Search

Objective The link between brain function and cardiovascular dynamics is an important issue yet to be elucidated completely. The insula is a neocortical brain area that is thought to have a cardiac chronotropic regulatory function, but its role in cardiac contractility is unknown. We aimed to analyze the variability in heart rate and cardiac contractility after functional activation of different insular regions through direct electrical stimulation (E-stim) in humans. Methods This was an observational, prospective study, including patients admitted for stereo-electroencephalographic recording because of refractory epilepsy, in whom the insular cortex was implanted. Patients with anatomical or electrophysiological insular abnormalities and those in whom E-stim produced subjective symptoms were excluded. Variations in heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO) were analyzed during insular E-stim and compared with control E-stim of non-eloquent brain regions and sham stimulations. Results Ten patients were included, 5 implanted in the right insula (52 E-stim) and 5 in the left (37 E-stim). Demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were similar. E-stim of both right and left insulas induced a significant decrease of the CO and HR, and an increase of the SV. E-stim of control electrodes and sham stimulations were not associated with variations in cardiac function. Blood pressure and respiratory rate remained unaltered. Interpretation Our results suggest a direct chronotropic and inotropic cardiac depressor function of the right and left insulas. The evidence of an insular direct cardiac regulatory function might open a path in the prevention or treatment of heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:1172-1180.

Background To assess the prevalence, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 in people with epilepsy (PWE) and evaluate seizure control in PWE during and after COVID-19. Methods Retrospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in 14 hospitals. Medical records of randomly selected PWE followed at neurology outpatient clinics were reviewed. Proportion of PWE with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 during 2020 was calculated. Risk factors associated with COVID-19 and its morbimortality were evaluated. Results 2751 PWE were included, mean age 48.8 years (18–99), 72.4% had focal epilepsy, and 35% were drug-refractory. COVID-19 prevalence in PWE was 5.53%, while in the Spanish population was 4.26%. Proportion of admissions to hospital, ICU, and deaths in PWE were 17.1%, 2%, and 4.61% of COVID-19 cases, while in Spanish population were 10.81%, 0.95%, and 2.57%, respectively. A severe form of COVID-19 occurred in 11.8%; dyslipidemia, institutionalization at long-term care facilities, intellectual disability, and older age were associated risk factors. Older age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiac disease, and institutionalization were associated with mortality from COVID-19. Seizure control was stable in 90.1% of PWE during acute COVID-19, while 8.6% reported an increase in seizure frequency. During post-COVID-19 follow-up, 4.6% reported seizure control worsening. Conclusions COVID-19 was moderately prevalent in PWE. One out of 5 patients required medical attention and 4.6% died due to COVID-19. Older age, dyslipidemia, institutionalization, and intellectual disability were significant risk factors associated with severe COVID-19. Seizure control remained stable during COVID-19 and throughout long-term follow-up in most PWE who contracted the infection.

ObjectiveThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide since December 2019. Neurologic symptoms have been reported as part of the clinical spectrum of the disease. We aimed to determine whether neurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to describe their main characteristics.MethodsWe systematically reviewed all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital in a Spanish population during March 2020. Demographic characteristics, systemic and neurologic clinical manifestations, and complementary tests were analyzed.ResultsOf 841 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (mean age 66.4 years, 56.2% men), 57.4% developed some form of neurologic symptom. Nonspecific symptoms such as myalgias (17.2%), headache (14.1%), and dizziness (6.1%) were present mostly in the early stages of infection. Anosmia (4.9%) and dysgeusia (6.2%) tended to occur early (60% as the first clinical manifestation) and were more frequent in less severe cases. Disorders of consciousness occurred commonly (19.6%), mostly in older patients and in severe and advanced COVID-19 stages. Myopathy (3.1%), dysautonomia (2.5%), cerebrovascular diseases (1.7%), seizures (0.7%), movement disorders (0.7%), encephalitis (n = 1), Guillain-Barré syndrome (n = 1), and optic neuritis (n = 1) were also reported, but less frequent. Neurologic complications were the main cause of death in 4.1% of all deceased study participants.ConclusionsNeurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In our series, more than half of patients presented some form of neurologic symptom. Clinicians need to maintain close neurologic surveillance for prompt recognition of these complications. The mechanisms and consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 neurologic involvement require further studies.

