Search

The scientific characterization of the properties of mesoporous materials is a key link for their development and application. In this paper, the development history, application scope, and characteristics of mesoporous adsorption and commonly used classical analytical models are briefly introduced by tabular comparison. To systematically understand the classical mesoporous analysis methods in physical adsorption, they were classified into four categories: modeled, model-free, completely model-free, and reverse methods. Then, these methods and three frequently-used analytical software for mesoporous adsorption were compared and analyzed. This has reference value for technicians of adsorption instrument management as well as for teaching and research of mesoporous materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper briefly compares the source, application scope, development history and respective characteristics of the commonly used classical models of microporous adsorption. In order to facilitate the systematic understanding and mastery of classical microporous analysis methods in physical adsorption, the methods are divided into three categories: (1) methods developed from standard isotherms, including t-method, αs-method, n-method and MP method; (2) methods based on micropore filling theory, including D-R method, D-A method and D-R-S method; (3) the currently commonly used methods include the original HK method (slit pore), HK-SF method (cylindrical pore), HK-CY method (spherical pore) and the improved HK method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]