Search

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) is the property of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Practical Pharmacy & Clinical Remedies is the property of Editorial Department of Practical Pharmacy & Clinical Remedies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cyber Security & Data Governance is the property of Editorial Office of Information Technology & Network Security and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of International Economy & Management is the property of Omniscient Pte. Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese vision of the Entrapment Scale (ES) in medical students. Methods: Totally 1768 medical students were selected. They were randomly allocated into two groups for exploratory factor analysis (n = 855) and confirmatory factor analysis (n =913). All samples were assessed in criterion validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). One month later, 53 participants were retested. Results: The exploratory factor analysis extracted 1 component from 16 items, and explained 64.66% of the total variance. The factor loading of items ranged between 0. 23 - 0. 77. The confirmatory factor analysis verified that the fitting of the two-factor model was slightly better than that of the one-factor model (X2/df=7. 00, RMSEA = 0. 08, GFI =0. 91, CFI =0. 95). The factor loading of items ranged from 0. 48 to 0. 89. The ES scores were positively correlated with the PHQ-9 scores (ICC =0. 44). Cronbach's a coefficients were 0. 96 for the total scale and 0. 83 for the test-retest reliability. The internal consistency reliabilities for the 2 factors were 0. 94 and 0. 93, and the test-retest reliabilities for the 2 factors were 0. 80 and 0. 83. Conclusion: The Chinese vision of the Entrapment Scale has good validity and reliability among Chinese medical students, and it could be used in the evaluation of entrapment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) is the property of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)