Search

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is well known for its more aggressive course and poorer prognosis compared to other BC subtypes. RegistEM study provides real world data to understand the distribution of BC subtypes in the advanced setting, being its primary objective. Biological samples collection is part of its procedures. This is a non-interventional cohort study and 1,907 patients (pts) have been enrolled up to now (females and males) with advanced BC (ABC), diagnosed from Jan-2016 to Dec-2019, either after recurrence or as first BC diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. These pts will be followed for at least 5 years. Methods: In the current analysis (cut-off date 08/April/2022, database ongoing), we describe characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes, including comparison between recurrent and de novo disease, of 157 pts with advanced TNBC included in the RegistEM study. Those pts represent the 10% of pts available in the database at the cut-off date and with ABC diagnosis up to December 2018 (n=1559). The BC clinical subtypes were histologically confirmed on the most recent tumor lesion (metastatic [M] or primary BC) before starting with the 1st-line therapy. Results: At first ABC diagnosis, 73% pts had recurrent early BC (EBC), 26% de novo MBC and 1% unresectable locally ABC (ULABC). Median age was 57 years (range 30-88), all pts were women, 98% Caucasian and 65% postmenopausal. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 37% pts, and a hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 59 of 147 pts. Germline BRCA1/2 and TP53 were the most frequently mutated genes, 21% (6/28) and 47% (8/17) pts, respectively. Visceral involvement was present in 69% pts (similar between recurrent EBC and de novo ABC, although brain metastases were only present in the recurrent EBC group), and ≤ 2 metastatic locations in 59%. In 61% (70/115) pts with recurrent EBC, the subtype was assessed in metastatic lesions, and 39 pts of them also had TN subtype in primary BC. In terms of the most frequent therapies by line: 1) 1st-line: chemotherapy (CT) (60%) and CT/biological therapy (BT) (39%). Of the 87 pts with CT alone, monotherapy was the preferred option in 57% pts (capecitabine 25%, taxanes 16%, and eribulin or vinorelbine, 5% each). Bevacizumab was the most frequent BT (79%) combined with CT (single agent in 56% pts, mostly taxanes and capecitabine). Progressive disease (PD) was reported in 85% pts (similar in pts with both recurrent and de novo MBC or ULABC); 2) 2nd-line: CT (79%) (monotherapy capecitabine, eribulin, taxanes) and CT/BT (17%) (CT-containing bevacizumab 82%). Progression was reported in 92% pts; 3) 3rd-line: CT (90%) (eribulin 33%, platinum-based 25%) and CT/BT (9%) (CT-containing bevacizumab 67%). Progression was reported in 88% pts. At database cut-off date, death was reported in 133 (85%) pts, mainly because of PD. Overall survival (OS) was similar between both groups, recurrent and de novo MBC. Conclusion: In this population of Spanish TNBC pts with ABC, three quarters had recurrent disease. De novo ABC pts had a higher proportion of non-visceral metastases, with absence of brain involvement at the first diagnosis. Single-agent CT and CT plus bevacizumab were the most frequent therapies, and OS was similar between recurrent and de novo MBC pts, although numerically higher in the later group. Citation Format: Silvia Antolin Novoa, César A Rodríguez, Josefina Cruz, Sara López-Tarruella, Ariadna Tibau, Encarna Adrover, Ana Miguel, Mireia Margelí, Purificación Martínez, María Hernández, Antonio Antón, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Catalina Falo, Isabel Álvarez, Diego Malón, Raquel Andrés, José L Alonso-Romero, César Gómez, J. José Illaramendi, Ruth Campo, Juan José Miralles, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Angel Guerrero-Zotano. Treatment strategies for advanced triple negative breast cancer patients as per routine clinical practice: analysis from the observational study GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-45.

