Search

Individuals with epilepsy are at risk of developing preictal, ictal, postictal and interictal psychoses. Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are the main class of drugs used to treat psychosis and schizophrenia. The efficacy and safety of APDs as a treatment for epileptic psychosis is not well understood. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of APDs for treating psychosis in people with epilepsy. We adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) from database inception to June 20, 2023. We contacted experts in the field and performed citation searches to identify additional records. Title, abstract, full‐text review, and data analysis were conducted in duplicate, with conflicts resolved by discussion among authors. Given the considerable heterogeneity of study designs, meta‐analysis was not deemed appropriate; instead, the results were tabulated in a narrative synthesis. The Joanna Briggs Institute Risk of Bias tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework were used to assess study quality. We identified 13 studies with a total of 1180 participants. In the four case series included, the psychotic symptoms of 25 of 28 patients treated with APDs partially improved or fully resolved. Three of the four cohort studies reported an association between antipsychotic use and longer duration of psychotic episodes, two found similar results in both APD and non‐APD groups, and two did not report control psychosis outcomes. When reported, seizure frequency was observed to remain unchanged or decrease following APD treatment. The evidence on the effectiveness of antipsychotics in the treatment of psychosis in epilepsy is inconclusive and may reflect confounding by indication. However, most studies suggest that antipsychotics were not associated with a marked worsening in seizure frequency. It remains unclear whether antipsychotics should be used in epilepsy, and well‐controlled cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (D2RO) significantly influences the clinical effectiveness and safety of many antipsychotic drugs. Maintaining a D2RO range of 65%–80% provides the best antipsychotic effects while minimizing adverse reactions. Data from a Phase III trial were used to establish an exposure–response relationship for monthly intramuscular Risperidone ISM (75 and 100 mg) or placebo administered to adults with schizophrenia. Pharmacodynamic analysis was based on an Emax model for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) developed in NONMEM. Plasma concentrations of the active moiety were derived using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model, which was used for D2RO simulations in conjunction with a published Emax model. The optimal D2RO range (65%–80%) was reached for the median within hours following the first injection of both Risperidone ISM doses. At steady state, median D2RO for both doses remained above 65% throughout the 28‐day dosing period and demonstrated lower variability than oral risperidone. PANSS response did not differ significantly between dose groups, most likely because active moiety concentrations had already reached the plateau of the concentration–response relationship. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis showed a profound placebo effect (−11.7%), and an additional maximal drug effect (−6.6%) resulting in a total PANSS improvement over time of −18.3%. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling quantified a PANSS improvement over time after Risperidone ISM administration. The response was not significantly different in either dose group, likely because D2RO was already above the proposed efficacy threshold (65%) within 1 h after the first Risperidone ISM injection and remained above this level following repeated administrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) factors significantly influence how patients respond to antipsychotic medications This systematic review was performed to synthesize the clinical utility of PGx-assisted treatment versus standard of care in schizophrenia. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception till June 2024 that had compared the clinical utility of PGx-assisted intervention as compared to the standard of care in schizophrenia. The primary outcome was safety, and the secondary outcomes were efficacy and medication adherence. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated (random-effects model) wherever feasible. Results: A total of 18,821 studies were screened, and five were included for review. All the RCTs had a high risk of bias. Four studies included the commonly used antipsychotics. Three studies reported negative outcomes (safety, efficacy, and medication adherence) and two reported positive outcomes (safety) using different scales. In the meta-analysis, there were significant differences in the total Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side-Effect Rating scale score [SMD 0.95 (95% CI: 0.76–1.13), p < 0.001); I2 = 0%] and the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score [SMD 10.65 (95% CI: 2.37–18.93), p = 0.01); I2 = 100%] between the PGx-assisted treatment and standard of care arms. However, the results were inconsistent, and the certainty of evidence (GRADE criteria) was very low. Conclusion: Current evidence on the clinical utility of PGx-assisted treatment in schizophrenia is limited and inconsistent and further evidence is required in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusion Antipsychotics increase the risk of developing diabetes, but clinical trials are not generalizable with short follow‐up, while observational studies often lack important information, particularly hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).We followed two Danish cohorts with schizophrenia. First, using Danish nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with first‐episode schizophrenia (FES) between 1999 and 2019 (n = 31,856). Exposure was a redeemed prescription for an antipsychotic, and the outcome was diabetes, defined via hospital‐based diagnosis and redeemed prescriptions for glucose‐lowering drugs. Adjusted Cox regression calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR). Second, using data from the Central Denmark Region, we identified all individuals diagnosed with FES from October 2016 to September 2022 (n = 2671). Using a within‐subject design, we analyzed the change in HbA1c during the 2 years after initiation of specific antipsychotics compared to the 2 years before.In the nationwide cohort, 2543 (8.0%) individuals developed diabetes (incidence rate = 9.39 [95% CI = 9.03–9.76] per 1000 