Search

Background Background: The feasibility of anti-TNF discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) must be proven in clinical trials including patients in clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic remission at the time of anti-TNF withdrawal to make recommendations for clinical practice. Aims Primary: to compare the rates of clinical remission at 1 year in patients who discontinue anti-TNF treatment vs. those who continue treatment. Secondary objectives: to know the effect of anti-TNF withdrawal on relapse-free time, mucosal healing and safety; and to identify predictive factors for relapse. Methods Prospective, quadruple-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) in clinical remission for > 6 months were randomised to maintain anti-TNF treatment [maintenance arm (MA)] or to withdraw it [withdrawal arm (WA)]. Patients who were on infliximab (IFX) received IFX 5 mg/kg or an intravenous placebo every 8 weeks, while patients on adalimumab (ADA) received subcutaneous ADA 40 mg or placebo every other week. Patients were followed-up until month 12 or up to the time of clinical relapse, whichever came first. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, trial scheme and definitions are summarized in figures 1a, 1b and 1c. Results were analysed by intention-to-treat (ITT) and by per-protocol (PP). Local investigators were blinded to faecal calprotectin (FC) and IFX and ADA trough levels. On-site monitoring was performed to assess data quality. Results 159 patients were screened, from whom 140 were randomised and comprised the ITT cohort: 70 allocated to the MA and 70 to the WA. Fifteen patients dropped out before the end of follow-up (12 months or relapse), leaving 63 patients in the MA and 62 patients in the WA for the PP analysis. The characteristics of patients in the MA and WA were similar (figure 2). The proportions of patients who maintained clinical remission -59/70 (84%), 95% confidence interval (CI)=74-92% in the MA vs. 53/70 (76%), 95%CI=64-85% in the WA- and who remained without significant endoscopic lesions at the end of follow-up were similar between groups (figures 3a, 3b, 3c). Only the proportion of patients with FC >250 mg/g was higher in the WA at the end of follow-up (figure 3d). Maintenance of clinical remission was no different between groups (figure 4). The same percentage of patients in both groups had at least one adverse event (69%). The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was also similar between groups (4% in MA vs. 7% in WA). Conclusion Anti-TNF withdrawal in selected IBD patients in clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic remission could be feasible without an increase in the risk of clinical relapse. Long-term follow-up of these patients is warranted.

Background and aims Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimize outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of IBD healthcare providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology. Results A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation, and immediate postoperative care. Conclusion Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery.

Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often classified as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, in some cases this categorization is not possible and these patients are labelled as inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) -or indeterminate colitis if histologic analysis of surgical specimens is possible-.The aims of this study were to compare the prognosis and therapeutic requirements in patients with IBDU and UC, and to identify potential predictive factors of reclassification as UC or CD. Methods Retrospective, observational, multicenter and case-control study of Spanish ENEIDA registry promoted by GETECCU. IBDU patients were identified from 18 centers. Every case of IBDU was matched with 2 patients of ulcerative colitis of the same hospital by sex, age at diagnosis and disease extent (in the patchy colitis subgroup, every case was matched with 1 extensive colitis and 1 left colitis). Results 231 IBDU patients and 469 UC patients were included. Only 15 IBDU patients met current criteria of indeterminate colitis. In the IBDU group 59.7% patients were males and the mean of age at diagnosis was 43.3 years. Disease extent was distributed in 14 proctitis, 59 left-sided colitis, 87 extensive colitis and 53 patchy colitis. 13.9% had rectal sparing and 31.9% presented ileitis. Thirteen percent were smokers at diagnosis, 5.6% had perianal disease and 15.9% had extraintestinal manifestations. Table 1: baseline characteristics of IBDU and UC group. When comparing IBDU to UC patients, there were no statistical differences between proportion of patients that needed immunosuppressants (35.7% vs 37.7%, p=0.558) and biological therapy (27.3% vs 24.3%, p=0.415). Regarding surgery for medically refractory disease, UC patients had higher surgical rates, although these differences did not reach statistical significance (2.6% vs 0.5%, p= 0.062). Figure 1: immunosuppressants, biological and surgery rates. Overall mortality rates were similar in both groups (5.1% in IBDU vs 2.6% in UC); with only one case related to IBD in IBDU group. During follow-up, 67 IBDU patients (31%) were reclassified (32 UC, 34 CD, 1 indeterminate colitis). 25% of patients were reclassified within 46 months of follow-up (Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curve of reclassification). Neither clinical, biochemical (C- reactive protein, albumin, hemoglobin) nor endoscopic variable (rectal sparing, ileitis) was associated with change in diagnosis. Conclusion In clinical practice, there were no statistical differences in prognosis, therapeutic requirements and surgical treatment between IBDU and UC patients. Two thirds of patients remained classified as IBDU during the follow-up. No predictive factors of reclassification have been identified.