Background: HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a new therapeutic entity, but it is uncertain if this subgroup of BC differs from HER2-negative tumors in clinical characteristics, prognosis, and response to therapy. The objective is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 422 patients (pts) with HER2-low BC documented before 1st line, having been diagnosed with advanced BC (ABC) before 2019 and included in the RegistEM study (n=1,663). Methods: In this analysis (cut-off date 08/April/2022; database is ongoing), two subgroups of pts have been considered based on HER2 results: HER2-low (n=422) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH] negative) and HER2-IHC 0 (n=590), as reference. Hormone Receptor (HR) expression has also been considered for subgroup analysis. Results: At first ABC diagnosis, < 1% pts had unresectable locally advanced BC (ULABC) in both groups, 31% de novo metastatic BC in HER2-low and 20% in HER2-IHC0 groups. Less than 1% were male, 99% Caucasian and ~71% postmenopausal. Median age was 60 years, being similar between both groups (range 26-96). Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 32% pts in HER2-low and 29% in HER2-IHC0. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation was higher in HER2-low (14/40=35%) in reference to HER2-IHC0 (14/64=22%) (p=0.14). Relevant information summarized by HR expression and HER2 status are detailed in the table below. Visceral disease was similar in both total groups (58% in HER2-low vs HER2-IHC0 56%), but slightly higher in HR- HER2-low pts (81% vs 64%), and 84% and 90% pts had ≤3 metastatic locations, in HER2-low and HER2-IHC0 groups, respectively. Distribution of 1st-line therapies was also similar between both groups, being endocrine therapy (ET) plus biological therapy (BT) (HER2-low 39% vs HER2-IHC0 36%) and ET (HER2-low 30% vs HER2-IHC0 28%), while chemotherapy (CT) (HER2-low 13% vs HER2-IHC0 16%) and CT plus BT (HER2-low 9% vs HER2-IHC0 10%) were more frequent in HR- pts. A 2nd-line therapy was reported in 70% HER2-low pts and 67% HER2-IHC0 pts. The median time to progression (TTP) at 1st-line therapy in HER2-low pts was 11 mo (0-66), being similar in HER2-IHC0 pts, but the higher difference was observed in relation to HR expression. Treatments in 2nd-line were similar in both groups, CT and ET/BT were the most frequent totally. Median duration of 2nd-line therapy was ~6 mo; progressive disease (PD) was reported in 85% pts. A 3rd-line therapy was reported in 74% HER2-low and 69% HER2-IHC0 pts. The median time to progression (TTP) to 3rd-line therapy was 6 mo, being similar in HER2-low and HER2-IHC0 pts .The most frequent 3rd-line therapies were CT and ET/BT in both groups, as in 2nd-line. Median duration of 3rd-line therapy was 4 mo; PD was reported in 84% HER2-low pts and 82% HER2-IHC0 pts. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS at 1st, 2nd and 3rd lines (mo) were 14 (12-16), 6 (5-7) and 6 (5-6) in HER2-low pts, being similar in HER2-IHC0. OS was comparable in all soubgroups analyzed, however, differences were observed regarding HR status. Conclusions: Our results show that HER2-low BC pts have similar characteristics than HER2-IHC0 BC pts. There are differences in therapy outcomes in terms of survival and prognosis, particularly in HR- tumors, being better in HER2-low BC pts. It could be related to the fact that these tumors have a specific biology, but more evidence is needed. Citation Format: Isabel Álvarez, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Ariadna Tibau, Catalina Falo, María Hernández, Ana Miguel, Raquel Andrés, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Miguel Corbellas, Sara López-Tarruella, Purificación Martínez, Cesar A Rodríguez, Diego Malón, María Marin, Mª José Echarri, Antonio Antón, Josefina Cruz, Diana Moreno, J. Ignacio Chacón, Ruth Campo, Andrea Blasco, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Silvia Antolin. Features and survival outcomes of HER2-low patients from a prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-30.