person‐years). Antipsychotics, compared to periods without, were associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes (HRR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.75–2.38). We found a dose–response association, particularly for second‐generation antipsychotics, and different risk rates for specific antipsychotics. In the Central Denmark Region cohort, a total of 9.2% developed diabetes but mean HbA1c levels remained stable at 37 mmol/mol during the 2 years after initiation of antipsychotic medication.This comprehensive real‐world two‐cohort study emphasizes that diabetes affects almost 10% of patients with FES. Antipsychotics increase this risk, while HbA1c deterioration requires longer treatment. These findings are important for clinicians and young patients with FES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: QT prolongation is a potential serious adverse drug reaction, and assessing the risk of QT-prolonging drugs is routinely included in psychotropic medication reviews. However, the actual clinical benefits of such assessments are unknown. We investigate whether QT prolongation (QTc value > 480 ms) manifests in psychiatric inpatients at risk of QT prolongation as identified by assessing drug regimens. Secondly, we test the predictive value of well-known risk factors for QT prolongation. Results: The median patient age was 49 years (IQR 34–64) for patients treated with a median of nine drugs (IQR 6–12) and a median QT-prolonging drug sum of three daily defined dosages (IQR 1.88–4.76). We extracted 290 ECGs for patients where pharmacist-led-medication reviews (PMRs) identified an increased risk of QT prolongation and 190 ECGs for patients with no such risk, identifying 33 cases of verified QT prolongation equally distributed between groups. Unadjusted regression analysis revealed that advanced age (OR 3.27 CI 95% 1.60–6.84) and cardiovascular comorbidity (OR 3.53 CI 95% 1.71–7.29) were associated with manifest QT prolongation, while the QT-prolonging drug load was not. Methods: We reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of 799 psychiatric inpatients exposed to PMRs made from 1 September 2016 to 31 December 2018 in Region Zealand Denmark. Conclusions: Patients at risk of QT prolongation as identified by drug reviews rarely manifests with actual QT prolongation. Non-pharmacological risk factors seem to be better predictors for identifying patients with QT prolongation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Antipsychotics and cognitive enhancers are often used to treat psychosis and behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia; however, these drugs have been linked with various adverse events including both metabolic and cerebro/cardiovascular events. Thus, this study sought to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) across four behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) treatment models by exploring potential associations between antipsychotics (APs), cognitive-enhancing medications, dosage, and earlier MACCE onset. Methods: Patients were obtained from the Loma Linda University Medical Center database who were age ≥ 50 or older and who were diagnosed with dementia and BPSD symptoms. Treatment group and drug dosing were analyzed using Cox regression analyses to predict time until MACCE onset. Patient age at dementia diagnosis, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and previous MACCE diagnoses were included as covariate variables. Results: The final study population consisted of 1162 individuals. Results indicated a significant effect of medication type on duration until MACCE, (p < 0.001), with the odds of experiencing a MACCE being 96.3% higher for individuals treated with both APs and cognitive enhancers (p < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of AP dosage on duration until MACCE (p < 0.001) and a significant effect of cognitive enhancer dosage on duration until a MACCE, (p < 0.001). The odds of experiencing a MACCE sooner were 238% higher for those on high doses of APs (p < 0.001) and 76% higher for individuals on high doses of cognitive enhancers (p < 0.010). Conclusion: The use of APs at high doses was associated with the greatest risk of an adverse medical outcome in older adults with dementia with concurrent behavioral symptoms. Use of AP medications in this population should include close monitoring for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Youth with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD) are frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Nonadherence to treatment often results in increased mood symptoms and diminished quality of life. We examined SGA adherence rates and adherence barriers among youth who have overweight/obesity and are diagnosed with BSD enrolled in a multisite pragmatic clinical trial. Methods: SGA adherence and adherence barriers at baseline via patient- and caregiver report was assessed. Adherence was defined as taking ≥70% of prescribed SGA doses in the past week. The weighted Kappa statistic was used to measure child-caregiver agreement about adherence rates, barriers, and caregiver assistance. Regression analyses were used to examine associations of caregiver assistance, age, sex, race, insurance status, dosing frequency, and number of concomitant medications with adherence. Barriers to adherence were analyzed separately for youth and their caregivers, using logistic regression to assess associations between informant-reported barriers and informant-reported adherence. Results: Participants included 1485 patients and/or caregivers. At baseline, 88.6% of patients self-reported as adherent; 92.0% of caregivers reported their child was adherent. Concordance between patients and caregivers was moderate (k = 0.42). Approximately, 50% of the sample reported no adherence barriers. Frequently endorsed barriers included forgetting, side effects, being embarrassed to take medications, and preferring to do something else. Concordance between informants regarding adherence barriers was weak (k = 0.05–0.36). Patients and caregivers who did not endorse adherence barriers reported higher adherence than those who endorsed barriers. Male sex and having once daily dosing of medications were associated with lower adherence. Discussion: One-week patient- and caregiver-reported adherence was high in this sample. Half of the sample reported adherence barriers. Most commonly endorsed barriers were forgetting, side effects, being embarrassed, and preferring to do something else. Caregivers and patients have unique perspectives regarding adherence barriers. Understanding and addressing treatment barriers in clinical practice may facilitate adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses three randomized controlled trials (RCT) which focused on the use of brexpiprazole to treat the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Topics explored include the brexpiprazole dosage administered which demonstrated improvement in symptoms, the treatment-emergent adverse events recorded following treatment, and a comparison between brexpiprazole and other antipsychotic medications in terms of effectiveness in managing BPSD.

