac doses in our study. This finding provides further support for the value of this technique in well-selected patients with early-stage left breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mammographically based noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) partial breast irradiation (PBI) is ideally suited for preoperative treatment. We hypothesize that delivering NIBB PBI to the preoperative tumor volume compared with the postoperative lumpectomy bed would simplify target identification and allow for a reduction in irradiated volume along each orthogonal axis. Patients with invasive breast cancer treated with NIBB PBI at our institution were identified. Preoperative NIBB treatments were modeled along orthogonal craniocaudal and mediolateral axes with an applicator encompassing the gross lesion plus a 1 cm clinical target volume margin. Preoperative treatment volumes were calculated along each axis using the selected applicator surface area multiplied by the preoperative mammogram separation. The actual applicator size and breast separation from the first fraction of postoperative treatment was used to calculate the postoperative treatment volume. Paired -test was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative treatment separation, area, and volume for each patient. Forty-eight patients with Stage I–II breast cancer had imaging and treatment data available for review. Along the axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (116 cm 3 vs. 204 cm 3, respectively; p < 0.0001). Similarly, along the mediolateral axis, the mean preoperative treatment volume was significantly less than the mean postoperative treatment volume (125 cm 3 vs. 216 cm 3, respectively; p < 0001). Based on our retrospective comparison, PBI delivered using NIBB to the preoperative tumor may reduce the volume of healthy breast tissue receiving radiation as compared with NIBB to the postoperative tumor bed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a multicenter Phase I–II trial endorsed by the GEC-ESTRO Breast Working Group, to analyze if very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy is feasible and safe compared with the standard APBI treatment in 4–5 days for early stage breast carcinomas. We have included 81 patients with pT1-2 pN0 invasive carcinomas after breast-conserving surgery. Between August 2017 and July 2019, 33 women received high-dose-rate brachytherapy, four fractions of 6.25 Gy in 2–3 days, and 48 patients received three fractions of 7.45 Gy in 2 days. Thirty-six patients were implanted perioperatively and 45 postoperatively. Mean age was 68 (51–90). Free surgical margins were of 2 mm or greater. Acute effects were 11% dermatitis, 18.5% hematoma, 3.7% infection, and 14.8% pain. At a median followup of 20 months (range 8–35), no relapse has occurred. Pigmentation changes in the entrance and exit of tubes were visible in 16%, but 1 year later, few cases remained. Patients developed G1-2 induration or fibrosis in 18.5% and 2.5%, respectively. No patient developed telangiectasia. The cosmetic outcome was good/excellent in 97.5% and fair in 2.5%. VAPBI with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy using four fractions of 6.25 Gy or three fractions of 7.45 Gy in two or 3 days is feasible. No excess has been observed in acute effects. At a mean followup of 20 months, late side effects seem to be similar to standard fractionation. VAPBI in two to 3 days is beneficial for the patients and reduces the workload of the brachytherapy units. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial, and the suitability criteria from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) have important differences. This is a single-institution retrospective review of 169 consecutive patients with DCIS who underwent lumpectomy followed by APBI intracavitary brachytherapy from 2003 to 2018. Outcomes, including overall survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, and distant metastasis, were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. The median followup time was 62.5 months. Median age was 66 years (47–89 years). The majority of patients had estrogen receptor–positive disease (89%). Fifty patients (30%) had Grade 3 disease. Of the 142 patients with adequate pathology interpretation, 91 and 108 cases had margins ≥ 3 mm and ≥2 mm, respectively. Most patients (72%) were prescribed and started endocrine therapy. Of the patients evaluable for ABS criteria (N = 130), 97 met the suitability criteria. Of the patients evaluable for ASTRO criteria (N = 129), 42 were deemed cautionary and 33 were deemed unsuitable. Of the patients evaluable for GEC-ESTRO criteria (N = 143), 141 cases were at intermediate risk and two were at high risk. Five-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, RFS, and overall survival were 0.6%, 97.7%, and 97.2%, respectively. The ABS, ASTRO, and GEC-ESTRO criteria failed to significantly predict for RFS. These results, although limited by short-term followup, indicate that expansion of the eligibility criteria of APBI for patients with DCIS should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient selection For boost treatments: Patients undergoing a lumpectomy as part of breast-conserving therapy can be eligible for a GammaPod boost treatment. This workflow consists of patient selection, daily quality assurance (QA), breast cup fitting, CT imaging, treatment planning, and treatment. [Extracted from the article]