Background: Over the last years, the treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) has been changing because of the development of new anti-HER2 agents. In the current analysis, we describe the features, treatment patterns, progression-free survivall (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes of BC pts with HER2 + (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+), following ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines in the most recent tumor lesion before the 2nd-line. Methods: The RegistEM study is an ongoing BC registry study that is providing prospective data from around 1900 pts diagnosed with advanced BC (ABC) between 01/Jan/2016 and 31/Dec/2019, in 38 Spanish institutions from GEICAM network. In this analysis, 296 HER2+ BC pts have been included, representing the 18% of pts available in the database at the cut-off date (08/Apr/2022), with ABC diagnosis before 2019 (n=1559). Results: At first ABC diagnosis, 58% (n=173) pts had recurrent disease (>36 months [mo] from initial BC diagnosis in 62%), 41% (n=120) de novo metastatic BC and 1% (n=3) unresectable locally ABC (ULABC); the median age was 58 years, 68% were postmenopausal and there was only 1 male pt. From total 296 pts, 66% had hormone receptor expression [HR+]; the BC subtype was assessed in tumor tissue from the breast (58%) or a metastatic lesion (34%), and in 8% pts, HER2 positivity was observed after the 1st-line. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 28% pts, and a hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 26% pts (n=74/282). Germline BRCA1/2 and TP53 genetic testing were reported in 14 and 26 pts respectively, being mutated in 3/14 (21%) and 5/26 (19%) pts. Bone (50%), lymph nodes (49%), liver (35%), lung (31%), soft tissue (8%) and central nervous system (CNS), mostly in brain (8%), were the main metastatic sites. One hundred pts were diagnosed with CNS metastases: 24 at baseline, 48 during the 1st-line and 28 in subsequent lines. Additional data according to HR status and type of ABC are detailed in the table below, showing a worse prognosis in absence of HR expression. In HR- pts, bone metastases were less frequent and lymph nodes metastases more frequent compared to HR+ pts. Visceral disease was present in 69% (66% in HR+ and 74% in HR-; non-statistically significant) pts and ≈80% had ≤3 (54%, ≤2) locations involved. The most common therapies by line were: 1) 1st-line: Chemotherapy (CT) + biological therapy (BT) (38%), CT + BT+ endocrine therapy (ET) (35%), and ET + BT [11%]; 2) 2nd-line: BT (55%), CT + BT (20%) and ET + BT (15%); 3) 3rd-line: CT + BT (49%) and BT (31%). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression-free survival (PFS) on 1st, 2nd and 3rd line was 18 (15-22), 8 (7-9) and 6 (5-8) mo, respectively. The median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) from ABC diagnosis was 43 (40-49) mo. These survival outcomes were higher in HR+ pts, however, the differences were only statistically significant in OS (p=0.006; log-rank). At database cut-off date, death was reported in 47% pts. Conclusions: In spite of the anti-HER2 therapies administered in the advanced setting, the HR expression is a relevant prognostic factor, with a clinically and statistically significant impact in OS, improving the outcomes of HR+ pts. Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Josefina Cruz, Silvia Antolin Novoa, Purificación Martínez, María Hernández, César A Rodríguez, J. Ignacio Chacón, Ariadna Tibau, Catalina Falo, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Mireia Margelí, Sonia Servitja, Raquel Andrés, María Galán-Gramaje, Encarna Adrover, Ana Miguel, Rafael Villanueva, Silvia Varela, Ruth Campo, Mª José Escudero, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Isabel Álvarez. Real-world data of Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) patients with HER2-positivity before the second-line therapy: data from the observational study GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-38.

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

Resumen El cancer de mama metastasico (CMM) constituye la primera causa de muerte por cancer entre las mujeres y plantea importantes retos en la practica clinica y en la convivencia con la enfermedad para pacientes y familiares. Con la participacion de un amplio panel de oncologos medicos y representantes de pacientes, en este proyecto se analizaron los recursos (herramientas de planificacion, registros de cancer), proceso asistencial (diagnostico, tratamiento, cuidados paliativos) y procesos transversales (atencion psicosocial, habitos de vida saludables, rol de las asociaciones de pacientes) en el abordaje del CMM en el contexto sanitario espanol. El trabajo realizado permitio identificar una serie de areas de mejora y proponer 42 recomendaciones orientadas a mejorar la calidad asistencial y la atencion de los pacientes con CMM y sus cuidadores organizadas en las siguientes areas de accion: registros de cancer, coordinacion entre niveles asistenciales, diagnostico de la metastasis, comunicacion y habilidades interpersonales, accesibilidad a farmacos, ensayos clinicos, el papel de la enfermeria en el CMM, cuidados paliativos, atencion psicosocial y promocion de estilos de vida saludables. Estas recomendaciones, elaboradas desde una perspectiva integral y centradas en las caracteristicas del entorno sanitario en Espana, ofrecen un punto de partida para la mejora de la calidad asistencial y pueden ser de gran valor en otros entornos sanitarios que se enfrenten a las mismas necesidades en el abordaje del CMM.

Cancer and cancer therapies are a major factor risk for osteoporosis due to bone loss and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Both factors contribute to a decrease in bone strength and, consequently, increased bone fragility and risk of fracture. Cancer-associated bone loss is a multifactorial process, and optimal interdisciplinary management of skeletal health, accurate assessment of bone density, and early diagnosis are essential when making decisions aimed at reducing bone loss and fracture risk in patients who have received or are receiving treatment for cancer. In this document, a multidisciplinary group of experts collected the latest evidence on the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment with the support of the Spanish scientific society SEOM. The aim was to provide an up-to-date and in-depth view of osteoporotic risk and its consequences, and to present a series of recommendations aimed at optimizing the management of bone health in the context of cancer.