Background Inflammatory arthropathies are the most common EIM associated to IBD with a prevalence of 20-50% for axial inflammation and 5-20% for peripheral arthritis. AntiTNF is the preferred treatment in patients with axial spondiloarthritis (AxSp) intolerant or refractory to NSAIDs and has shown efficacy in peripheral arthritis (pSp) as well. Nevertheless, an optimal antiTNF through level has not been yet stablished in this clinical setting. Thus, our aims were to evaluate the correlation between antiTNF through levels and joint EIM activity in IBD patients. Methods We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study. IBD patients diagnosed with articular EIM (AxSp, pSp or both) under antiTNF treatment at least 6 months were included. Anti-TNF concentrations were measured using ELISA. Blood samples were obtained just before the administration of the drug (trough levels), and an simultaneous evaluation by a reumatologist was performed. Definitions: inactive AxSp = ASDAS-CRP Results A total of 78 patients were included: Median age 52 ±15, 45% women, 82% CD (56% ileal; 18% colic; 24% ileocolic; 2% upper gastrointestinal involvement; 22% stricturing behaviour; 16% penetrating; 14% perianal disease), 18% UC (61% extensive, 15% left-sided, 23% proctitis), 11% had another EIM. HLA B-27 was present in 26% patients. Distribution of spondiloartrhopaties was: AxSp 42%, pSp 37%, or both 20%. Among CD patients, 18,9% presented clinical activity (n=14). Mean IBD disease duration was 11± 9,7 years. Fourteen patients (18%) were also under immunosupressive treatment .Through levels distributed by joint activity are shown in table 1.Figure 1 shows distribution of adalimumab through levels by AxSp activity. Conclusion No correlation between antiTNF through levels and joint EIM activity was found in these preliminary results. However, patients with active axial Sp treated with adalimumab had lower through levels than those with inactive axial Sp.

Background Sexuality is a complex entity and a major determinant of quality of life in patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It has been estimated that sexual dysfunction (SD) affects 30% of women and 5% of men in the general population as well as 50% in women and 25% in men with IBD. Objectives To compare the rates of SD between young female and male patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and healthy controls matched by age and sex and to search for predictors of SD in CD patients. Methods Observational, case-control, prospective study including CD patients with CD, 18-40 years of age. Age and sex-matched (2:1) healthy controls (HC) were selected. Demographic characteristics of all subjects and clinical features of CD were collected. The variables explored were SD in women (Index of Female Sexual Function (IFSF), SD in men (International Index of Erectile Function [IIFE-15]) and presence of anxiety-depression (Hospital Anxiety/Depression Scale [HADS]). Results A total of 163 subjects were included: 83 men (58 CD, median 28 years (RIQ 24-36) and 25 male HC, median 31 years (RIQ 26-37) and 80 women (50 female CD, median 26 years (RIQ 21-36) and 30 HC, median 28 (RIQ 26-32). 24% of women with CD and 8% of men had clinical activity (HBI >4). Table 1 summarizes main clinical characteristics of overall study population. Demographic characteristics of men with CD and HC were not significantly different. Sedentary lifestyle was more common among women with CD vs HC (46% vs 3.3%, p SD in men, measured by IIFE, was more common in CD patients than among HC, 14/58 (24%) vs 1/25 (4%), p=0.031. CD male patients scored significantly lower than HC regarding overall sexual satisfaction 8 (6-9) vs 9 (8-10), p=0,02. Erectile dysfunction occurred only in CD (7/46, 15%), p= 0.08. Female SD was, likewise more frequent in women with CD vs female HC, (18/50 (38%) CD vs 3/30 (12%) HC,p=0.017), and female CD patients scored significantly lower with regard sexual desire (5 vs 7, p=0.008), arousal (9.0 vs 11, p=0.06) and lubrication (10 vs 13, p=0.04) than female HC. Logistic regression analysis showed that only anxiety was associated with SD in women, finding no associated risk factors with SD in CD male patients. Conclusion CD patients present a disease activity-independent higher risk of SD compared to the general population. Domain affected in male patients is impairment of satisfaction whereas lubrication, sexual desire and arousal, being associated with anxiety, are affected in female CD patients.