Therapeutical strategies in breast cancer are continuously updating. Recent researches assessed the possibility of irradiating only the surgical bed in selected patients (Partial Breast Irradiation, PBI). In 2014 we designed a study to evaluate toxicity and cosmesis of APBI using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy-Rapid Arc compared with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI). We present here the 5-years updated data. HYPAB was a single-institution randomized trial that recruited 172 patients from 2015 to 2018. Patients underwent conserving surgery and were randomized to either adjuvant WBI (40.5Gy/15 fractions with simultaneous boost to 48 Gy to tumoral bed) or APBI (30Gy/5 fractions), both delivered with VMAT-RA technique. Clinical evaluation was performed during the first visit, once a week during radiotherapy and during follow up. Cosmesis was assessed using the Harvard Scale for Breast Cosmesis. At the time of the analysis 161 patients were eligible, 53% in the WBI and 47% in the APBI group, with a median follow-up of 67 months. Most common late skin toxicities were G1 fibrosis (32%) and oedema (28%) and were higher in the WBI group; no G3 toxicities were observed. Cosmesis was rated poor in only 6 cases. 147 patients had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up, and no patients died of the disease. Mature results confirm the safety and efficacy of APBI in selected early stage breast cancer patients. Late toxicity is improved in the APBI arm at the cost of a slight increase in local relapse. Further studies are ongoing to better elucidate the use of APBI as a de-escalation approach., Competing Interests: Disclosure No conflict of Interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

La radiothérapie a bénéficié durant ces vingt dernières années de nombreuses évolutions. Ces dernières sont liées aux progrès de l'informatique et de l'imagerie permettant de mieux définir les cibles, assurer une meilleure épargne des organes à risque et une excellente reproductibilité des traitements grâce au contrôle parfait du positionnement. Dans la radiothérapie des cancers du sein, l'évolution a été marquée par la possibilité de réduire la durée des traitements de 6–7 à 3–4 semaines en utilisant des schémas hypofractionnés, voire en la limitant à une semaine grâce à la focalisation du traitement au seul site opératoire. Ce concept d'irradiation partielle et accélérée du sein a remis en cause le paradigme de l'obligation d'irradier la totalité de la glande mammaire en situation adjuvante pour toutes les patientes. En outre, sa maîtrise technique et le développement de la stéréotaxie contribuent actuellement à l'initiation de projets de recherche en situation néoadjuvante. Ces projets évaluent l'impact de l'irradiation tumorale préopératoire à hautes doses, seule ou en combinaison aux traitements systémiques, étudient les modifications biologiques de la tumeur, évaluent l'immunité antitumorale et l'impact sur la réponse pathologique complète qui constitue un marqueur prédictif, dans certains cas, d'une meilleure probabilité de survie à long terme. Dans cette revue, nous ferons le point sur ces évolutions, en situations adjuvante et néo-adjuvante, qui permettent à la radiothérapie de s'inscrire également dans l'ère de la personnalisation des traitements. Radiation therapy has benefited from many developments over the past 20 years. These developments are mainly linked to the technology, imaging and informatics evolutions which allow better targets definitions, ensure better organs-at-risk sparing and excellent reproducibility of treatments, with a perfect control of patient positioning. In breast cancer radiotherapy, the evolution was marked by the possibility of reducing the duration of treatments from 6–7 to 3–4 weeks by using hypofractionated regimens, or by further reducing the irradiation to one week when treatment is solely focalised to the tumour bed. This concept of accelerated partial breast irradiation has challenged the paradigm of the obligation to irradiate the whole breast after conservative surgery in all patients. In addition, the technical mastery of accelerated partial breast irradiation and the development of stereotactic