ImportanceBiomarkers to guide the use of pertuzumab in the treatment of early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer beyond simple ERBB2 status are needed.ObjectiveTo determine if use of the HER2DX genomic assay (Reveal Genomics) in pretreatment baseline tissue samples of patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer is associated with response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a retrospective diagnostic/prognostic analysis of a multicenter academic observational study in Spain performed during 2018 to 2022 (GOM-HGUGM-2018-05). In addition, a combined analysis with 2 previously reported trials of neoadjuvant cohorts with results from the assay (DAPHNe and I-SPY2) was performed. All patients had stage I to III ERBB2-positive breast cancer, signed informed consent, and had available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens obtained prior to starting therapy.ExposuresPatients received intravenous trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg, loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in combination with intravenous docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks and intravenous carboplatin area under the curve of 6 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, or this regimen plus intravenous pertuzumab, 840 mg, loading dose, followed by an intravenous 420-mg dose every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.Main Outcome and MeasuresAssociation of baseline assay-reported pathologic complete response (pCR) score with pCR in the breast and axilla, as well as association of baseline assay-reported pCR score with response to pertuzumab.ResultsThe assay was evaluated in 155 patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer (mean [range] age, 50.3 [26-78] years). Clinical T1 to T2 and node-positive disease was present in 113 (72.9%) and 99 (63.9%) patients, respectively, and 105 (67.7%) tumors were hormone receptor positive. The overall pCR rate was 57.4% (95% CI, 49.2%-65.2%). The proportion of patients in the assay-reported pCR-low, pCR-medium, and pCR-high groups was 53 (34.2%), 54 (34.8%), and 48 (31.0%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, the assay-reported pCR score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) showed a statistically significant association with pCR (odds ratio [OR] per 10-unit increase, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.70; P P P P = .77). A statistically significant interaction between the assay-reported pCR score and the effect of pertuzumab in pCR was observed.Conclusions and RelevanceThis diagnostic/prognostic study demonstrated that the genomic assay predicted pCR following neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab. This assay could guide therapeutic decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant pertuzumab.

Purpose We conducted a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection, in terms of false-negative rate (FNR) and sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), need for axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND), morbidity, preferences, and costs. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched. We assessed the quality of the included systematic reviews using AMSTAR2 tool, and estimated the degree of overlapping of the individual studies on the included reviews. Results Six systematic reviews with variable quality were selected. We observed a very high overlapping degree across the included reviews. The FNR and the SLNIR were quite consistent (FNR 13-14%; SLNIR- 90% or higher). In women with initially clinically node-negative breast cancer, the FNR was better (6%), with similar SLNIR (96%). The included reviews did not consider the other prespecified outcomes. Conclusions It would be reasonable to suggest performing an SLNB in patients treated with NACT, adjusting the procedure to the previous marking of the affected lymph node, using double tracer, and biopsy of at least three sentinel lymph nodes. More well-designed research is needed.

