Search

Objectives: With the rise in antimicrobial resistance, there is a growing demand for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST). In this study, we applied the EUCAST RAST method to ESBL/carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates without using advanced identification systems and analysed the effect of this method on mortality rates Also the clinical impact of this method on patients infected with these bacteria and its effect on mortality rates were investigated., Methods: RAST was used for clinical blood cultures containing carbapenemase/ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae without advanced identification systems (e.g. MALDI TOF), with preliminary identification by simple diagnostic tests (predicted RAST, or p-RAST), and its categorical agreement was investigated. The impact of the method on mortality was analysed by comparing the clinical data of patients whose blood cultures were subject to p-RAST (p-RAST group, n = 49) and those who were not subject to p-RAST (non-RAST group, n = 145)., Results: p-RAST results were analysed based on 539 antibiotic-bacteria combinations. Total error rates at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were 2.9%, 3.9% and 3.8%, respectively. In the p-RAST group, patients who did not receive appropriate antibiotics (29/45, 59.1%) were switched to appropriate treatment within 8 h at the latest. In contrast, in the non-RAST group, treatment of patients who received inappropriate antibiotics (79/145, 54.5%) could be changed after at least 24 h. Mortality rates were lower in the p-RAST group than in the non-RAST group (28.6% versus 51.7%, P = 0.005)., Conclusions: p-RAST can be used safely in hospital laboratories with high rates of antimicrobial resistance and can reduce mortality rates by shortening the transition time to appropriate treatment., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The risk of occupational transmission of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers is primarily associated with needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs). However, most NSIs are not reported, and most health care workers are not aware of postexposure procedures., Methods: Data for NSIs reported in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively., Results: A total of 546 staff members reported NSIs. Of these, 376 (68.9%) were women. NSIs were more commonly reported by trainee nurses (243 [44.5%]), followed by nurses (121 [22.2%]), cleaning staff (108 [19.8%]), and doctors (49 [9%]). The rate of postexposure interventions was 13% in 2008 and 92.6% in 2016 (P < .0001; χ 2  = 82.866). NSI rates also show that the number of applications with NSIs increased over the years. When occupational blood exposure was examined, the number of bloodborne pathogens was 50 (9.3%) cases of hepatitis B virus, 30 (5.6%) cases of hepatitis C virus, 3 cases of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, 1 case of HIV, and 2 cases of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus coinfection., Discussion: Over the years, the increase in both the appropriate intervention rate and the number of reports to the hospital infection control committee after NSIs shows that regular training regarding NSIs is effective., Conclusions: Hospital infection control committees may play a more active role in raising awareness in this regard and thus reducing the rate of unreported NSIs., (Copyright © 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)