Clinical outcomes after a first-episode of psychosis (FEP) are heterogeneous. Many patient-related factors such as gender and comorbidity have been studied to predict symptomatic outcomes. However, psychiatrist-related factors such as prescription behaviour and gender have received little attention. We assessed the relationship between patients' psychiatrists, psychosis severity and daily functioning in 201 patients remitted from an FEP for a duration of one year, treated by 18 different psychiatrists. We controlled for baseline severity, dose and type of antipsychotic medication, frequency of visits, and patients' education. Symptom severity, daily functioning, and antipsychotic drug use were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and, 12 months follow-up. We found that psychiatrists accounted for 9.1% of the explained variance in patients' symptom severity and 10.1% of the explained variance in daily functioning.These effects persisted even when controlling for factors such as baseline severity and the prescribed dose. The effect of prescribed dose on symptom severity and daily functioning differed between psychiatrists. Treatment centre, session frequency, and medication nonadherence were not related to symptom severity. Our results emphasize the importance of individual psychiatrist factors in symptomatic outcomes after an FEP. Further identification of psychiatrist-related factors such as the quality of therapeutic alliances and shared decision-making, may optimize psychiatrists' training with the goal of improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of the first antipsychotic drug, chlorpromazine, was a milestone for psychiatry. The authors review the history, classification, indications, mechanism, efficacy, side effects, dosing, drug initiation, switching, and other practical issues and questions related to antipsychotics. Classifications such as first-generation/typical versus second-generation/atypical antipsychotics are neither valid nor useful; these agents should be described according to the Neuroscience-based Nomenclature (NbN). Antipsychotic drugs are not specific for treating schizophrenia. They reduce psychosis regardless of the underlying diagnosis, and they go beyond nonspecific sedation. All currently available antipsychotic drugs are dopamine blockers or dopamine partial agonists. In schizophrenia, effect sizes for relapse prevention are larger than for acute treatment. A major unresolved problem is the implausible increase in placebo response in antipsychotic drug trials over the decades. Differences in side effects, which can be objectively measured, such as weight gain, are less equivocal than differences in rating-scale-measured (subjective) efficacy. The criteria for choosing among antipsychotics are mainly pragmatic and include factors such as available formulations, metabolism, half-life, efficacy, and side effects in previous illness episodes. Plasma levels help to detect nonadherence, and once-daily dosing at night (which is possible with many antipsychotics) and long-acting injectable formulations are useful when adherence is a problem. Dose-response curves for both acute treatment and relapse prevention follow a hyperbolic pattern, with maximally efficacious average dosages for schizophrenia of around 5 mg/day risperidone equivalents. Computer apps facilitating the choice between drugs are available. Future drug development should include pharmacogenetics and focus on drugs for specific aspects of psychosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This research aims to evaluate patterns of prescription of medications used to manage acute agitation in adult Iranian patients at the emergency department (ED) of Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran. Method: The study analyzed data from the medical records of 252 patients who received pharmacotherapy for agitation. Results: The findings revealed that 181 patients (71.82%) were given typical antipsychotics, with haloperidol being the most commonly prescribed medication. Atypical antipsychotics were administered to 24 participants (9.52%), primarily olanzapine, and 52 patients (20.63%) received benzodiazepines, predominantly lorazepam. The treatment response was also assessed as appropriate in 224 patients (88.89%) and inappropriate in 28 patients (11.11%). Conclusion: The study recommends providing new-generation medications to developing countries and underscores the importance of updating student educational programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Finding effective treatment regimens for bipolar disorder is challenging, as many patients suffer from significant symptoms despite treatment. This study investigated the risk of relapse (psychiatric hospitalization) and treatment safety (non‐psychiatric hospitalization) associated with different doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in persons with bipolar disorder.Individuals aged 15–65 with bipolar disorder were identified from Finnish national health registers in 1996–2018. Studied antipsychotics included olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole; mood stabilizers lithium, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Medication use was divided into three time‐varying dose categories: low, standard, and high. The studied outcomes were risk of psychiatric hospitalization (relapse) and the risk of non‐psychiatric hospitalization (treatment safety). Stratified Cox regression in within‐individual design was used.The cohort included 60,045 individuals (mean age 41.7 years, SD 15.8; 56.4% female). Mean follow‐up was 8.3 years (SD 5.8). