Search

为了解决风味（原香和烤香）油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油的定性判别问题，设计高、低两个掺伪梯度，基于挥发性成分构建并对比分析了定性判别风味油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油的主成分分析（PCA）模型和逻辑回归模型。结果表明：逻辑回归模型定性判别风味油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油的能力较强，优于PCA模型；高掺伪梯度下定性判别原香和烤香油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油，PCA模型的最低检出限分别为20%和60%，而逻辑回归模型的最低检出限均为10%；低掺伪梯度下定性判别原香和烤香油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油，PCA模型的判别不准确，而逻辑回归模型的最低检出限均为4%。逻辑回归模型能很好地定性判别风味油茶籽油掺伪浸出油茶籽油。 Based on volatile components, principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression (LR)models were constructed and compared to solve the problem of qualitative identification of flavor (original/roasted) oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with leaching oil-tea camellia seed oil under high and low adulteration gradients.The results showed that LR model had a good ability to qualitatively identify the flavor oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with leaching oil-tea camellia seed oil, which was better than that of PCA model. Under the high adulteration gradient, the detection limit of the PCA model for original/roasted oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with leaching oil-tea camellia seed oil was 20%/60%, and the detection limit of the LS model was 10%/10%, respectively. Under the low adulteration gradient, the detection limit of LR model for original/roasted oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with leaching oil-tea camellia seed oil was 4%/4%, but the discriminative ability of the PCA model was not accurate.The LR model can qualitatively identify flavor oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with leaching oil-tea camellia seed oil.

为解决油茶籽油掺伪其他植物油的定性鉴别问题，在油茶籽油中分别掺入大豆油、花生油、葵花籽油、棉籽油、葡萄籽油、菜籽油、棕榈油和米糠油，设置高和低两种不同掺伪梯度，基于14个特征性脂肪酸和甘油三酯指标，运用Python语言构建并对比分析了二分类决策树模型、多分类决策树模型和多层感知机人工神经网络(MLP-ANN)模型用于油茶籽油掺伪定性鉴别的效果。结果表明：高和低掺伪梯度下，二分类决策树模型对油茶籽油掺伪其他植物油的定性鉴别的准确率均达到0.95以上；多分类决策树模型的精确率和准确率在高掺伪梯度下均达到了0.95，但在低掺伪梯度下仅为0.90；在高和低掺伪梯度下，MLP-ANN模型对油茶籽油掺伪定性鉴别的平均精确率均达到0.98，准确率分别达到0.97和0.98。相比于决策树模型，MLP-ANN模型能很好地实现油茶籽油掺伪定性鉴别。 In order to solve the qualitative identification problem of adulterated oil-tea camellia seed oil with other vegetable oils, soybean oil, peanut oil, sunflower seed oil, cottonseed oil, grape seed oil, rapeseed oil, palm oil and rice bran oil were mixed into oil-tea camellia seed oil respectively, two different adulteration gradients of high and low were set up, and based on characteristic fatty acid and triglyceride indicators, the effects of the binary decision tree model, multi-classification decision tree model and multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-ANN) model for qualitative identification of adulterated oil-tea camellia seed oil were compared and analysed using Python language. The results showed that the accuracy of the binary decision tree model for qualitative identification of oil-tea camellia seed oil adulterated with other vegetable oils under high and low adulteration gradients was above 0.95. The accuracy and precision of the multi-classification decision tree model reached 0.95 at high adulteration gradient, but only 0.90 at low adulteration gradient. Under high and low adulteration gradients, the average precision of MLP-ANN model for qualitative identification of adulterated oil-tea camellia seed oil reached 0.98, and the accuracy reached 0.97 and 0.98 respectively. Compared with the decision tree model, the MLP-ANN model can well realize the qualitative identification of adulterated oil-tea camellia seed oil.

Copyright of Journal of Food Safety & Quality is the property of Journal of Food Safety & Quality Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Ground Improvement is the property of Journal of Ground Improvement Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Food & Machinery is the property of Food & Machinery Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Shipin Kexue/ Food Science is the property of Food Science Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Acta Edulis Fungi is the property of Acta Edulis Fungi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Shipin Kexue/ Food Science is the property of Food Science Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)