Search

An abstract topological graph (AT-graph) is a pair $A=(G,\mathcal{X})$, where $G=(V,E)$ is a graph and $\mathcal{X} \subseteq {E \choose 2}$ is a set of pairs of edges of $G$. A realization of $A$ is a drawing $\Gamma_A$ of $G$ in the plane such that any two edges $e_1,e_2$ of $G$ cross in $\Gamma_A$ if and only if $(e_1,e_2) \in \mathcal{X}$; $\Gamma_A$ is simple if any two edges intersect at most once (either at a common endpoint or at a proper crossing). The AT-graph Realizability (ATR) problem asks whether an input AT-graph admits a realization. The version of this problem that requires a simple realization is called Simple AT-graph Realizability (SATR). It is a classical result that both ATR and SATR are NP-complete. In this paper, we study the SATR problem from a new structural perspective. More precisely, we consider the size $\mathrm{\lambda}(A)$ of the largest connected component of the crossing graph of any realization of $A$, i.e., the graph ${\cal C}(A) = (E, \mathcal{X})$. This parameter represents a natural way to measure the level of interplay among edge crossings. First, we prove that SATR is NP-complete when $\mathrm{\lambda}(A) \geq 6$. On the positive side, we give an optimal linear-time algorithm that solves SATR when $\mathrm{\lambda}(A) \leq 3$ and returns a simple realization if one exists. Our algorithm is based on several ingredients, in particular the reduction to a new embedding problem subject to constraints that require certain pairs of edges to alternate (in the rotation system), and a sequence of transformations that exploit the interplay between alternation constraints and the SPQR-tree and PQ-tree data structures to eventually arrive at a simpler embedding problem that can be solved with standard techniques., Comment: Short version with less content accepted to ISAAC 2024

We study Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators, which is the problem of augmenting an $n$-vertex planar graph whose vertices are partitioned into independent sets (called clusters) with paths - one for each cluster - that connect all the vertices in each cluster while maintaining planarity. We show that the problem can be solved in time $2^{O(n)}$ for both the variable and fixed embedding case. Moreover, we show that it can be solved in subexponential time $2^{O(\sqrt{n}\log n)}$ in the fixed embedding case if additionally the input graph is connected. The latter time complexity is tight under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. We also show that $n$ can be replaced with the vertex cover number of the input graph by providing a linear (resp. polynomial) kernel for the variable-embedding (resp. fixed-embedding) case; these results contrast the NP-hardness of the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth (and even on trees). Finally, we complement known lower bounds for the problem by showing that Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators is NP-hard even when the number of clusters is at most $3$, thus excluding the algorithmic use of the number of clusters as a parameter., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024)

We present singly-exponential quantum algorithms for the One-Sided Crossing Minimization (OSCM) problem. Given an $n$-vertex bipartite graph $G=(U,V,E\subseteq U \times V)$, a $2$-level drawing $(\pi_U,\pi_V)$ of $G$ is described by a linear ordering $\pi_U: U \leftrightarrow \{1,\dots,|U|\}$ of $U$ and linear ordering $\pi_V: V \leftrightarrow \{1,\dots,|V|\}$ of $V$. For a fixed linear ordering $\pi_U$ of $U$, the OSCM problem seeks to find a linear ordering $\pi_V$ of $V$ that yields a $2$-level drawing $(\pi_U,\pi_V)$ of $G$ with the minimum number of edge crossings. We show that OSCM can be viewed as a set problem over $V$ amenable for exact algorithms with a quantum speedup with respect to their classical counterparts. First, we exploit the quantum dynamic programming framework of Ambainis et al. [Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms. SODA 2019] to devise a QRAM-based algorithm that solves OSCM in $O^*(1.728^n)$ time and space. Second, we use quantum divide and conquer to obtain an algorithm that solves OSCM without using QRAM in $O^*(2^n)$ time and polynomial space., Comment: This is the long version of a paper to appear at the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD '24)