Resumen: Objetivos: Comprobar si han existido variaciones en la etiología del ictus isquémico en los últimos años e investigar las posibles causas que lo justifiquen. Pacientes y métodos: Análisis de los antecedentes epidemiológicos y factores de riesgo vascular de los pacientes diagnosticados de ictus isquémico en el Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA) entre 2009 y 2014. La clasificación etiológica del ictus isquémico se realizó según los criterios TOAST. Se compararon los resultados con los de la clásica Stroke Data Bank (SDB) y se contrastaron ambas series con otros registros hospitalarios publicados en el periodo que las separa. Resultados: Se analiza a 1.664 pacientes, 58% varones, mediana de edad 74 años. Según la clasificación etiológica los resultados obtenidos son (CHUA/SDB): aterotrombóticos (12%/9%), lacunares (13%/25%), cardioembólicos (32%/19%), causa infrecuente (3%/4%) e indeterminados (40%/44%). El 63% de los pacientes del CHUA era mayor de 70 años, en la SDB solo el 42% superaba esa edad. En ambos registros el subtipo cardioembólico era más prevalente en mayores de 70 años. La HTA no tratada era más frecuente en la SDB (SDB = 31% vs. CHUA = 10%). El análisis de otras bases de datos muestra una tendencia progresiva a escala mundial al aumento en la prevalencia del ictus cardioembólico. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio muestra tanto en nuestro centro como a escala mundial una disminución del porcentaje de ictus lacunares y un aumento del de cardioembólicos respecto a la SDB. Estas diferencias pudieran justificarse por el envejecimiento de los pacientes, el mejor control de la HTA actualmente y mayor capacidad para detectar arritmias cardioembólicas en las Unidades de Ictus. Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to determine whether the aetiology of ischaemic stroke has changed in recent years and, if so, to ascertain the possible reasons for these changes. Patients and methods: We analysed the epidemiological history and vascular risk factors of all patients diagnosed with ischaemic stroke at Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA) from 2009 to 2014. Ischaemic stroke subtypes were established using the TOAST criteria. Our results were compared to data from the classic Stroke Data Bank (SDB); in addition, both series were compared to those of other hospital databases covering the period between the two. Results: We analysed 1664 patients (58% were men) with a mean age of 74 years. Stroke aetiology in both series (CHUA, SDB) was as follows: atherosclerosis (12%, 9%), small-vessel occlusion (13%, 25%), cardioembolism (32%, 19%), stroke of other determined aetiology (3%, 4%), and stroke of undetermined aetiology (40%, 44%). Sixty-three percent of the patients from the CHUA and 42% of the patients from the SDB were older than 70 years. Cardioembolic strokes were more prevalent in patients older than 70 years in both series. Untreated hypertension was more frequent in the SDB (SDB = 31% vs CHUA = 10%). The analysis of other databases shows that the prevalence of cardioembolic stroke is increasing worldwide. Conclusions: Our data show that the prevalence of lacunar strokes is decreasing worldwide whereas cardioembolic strokes are increasingly more frequent in both our hospital and other series compared to the SDB. These differences may be explained by population ageing and the improvements in management of hypertension and detection of cardioembolic arrhythmias in stroke units. Palabras clave: Base de Datos de Ictus, Etiología del ictus, Subtipos de ictus, TOAST, Factores de riesgo vascular, Fibrilación auricular, Keywords: Stroke Data Bank, Stroke aetiology, Stroke subtypes, TOAST, Vascular risk factors, Atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Antiepileptic drugs are the first-line treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are the most studied with well-known efficacy. Eslicarbazepine acetate is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that has not previously been evaluated for the treatment of TN. We aim to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of eslicarbazepine for TN. DESIGN AND METHODS Retrospective, open-label, multicentric, intention-to-treat study. We included patients older than 18 years who met the ICHD-3 beta diagnostic criteria for TN. We evaluated the variation of intensity and frequency of pain paroxysms before and after treatment with eslicarbazepine. Secondary objectives assessed were tolerability and safety of eslicarbazepine. RESULTS Eighteen patients were included, 15 women, mean age 65.2 years old, mean follow-up 21.1 months. The mean number of drugs tested before eslicarbazepine was 2; 10 patients used eslicarbazepine as monotherapy. After the treatment with ESL, the median of pain intensity improved from 9.5 to 2.5 (p

Brivaracetam is currently indicated as adjunctive therapy for patients with focal-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. However, it has been suggested that it could provide broad-spectrum efficacy given its similarity to levetiracetam and based on the results from preclinical studies and others of patients with generalized epilepsy. We present the case of a woman with refractory idiopathic generalized epilepsy and absence seizures with dramatic response to brivaracetam. Our report supports a consideration of treatment with this new antiepileptic drug on a case-by-case basis in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy, while we await further studies on this topic.