Background: The RegistEM study is a non-interventional study that is providing prospective data from around 1900 ABC pts (females and males) diagnosed with advanced disease between 01/Jan/2016 and 31/Dec/2019, either after recurrence or at 1st diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites representative of the national territory and whose investigators are GEICAM members. Methods: In the current analysis (cut-off date 10/May/2021, ongoing database), we describe the features of 279 pts included in the RegistEM study, with HER2+ (immunohistochemistry [IHQ] 3+, IHQ 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+) tumors at any time of their ABC (5% after the 1st-line therapy). This subgroup has been evaluated because of the interest from a clinical perspective. Multivariate Cox analysis aiming to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) were built. Results: 279 pts were identified, representing the 15% pts available in the database at the cut-off date. At first ABC diagnosis, 48% pts had recurrent BC (>12 months [mo] from initial BC diagnosis in 93%), 51% de novo metastatic BC and 1% unresectable locally advanced BC (ULABC). The median age was 59 years, 98% were white , 71% postmenopausal and only 1 male was part of this subset. Considering the BC subtype assessed in the most recent tumor lesion before the 1st-line therapy, 264 pts wereHER2 positive (67% with hormone receptor [HR]+). Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 31% pts, and an hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 25% (66/267 pts). BRCA1/2 and TP53 mutations were reported in 4/20 and 4/19 pts, respectively, and p53 overexpression in 20/46 pts. Lymph nodes (56%), bone (49%), liver (34%), lung (33%), soft tissue (10%) and brain (8%) were the main metastatic sites. Additional data according to HR status and type of ABC are detailed in the table below. In HR- pts, bone metastases were less frequent and lymph nodes metastases more frequent compared to HR+ pts. Visceral disease was present in 68% pts and ≈75% had ≤3 (47% ≤2) locations involved. The most common therapies by line were: 1) 1st-line: CT + dual anti-HER2 blockade (3%), chemotherapy (CT) (almost in all pts taxane-based)+dual anti-HER2 blockade + endocrine therapy (ET) (mainly aromatase inhibitors) (35%), and ET + anti-HER2 blockade or ET + cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (11%); 2) 2nd-line: anti-HER2 blockade (56%) [mostly an antibody-drug conjugate (90%)], CT + anti-HER2 blockade (18%) and ET + anti-HER2 blockade (14%); 3) 3rd-line: CT + anti-HER2 blockade (55%) and anti-HER2 blockade (22%). The median time-to-progressions to 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-line were 14, 5, and 4 mo, respectively. A 4th-line therapy was reported in 52% of pts who received a 3rd-line. At database cut-off date, death was reported in 34% of pts. The median OS of this subset of pts was 41 mo (36-49). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the following variables were significantly related with worse survival (from ABC diagnosis): Brain (HR=2.62; 95% CI, 1.02-6.73) and Visceral no Brain involvement (HR=2.15; 95% CI, 1.02-4.53) compare to only soft tissue lesions; early stage at first diagnosis (HR=1.77; 95% CI, 1.15-2.73); HR- (HR=1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.60) and age (HR=1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Conclusions: In this cohort of HER2+ pts with advanced disease, half of them had de novo ABC which was associated with better OS. The median PFS in 1st- and 3rd-line were slightly better in HR+ pts, and in 2nd-line was similar between HR+ and HR- cohorts. HR+181 (67%)HR- 91 (33%)Recurrent EBC134 (48%)ULABC or de novo M1 145 (52%)Time to recurrence >12 mo in EBC pts., n8435125NALocation of metastaticsites, nBoneBrainLiverLungLymph nodesSoft tissue104 10 62 57 90 1829 9 3232 64 1059 15 36 47 51 2278 6 59 46 1056Líne123123123123n180935690492613385521446333Deaths, n211112111161715141584Therapies by line, nET/BT261922101910212100ET12441011022323CT/BT/ET935031038305830CT/BT4017307581552182366924CT3572353711211BT6431373651145143385The most frequent therapies, nCT + dual anti-HER2 blockade + ET8623331551CT + single-agent HER2 blockade + ET522CT + dual anti-HER2 blockade3493644391016252CT + single-agent HER2 blockade4825641588211521CT5573354711411ET*22105212162644ET + HER2 blockade1213411662782Anti-HER2 blockade6431073651145143382Median duration of treatment, mo125585310441064TTP (mo), median (range)15(1-47)5(1-32)5(0-18)11(2-38)5(1-27)4(2-12)12 (1-47)5(1-26)4(0-17)17(2-45)7(1-32)4(1-18)Median PFS, mo14561154------HR: hormone receptor; EBC: early breast cancer; ULABC: unresectable locally advanced breast cancer; M1: metastatic; mo: month; ET: endrocrine therapy; BT: biological therapy; CT: chemotherapy; TTP: time-to-progression; PFS: progression-free survival. *ET includes aromatase inhibitors or selective estrogen receptor degraders, as single-agents or combined with cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: Isabel Álvarez, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano, Josefina Cruz, Purificación Martínez, María Hernández, César A Rodríguez, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Silvia Antolín, Encarna Adrover, Raquel Andrés, Catalina Falo, Jose Ignacio Chacón, Ana Miguel, Sonia Servitja, Maria Galán Gramaje, Mireia Margelí Vila, César Gómez Raposo, María Jose Echarri, Rafael Villanueva, Ariadna TIbau Martorell, Silvia Varela Ferreiro, Ruth Campo, Juan Jose Miralles, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Sara López-Tarruella. Features of HER2+ metastasic patients (pts) from a prospective registry of advanced breast cancer (ABC), GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-04.