This paper studies planar drawings of graphs in which each vertex is represented as a point along a sequence of horizontal lines, called levels, and each edge is either a horizontal segment or a strictly $y$-monotone curve. A graph is $s$-span weakly leveled planar if it admits such a drawing where the edges have span at most $s$; the span of an edge is the number of levels it touches minus one. We investigate the problem of computing $s$-span weakly leveled planar drawings from both the computational and the combinatorial perspectives. We prove the problem to be para-NP-hard with respect to its natural parameter $s$ and investigate its complexity with respect to widely used structural parameters. We show the existence of a polynomial-size kernel with respect to vertex cover number and prove that the problem is FPT when parameterized by treedepth. We also present upper and lower bounds on the span for various graph classes. Notably, we show that cycle trees, a family of $2$-outerplanar graphs generalizing Halin graphs, are $\Theta(\log n)$-span weakly leveled planar and $4$-span weakly leveled planar when $3$-connected. As a byproduct of these combinatorial results, we obtain improved bounds on the edge-length ratio of the graph families under consideration., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024)

Not every directed acyclic graph (DAG) whose underlying undirected graph is planar admits an upward planar drawing. We are interested in pushing the notion of upward drawings beyond planarity by considering upward $k$-planar drawings of DAGs in which the edges are monotonically increasing in a common direction and every edge is crossed at most $k$ times for some integer $k \ge 1$. We show that the number of crossings per edge in a monotone drawing is in general unbounded for the class of bipartite outerplanar, cubic, or bounded pathwidth DAGs. However, it is at most two for outerpaths and it is at most quadratic in the bandwidth in general. From the computational point of view, we prove that upward-$k$-planarity testing is NP-complete already for $k =1$ and even for restricted instances for which upward planarity testing is polynomial. On the positive side, we can decide in linear time whether a single-source DAG admits an upward $1$-planar drawing in which all vertices are incident to the outer face., Comment: This is the extended version, with full appendix, of a paper to appear in the Proc. 32nd Int. Symp. Graph Drawing & Network Visualization (GD 2024)

We study upward pointset embeddings (UPSEs) of planar $st$-graphs. Let $G$ be a planar $st$-graph and let $S \subset \mathbb{R}^2$ be a pointset with $|S|= |V(G)|$. An UPSE of $G$ on $S$ is an upward planar straight-line drawing of $G$ that maps the vertices of $G$ to the points of $S$. We consider both the problem of testing the existence of an UPSE of $G$ on $S$ (UPSE Testing) and the problem of enumerating all UPSEs of $G$ on $S$. We prove that UPSE Testing is NP-complete even for $st$-graphs that consist of a set of directed $st$-paths sharing only $s$ and $t$. On the other hand, for $n$-vertex planar $st$-graphs whose maximum $st$-cutset has size $k$, we prove that it is possible to solve UPSE Testing in $O(n^{4k})$ time with $O(n^{3k})$ space, and to enumerate all UPSEs of $G$ on $S$ with $O(n)$ worst-case delay, using $O(k n^{4k} \log n)$ space, after $O(k n^{4k} \log n)$ set-up time. Moreover, for an $n$-vertex $st$-graph whose underlying graph is a cycle, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an UPSE on a given poinset, which can be tested in $O(n \log n)$ time. Related to this result, we give an algorithm that, for a set $S$ of $n$ points, enumerates all the non-crossing monotone Hamiltonian cycles on $S$ with $O(n)$ worst-case delay, using $O(n^2)$ space, after $O(n^2)$ set-up time., Comment: This is the long version of a paper to appear at the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD '24)

We propose efficient algorithms for enumerating the notorious combinatorial structures of maximal planar graphs, called canonical orderings and Schnyder woods, and the related classical graph drawings by de Fraysseix, Pach, and Pollack [Combinatorica, 1990] and by Schnyder [SODA, 1990], called canonical drawings and Schnyder drawings, respectively. To this aim (i) we devise an algorithm for enumerating special $e$-bipolar orientations of maximal planar graphs, called canonical orientations; (ii) we establish bijections between canonical orientations and canonical drawings, and between canonical orientations and Schnyder drawings; and (iii) we exploit the known correspondence between canonical orientations and canonical orderings, and the known bijection between canonical orientations and Schnyder woods. All our enumeration algorithms have $O(n)$ setup time, space usage, and delay between any two consecutively listed outputs, for an $n$-vertex maximal planar graph.