radiotherapy techniques are currently contributing to the development of research projects in neoadjuvant settings. Thus, numerous ongoing studies are evaluating the impact of high-dose preoperative tumour irradiation, alone or in combination with systemic treatments, on biological tumor changes, on anti-tumour immunity, and on the pathologic complete response, which is considered as predictive of better long-term survival in some molecular breast cancer subtypes. In this review, we discuss all these developments which allow breast radiation therapy to enter the era of personalisation of treatments in oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report acute toxicities in breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) recruited in a prospective trial and treated with accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) delivered with a hypofractionated schedule. Methods: From March 2014 to June 2019, pts with early-stage BC (Stage I), who underwent breast conservative surgery (BCS), were recruited in a prospective study started at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. Pts received APBI with a hypofractionated schedule of 30 Gy in five daily fractions. Radiotherapy treatment (RT) was delivered using VMAT. Acute toxicity was assessed according to RTOG/EORTC criteria at the end of RT. Results: Between March 2014 and June 2019, 151 pts were enrolled in this study. 79 Pts had right-side and 72 had left-side breast cancer. Median age was 69 (range 43–92). All pts presented with pathological stage IA BC, molecular classification was Luminal A in 128/151 (85%) and Luminal B in 23/151 (15%) cases. Acute toxicity, assessed at the end of RT, consisted of G1 erythema in 37/151 (24. 5%) pts and skin toxicities higher than G1, did not occur. Fibrosis G1 and G2 were reported in 41/151 (27. 1%) pts and in 2/151 pts (1. 3%), respectively. Edema G1 occurred in 8/151 (5. 3%) pts and asthenia G1 occurred in 1/151 (0. 6%) pts. Conclusions: APBI with VMAT proved to be feasible and can be a valid alternative treatment option after BCS in selected early breast cancer pts according to ASTRO guidelines. A longer follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To establish consensus guidelines for a safe clinical practice of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy (BT). APBI with interstitial multicatheter BT has proved to be effective in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. This paradigm shift in the approach to early breast cancer conservative treatment, along with the existing controversies on the clinical practice of APBI, prompted the Spanish Brachytherapy Group (GEB) of the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Physics (SEFM) to address BT APBI in a consensus meeting. Prior to the meeting, a survey with 27 questions on indication, inclusion criteria, BT modality, implant technique, image guidance and simulation, CTV and OAR definition, dose prescription and fractionation, dose calculation, implant quality metrics and OAR dose constrains was distributed. Items not reaching a level of agreement of 70% were discussed and voted during the meeting. 26 Institutions completed the survey, 60% of them perform APBI procedures. The analysis of the survey showed consensus reached on approximately half the questions. An expert panel discussed the remaining items; thereafter, a voting established the definite consensus. This document summarizes the consensus guidelines agreed during the meeting of the Spanish Brachytherapy Group SEOR-SEFM. Institutions with BT facilities available should offer interstitial BT APBI as a treatment option to patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Institutions willing to implement interstitial BT APBI are encouraged to follow the consensus guidelines established herein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This consensus statement from the Breast Cancer Working Group of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aims to define practical guidelines for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). Methods: Recent recommendations for relevant aspects of APBI were summarized and a panel of experts reviewed all the relevant literature. Panel members of the DEGRO experts participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for implementing APBI in clinical routine, focusing on patient selection, target definition, and treatment technique. Results: Appropriate patient selection, target definition for different APBI techniques, and basic rules for appropriate APBI techniques for clinical routine outside of clinical trials are described. Detailed recommendations for APBI in daily practice, including dose constraints, are given. Conclusion: Guidelines are mandatory to assure optimal results of APBI using different techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of