Search

The (total) connected domination game on a graph $G$ is played by two players, Dominator and Staller, according to the standard (total) domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the (total) connected game domination number ($\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G)$) $\gamma_{\rm cg}(G)$ of $G$. We show that $\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G)\in \{\gamma_{\rm cg}(G), \gamma_{\rm cg}(G) + 1, \gamma_{\rm cg}(G) + 2\}$, and consequently define $G$ as Class $i$ if $\gamma_{\rm tcg}(G) = \gamma_{\rm cg} + i$ for $i \in \{0,1,2\}$. A large family of Class $0$ graphs is constructed which contains all connected Cartesian product graphs and connected direct product graphs with minumum degree at least $2$. We show that no tree is Class $2$ and characterize Class $1$ trees. We provide an infinite family of Class $2$ bipartite graphs., Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures

The Maker-Breaker domination game is played on a graph $G$ by Dominator and Staller. The players alternatively select a vertex of $G$ that was not yet chosen in the course of the game. Dominator wins if at some point the vertices he has chosen form a dominating set. Staller wins if Dominator cannot form a dominating set. In this paper we introduce the Maker-Breaker domination number $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}(G)$ of $G$ as the minimum number of moves of Dominator to win the game provided that he has a winning strategy and is the first to play. If Staller plays first, then the corresponding invariant is denoted $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}'(G)$. Comparing the two invariants it turns out that they behave much differently than the related game domination numbers. The invariant $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}(G)$ is also compared with the domination number. Using the Erd\H{o}s-Selfridge Criterion a large class of graphs $G$ is found for which $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}(G) > \gamma(G)$ holds. Residual graphs are introduced and used to bound/determine $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}(G)$ and $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}'(G)$. Using residual graphs, $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}(T)$ and $\gamma_{{\rm MB}}'(T)$ are determined for an arbitrary tree. The invariants are also obtained for cycles and bounded for union of graphs. A list of open problems and directions for further investigations is given., Comment: 20 pages, 5 figures

We introduce the Maker-Breaker domination game, a two player game on a graph. At his turn, the first player, Dominator, select a vertex in order to dominate the graph while the other player, Staller, forbids a vertex to Dominator in order to prevent him to reach his goal. Both players play alternately without missing their turn. This game is a particular instance of the so-called Maker-Breaker games, that is studied here in a combinatorial context. In this paper, we first prove that deciding the winner of the Maker-Breaker domination game is PSPACE-complete, even for bipartite graphs and split graphs. It is then showed that the problem is polynomial for cographs and trees. In particular, we define a strategy for Dominator that is derived from a variation of the dominating set problem, called the pairing dominating set problem.

In this paper a relationship is established between the domination game and minimal edge cuts. It is proved that the game domination number of a connected graph can be bounded above in terms of the size of minimal edge cuts. In particular, if $C$ a minimum edge cut of a connected graph $G$, then $\gamma_g(G) \le \gamma_g(G\setminus C) + 2\kappa'(G)$. Double-Staller graphs are introduced in order to show that this upper bound can be attained for graphs with a bridge. The obtained results are used to extend the family of known traceable graphs whose game domination numbers are at most one-half their order. Along the way two technical lemmas, which seem to be generally applicable for the study of the domination game, are proved., Comment: 15 pages, 1 figure

The distinguishing number of a graph $H$ is a symmetry related graph invariant whose study started two decades ago. The distinguishing number $D(H)$ is the least integer $d$ such that $H$ has a $d$-distinguishing coloring. A $d$-distinguishing coloring is a coloring $c:V(H)\rightarrow\{1,\dots,d\}$ invariant only under the trivial automorphism. In this paper, we continue the study of a game variant of this parameter, recently introduced. The distinguishing game is a game with two players, Gentle and Rascal, with antagonist goals. This game is played on a graph $H$ with a fixed set of $d\in\mathbb N^*$ colors. Alternately, the two players choose a vertex of $H$ and color it with one of the $d$ colors. The game ends when all the vertices have been colored. Then Gentle wins if the coloring is $d$-distinguishing and Rascal wins otherwise. This game defines two new invariants, which are the minimum numbers of colors needed to ensure that Gentle has a winning strategy, depending who starts the game. The invariant could eventually be infinite. In this paper, we focus on cartesian product, a graph operation well studied in the classical case. We give sufficient conditions on the order of two connected factors $H$ and $F$ relatively prime, which ensure that one of the game distinguishing numbers of the cartesian product $H\square F$ is finite. If $H$ is a so-called involutive graph, we give an upper bound of order $D^2(H)$ for one of the game distinguishing numbers of $H\square F$. Finally, using in part the previous result, we compute the exact value of these invariants for cartesian products of relatively prime cycles. It turns out that the value is either infinite or equal to $2$, depending on the parity of the product order.

In the domination game studied here, Dominator and Staller alternately choose a vertex of a graph $G$ and take it into a set $D$. The number of vertices dominated by the set $D$ must increase in each single turn and the game ends when $D$ becomes a dominating set of $G$. Dominator aims to minimize whilst Staller aims to maximize the number of turns (or equivalently, the size of the dominating set $D$ obtained at the end). Assuming that Dominator starts and both players play optimally, the number of turns is called the game domination number $\gamma_g(G)$ of $G$. Kinnersley, West and Zamani verified that $\gamma_g(G) \le 7n/11$ holds for every isolate-free $n$-vertex forest $G$ and they conjectured that the sharp upper bound is only $3n/5$. Here, we prove the 3/5-conjecture for forests in which no two leaves are at distance 4 apart. Further, we establish an upper bound $\gamma_g(G) \le 5n/8$, which is valid for every isolate-free forest $G$., Comment: 16 pages