Given a straight-line drawing of a graph, a segment is a maximal set of edges that form a line segment. Given a planar graph $G$, the segment number of $G$ is the minimum number of segments that can be achieved by any planar straight-line drawing of $G$. The line cover number of $G$ is the minimum number of lines that support all the edges of a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Computing the segment number or the line cover number of a planar graph is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete and, thus, NP-hard. We study the problem of computing the segment number from the perspective of parameterized complexity. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to each of the following parameters: the vertex cover number, the segment number, and the line cover number. We also consider colored versions of the segment and the line cover number., Comment: The conference version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

In this paper, we initiate the study of quantum algorithms in the Graph Drawing research area. We focus on two foundational drawing standards: 2-level drawings and book layouts. Concerning $2$-level drawings, we consider the problems of obtaining drawings with the minimum number of crossings, $k$-planar drawings, quasi-planar drawings, and the problem of removing the minimum number of edges to obtain a $2$-level planar graph. Concerning book layouts, we consider the problems of obtaining $1$-page book layouts with the minimum number of crossings, book embeddings with the minimum number of pages, and the problem of removing the minimum number of edges to obtain an outerplanar graph. We explore both the quantum circuit and the quantum annealing models of computation. In the quantum circuit model, we provide an algorithmic framework based on Grover's quantum search, which allows us to obtain, at least, a quadratic speedup on the best classical exact algorithms for all the considered problems. In the quantum annealing model, we perform experiments on the quantum processing unit provided by D-Wave, focusing on the classical $2$-level crossing minimization problem, demonstrating that quantum annealing is competitive with respect to classical algorithms., Comment: 37 pages, 32 figures, 2 tables

A rectangular drawing of a planar graph $G$ is a planar drawing of $G$ in which vertices are mapped to grid points, edges are mapped to horizontal and vertical straight-line segments, and faces are drawn as rectangles. Sometimes this latter constraint is relaxed for the outer face. In this paper, we study rectangular drawings in which the edges have unit length. We show a complexity dichotomy for the problem of deciding the existence of a unit-length rectangular drawing, depending on whether the outer face must also be drawn as a rectangle or not. Specifically, we prove that the problem is NP-complete for biconnected graphs when the drawing of the outer face is not required to be a rectangle, even if the sought drawing must respect a given planar embedding, whereas it is polynomial-time solvable, both in the fixed and the variable embedding settings, if the outer face is required to be drawn as a rectangle., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

The page-number of a directed acyclic graph (a DAG, for short) is the minimum $k$ for which the DAG has a topological order and a $k$-coloring of its edges such that no two edges of the same color cross, i.e., have alternating endpoints along the topological order. In 1999, Heath and Pemmaraju conjectured that the recognition of DAGs with page-number $2$ is NP-complete and proved that recognizing DAGs with page-number $6$ is NP-complete [SIAM J. Computing, 1999]. Binucci et al. recently strengthened this result by proving that recognizing DAGs with page-number $k$ is NP-complete, for every $k\geq 3$ [SoCG 2019]. In this paper, we finally resolve Heath and Pemmaraju's conjecture in the affirmative. In particular, our NP-completeness result holds even for $st$-planar graphs and planar posets., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

A map graph is a graph admitting a representation in which vertices are nations on a spherical map and edges are shared curve segments or points between nations. We present an explicit fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for recognizing map graphs parameterized by treewidth. The algorithm has time complexity that is linear in the size of the graph and, if the input is a yes-instance, it reports a certificate in the form of a so-called witness. Furthermore, this result is developed within a more general algorithmic framework that allows to test, for any $k$, if the input graph admits a $k$-map (where at most $k$ nations meet at a common point) or a hole-free~$k$-map (where each point of the sphere is covered by at least one nation). We point out that, although bounding the treewidth of the input graph also bounds the size of its largest clique, the latter alone does not seem to be a strong enough structural limitation to obtain an efficient time complexity. In fact, while the largest clique in a $k$-map graph is $\lfloor 3k/2 \rfloor$, the recognition of $k$-map graphs is still open for any fixed $k \ge 5$.