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine and aripiprazole were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses, and risperidone in low dose. The lowest adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was observed for standard dose aripiprazole (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.82). Quetiapine was not associated with a decreased risk of relapse at any dose. Mood stabilizers were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses; lowest aHR was observed for standard dose lithium (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.56–0.65). Apart from lithium, high doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers were associated with an increased risk of non‐psychiatric hospitalization. Lithium was associated with a decreased risk of non‐psychiatric hospitalization in low (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84–0.93) and standard doses (aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88).Standard doses of lithium and aripiprazole were associated with the lowest risk of relapse, and standard dose of lithium with the lowest risk of non‐psychiatric hospitalization. Quetiapine was not associated with decreased risk of relapse at any dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of Australians dispensed psychotropic medications between 2013 and 2022 according to their age. Methods: Services Australia provided a de-identified 10% random Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme sample that allowed us to determine, for each year, the proportion of Australians dispensed at least one script for antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, or hypnotics. The classification of medications followed Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical coding. Participants were stratified into 10-year age groups from 0–9 to ⩾90 years, and sex was coded as male/female. We retrieved population numbers from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Results: The number of records per year ranged from 1,540,520 to 1,746,402, and 54.10% were for females. A greater proportion of older adults, particularly those aged ⩾70 years, were dispensed antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics and hypnotics than any other age group. The proportion of people who dispensed antipsychotics, anxiolytics and hypnotics declined between 2013 and 2022 but increased for antidepressants, most markedly for adolescents and young adults. Females were more frequently dispensed antidepressants, anxiolytics and hypnotics than males, but males were more frequently dispensed antipsychotics than females, albeit not in later life. Conclusion: Older age groups and females are the most frequent recipients of psychotropic medications dispensed in Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis constitutes a condition that involves life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by severe infection. This nested case–control study investigated risk factors for severe sepsis and whether antipsychotic use is associated with severe sepsis risk in patients with schizophrenia, a topic that has not been comprehensively explored in previous studies. Methods: We selected 39,432 patients with schizophrenia aged between 15 and 65 years from Taiwan's Psychiatric Inpatient Medical Claims database for the period 2000–2012. The case group comprised patients with severe sepsis after their first psychiatric admission (n = 1382). The case and control groups were randomly matched (1:4) by age, sex and first psychiatric admission (year) and finally comprised 1382 and 5528 individuals, respectively. We employed multivariable conditional logistic regression to identify (1) risk factors (physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications) and (2) antipsychotic–severe sepsis associations. Results: Higher numbers of psychiatric admissions and physical illnesses such as delirium, cerebrovascular disease and cancer were significantly associated with a higher risk of severe sepsis. Furthermore, severe sepsis was associated with the use of antithrombotic agents, systemic corticosteroids and agents targeting the renin–angiotensin system. Clozapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.65) and quetiapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.59) use were associated with an increased risk of severe sepsis. The use of more than one antipsychotic drug could further increase this risk. Conclusion: Several physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications increase the risk of severe sepsis in patients with schizophrenia. Specifically, clozapine or quetiapine use significantly increased the risk of severe sepsis in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to accelerate drug development and avoid unnecessary drug trials in vulnerable pediatric populations, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a general advice letter to sponsors permitting the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults to be extrapolated to adolescents. Extrapolation is based on the evidence‐based assumptions that (1) disease characteristics and (2) response to therapy, are similar in adults and adolescents. Whereas the FDA validated the extrapolation approach using data from multiple drug development programs, aripiprazole data are the most relevant to confirm the validity of the extrapolation approach for brexpiprazole, since aripiprazole and brexpiprazole both modulate dopaminergic and serotonergic signaling in the brain. The aims of this analysis were (1) to quantitatively assess the aripiprazole exposure (average steady‐state concentration)–response (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score change from baseline) similarity between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, (2) to extend the aripiprazole exposure–response modeling to brexpiprazole using adult data, and (3) to use the brexpiprazole model to predict schizophrenia symptom response in adolescents. Disease–drug–dropout models were developed using patient‐level data from clinical studies of aripiprazole (1007 adults, 294 adolescents) and brexpiprazole (1235 adults) in schizophrenia. The aripiprazole model demonstrated similar exposure–response between adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, validating the extrapolation approach. Extrapolation of the brexpiprazole adult exposure–response model to adolescents predicted the efficacy of brexpiprazole in adolescents aged 13‐17 years with schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The administration of sedatives to critically ill patients is a common practice in intensive care units (ICU) and has been associated with negative outcomes. To mitigate this, atypical antipsychotics are utilized as adjunctive therapy. This study aims to review and quantify overall effectiveness of the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine on reduction in the amount of continuous infusion propofol utilized in the ICU. Methods: This was an observational study that took place from February 27, 2021 to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome of this study