Cardiac arrhythmias are a frequent complication related to seizures [1]. Most are benign although some, such as high-grade atrioventricular block, asystole, atrial fibrillation (AF), and ventricular fibrillation are potentially harmful. Indeed, several studies suggest that cardiac dysfunction may be the primary underlying cause of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Post-ictal atrial fibrillation (PIAF) is a very rare cardiac arrhythmia associated with seizures, and its relevance is currently unknown. AF characteristics include: 1) irregular R-R intervals, 2) absence of distinct repeating P waves, and 3) erratic atrial activity [2]. Atrial flutter is differentiated from AF because of the characteristic “saw tooth” waves on the ECG instead of the chaotic atrial rhythm of the AF. In fact, there are only four reported cases of PIAF diagnosed during video-EEG monitoring (VEM) [1], [3], [4]. We report a case of PIAF identified during long-term VEM, with recurrent episodes corroborated by Holter-ECG monitoring

Objective To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Methods This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged >= 12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure-free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow-up. Results A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 +/- 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1-57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2-10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log-rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3-26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure-free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow-up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1-8.33, P = .046). Significance PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide since December 2019 Spain is one of the most affected countries, with high incidence a

Background The aim of this study was to have a better understanding of the influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in people with epilepsy (PWE) and to assess whether there have been changes in seizure control during the current COVID-19 outbreak, exploring the possible causes thereof. Methods This is an observational, retrospective study based on prospective data collection of 100 successive patients who attended an epilepsy outpatient clinic either face-to-face or telephonically during the months of the COVID-19 outbreak and national state of emergency. Results One hundred patients were included, 52% women, mean age 42.4 years. During the COVID-19 period, 27% of the patients presented an increase of > 50% of seizure frequency. An increase of stress/anxiety (odds ratios (OR): 5.78; p = 0.008) and a prior higher seizure frequency (OR: 12.4; p = 0.001) were associated with worsening of seizures. Other risk factors were exacerbation of depression, sleep deprivation, less physical activity, and history of epilepsy surgery. Three patients had status epilepticus (SE) and one a cluster of seizures. Likewise, 9% of patients improved their seizure control. Reduction in stress/anxiety (OR: 0.05; p = 0.03) and recent adjustment of antiepileptics (OR: 0.07; p = 0.01) acted as protecting factors. Conclusions A high proportion of PWE suffered a significant worsening of their seizure control during the months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Emotional distress due to home confinement was the main factor for the change in seizure control. Promoting physical activity and adequate sleep may minimize the potential impact of the pandemic in PWE. Ensuring correct follow-up can prevent decompensation in those PWE at high risk., Highlights • During COVID-19 pandemic, seizure control worsened in 27% of people with epilepsy. • Emotional distress was the most important risk factor for seizure control worsening. • Promoting physical activity and adequate sleep can minimize seizures exacerbation. • Ensuring correct follow-up can prevent decompensations in people with epilepsy.

ResumenLa neurocisticercosis es la enfermedad parasitaria más frecuente del sistema nervioso central. Es causada por las larvas de Taenia solium, las cuales pueden estar alojadas en distintas localizaciones anatómicas. En países como España existe una prevalencia en ascenso debido, principalmente, a la inmigración desde regiones endémicas. Las formas extraparenquimatosas son menos frecuentes, pero más graves por su tendencia a producir complicaciones. La neuroimagen desempeña un papel primordial en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de esta enfermedad, apoyada en la serología y un contexto clínico-epidemiológico compatible. El tratamiento de elección son los fármacos cisticidas albendazol y praziquantel, habitualmente se asocian a estos corticoides y, cuando corresponde, la cirugía. Se presenta un caso de neurocisticercosis con afectación simultánea intraventricular y subaracnoidea en su forma racemosa gigante.AbstractNeurocysticercosis is the most frequent parasitic disease of the central nervous system. It is caused by the larvae of Taenia solium, which can affect different anatomical sites. In Spain there is an increasing prevalence mainly due to immigration from endemic areas. The extraparenchymal forms are less common, but more serious because they usually develop complications. Neuroimaging plays a major role in the diagnosis and follow-up of this disease, supported by serology and a compatible clinical and epidemiological context. First-line treatments are cysticidal drugs such as albendazole and praziquantel, usually coadministered with corticosteroids, and in some cases surgery is indicated. We here report a case of neurocysticercosis with simultaneous intraventricular and giant racemose subarachnoid involvement.

Background Magnesium has a regulatory role in the excitability of cell membranes, and is also a cofactor in the phosphorylation of thiamine. Hypomagnesemia has been associated with coronary vasospasm, but its role in cerebrovascular pathology is controversial, and cerebral vasospasm exclusively attributable to hypomagnesemia has not been reported in humans. Case presentation We report the case of a 51-year-old man in whom uncontrollable vomiting, treatment with omeprazole and thiazide, and renal impairment lead to a severe hypomagnesemia (magnesium below the level of detection in blood tests), which secondarily caused Wernicke’s encephalopathy and vasospasm in multiple cerebral arteries (seen with cerebral angiography and CT angiography) that presented with a complete right hemisphere neurological deficit. These disturbances completely resolved when magnesium levels were normalized and subsequent neuroimaging tests confirmed the resolution of angiographic changes. Conclusion Our case suggests that hypomagnesemia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with neurological symptoms and predisposing causes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0660-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.