In an upward-planar L-drawing of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) each edge $e$ is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment with its lowest endpoint at the tail of $e$ and of a horizontal segment ending at the head of $e$. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Recently, upward-planar L-drawings have been studied for $st$-graphs, i.e., planar DAGs with a single source $s$ and a single sink $t$ containing an edge directed from $s$ to $t$. It is known that a plane $st$-graph, i.e., an embedded $st$-graph in which the edge $(s,t)$ is incident to the outer face, admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it admits a bitonic $st$-ordering, which can be tested in linear time. We study upward-planar L-drawings of DAGs that are not necessarily $st$-graphs. On the combinatorial side, we show that a plane DAG admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it is a subgraph of a plane $st$-graph admitting a bitonic $st$-ordering. This allows us to show that not every tree with a fixed bimodal embedding admits an upward-planar L-drawing. Moreover, we prove that any acyclic cactus with a single source (or a single sink) admits an upward-planar L-drawing, which respects a given outerplanar embedding if there are no transitive edges. On the algorithmic side, we consider DAGs with a single source (or a single sink). We give linear-time testing algorithms for these DAGs in two cases: (i) when the drawing must respect a prescribed embedding and (ii) when no restriction is given on the embedding, but it is biconnected and series-parallel., Comment: Extended abstract appeared at MFCS 2022

Graph product structure theory expresses certain graphs as subgraphs of the strong product of much simpler graphs. In particular, an elegant formulation for the corresponding structural theorems involves the strong product of a path and of a bounded treewidth graph, and allows to lift combinatorial results for bounded treewidth graphs to graph classes for which the product structure holds, such as to planar graphs [Dujmovi\'c et al., J. ACM, 67(4), 22:1-38, 2020]. In this paper, we join the search for extensions of this powerful tool beyond planarity by considering the h-framed graphs, a graph class that includes 1-planar, optimal 2-planar, and k-map graphs (for appropriate values of h). We establish a graph product structure theorem for h-framed graphs stating that the graphs in this class are subgraphs of the strong product of a path, of a planar graph of treewidth at most 3, and of a clique of size $3\lfloor h/2 \rfloor +\lfloor h/3 \rfloor -1$. This allows us to improve over the previous structural theorems for 1-planar and k-map graphs. Our results constitute significant progress over the previous bounds on the queue number, non-repetitive chromatic number, and p-centered chromatic number of these graph classes, e.g., we lower the currently best upper bound on the queue number of 1-planar graphs and k-map graphs from 495 to 81 and from 32225k(k-3) to 61k, respectively. We also employ the product structure machinery to improve the current upper bounds of twin-width of planar and 1-planar graphs from 183 to 37, and from O(1) to 80, respectively. All our structural results are constructive and yield efficient algorithms to obtain the corresponding decompositions.

We study a classic problem introduced thirty years ago by Eades and Wormald. Let $G=(V,E,\lambda)$ be a weighted planar graph, where $\lambda: E \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ is a length function. The Fixed Edge-Length Planar Realization problem (FEPR for short) asks whether there exists a planar straight-line realization of $G$, i.e., a planar straight-line drawing of $G$ where the Euclidean length of each edge $e \in E$ is $\lambda(e)$. Cabello, Demaine, and Rote showed that the FEPR problem is NP-hard, even when $\lambda$ assigns the same value to all the edges and the graph is triconnected. Since the existence of large triconnected minors is crucial to the known NP-hardness proofs, in this paper we investigate the computational complexity of the FEPR problem for weighted $2$-trees, which are $K_4$-minor free. We show its NP-hardness, even when $\lambda$ assigns to the edges only up to four distinct lengths. Conversely, we show that the FEPR problem is linear-time solvable when $\lambda$ assigns to the edges up to two distinct lengths, or when the input has a prescribed embedding. Furthermore, we consider the FEPR problem for weighted maximal outerplanar graphs and prove it to be linear-time solvable if their dual tree is a path, and cubic-time solvable if their dual tree is a caterpillar. Finally, we prove that the FEPR problem for weighted $2$-trees is slice-wise polynomial in the length of the longest path., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2021)

A long-standing conjecture by Heath, Pemmaraju, and Trenk states that the upward book thickness of outerplanar DAGs is bounded above by a constant. In this paper, we show that the conjecture holds for subfamilies of upward outerplanar graphs, namely those whose underlying graph is an internally-triangulated outerpath or a cactus, and those whose biconnected components are $at$-outerplanar graphs. On the complexity side, it is known that deciding whether a graph has upward book thickness $k$ is NP-hard for any fixed $k \ge 3$. We show that the problem, for any $k \ge 5$, remains NP-hard for graphs whose domination number is $O(k)$, but it is FPT in the vertex cover number., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2021)

