Search

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences is the property of Editorial Board of Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of China Medical University is the property of Journal of China Medical University Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Metal Working (1674-165X) is the property of Metal Working Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Metal Working (1674-165X) is the property of Metal Working Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Railway Standard Design is the property of Railway Standard Design Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To investigate the effects of supine position direct anterior approach (DAA) and lateral position direct lateral approach (DLA) on hip function, balance function and gait parameters in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: 97 patients with primary THA admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to October 2019 selected, and were divided into group A (n=47) and group B (n=50) according to the different ways of approach, group A was given lateral position DLA, group B was given supine position DAA. The hip function, imaging parameters, balance function and gait parameters were compared between the two groups, and the incidence of postoperative complications was recorded. Results: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation, Harris score (HHS) and Berg Balance Scale score (BBS) of hip joint of the two groups showed an increasing trend, and group B was higher than group A (P<0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, the intraoperative hemorrhage was less than that of group A, the incision length and time of first walking out of bed were shorter than those of group A (P<0.05). 3 months and 6 months after operation, the step frequency, step speed and step length of the two groups were increased in turn, and group B was higher than group A (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Comparison of acetabular abduction angle and anteversion angle between the two groups 6 months after operation showed no differences (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with lateral position DLA, the patients with primary THA are given supine position DAA, it can obtain the same surgical effect, and can improve the hip joint function, balance function and gait parameters, and the safety is guaranteed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences is the property of Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

目的探讨全程优质护理对口腔颌面外科手木患者的心理影响。方法选取2018 年1 0 月至201 9 年10 月该院 收治的口腔颌面外科手术患者86 例作为研究对象， 随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组43 例， 实施常规护理； 观察组43 例， 实施 全程优质护理。比较2 组护理前后焦虑自评量表(SAS) 、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分， 以及并发症发生率、护理满意度。结果2 组 患者护理前的SAS 与SDS 评分比较， 差异均无统计学意义( P > 0. 05) ， 护理后观察组SAS 、SDS 评分低于对照组， 差异均有统计 学意义(P<0. 05) ， 观察组并发症发生率为9. 30% ， 明显低于对照组的44. 1 9 % ， 差异有统计学意义(P<0. 05) 。观察组的护理 服务满意度为95. 35 % ， 高于对照组的79. 07% ， 差异有统计学意义(P < 0. 05) 。结论对口腔颌面外科手木患者积极实施全程 优质护理服务， 并发症发生率更低， 有利于缓娇其焦虑、抑郁情绪，提升护理满意度，值得临床推广。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]