was the percentage change in average propofol infusion rate (mcg/kg/min) from baseline to the greater than 24 to 48 hours period after atypical antipsychotic initiation. Secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, QTc interval monitoring, and continuation of the antipsychotic without a valid indication. Descriptive statistics were utilized for the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The average baseline propofol rate was 31 mcg/kg/min, which reduced 8.6% to 28.35 mcg/kg/min over the 0 to 24 hours period, was reduced by 19.4% compared to baseline to a rate of 25 mcg/kg/min during the greater than 24 to 48 hours period, and finally a percent reduction of 54.2% seen during the greater than 48 to 72 hours period to a rate of 14 mcg/kg/min. Conclusions: Patients who received an adjunctive antipsychotic saw resulting propofol rate reductions of 8.6% at 24 hours, 19.4% at 48 hours, and 54.2% at 72 hours. However, research on this topic should not end here, as further investigation with higher-level study design is needed to determine the true impact of these agents for this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Atypical antipsychotics are associated with several adverse effects including metabolic syndrome, weight gain, QTc interval prolongation, and extrapyramidal effects. This study aims to investigate the risk of renal impairment in patients receiving atypical antipsychotics. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted via PubMed and Ovid SP and Web of Science to retrieve studies reporting the risk of renal impairment in patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of renal impairment and the subgroup analysis was calculated using the random-effects generic inverse variance method in Cochrane Review Manager. Results: A total of 4 studies involving 514,710 patients (221, 873 patients on atypical antipsychotics/CKD and 292, 837 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Patients on atypical antipsychotics exhibited an increased risk of renal impairment, with a pooled risk ratio of 1.34 (95%CI 1.23–1.47). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that atypical antipsychotic use was associated with an increased risk of both acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 1.51, 95%CI 1.34–1.71) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR: 1.23, 95%CI 1.12–1.35). Conclusion: Patients receiving atypical antipsychotics have an increased risk of renal impairment. Quetiapine carries the highest risk of renal impairment encompassing both AKI and CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health measures were implemented, yet it is unknown whether these measures affected medication access in those with schizophrenia (SCZ). This study aimed to assess whether the antipsychotic utilization in SCZ changed during the pandemic. We used dispensed prescription drug data from the Canadian province of Manitoba in individuals with SCZ using linked administrative data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. The quarterly incident and prevalent dispensation of antipsychotics at two periods were compared with the expected trend (April 1, 2015 to April 1, 2020 and 2021) using linear autoregression. We stratified the primary results by age and sex and examined multiple subgroups. There were 9045 individuals with SCZ in the first fiscal quarter of 2020. The prevalent use of the most common antipsychotics were: olanzapine (206.7/1000), risperidone (190.8/1000), quetiapine (174.4/1000), and clozapine (100.9/1000). The overall prevalent use of antipsychotics remained stable during the pandemic compared with the expected trend. A significant decrease in the incident use in April–June 2020 (estimate: -1.3, 95%CI:-2.2,-0.3) was noted compared with the expected. A significantly higher incidence of atypical antipsychotics (estimate: 1.4, 95%CI: 0.2,2.5) and risperidone separately (estimate: 1.8, 95%CI: 0.2,3.3) was noted in 2021 compared with expected. This study found a decline in the receipt of antipsychotics for people with SCZ during the initial implementation of COVID-19 public health measures, particularly on the overall incidence. Future work on investigating the impact of these trends on SCZ outcomes is needed to inform future pandemic-related policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects. We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms. APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outpatient treatment initiators and individuals with moderately severe or severe pretreatment depression were most likely to benefit from ketamine treatment over electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for treatment‐resistant depression (TRD), a newly published analysis has found. Individuals with the most severe pretreatment depression saw greater benefit from ECT early in treatment. Study results were published online June 25, 2024, in JAMA Network Open. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Though pandemic-related suicides are a concern, little is known about factors potentially linking graduate student life and suicide risk. This study identified factors associated with suicide risk among Brazilian graduate students (N = 5,344) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, this study revealed that 31.5% of participants presented some risk for suicide: 16.6% "low risk," 4.7% "moderate risk," and 10.2% "high risk." Higher income and religious affiliation were identified as protective factors. Identified risk factors encompass non-heterosexual orientation, a history of depression or posttraumatic stress or common mental disorders diagnoses, the use of medications—both general and psychopharmaceuticals—without medical prescription, antipsychotics use, alcohol consumption, lack of health insurance, and dissatisfaction with life as a result of accessing social media networks. The high vulnerability of graduate students to suicide risk highlights the need for institutional suicide prevention initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lurasidone hydrochloride (LRS HCl), an antipsychotic drug with low aqueous solubility, was dispersed in a matrix of polyethylene glycol (PEG) using the green solvent evaporation method. The green solvents used were water and ethanol. Solid dispersions and physical mixtures were prepared at various drug-to-polymer ratios, characterized by XRPD, FTIR, and DSC analyzes, and then used for the preparation of fast disintegrating tablets (FDTs). The tablets were analyzed for hardness, disintegration, and in vitro dissolution of LRS HCl. In vitro release profiles showed a significant improvement