The $\textit{planar slope number}$ $psn(G)$ of a planar graph $G$ is the minimum number of edge slopes in a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. It is known that $psn(G) \in O(c^\Delta)$ for every planar graph $G$ of degree $\Delta$. This upper bound has been improved to $O(\Delta^5)$ if $G$ has treewidth three, and to $O(\Delta)$ if $G$ has treewidth two. In this paper we prove $psn(G) \in \Theta(\Delta)$ when $G$ is a Halin graph, and thus has treewidth three. Furthermore, we present the first polynomial upper bound on the planar slope number for a family of graphs having treewidth four. Namely we show that $O(\Delta^2)$ slopes suffice for nested pseudotrees., Comment: Extended version of "Planar Drawings with Few Slopes of Halin Graphs and Nested Pseudotrees" to appear in the Proceedings of the 17th Algorithms and Data Structures Symposium (WADS 2021)

Given a bipartite graph $G=(V_b,V_r,E)$, the $2$-Level Quasi-Planarity problem asks for the existence of a drawing of $G$ in the plane such that the vertices in $V_b$ and in $V_r$ lie along two parallel lines $\ell_b$ and $\ell_r$, respectively, each edge in $E$ is drawn in the unbounded strip of the plane delimited by $\ell_b$ and $\ell_r$, and no three edges in $E$ pairwise cross. We prove that the $2$-Level Quasi-Planarity problem is NP-complete. This answers an open question of Dujmovi\'c, P\'{o}r, and Wood. Furthermore, we show that the problem becomes linear-time solvable if the ordering of the vertices in $V_b$ along $\ell_b$ is prescribed. Our contributions provide the first results on the computational complexity of recognizing quasi-planar graphs, which is a long-standing open question. Our linear-time algorithm exploits several ingredients, including a combinatorial characterization of the positive instances of the problem in terms of the existence of a planar embedding with a caterpillar-like structure, and an SPQR-tree-based algorithm for testing the existence of such a planar embedding. Our algorithm builds upon a classification of the types of embeddings with respect to the structure of the portion of the caterpillar they contain and performs a computation of the realizable embedding types based on a succinct description of their features by means of constant-size gadgets., Comment: Extended version of a paper to appear at SODA '21

The $2$-layer drawing model is a well-established paradigm to visualize bipartite graphs. Several beyond-planar graph classes have been studied under this model. Surprisingly, however, the fundamental class of $k$-planar graphs has been considered only for $k=1$ in this context. We provide several contributions that address this gap in the literature. First, we show tight density bounds for the classes of $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs with $k\in\{2,3,4,5\}$. Based on these results, we provide a Crossing Lemma for $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs, which then implies a general density bound for $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs. We prove this bound to be almost optimal with a corresponding lower bound construction. Finally, we study relationships between $k$-planarity and $h$-quasiplanarity in the $2$-layer model and show that $2$-layer $k$-planar graphs have pathwidth at most $k+1$., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)

In a planar L-drawing of a directed graph (digraph) each edge e is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment starting at the tail of e and a horizontal segment ending at the head of e. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Our main focus is on bimodal graphs, i.e., digraphs admitting a planar embedding in which the incoming and outgoing edges around each vertex are contiguous. We show that every plane bimodal graph without 2-cycles admits a planar L-drawing. This includes the class of upward-plane graphs. Finally, outerplanar digraphs admit a planar L-drawing - although they do not always have a bimodal embedding - but not necessarily with an outerplanar embedding., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2020)

An embedding of a graph in a book, called book embedding, consists of a linear ordering of its vertices along the spine of the book and an assignment of its edges to the pages of the book, so that no two edges on the same page cross. The book thickness of a graph is the minimum number of pages over all its book embeddings. For planar graphs, a fundamental result is due to Yannakakis, who proposed an algorithm to compute embeddings of planar graphs in books with four pages. Our main contribution is a technique that generalizes this result to a much wider family of nonplanar graphs, which is characterized by a biconnected skeleton of crossing-free edges whose faces have bounded degree. Notably, this family includes all 1-planar, all optimal 2-planar, and all k-map (with bounded k) graphs as subgraphs. We prove that this family of graphs has bounded book thickness, and as a corollary, we obtain the first constant upper bound for the book thickness of optimal 2-planar and k-map graphs.