Background Recently, a subcutaneous formulation of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) (SC-IFX) has been approved for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aims of this study were to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and patient experience following a switching to SC-IFX in patients who are in clinical remission on IV-IFX maintenance treatment. Methods Multicentre, descriptive, and observational study including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who were going to be changed from IV-IFX to SC-IFX on the ENEIDA registry (a large, prospectively maintained database of the Spanish Working Group in IBD–GETECCU). All patients were on clinical and biological remission at least 24 weeks before changing. Demographic and disease data, clinical activity (Harvey-Bradshaw index for CD and mayo index for UC), analytical data (C reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC), as well as trough levels were collected at baseline, at 12 and 24 weeks. Results One hundred and fifty-five patients were included: 54 UC (35%) and 91 (65%) CD; 44% women and 56% men; age 45.5 years (32-55). IV-IFX was mainly administered due to active disease (72%) and perianal disease (7%) and during 32 months [range 14-56]. Pre-switch, 78 (50.3%) were on 8-weekly dosing of IV-IFX, 77 (49.7%) were with intensification dose and the half (50.3%) were on concomitant immunomodulatory therapy. SC-IFX was mainly switching by COVID-19 pandemic (60%), to increase through levels (15%) or patient request (25%). The majority of patients (140, 90%) remained with standard dose, 8 (5%) required dose intensification (120 mg weekly in 4 and 240 mg every 2 weeks in 4) and 7 (4.5%) had successful de-escalation (120 mg every 3 weeks in 4 and 120 mg every 4 weeks in 3). Clinical indices, CRP levels and FC remained unchanged (Figure). Median SC-IFX levels significantly increased from baseline of 4.5 μg/dl [range 2.6-9.2] to 14 μg/dl [range 9.5-16.2] at week 12 and 13.2 μg/dl [range 10.4-19.7] at week 24. No factors (immunossupresor, body mass index, disease location) were associated with the increase of IFX trough levels. During 24 weeks of follow-up, 16 of the 78 patients (20.5%) stopped immunosuppressant treatment. The adverse events were recorded in 9 patients (5.8%), 4 (2.6%) were hospitalized and 4 (2.6%) had surgery (one of them for perianal disease). Nine patients (5.8%) stopped SC-IFX (1 primary failure, 2 loss of response, 4 adverse events, 1 voluntarily, and 1 surgery). Conclusion The switch from IV to SC IFX maintains clinical remission safely in IBD patients, offers higher drug levels and a good patient acceptance. However, the significance of higher drug levels with SC-IFX requires further exploration.