a novel accelerated partial breast irradiation regimen delivered in a single fraction postoperatively.Methods and Materials: We enrolled 50 patients with low-risk, hormone-sensitive breast cancer from 2015 to 2018 on a prospective phase 1/2 trial to receive single-fraction, high-gradient partial-breast irradiation (SFHGPBI) 2 to 8 weeks after lumpectomy for node-negative, invasive, or in situ breast cancer. The high gradient was achieved by prescribing 20 Gy to the surgical bed and 5 Gy to the breast tissue within 1 cm of the surgical bed simultaneously in 1 fraction using external beam.Results: The median age was 65 (range, 52-84). Ten patients (20%) had small-volume ductal carcinoma in situ while the remainder had stage I disease. At a median follow-up of 25 months, we evaluated toxicity, patient- and physician-reported cosmesis, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), and initial tumor control. There was no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grade 3+ toxicity. Only 34% of patients experienced grade 1 erythema. Good-to-excellent pretreatment cosmesis was present in 100% and 98% per physicians and patients, respectively, and did not change post-SFHGPBI. Quantitative cosmesis by percentage of breast retraction assessment significantly improved over time during the post-SFHGPBI period per mixed repeated measures modeling (P = .0026). QOL per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaires C30 and BR-23 did not decline other than temporarily in the systemic therapy effects and hair loss domains, both of which returned to pretreatment values. There was 1 noninvasive in-breast recurrence in a separate untreated quadrant 18 months post-SFHGPBI and 1 isolated axillary recurrence 30 months post-SFHGPBI, both salvaged successfully. There were no distant recurrences or cancer-related deaths observed.Conclusions: Accelerated partial-breast irradiation delivered in a single fraction postoperatively using external beam techniques is a novel, feasible, well-tolerated regimen. SFHGPBI does not adversely affect cosmesis or QOL as reported by both physicians and patients. Initial tumor control rates are excellent, with longer follow-up required to confirm efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To report the achieved dosimetry in the ACCEL trial and compare the results to reported dosimetry from the major accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) phase III trials. The ACCEL trial was a single arm, phase II, prospective cohort study. A five-field, inverse-planned, IMRT strategy was employed using a class solution technique to increase planning consistency including high dose conformity and low normal tissue dose to the ipsilateral breast. Between 2016 and 2019, 283 patients were treated with 27 Gy in five fractions in consecutive days. The average PTV conformity index was 1.1. For the ipsilateral breast, the median (range) volume receiving 95% and 50% of the prescription dose was 9.7% (3.2–22.4) and 30.3% (11.1–54.6), respectively. Compared to major APBI phase III trial constraints, this reduction in irradiated volume at the 95% and 50% isodose levels represents a reduction of 209 cm3 and 265 cm3, respectively. The IMRT planning strategy employed in the ACCEL trial demonstrated consistent and superior dosimetry by comparison to conventionally used 3D CRT techniques. Future APBI trials should update dosimetric constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of women treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB-APBI) with risk groups defined by Groupe Européen de Curie-thérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), updated ASTRO, and American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines and to elucidate the most appropriate guideline that could differentiate outcomes among its risk groups. Two hundred forty women underwent MIB-APBI during July 2000 to March 2013. Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes (local control [LC], disease-free survival [DFS], cause-specific survival [CSS], and overall survival [OAS]) stratified by the risk groups proposed by the aforementioned patient selection guidelines were carried out on a prospectively maintained database. At a median follow-up of 114 months, 10-year LC, DFS, and OAS were 90%, 81%, and 83.5%, respectively, for the entire group. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC rates for risk groups by ESTRO, ASTRO, updated ASTRO and ABS guidelines. The 10-year DFS and OAS for GEC-ESTRO low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group was 75%, 88%, and 60% (p = 0.02) and 86%, 93%, and 62% (p = 0.001), respectively. Ten-year DFS and OAS in the ABS 2018–acceptable and ABS 2018–unacceptable group were 78% and 67% (p = 0.01) and 88% and 69% (p = 0.001), respectively. No significant difference in any of the outcomes was observed with risk groups suggested by ASTRO or updated ASTRO consensus guidelines. None of the current patient selection guidelines for APBI could differentiate LC (main APBI endpoint) among its risk groups, whereas GEC-ESTRO and ABS guideline could differentiate DFS and OAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To compare the early cosmetic outcomes after whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) by various cosmetic assessment methods. Materials/methods: APBI was delivered using multiplane interstitial brachytherapy as per standard guidelines. Majority of women in WBRT cohort received hypo-fractionated external beam radiotherapy using bitangential portals and mega-voltage photons along with sequential boost to the tumor bed. Single cross-sectional assessment (18–36 months post-treatment completion) of the breast cosmesis was done by RO, SO and the patient using the modified Harvard scale and by photographic assessment using the BCCT.core software. The two cohorts were propensity score-matched using menopausal status, size of surgical cavity, size of tumor in greatest dimension, median number of lymph nodes dissected, treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy and treatment with hormonal therapy. Results: A total of 64 APBI patients were matched with 99 WBRT patients of the entire cohort of 320. At a median follow-up of 25 months, cosmetic results were significantly better for APBI as compared to WBRT cohort by all methods of evaluation (excellent/good: RO:75% vs 38.4%, p = 0.0001; SO: 54.7% vs 37.4%, p = 0.009; patient: 87.5% vs 58.6%, p = 0.001 and BCCT: 73.4% vs 51.6%, p = 0.001). Individual parameters that were significantly better in APBI cohort included size and shape of breast as well as location and shape of NAC. Better results for individual BCCT parameters (pLBC, pBRE, pBAD) were also seen. Conclusions: Overall cosmetic outcomes as well as individual subdomains are significantly better with APBI as compared to WBRT by all methods of assessment of cosmesis when matched for various factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to evaluate inter-fractional dosimetric variations for high-dose rate breast brachytherapy using a strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI). For the nine patients included, dosimetric constraints for treatment were as follows: for the planning target volume for evaluation (PTV_Eval), the volume receiving 90, 150 and 200% of the prescribed dose (V 90%,150%,200%) should be >90%, ≤50 cm3 and ≤20 cm3, respectively; the dose covering 1 cm3 (D 1cc) of the organs at risk should be ≤110% of the prescribed dose; and the air volume should be ≤10% of PTV_Eval. Differences in V 90%,150%,200%, D 1cc and air volume (⁠|$\Delta V$| and |$\Delta D$|⁠) as inter-fractional dosimetric variations and SAVI displacements were measured with pretreatment and planning computed tomography (CT) images. Inter-fractional dosimetric variations were analyzed for correlations with the SAVI displacements. The patients were divided into two groups based on the distance of the SAVI from the surface skin to assess the relationship between the insertion position of the SAVI and dosimetric parameters. The median Δ V 90%,150%,200% for the PTV_Eval in all patients was −0.3%, 0.2 cm3 and 0.2 cm3, respectively. The median (range) Δ D 1cc for the chest wall and surface skin was −0.8% (−18.9 to 9.4%) and 0.3% (−7.6 to 5.3%), respectively. SAVI displacement did not correlate with inter-fractional dosimetric variations. In conclusion, the dose constraints were satisfied in most cases. However, there were inter-fractional dosimetric changes due to SAVI displacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adjuvant irradiation is the standard treatment after breast conservative surgery. Normofractionated regimen with an overall treatment time of 5 to 6 weeks is often considered as a limiting factor for irradiation compliance. In order to answer this issue, moderate and more recently extreme hypofractionated protocols appeared. We report here oncological outcomes and toxicity of hypofractionated breast irradiation. After defining the frame of moderate and extreme hypofractionated breast irradiations based on overall treatment time, patient selection criteria were listed. According to their levels of proof, the results of moderate and extreme hypofractionated breast irradiation were analysed. Overall treatment time for moderate hypofractionated breast irradiation ranged from 3 to 4 weeks, while for extreme hypofractionated breast irradiation, it was less than 1 week. For moderate hypofractionated breast irradiation, whole breast irradiation was currently performed with or without lymph node irradiation. Moderate hypofractionated breast irradiation has proven to be as safe and as efficient as normofractionated breast irradiation