Background: The incidence of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) is estimated to be around 5-15%, but necropsies show a much higher incidence (30-50%). Frecuency of BCBM has gradually increase likely as a result from advances in systemic treatment that allow more patients to live long enough to develop BCBM. In general, outcome for patients with BCBM is poor, with 1-year survival of approximately 20%, but some patient and tumor characteristics are associated with improved behaviour. The RegistEM study is a non-interventional cohort study providing prospective data from around 1,867 advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts.). This study offers a unique opportunity to assess the incidence, potential risk factors, and outcomes for patients with BCBM. Methods: In this analysis (cut-off date 26/April/2021 and ongoing database), we describe the features of 218 pts. with BCBM included in the RegistEM study, which represent the 11% of current total number of pts. in the study. BC clinical subtypes are based on the most recent tumor lesion (distant metastasis or primary BC). The most frequent therapies by BC subtypes are detailed in the table below. At the database cut-off date, death had been reported in 74% pts with BCBM. Results: All pts. were female, 97% caucasian, and at ABC diagnosis, 66% were postmenopausal and their median age was 55 years. The subtype distribution was: Luminal (ER+/HER2-) 41%, HER2+ 35%, Triple Negative (TN) 19%, unknown 5%. Eighty pts. (37%) had BM at diagnosis of ABC, and in 17 of them BM was the only site of relapse. The median time from diagnosis of primary BC to BM at initial diagnosis of ABC was 34 months (mo), being shorter for TN (18 mo). In patients without BM at diagnosis of ABC, the median time from ABC diagnosis to onset of BM for de novo metastatic disease was: Luminal 27 mo, HER2+ 28 mo, TN 10 mo; while for EBC disease was: Luminal 18 mo, HER2+ 14 mo, TN 10 mo. De novo metastatic BC was associated with longer time to BM appearance (HR:0.527, CI 95%: 0.358-0.776) while TN subtype with shorter time (HR:4.122, CI 95%: 2.318-7.329) compared to Luminal subtype. The median survival from the onset of BM, according to BC subtype was: Luminal 6 mo, HER2 11 mo and TN 4 mo. Risk factors for worse survival were: BM at ABC (HR:1.677, CI 95%:1.169-2.406) and TN subtype (HR:3.631, CI 95%: 2.353-5.603) compared to Luminal subtype. Conclusions: TN breast cancer is associated with a shorter time to brain metastases and poorer outcome than other breast cancer subtype. Patients with de novo metastatic BC develop metastases later than patients with metastatic recurrence after primary BC. New treatment approach to avoid the onset of brain metastases in patients with ABC warrants further research. Luminaln=90 (41%)HER2+n=77 (35%)Triple Negativen=41 (19%)HRHER2+-Any+–First BC diagnosis, nEBC (stages I-III)ULABC or de novo metastatic65. 2555. 2227. 14Only CNS metastases at ABC diagnosis584Number of line (L)1L2L3L1L2L3L1L2L3Ln877158745936352515Type of therapy, nET/BT26167443---ET239531----CT/BT/ET58-15-----CT/BT10924014211331CT/ET623------CT172635321222214BT1693811---Most frequent therapies by mechanism of action, nAI/CDK4/6i 20SERD 12CT single agent 12AI single agent 11CT + antiangiogenic 9CT single agent 24SERD +/- CDK4/6i 8AI + CDK4/6i 7CT + antiangiogenic 7CT single agent 27CT combination 8SERD +/- CDK4/6i 6CT + dual anti-HER2 blockade 46CT + anti-HER2 blockade single agent 7Anti-HER2 single agent 35CT + anti-HER2 blockade single agent 12CT + anti-HER2 blockade single agent 18Anti-HER2 blockade single agent 9CT combination 12CT + antiangiogenic 12CT single agent 10CT single agent 16CT combination 6CT + antiangiogenic 4CT single agent 9CT combination 5Median Treatment duration, months (range)7 (0-31)6 (0-41)4 (0-16)12 (0-43)5 (0-47)3 (0-17)5 (0-18)3 (0-7)2 (0-6)TTP in months, median (range)8 (2-35)--12 (3-46)--6 (2-19)--Death, n635139Abbreviations: HR=hormone receptor; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; BC=breast cancer; EBC=early breast cancer; ULABC=unresectable locally advanced breast cancer; ET=endrocrine therapy; BT=biological therapy; CT=chemotherapy; TTP=time to progression; AI=aromatase inhibitor; SERD=selective estrogen receptor degrader; CDK4/6i=cyclin dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano, César A Rodríguez, Josefina Cruz, María Hernández, Encarna Adrover, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Catalina Falo, Purificación Martínez, Ana Miguel, Raquel Andrés, Silvia Antolín, J. Ignacio Chacón, Jose Luis Alonso Romero, Rafael Villanueva Vázquez, Ana Isabel Ballesteros García, María Galán Gramaje, Diego Malón Jiménez, Silvia Varela Ferreiro, Diana Moreno Muñoz, Ruth Campo, María José Escudero, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Isabel Alvarez. Breast cancer clinical subtypes in brain metastases patients from a prospective registry of advanced breast cancer, GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-08.

Infertility is one of the main sequelae of cancer and its treatment in both children and adults of reproductive age. It is, therefore, essential that oncologists and haematologists provide adequate information about the risk of infertility and the possibilities for its preservation before starting treatment. Although many international clinical guidelines address this issue, this document is the first Spanish multidisciplinary guideline in paediatric and adult oncological patients. Experts from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Fertility Society, the Spanish Society of Haematology and Haemotherapy, the Spanish Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology and the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology have collaborated to develop a multidisciplinary consensus.