In this paper we study the area requirements of planar greedy drawings of triconnected planar graphs. Cao, Strelzoff, and Sun exhibited a family $\cal H$ of subdivisions of triconnected plane graphs and claimed that every planar greedy drawing of the graphs in $\mathcal H$ respecting the prescribed plane embedding requires exponential area. However, we show that every $n$-vertex graph in $\cal H$ actually has a planar greedy drawing respecting the prescribed plane embedding on an $O(n)\times O(n)$ grid. This reopens the question whether triconnected planar graphs admit planar greedy drawings on a polynomial-size grid. Further, we provide evidence for a positive answer to the above question by proving that every $n$-vertex Halin graph admits a planar greedy drawing on an $O(n)\times O(n)$ grid. Both such results are obtained by actually constructing drawings that are convex and angle-monotone. Finally, we consider $\alpha$-Schnyder drawings, which are angle-monotone and hence greedy if $\alpha\leq 30^\circ$, and show that there exist planar triangulations for which every $\alpha$-Schnyder drawing with a fixed $\alpha<60^\circ$ requires exponential area for any resolution rule.

For a clustered graph, i.e, a graph whose vertex set is recursively partitioned into clusters, the C-Planarity Testing problem asks whether it is possible to find a planar embedding of the graph and a representation of each cluster as a region homeomorphic to a closed disk such that 1. the subgraph induced by each cluster is drawn in the interior of the corresponding disk, 2. each edge intersects any disk at most once, and 3. the nesting between clusters is reflected by the representation, i.e., child clusters are properly contained in their parent cluster. The computational complexity of this problem, whose study has been central to the theory of graph visualization since its introduction in 1995 [Qing-Wen Feng, Robert F. Cohen, and Peter Eades. Planarity for clustered graphs. ESA'95], has only been recently settled [Radoslav Fulek and Csaba D. T\'oth. Atomic Embeddability, Clustered Planarity, and Thickenability. To appear at SODA'20]. Before such a breakthrough, the complexity question was still unsolved even when the graph has a prescribed planar embedding, i.e, for embedded clustered graphs. We show that the C-Planarity Testing problem admits a single-exponential single-parameter FPT algorithm for embedded clustered graphs, when parameterized by the carving-width of the dual graph of the input. This is the first FPT algorithm for this long-standing open problem with respect to a single notable graph-width parameter. Moreover, in the general case, the polynomial dependency of our FPT algorithm is smaller than the one of the algorithm by Fulek and T\'oth. To further strengthen the relevance of this result, we show that the C-Planarity Testing problem retains its computational complexity when parameterized by several other graph-width parameters, which may potentially lead to faster algorithms., Comment: Extended version of the paper "C-Planarity Testing of Embedded Clustered Graphs with Bounded Dual Carving-Width" to appear in the Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2019)

In this paper we study planar morphs between straight-line planar grid drawings of trees. A morph consists of a sequence of morphing steps, where in a morphing step vertices move along straight-line trajectories at constant speed. We show how to construct planar morphs that simultaneously achieve a reduced number of morphing steps and a polynomially-bounded resolution. We assume that both the initial and final drawings lie on the grid and we ensure that each morphing step produces a grid drawing; further, we consider both upward drawings of rooted trees and drawings of arbitrary trees., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appears in WADS 2019

A simple topological graph is $k$-quasiplanar ($k\geq 2$) if it contains no $k$ pairwise crossing edges, and $k$-planar if no edge is crossed more than $k$ times. In this paper, we explore the relationship between $k$-planarity and $k$-quasiplanarity to show that, for $k \geq 2$, every $k$-planar simple topological graph can be transformed into a $(k+1)$-quasiplanar simple topological graph., Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1705.05569

We study the problem of drawing a dynamic graph, where each vertex appears in the graph at a certain time and remains in the graph for a fixed amount of time, called the window size. This defines a graph story, i.e., a sequence of subgraphs, each induced by the vertices that are in the graph at the same time. The drawing of a graph story is a sequence of drawings of such subgraphs. To support readability, we require that each drawing is straight-line and planar and that each vertex maintains its placement in all the drawings. Ideally, the area of the drawing of each subgraph should be a function of the window size, rather than a function of the size of the entire graph, which could be too large. We show that the graph stories of paths and trees can be drawn on a $2W \times 2W$ and on an $(8W + 1) \times (8W + 1)$ grid, respectively, where $W$ is the window size. These results are constructive and yield linear-time algorithms. Further, we show that there exist graph stories of planar graphs whose subgraphs cannot be drawn within an area that is only a function of $W$.