Search

INTRODUCTION:Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a common symptom affecting 23-75% of stroke survivors. It is associated with increased risk of institutionalization and death, and it is of many patients considered among the worst symptoms to cope with after stroke. Longitudinal studies focusing on trajectories of fatigue may contribute to understanding patients' experience of fatigue over time and its associated factors, yet only a few have been conducted to date. OBJECTIVES:To explore whether subgroups of stroke survivors with distinct trajectories of fatigue in the first 18 months post stroke could be identified and whether these subgroups differ regarding sociodemographic, medical and/or symptom-related characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS:115 patients with first-ever stroke admitted to Oslo University Hospital or Buskerud Hospital were recruited and data was collected prospectively during the acute phase and at 6, 12 and 18 months post stroke. Data on fatigue (both pre- and post-stroke), sociodemographic, medical and symptom-related characteristics were collected through structured interviews, standardized questionnaires and from the patients' medical records. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was used to identify latent classes, i.e., subgroups of patients, based on their Fatigue Severity Scales (FSS) scores at the four time points. Differences in sociodemographic, medical, and symptom-related characteristics between the latent classes were evaluated using univariate and multivariable ordinal regression analyses. RESULTS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE:Using GMM, three latent classes of fatigue trajectories over 18 months were identified, characterized by differing levels of fatigue: low, moderate and high. The mean FSS score for each class remained relatively stable across all four time points. In the univariate analyses, age

Objective: To explore ways that psychotherapists and suicidal patients handle suicidality as a topic, and how it impacts the bond between them.Method: Nineteen suicidal patients and their therapists participated in a naturalistic study. Patients were interviewed before they started in therapy, and both patients and therapists were interviewed after three sessions and after one year.Results: Whether suicidality was frequently or seldomly addressed during the sessions did not bear any direct influence on the establishment of a working alliance. Rather, the sense of being engaged in a process of change followed from the therapist’s capacity to establish a wide listening perspective, with sensitivity towards their own uncertainties, as well as to implicit and explicit messages about the patient’s state of mind. The “private theories” of suicidality and cure that were held by the two parties tended to converge as a result of their work together. If convergence was not established early on, what mattered was their capacity to detect and work on their divergences. Unaddressed divergences led to vicissitudes and eventually resignation.Conclusions: Listening and exploring divergences in private theories of cure mattered for the creation of a viable working alliance directed at the patient’s efforts to live their life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To estimate the rates of primary and secondary prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees (ULAs), to describe the most frequently reported reasons for rejection and to estimate the influence of background factors on the risk of rejection. Method: Cross-sectional study analysing population-based questionnaire data ( n = 224). Effects were analysed by logistic regression analyses and Cox regression analyses. Results: Primary prosthesis rejection was found in 4.5% whereas 13.4% had discontinued prosthesis use. The main reasons reported for primary non-wear were a perceived lack of need and discrepancies between perceived need and the prostheses available. The main reasons reported for secondary prosthesis rejection were dissatisfaction with prosthetic comfort, function and control. Primary prosthesis rejection was more likely in ULAs amputated at high age and in ULAs with proximal amputations. Secondary prosthesis rejection was more likely in proximal ULAs and in women. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of rejection in proximal ULAs, elderly ULAs and in women. Emphasising individual needs will probably facilitate successful prosthetic fitting. Improved prosthesis quality and individualised prosthetic training may increase long-term prosthesis use. Further studies of the effect of prosthetic training and of the reasons for rejection of different prosthetic types are suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To increase knowledge of health services utilization and related factors in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees., Design: Population-based cross-sectional study conducted in Norway., Subjects: Two hundred and twenty four adult acquired major upper-limb amputees (57.4% response rate). Mean age was 53.7 years, 83.5% were men and mean post-amputation time was 24.0 years., Methods: Data were collected by postal questionnaires. Amputation-related health services utilization, perceived benefit and unmet needs were reported and associations between these factors and background factors were estimated by multivariate logistic regression analyses., Results: Reported health services utilization was relatively low. The reported benefit of utilized services was generally high. For several non-utilized services, considerable unmet needs for utilization were reported. Several background factors were significantly associated with different aspects of the services examined. A considerable discrepancy between reported pain and utilization of specified pain treatments was noted., Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that several health services available to acquired major upper-limb amputees should be strengthened. Establishing routines to ensure access to optimal, individualized rehabilitation may prevent disability. We recommend additional, longitudinal studies to further assess the need for mental health care and pain treatment in acquired major upper-limb amputees.