Search

Copyright of Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering is the property of Chongqing University of Technology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Railway Signalling & Communication Engineering is the property of Railway Signalling & Communication Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Railway Signalling & Communication Engineering is the property of Railway Signalling & Communication Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective To compare the safety and outcome between total laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted synchronous resection for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Methods The data of patients who underwent total laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases in our hospital between December 2008 and December 2016 were collected and analyzed. The total laparoscopic surgery patients were matched 1∶2 to the laparoscopy-assisted surgery patients based on the propensity score. 22 patients were classified in the total laparoscopic group and 44 patients were classified in the laparoscopy-assisted group. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results There was no difference in the preoperative baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The median operative time were 317.50 and 267.50 minutes in the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopy-assisted group, respectively, and the median intraoperative blood loss were 100 and 200 ml, both with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). There were 1 case of intraoperative blood transfusion in the total laparoscopic group and 5 cases in the laparoscopy-assisted group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.650). The median postoperative hospital stay in the two groups were 11.0 and 10.0 days, the median postoperative defecation time were 4.0 and 4.0 days and postoperative complication rates were 13.6% and 20.5%, and none of these differences were statistically significant (P>0.05). However, no Clavien-DindoⅡ level and above complications occurred in total laparoscopic group. The median disease-free survival (DFS) were 15.0 and 15.7 months in the total laparoscopic group and the laparoscopy-assisted group, the overall survival (OS) were 25.9 and 37.6 months, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopy-assisted approaches are similar, so the appropriate approach should be chosen according to the clinical condition and surgeon′s experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Food Research & Development is the property of Food Research & Development Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Food Safety & Quality is the property of Journal of Food Safety & Quality Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Oncology is the property of Chinese Journal of Oncology / Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Oncology is the property of Chinese Journal of Oncology / Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The shock wave overpressure, heat flux intensity and gas jet impulse during the firing of weapon system were tested to evaluate the risk in the back-ejection area of recoilless rifle. Based on the analysis of the test data and the calculation of the probability model, the personnel trauma probability under the action of different dangerous sources was obtained. The results show that shock wave could cause injury to human eardrum and lung tissue in the dangerous area with a radius of 5 m and a fan angle of 120 degrees. The degree of injury is the most serious in the rear of nozzle. The probability of lung tissue injury is more than 50% in 2 m. The diameter of flame zone is about 2. 18 m, and the heat flux in the center of fireball is the strongest. The probability of first-degree burn is 46. 95%, but it is not lethal enough.The gas impulse produced by the high-speed gas jet is lethal to the human body, especially when the human head is impacted, the distance of fatal probability greater than 50% is 3 m. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]