in the release rate of LRS HCl from tablets prepared with solid dispersions compared to those containing untreated LRS HCl or the physical mixture. The presented results confirm that the use of solid dispersions prepared by the green solvent evaporation method is a promising approach to enhance the in vitro dissolution of poorly soluble drugs such as LRS HCl. The applicability of mathematical models was tested to describe the release profiles of LRS HCl from FDTs. The diffusion process, following Fick's law for drug release, appears to be the predominant release mechanism for this specific drug in FDTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Antipsychotic drugs are critical in managing psychosis but they also carry risks when misused, leading to toxicity. Case Presentation: A patient overdosed on olanzapine, resulting in anticholinergic toxidrome with symptoms like tachycardia and altered mental status. Immediate recognition and management of antipsychotic toxicity-induced toxidromes in emergency settings are crucial. Treatment strategy includes maintaining airway, breathing and circulation along with decontamination. There is no specific antidote. Conclusion: This case underscores the need for emergency physicians to remain vigilant and proactive in identifying and addressing such toxicity by identification of toxidromes to prevent complications and missed diagnosis in emergency department. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. This study assessed the potential efficacy of donepezil in treating autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by social communication difficulties and repetitive behaviors. Donepezil, primarily used to treat Alzheimer’s disease as an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, has gained attention as a potential treatment for ASD symptoms. Methods. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to investigate the effects of donepezil on individuals with ASD. Outcome measures assessed various aspects of ASD, including language skills, executive function, behavior, and core symptoms. Nine studies were identified, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three retrospective studies, one open-label trial, and one case report. Results. One RCT reported significant improvements in expressive and receptive language skills, especially in younger children. Another study combining donepezil with choline supplementation showed enhanced receptive language skills, particularly in younger participants. An open-label trial indicated improved rapid eye movement sleep patterns in autistic children treated with donepezil. Several retrospective studies reported improvements in behavioral symptoms, such as aggression and hyperactivity. However, other RCTs did not find statistically significant improvements in executive functioning. Conclusion. In general, donepezil use in ASD demonstrates promise in specific areas, notably language development and behavioral symptom management. However, the results are contradictory, requiring further research to clarify its role, optimal dosing, long-term effects, and potential side effects in individuals with ASD. Practical Implications. Donepezil can be used to improve the clinical global impression and language skills of people with ASD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: As part of the Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines 2.0 project, we conducted a systematic review to find risk factors or risk stratification approaches that can be used to identify subsets of older adults who may benefit from targeted ED delirium screening. Methods: An electronic search strategy was developed with a medical librarian, conducted in April 2021 and November 2022. Full‐text studies of patients ≥65 years assessed for prevalent delirium in the ED were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster University Clarity Group tool. Outcomes measures pertained to the risk stratification method used. Due to heterogeneity of patient populations, risk stratification methods, and outcomes, a meta‐analysis was not conducted. Results: Our search yielded 1878 unique citations, of which 13 were included. Six studies developed a novel delirium risk score with or without evaluation of specific risk factors, six studies evaluated specific risk factors only, and one study evaluated an existing nondelirium risk score for association with delirium. The most common risk factor was history of dementia, with odds ratios ranging from 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–8.9) to 18.33 (95% CI 8.08–43.64). Other risk factors that were consistently associated with increased risk of delirium included older age, use of certain medications (such as antipsychotics, antidepressants, and opioids, among others), and functional impairments. Of the studies that developed novel risk scores, the reported area under the curve ranged from 0.77 to 0.90. Only two studies reported potential impact of the risk stratification tool on screening burden. Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity, but results suggest that factors such as dementia, age over 75, and functional impairments should be used to identify older adults who are at highest risk for ED delirium. No studies evaluated implementation of a risk stratification method for delirium screening or evaluated patient‐oriented outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This review examines health care team-focused interventions on managing persistent or recurrent distress behaviors among older adults in long-term residential or inpatient health care settings. Methods: We searched interventions addressing health care worker (HCW) knowledge and skills related to distress behavior management using Ovid MEDLINE, Elsevier Embase, and Ovid PsycINFO from December 2002 through December 2022. Results: We screened 6,582 articles; 29 randomized trials met inclusion criteria. Three studies on patient-facing HCW interactions (e.g. medication management, diagnosing distress) showed mixed results on agitation; one study found no effect on quality of life. Six HCW-focused studies suggested short-term reduction in distress behaviors. Quality-of-life improvement or decreased antipsychotic use was not evidenced. Among 17 interventions combining HCW-focused and patient-facing activities, 0 showed significant distress reduction, 8 showed significant antipsychotic reduction (OR = 0.79, 95%CI [0.69, 0.91]) and 9 showed quality of life improvements (SMD = 0.71, 95%CI [0.39, 1.04]). One study evaluating HCW, patient-, and environmental-focused intervention activities showed short-term improvement in agitation. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Novel health care models combining HCW training and patient management improve patient quality of life, reduce antipsychotic use, and may reduce distress behaviors. Evaluation of intervention's effects on staff burnout and utilization is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe nursing home (NH) characteristics associated with antipsychotic use and test whether associations changed after implementation of the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care's antipsychotic reduction initiative (ARI). Methods: Longitudinal quasi-experimental design using data from multiple sources and piecewise linear mixed models were used for statistical analyses. Results: There was a significant decrease in monthly antipsychotic use across the study period (pre-ARI b = −0.0003, p <.001; post-ARI b = −0.0012, p <.001), which held after adjusting for NH characteristics. Registered nurse hours (b = −0.0026, p <.001), licensed practical nurse hours (b = −0.0019, p <.001), facility chain membership (b = −0.0013, p <.01), and health inspection ratings (b = −0.0003, p >.01) were associated with decreased antipsychotic use. Post-ARI changes in associations between NH characteristics and antipsychotic use were small and not statistically significant. Conclusions: Decreases in antipsychotic use were associated with most NH characteristics, and associations persisted post-ARI. Further research is warranted to examine the interactions between ARI policy and NH characteristics on antipsychotic prescribing, as well as other NH factors, such as facility prescribing cultures and clinical specialty of staff. Clinical Implications: Decreases in monthly antipsychotic use were observed following the ARI. The decreases in monthly antipsychotic use were associated with most NH characteristics, and these associations persisted during the post-ARI period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This cohort study examines the risk of pneumonia associated with the use of antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. Key Points: Question: What antipsychotics are associated with pneumonia, which is the fourth leading cause of death in patients with schizophrenia? Findings: In this cohort study of 61 889 people with schizophrenia, antipsychotics with high anticholinergic burden were associated with an increased incidence of pneumonia. Significantly higher risks were detected for clozapine (≥180 mg/d), quetiapine (≥440 mg/d), and olanzapine (≥11 mg/d). Meaning: Findings of this study suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, pneumonia is associated with the use of specific antipsychotics, setting the stage for personalized prevention strategies to decrease the incidence of this life-threatening condition in patients with schizophrenia. Importance: Antipsychotic drugs (particularly clozapine) have been associated with pneumonia in observational studies. Despite studies of the associations between antipsychotic use and incident pneumonia, it remains unclear to what degree antipsychotic use is associated with increased risk of pneumonia, whether dose-response associations exist, and what agents are specifically associated with incident pneumonia. Objective: To estimate pneumonia risk associated with specific antipsychotics and examine whether polytherapy, dosing, and receptor binding properties are associated with pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study identified patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (hereafter, schizophrenia) aged 16 years or older from nationwide Finnish registers from 1972 to 2014. Data on diagnoses, inpatient care, and specialized outpatient care were obtained from the Hospital Discharge Register. Information on outpatient medication dispensing was obtained from the Prescription Register. Study follow-up was from 1996 to 2017. Data were analyzed from November 4, 2022, to December 5, 2023. Exposures: Use of specific antipsychotic monotherapies; antipsychotics modeled by dosage as low (<0.6 of the World Health Organization defined daily dose [DDD] per day), medium (0.6 to <1.1 DDDs per day), or high dose (≥1.1 DDDs per day); antipsychotic polypharmacy; and antipsychotics categorized according to their anticholinergic burden as low, medium, and high. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospitalization for incident pneumonia. Pneumonia risk was analyzed using adjusted, within-individual Cox proportional hazards regression models, with no antipsychotic use as the reference. Results: The study included 61 889 persons with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [16.0] years; 31 104 men [50.3%]). During 22 years of follow-up, 8917 patients (14.4%) had 1 or more hospitalizations for pneumonia and 1137 (12.8%) died within 30 days of admission. Compared with no antipsychotic use, any antipsychotic use overall was not associated with pneumonia (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.26). Monotherapy use was associated with increased pneumonia risk compared with no antipsychotic use (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.30]; P =.03) in a dose-dependent manner, but polytherapy use was not. When categorized by anticholinergic burden, only the use of antipsychotics with a high anticholinergic burden was associated with pneumonia (AHR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45]; P <.001). Of specific drugs, high-dose quetiapine (AHR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.60]; P =.003), high- and medium-dose clozapine (AHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.22-1.71]; P <.001 and AHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.18-1.74]; P <.001, respectively), and high-dose olanzapine (AHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.58]; P =.02) were associated with increased pneumonia risk. