Search

Copyright of China Harbour Engineering is the property of Editorial Office of China Harbour Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

By expounding the construction principle of DCM piles, this paper analyzes the heave of the seabed surface after DCM treatment of the seawall foundation in the main reclamation works of Hong Kong International Airport three runway system project. By analyzing the influence of the seabed heave on the stability of armor rock, toe rock, and overall bank slope of seawall, it is concluded that the weight of armor and toe rocks in Hong Kong three runway project cannot meet the stability design requirements, although the overall stability is affected, the project can still meet the design requirements, and the proposed treatment methods are given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of China Harbour Engineering is the property of Editorial Office of China Harbour Engineering and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine / Zhongguo Yufang Shouyi Xuebao is the property of Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Through engineering examples, we set two and four dolphins schemes for the open type butterfly terminal, and selected the optimal design scheme from the layout, function, structure design and cost analysis. The results show that the scheme of two breasting dolphins can satisfy the berthing requirements of different design vessels, and the requirements of mooring line layout, and the project cost is less than the scheme of four dolphins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]