with level IA evidence. For extreme hypofractionated breast irradiation, phase III randomized trials confirmed that accelerated partial breast irradiation was non-inferior in terms of local control compared to normofractionated whole breast irradiation (with external beam radiation therapy and multicatheter brachytherapy), with similar acute and late toxicity. While the use of intraoperative breast irradiation remains under debate, new very accelerated partial breast irradiation (overall treatment time not exceeding 2 days) protocols emerged with encouraging results. Accelerated partial breast irradiation is warranted for extreme hypofractionated breast irradiation and is indicated for low-risk breast cancers. Moderate and extreme hypofractionated breast irradiation regimens are validated and can be routinely proposed according to patient selection criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Following partial mastectomy, whole-breast irradiation (WBI), delivered over 3 to 6 weeks, has been the standard adjuvant radiation approach for early-stage breast cancer. A growing body of literature over the past decade has suggested that irradiation of the partial breast, including the tumor bed plus a margin, may be a suitable alternative for appropriately selected patients. The use of partial breast irradiation (PBI) has been studied in multiple prospective randomized trials, now with up to 10 years of follow-up, establishing similar safety and efficacy compared with WBI. Advantages of PBI include (1) reduced treatment duration, (2) potential reductions in treatment-related toxicity, (3) improved cosmetic outcomes, and (4) reduced costs. The purpose of this article is to review appropriate patient selection criteria, clinical and toxicity outcomes data, clinical consensus practice guidelines, and the various PBI techniques. Recent Findings: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0413 study (NRG Oncology) is the most recently published (abstract form only) prospective randomized trial comparing PBI using 3D conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT, 38.5 Gy/10 fractions, twice daily) or brachytherapy (interstitial catheters or applicator based, 34 Gy/10 fractions, twice daily), vs. WBI (50 Gy ± tumor a bed boost). With a median follow-up of 10.2 years, the 10-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free interval was 95.2% vs. 95.9% for PBI and WBI, although it did not meet the statistical significance for equivalence. Similarly, the randomized trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RAPID) trial is a prospective randomized trial comparing primarily 3D-CRT (38.5 Gy/10 fractions, twice daily) with WBI, (42.5 Gy/16 daily fractions or 50 Gy/25 daily fractions ± tumor bed boost). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) at 8 years were not statistically significantly different (PBI vs WBI, 3% vs. 2.8%; HR = 1.27; 90% VI, 0.84–1.91). Summary: There is a growing body of literature supporting the use of PBI in appropriately selected patients and its use should continue to increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Nylon 6/6 interstitial brachytherapy catheters may stretch when exposed to moisture, mechanical tension, and body temperature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the magnitude of catheter stretch during a course of multi-catheter interstitial breast brachytherapy for nylon 6/6 treatment catheters, and to assess the impact this has on treatment plan dosimetry. Material and methods : Catheters were exposed to water at 37°C for six days and the internal catheter length change (∆L_W) was measured daily. Additionally, the measured internal catheter length change (∆L_P), performed prior to each treatment fraction, for seven interstitial breast brachytherapy patients (total of 76 catheters) were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum length change seen in ∆L_P and ∆L_W were introduced as a source positional error to retrospective treatment plans, and treatment plan dosimetry was analyzed. Results : ∆L_W and ∆L_P were on average +4.0% and +1.6% of the catheter lengths in water or tissue after 48 hours. Weak correlation was seen between the average ∆L_P per catheter and both the catheter length within tissue (ρ = 0.36, p = 0.0007), and the mid-catheter depth in tissue (ρ = 0.42, p < 0.0001). The D90CTV decreased 1.5% (p < 0.05) and 8.2% (p < 0.05) when the ∆L_P and ∆L_W were introduced to the initial plans. Conclusions : Nylon 6/6 catheters stretch during a course of multi-catheter interstitial breast brachytherapy treatment. The observed stretch may affect treatment plan dosimetry, if the catheter internal length is only measured immediately after the insertion. Additional catheter length checks are recommended to verify the actual catheter internal length during the treatment.