Background: A treat-to-target strategy, in which strictly defined treatment targets facilitate decision making in clinical practice, is advocated as an optimised management approach for some chronic disorders. The aim of the STARDUST trial was to assess whether a treat-to-target strategy with early endoscopy, regular biomarker and clinical symptom monitoring, and dose intensification for persistent inflammatory activity, was more successful in achieving endoscopic improvement at week 48 than a clinically driven maintenance strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease receiving ustekinumab. Methods: This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial included adults with active, moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220–450 and Simple Endoscopic Score in Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≥3) for whom conventional therapy or one biologic therapy, or both, had failed. Patients received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at baseline and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at week 8. At week 16, patients with a CDAI improvement of 70 or more points from baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard-of-care or treat-to-target maintenance treatment through week 48. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and was stratified by biologic history status and baseline SES-CD score. All patients who signed informed consent, who were not screening failures, and who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in week 16 analyses. All patients included in week 16 analyses and randomly assigned to one of the maintenance treatment regimens were included in the week 48 efficacy and safety analyses (ie, on an intention-to-treat basis). Patients assigned to the treat-to-target arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks based on SES-CD improvement from baseline and could escalate to every 4 weeks through week 48 if prespecified targets were missed. Patients assigned to the standard-of-care arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks; those receiving treatment every 12 weeks could escalate per European labelling. The primary efficacy endpoint was endoscopic response at week 48 (SES-CD score ≥50% decrease from baseline), analysed by non-responder imputation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03107793, and is active but not recruiting. Findings: 498 patients received standard induction treatment, of whom 440 were randomly assigned to the treat-to-target group (n=219) or the standard-of-care group (n=221). At week 48, there was no significant difference in endoscopic response (83 [38%] of 219 patients vs 66 [30%] of 221 patients; p=0·087), endoscopic remission (25 [11%] vs 32 [15%]; p=0·334), mucosal healing (31 [14%] vs 37 [17%]; p=0·449), and clinical remission (135 [62%] vs 154 [70%]; p=0·072) between the two groups; clinical response was significantly lower in the treat-to-target group than in the standard-of-care group (149 [68%] vs 172 [78%]; p=0·020). Other endoscopic, clinical, and biomarker outcomes were generally not significantly different between groups. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (29 [13%] of 219 patients in the treat-to-target group vs 29 [13%] of 221 patients in the standard-of-care group), abdominal pain (23 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), arthralgia (24 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), and headache (24 [11%] vs 21 [10%]). Interpretation: Timely escalation of ustekinumab therapy for patients with Crohn's disease, based on early endoscopic response, clinical symptoms, and biomarkers, did not result in significantly better endoscopic outcomes at week 48 than symptom-driven decisions alone. Future studies need to confirm if some subgroups of patient might benefit from a treat-to-target strategy with ustekinumab. Funding: Janssen-Cilag.

Background Prospective registries are necessary to evaluate the safety of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment during pregnancy and in children in the long term. Aims The overall aim of DUMBO registry is to know the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) during pregnancy and in children up to 4 years of age exposed during pregnancy to drugs for IBD (mainly focused on biologics), compared to unexposed children. In this analysis we aim to evaluate the risk of SAEs during pregnancy and the predictive factors of it (mainly focused on IBD drugs). Methods Prospective, observational and multicentre registry, which enrols pregnant women with IBD (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, IBD-unclassified) over 5 years in 70 centres in Spain. The registry was kicked off in September 2019. SAE was defined based on “Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting by European Medicines Agency”. Study protocol is summarized in figure 1. Results 433 women have been included so far; 241 got pregnant at least 9 months before this interim analysis (table 1). Mean age was 34 years, and 17% of women had active disease at any time during pregnancy. 23% of pregnancies were exposed to immumodulators (thiopurines), 25% to biologics and 10% to combo therapy (biologics and immunomodulators). 85 pregnancies (35%) were exposed to biologics (60 anti-TNF, 17 ustekinumab, and 8 vedolizumab) either in combo or in monotherapy. There were 237 newborns (227 singleton and 5 pair of twins), 9 miscarriages and 1 abortion. 72% of patients had vaginal delivery and 28% C-sections (18% due to perianal CD or active disease). A total of 59 pregnancies (24.5%) reported at least one SAE: 32% in exposed to biologics and 20.5% in non-exposed group (p>0.05) (figure 2). Four out of 17 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab and 3 out of 8 exposed to vedolizumab had SAEs (non-related with the drug). In the multivariate analysis, adjusted by disease activity, in comparison with no immunosuppressive treatment, neither immunosuppressants [Odds ratio (OR)=1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.3–4.3] nor biologics in monotherapy or in combo (OR=0.8; 95%CI=0.2–3) were associated with higher risk of SAEs. 40 patients (17%) were hospitalised due to complications during pregnancy or delivery (figure 3). Two patients underwent surgery during pregnancy due to IBD complications Conclusion IBD treatment (either immunomodulators or biologics) does not increase the risk of SAEs during pregnancy. Nevertheless, one-quarter of IBD women suffer SAEs during pregnancy and about 20% need hospitalisation, which should be taken into account when managing IBD during pregnancy.