To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection.The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate.Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used.SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.

Background: HER2DX (Prat et al. EBiomedicine 2022) is a 27-gene prognostic (risk-score) and predictive (pathological complete response [pCR]-score) assay in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer based on clinical data and the expression of 4 gene signatures (immune, proliferation, luminal differentiation and HER2 amplicon). Here, we aim to evaluate, for the first time, the ability of HER2DX to predict pCR following neoadjuvant TCH or TCHP in HER2+ disease. Methods: Standardized HER2DX was performed in a central lab on baseline pre-treatment FFPE tumor biopsies from the GOM-HGUGM-2018-05 study in Spain, a consecutive retrospective series of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer eligible for neoadjuvant therapy. Pts received standard 6 cycles of docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) or TCH with pertuzumab (TCHP) regimens. Primary aim was to test the ability of HER2DX pCR score to predict pCR (ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary objectives were to test the ability of HER2DX pCR score to predict pCR independently of clinical-pathological variables and the PAM50 subtype (HER2-enriched versus not), and to evaluate the association of HER2DX pCR score with the HER2DX risk-score. Logistic regression and receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed in R code 4.0.5. Results: HER2DX was evaluated in 155 pts (97%) enrolled in the study with available RNA (as of June 2022). Mean age of pts was 50 (range 22-74) and 55.2% of pts (n=85) were pre-menopausal. Clinical T2-4 disease represented 77.4% of cases (n=120), clinical node-positive disease (cN1-3) represented 63.9% of cases (n=99), and 68.0% of tumors (n=105) were hormone receptor-positive. The overall pCR rate was 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50-65): 52.2% (95% CI 40-64) with TCH (n=67) and 61.4% (95% CI 50-72) with TCHP (n=88). The proportion of HER2DX low-, medium- and high-pCR groups was 34.2%, 34.8% and 31.0%, respectively. HER2DX pCR score (as a continuous variable from 0 to 100) was significantly associated with pCR (odd ratio [OR]=1.03, p=5.91e-07). The pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high and pCR-low groups were 75.0% and 28.0% (OR=7.6, 95% CI 3.2-19.1, p=7.14e-06), respectively. In pts treated with TCHP, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high and pCR-low groups were 85.7% and 27.3% (OR=16.0, 95% CI 4.3-59.01, p=3.2e-05), respectively. The AUC ROC of HER2DX pCR score (as a continuous variable) and pCR status was 0.746 (in all pts) and 0.812 (in pts treated with TCHP). HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR independently of hormone receptor status, Ki67, age, menopausal status, pertuzumab use, clinical stage and PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype. The proportion of HER2DX low- and high-risk of relapse disease was 32.0% and 68.0%, respectively. The correlation of HER2DX pCR score and HER2DX risk-score was weak (coefficient=-0.17), as previously described. Proportion of cases according to both HER2DX scores and absolute difference of pCR rates between TCHP and TCH in each combined group is shown in Table. Conclusion: The HER2DX genomic test predicts pCR following neoadjuvant TCH or TCHP regimens independently of clinical-pathological variables and intrinsic subtype. The combination of both HER2DX scores might help better tailor systemic therapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer. Citation Format: Coralia Bueno-Muiño, Isabel Echavarria, Sara López-Tarruella, Roche-Molina Marta, María del Monte-Millán, Tatiana Massarrah, Yolanda Jerez Gilarranz, Blanca Herrero, Salvador Gámez, Iván Márquez-Rodas, María Cebollero-Presmanes, Nevado Santos Manuel, Pilar de la Morena Barrio, Francisco Ayala de la Peña, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Fernando Moreno Antón, Álvaro Rodríguez Lescure, Teresa Quintanar, Diego Malón-Giménez, Laura Rodriguez-Lajusticia, Ana Isabel Ballesteros García, Dulce Bañón Torres, Lucía Villarejo, Nerea Lobato, Ainhoa Arias, Inmaculada Ocaña, Enrique Álvarez, Laia Paré, Mercedes Marín-Aguilera, Patricia Galván, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Ana Vivancos, Patricia Villagrasa, Joel S Parker, Charles M. Perou, Aleix Prat, Miguel Martín. Independent validation of the HER2DX genomic test in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab (TCH/TCHP): a correlative analysis from a multicenter academic study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-46.

