Search

The target area was "drivers of arable land change", and 585 and 296 papers were conditionally selected from the China Knowledge Network database and the Web of Science database, respectively. We used the literature induction method and CiteSpace tool to compare and analyze the Chinese and foreign literature in the target area. The results show that : (1) the temporal distribution of Chinese and foreign literature can be roughly divided into two stages: from 1999 to 2010, the number of Chinese and foreign literature showed rapid growth and slow growth respectively; from 2010 to 2020, the number of Chinese and foreign literature showed fluctuating growth and steady growth respectively. (2) The authors of Chinese and foreign literature are mostly associated with institutional cooperation within academic institutions, but less with other institutions; the hot research areas can be roughly divided into rapidly urbanizing areas, main grain-producing areas and ecologically fragile areas; socio-economic factors are the main drivers of arable land change, while the influence of policy factors and natural factors are more common in main grain-producing areas and ecologically fragile areas, respectively; the scale of foreign literature is more balanced, while the scale of Chinese literature is more balanced. The scale of research in foreign literature is more balanced, while the city and county scale research dominates in Chinese literature. (3) The hot topics in Chinese and foreign literature are more or less the same, and foreign literature has richer research perspectives on arable land quality and ecological changes. Finally, this paper puts forward the research outlook of strengthening institutional cooperation, enriching the connotation and objects of research on the drivers of farmland change, broadening the objectives of farmland governance, and fully considering the matching of thesis topics and research scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering is the property of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Homestead withdrawal is an important means to effectively alleviate the contradiction between urban and rural construction land and promote the rural revitalization. On the basis of sorting out the path of paid withdrawal of homestead, this paper constructs the value compensation system of homestead. In accordance with the principles of affordability of government, acceptability of peasant households and sustainability of work, the effective compensation threshold of voluntary paid exit of homestead in different modes is scientifically determined based on cost-benefit theory. The results show that: (1) The compensation threshold of paid exit of homestead is the compensation range consisting of the minimum acceptable value for peasant households and the maximum acceptable value for the government; (2) When the sum of opportunity cost and total cost of homestead exit is less than the minimum threshold, peasant households are willing to accept homestead exit, and the maximum threshold is lower than the sum of the value of homestead and ground ancillary facilities and total cost of homestead exit; (3) In the mode of "transformation in different places", where the government plays a leading role and there are fewer sources of funds, the actual compensation amount is close to the minimum threshold. In the mode of "one family but several houses", where the demands of the government are equal to that of the peasant households, the compensation amount is biased to the median. In the mode of "overall relocation" and "community" modes, where farmers play a leading role and there are more sources of compensation funds from the government, the actual compensation amount tends to the maximum threshold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Natural Resources / Ziran Ziyuan Xuebao is the property of Journal of Natural Resources and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)