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, antipsychotic agents associated with pneumonia include not only clozapine (at dosages ≥180 mg/d) but also quetiapine (≥440 mg/d) and olanzapine (≥11 mg/d). Moreover, monotherapy antipsychotics and antipsychotics with high anticholinergic burden are associated with increased pneumonia risk in a dose-dependent manner. These findings call for prevention strategies aimed at patients with schizophrenia requiring high-risk antipsychotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling mental disorder that significantly impacts individuals’ lives. Long-term treatment with antipsychotic drugs, coupled with the complications of the disease itself, increases the risk of dysphagia in patients. These disorders further heighten the likelihood of choking and asphyxia death among this population. This project aims to comprehensively review the pathological mechanisms behind dysphagia in schizophrenia, alongside proposing early screening and evaluation methods. It also suggests treatment recommendations to mitigate the risks and complications associated with dysphagia in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The current study uses longitudinal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) to assess the effects of antipsychotic medication use on changes in cognitive functioning among adults in the United States. Methods: Linear mixed models were conducted that included study visits, days between visits, sex, age, education, and medical history (i.e. diabetes, seizures, traumatic brain injury, stroke, and Parkinson's disease). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) was used to create variables assessing changes in psychotic symptoms, manic symptoms, and agitation/disinhibition. Results: The results indicated that starting an antipsychotic medication was associated with a greater decline in semantic fluency (Fruit and Vegetable Naming), processing speed (Digit Symbol and Trail Making Test, Part A), and cognitive flexibility (Trail Making Test, Part B). Conversely, stopping an antipsychotic medication was protective against declines in the same cognitive skills. The effect of antipsychotic medications on cognitive functioning did not appear to differ by reported changes in psychiatric symptoms after adjusting for false discovery. Conclusion: The results suggest that prescribers should consider discontinuance of an antipsychotic if the patient is reporting cognitive problems and their symptoms are manageable off the medications. The findings hope to spark future research into the effects of antipsychotic use on biomarkers of progressive dementias (e.g. Alzheimer's disease). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by cognitive, affective, and social dysfunction, resulting in hallucinations, delusions, emotional blunting, and disordered thinking. In recent years, proteomics has been increasingly influential in SCZ research. Glycosylation, a key post-translational modification, can alter neuronal stability and normal signaling in the nervous system by affecting protein folding, stability, and cellular signaling. Recent research evidence suggests that abnormal glycosylation patterns exist in different brain regions in autopsy samples from SCZ patients, and that there are significant differences in various glycosylation modification types and glycosylation modifying enzymes. Therefore, this review explores the mechanisms of aberrant modifications of N-glycosylation, O-glycosylation, glycosyltransferases, and polysialic acid in the brains of SCZ patients, emphasizing their roles in neurotransmitter receptor function, synaptic plasticity, and neural adhesion. Additionally, the effects of antipsychotic drugs on glycosylation processes and the potential for glycosylation-targeted therapies are discussed. By integrating these findings, this review aims to provide a comprehensive perspective to further understand the role of aberrant glycosylation modifications in the pathophysiology of SCZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antipsychotic medications are effective treatments for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar I disorder (BD-I), but when presented with different treatment options, there are tradeoffs that individuals make between clinical improvement and adverse effects. As new options become available, understanding the attributes of antipsychotic medications that are valued and the tradeoffs that individuals consider when choosing among them is important. Methods: A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was administered online to elicit preferences across 5 attributes of oral antipsychotics: treatment efficacy (i.e., improvement in symptom severity), weight gain over 6 months, sexual dysfunction, sedation, and akathisia. Eligible respondents were aged 18–64 years with a self-reported clinician diagnosis of SZ or BD-I. Results: In total, 144 respondents with SZ and 152 with BD-I completed the DCE. Of those with SZ, 50% identified themselves as female and 69.4% as White, with a mean (SD) age of 41.0 (10.1) years. Of those with BD-I, most identified themselves as female (69.7%) and as White (77.6%), with a mean (SD) age of 40.0 (10.7) years. In both cohorts, respondents preferred oral antipsychotics with better efficacy, less weight gain, no sexual dysfunction or akathisia, and lower risk of sedation. Treatment efficacy was the most important attribute, with a conditional relative importance (CRI) of 31.4% for respondents with SZ and 31.0% for those with BD-I. Weight gain (CRI = 21.3% and 23.1%, respectively) and sexual dysfunction (CRI = 23.4% and 19.2%, respectively) were adverse effects in this study that respondents most wanted to avoid. Respondents with SZ were willing to accept 9.8 lb of weight gain or > 25% risk of sedation for symptom improvement; those with BD-I were willing to accept 8.5 lb of weight gain or a > 25% risk of sedation. Conclusions: In this DCE, treatment efficacy was the most important attribute of oral antipsychotic medications among respondents with SZ and BD-I. Weight gain and sexual dysfunction were the adverse effects respondents most wanted to avoid; however, both cohorts were willing to accept some weight gain or sedation to obtain better efficacy. These results highlight features that patients value in antipsychotic medications and how they balance benefits and risks when choosing among treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of a new psychopharmaceutical medication instead of the previous one always poses a certain challenge. In the case of antipsychotics (AP), these problems are considerably more complicated and are mainly caused by the question of dose equivalents, but also by the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug. In the case of partial dopamine D2 agonists, an additional issue is the possibility of deterioration when switching from the previous D2 antagonists to these drugs. Cross-titration is therefore generally recommended. Finally, due to the capsule form, it is not possible to increase the dose of cariprazine by less than 1.5 mg during titration. In this paper, we have presented our proposal to replace the most commonly used second-generation APs with the third-generation AP cariprazine. We have taken into account the dose equivalents, the pharmacological forms of the drugs and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]