Background Crohn′s disease (CD) is a progressive inflammatory bowel disease that can lead to complications such as strictures or penetrating disease, and ultimately surgery, representing a complex clinical challenge in the care of patients. We aimed to evaluate the influence of CD phenotype in the retention rate of ustekinumab in the Sustain study. Methods Retrospective, multicentre study (>60 sites) including patients with active CD [(Harvey-Bradshaw (HBI)>4)] who received ≥1 dose of ustekinumab intravenously before July 2018. Clinical remission was defined as HBI≤4 and response as ≥3 points decrease from baseline. Loss of response (LoR) was defined as reappearance of symptoms that led to intensifying the treatment dose, adding another medication to control CD, switching or surgery in patients with short-term remission. Disease characteristics were collected (date of diagnosis; location; behaviour: inflammatory, stenosing or penetrating; presence of perianal disease or extraintestinal manifestations; previous surgeries, etc.). The retention rates in patients on ustekinumab depending of their disease phenotype were evaluated by descriptive analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Predictive factors were assessed by Cox-regression. Data quality was assured by remote monitoring. Results 463 CD patients were included (Table 1). 87 patients (18.6%) had penetrating CD in our cohort. The probability of maintaining UST treatment was 91% at 6, 83% at 12, 76% at 18 and 73% at 24 months. Similar retention rates were observed in patients with inflammatory (77.6%), stricturing (76.4%) and penetrating (79%) disease behaviour (p>0.05). Figure 1. Conclusion Ustekinumab has shown to be equally effective in the treatment of inflammatory, stricturing and penetrating CD phenotype in Sustain, the largest study evaluating its use in CD in clinical practice, having the longest follow-up period reported to date.

Carboxymaltose iron (Ferinject®) is a formulation for intravenous (iv) administration, used for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia and/or iron deficiency when oral administration of iron is not effective or due to intolerance. Its safety profile is excellent with few, but not nonexistent, side effects. Hypophosphatemia has been described as one of them. It is usually mild, transient and asymptomatic. However, in some cases it may be accompanied by nausea, asthenia, in addition to muscular and neurological symptoms and hematological alterations. It is, therefore, a potentially serious adverse effect whose prevalence is unknown and which requires high clinical suspicion to be detected.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the advances in medical therapies, a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require surgical intervention. This Topical Review aims to offer expert consensus practice recommendations for peri-operative care to optimise outcomes of IBD patients who undergo surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of IBD health care providers systematically reviewed aspects relevant to peri-operative care in IBD. Consensus statements were developed using Delphi methodology. RESULTS: A total of 20 current practice positions were developed following systematic review of the current literature covering use of medication in the peri-operative period, nutritional assessment and intervention, physical and psychological rehabilitation and prehabilitation and immediate postoperative care. CONCLUSION: Peri-operative planning and optimization of the patient are imperative to ensure favourable outcomes and reduced morbidity. This Topical Review provides practice recommendations applicable in the peri-operative period in IBD patients undergoing surgery.

Malaltia de Crohn; Factors predictius; Ustekinumab Enfermedad de Crohn; Factores predictivos; Ustekinumab Crohn’s disease; Predictive factors; Ustekinumab Ustekinumab has shown efficacy in Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients. To identify patient profiles of those who benefit the most from this treatment would help to position this drug in the therapeutic paradigm of CD and generate hypotheses for future trials. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether baseline patient characteristics are predictive of remission and the drug durability of ustekinumab, and whether its positioning with respect to prior use of biologics has a significant effect after correcting for disease severity and phenotype at baseline using interpretable machine learning. Patients’ data from SUSTAIN, a retrospective multicenter single-arm cohort study, were used. Disease phenotype, baseline laboratory data, and prior treatment characteristics were documented. Clinical remission was defined as the Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4 and was tracked longitudinally. Drug durability was defined as the time until a patient discontinued treatment. A total of 439 participants from 60 centers were included and a total of 20 baseline covariates considered. Less exposure to previous biologics had a positive effect on remission, even after controlling for baseline disease severity using a non-linear, additive, multivariable model. Additionally, age, body mass index, and fecal calprotectin at baseline were found to be statistically significant as independent negative risk factors for both remission and drug survival, with further risk factors identified for remission. This work was supported by Janssen-Cilag Spain. This sponsor had a partial role in study design, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Carboxymaltose iron (Ferinject®) is a formulation for intravenous (iv) administration, used for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia and/or iron deficiency when oral administration of iron is not effective or due to intolerance. Its safety profile is excellent with few, but not nonexistent, side effects. Hypophosphatemia has been described as one of them. It is usually mild, transient and asymptomatic. However, in some cases it may be accompanied by nausea, asthenia, in addition to muscular and neurological symptoms and hematological alterations. It is, therefore, a potentially serious adverse effect whose prevalence is unknown and which requires high clinical suspicion to be detected.