Search

Рад се састоји у утврђивању основних обележја системског приступа менаџмента у малим и средњим предузећима, са нарочитим освртом на стање менаџмента и законску регулативу у Републици Србији. Истраживан је један од најзначајнијих феномена који постоји у нашем друштву и без правилног коришћења менаџмента није могуће унапредити друштвене односе , односно разрешити економске и друге проблеме друштва. Као посебан део рада обрађено је функционисање малих и средњих предузећа у компанијском праву. Rad se sastoji u utvrđivanju osnovnih obeležja sistemskog pristupa menadžmenta u malim i srednjim preduzećima, sa naročitim osvrtom na stanje menadžmenta i zakonsku regulativu u Republici Srbiji. Istraživan je jedan od najznačajnijih fenomena koji postoji u našem društvu i bez pravilnog korišćenja menadžmenta nije moguće unaprediti društvene odnose , odnosno razrešiti ekonomske i druge probleme društva. Kao poseban deo rada obrađeno je funkcionisanje malih i srednjih preduzeća u kompanijskom pravu. The paper consists in establishing essential features of systemic approach in management in small and medium-sized enterprises, with particular reference to the state of managent and legal regulations in the Republic of Serbia. One of the most important phenomena present in our society has been investigated. Without the correct use of management, it would be impossible to further social relations, or to resolve economic and other social problems. A special part of the paper has been dedicated to the treatment of performance of small and medium enterprises in company low.

Th is paper deals with the anthropolinguistic analysis of examples singled out from interviews forming the corpus used in the study titled The stereotype of time in the discourse of the displaced persons from the territory of Kosovo and Metohija . It points to the role of researcher in conducting field interviews with displaced persons. The interventions of the researcher during the interview are in focus here, playing, on the one hand, an important role in creating the complete corpus of the interviews and, on the other, showing some of the differences in the conceptualization of the researchers worlds and their collocutors respectively, which could not have been considered in advance and which were noticed only aft er the interview had been transcribed. Th ese interventions are important, since they direct the collocutor towards the wanted topic.

Истраживач и саговорник (казивач, информатор, информант) су кључне речи теренског дискурса, а њихова интеракција – кључни проблем теренске праксе етнолога и антрополога. Рад има за циљ да размотри улоге истраживача и саговорника, као и карактеристике односа који се између њих успоставља у истраживачком процесу. Однос истраживача и његових саговорника на терену веома је осетљив, оптерећен бројним проблемима трансфера (преноса) и контратрансфера (против преноса). A researcher and his/hers informants stand as the key players in a fieldwork discourse, thus their interaction is a key problem of fieldwork performed by eth­nologists and anthropologists. This paper aims to shed light on the roles of a researcher and informants and their mutually sustainable relationship formed in a research process. This fieldwork based relationship is very sensitive, burdened by many problems related to transfer and counter-transfer set about for a researcher to analyze and keep under control at all times. The notion of transfer was introduced into psychotherapy by Freud, but it is applicable as well onto all other human interactions. During the course of a fieldwork, informants can transfer a variety of feelings, thoughts and fantasies upon a researcher, who may or may not resemble some special persons from the informants' respective lives hence influencing the informants' behavior accordingly. A positive transfer is beneficial, as it tends to 'open up' the informant, while the negative one manifests in the informant's resistance toward cooperation, hiding of important information and so on. On the other hand, the actual appearance of an informant, his/hers behavior and accounts could also trigger various emotional, often subconscious, counter-transfer reactions. In this sense, a counter-transfer is a transfer by a researcher toward his/hers informants. For example, informants could, in their accounts, by saying this or that stir a researcher's negative associations and thus provoke counter-transfers with negative connotations (avoidance of particular informant, cessation of conversation, disinterest in informants' subjects, lack of empathy etc). This is why a researcher has to keep under control his/hers potential counter-transfer expressions; uncontrolled manifestation could cause various problems and burden the research process furthermore.