Background: The RegistEM study is a non-interventional cohort study that will provide prospective data from >1,800 advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts), either after recurrence or as first diagnosis in 38 Spanish sites. Primary objective is the distribution of BC subtypes. A new nomenclature has been proposed for those cases with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization (ISH), HER2-low BC. In clinical practice these tumors are reported as HER2 negative. This subpopulation has been identified as an interesting group from a clinical perspective. Methods: In this analysis (cut-off date 01/April/2020; database is ongoing) we describe the characteristics of 229 pts with hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-low BC documented in a metastatic lesion after early disease recurrence and who received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Three subgroups of pts have been considered for this analysis based on HER2 results: HER2 IHC 0, HER2-low, and HER2 ISH- (without IHC). Biological samples collection is part of study procedures. Results: The distribution of HER2 IHC 0, HER2-low, and HER2 ISH- subgroups was 52.4%, 42.8% and 4.8%, respectively. The median time to advance disease was 98.6, 88.8 and 106.9 mo in each group. Almost all pts were female and Caucasian (99%), and at ABC diagnosis, 75.5% were postmenopausal. Median age was 59 years (range 33-88). Fourteen (6.1%) pts had HER2+ (IHC 3+ or ISH amplified) BC subtype during their disease. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 31.4% pts, an hereditary-risk genetic test was performed in 11.4% (n=26) pts in total and BRCA2 gene mutation (n=6) was the only one reported. The most frequent metastases are included in Table 1. Visceral disease was present in 63.3% pts and 76% pts had ≤2 locations. The most frequent 1st-line therapies were ET/biological therapy (BT) (46.7%) and ET (28.8%), and were equal distributed in the 3 subgroups. The most common ET/BT regimens were aromatase inhibitor (AI)/cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) (49.1%/48.9%/42.9% in each subgroup) and fulvestrant (FUL)/CDKi (35.8%/27.7%/28.6%); AIs (50%/64%/66.7%) and FUL (31.6%/20%/0%) were also the most common drugs for monotherapy ET. A 2nd-line therapy was reported in ~53% pts in HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low, and in 36% pts in HER2 ISH-. The median time to progression (TTP) to 1st-line therapy was 11.4 mo (1.2-37.0), being similar in pts with HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low (~11 mo), and higher in pts with HER2 ISH- (16 mo). The most frequent 2nd-line therapies were ET/BT (~34% in HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low, and 25% in HER2 ISH-) [FUL/CDKi (36.4%/47.1%/100%), AI/CDKi (36.4%/23.5%/0%)], chemotherapy as monotherapy (17 pts out of 63 in HER2 IHC 0, 17 pts out of 53 in HER2-low and 1 pt (capecitabine) out of 4 in HER2 FISH-) (capecitabine 29.4%/52.9% in HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low). Median duration of 2nd-line therapy was ~5 mo in HER2 IHC 0 and ~8 mo in HER2-low and HER2 ISH-; disease progression was reported in 52.4%/62.3%/50% pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this population of HR+ tumors, the proportion of HER2 IHC 0 and HER2-low groups was similar. Time to advance relapse and the distribution of distant metastases were similar among the groups. The most common first- and second-line therapy was the ET/BT combination, with AI/CDKi and FUL/CDKi, respectively. Table 1Location of metastatic lesionsIHC 0HER2-lowISH- non IHCN=120 N (%)N=98 N (%)N=11 N (%)Bone74 (61.7)55 (56.1)6 (54.5)Liver36 (30.0)37 (37.8)3 (27.3)Lung27 (22.5)21 (21.4)5 (45.5)Lymph Node27 (22.5)21 (21.4)2 (18.2)Soft Tissue6 (5.0)11 (11.2)0CNS3 (2.5)4 (4.1)0Other43 (35.8)31 (31.6)5 (45.5) Citation Format: Isabel Álvarez, Angel Guerrero, Sara López-Tarruella, Purificación Martínez, Marta Mori, Catalina Falo, Silvia Antolín, César A Rodríguez, Mireia Margeli, Isabel Garau, Ariadna Tibau, Diana Moreno, Josefina Cruz, María José Echarri, Antonio Antón, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, María José Escudero, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Carlos Jara. Characteristics of HR+/HER2- patients with recurrent disease by HER2 expression from a prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-24.

Background: The RegistEM study will provide prospective data from advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts). Understanding the real distribution of BC subtypes is its primary objective. A new nomenclature has been proposed for those cases with HER2 1+ or 2+ by immunohistochemistry and negative in situ hybridization, HER2-low BC. In clinical practice, these tumors are reported as HER2 negative. Methods: This is a non-interventional study that will enroll approximately 1,867 pts with ABC diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2019, either after recurrence or as 1st diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. Biological samples (primary and/or metastatic tumor lesions, and blood) collection is part of its procedures. In this analysis (cut-off date 01/April/2020, database ongoing), we describe the characteristics of pts with Triple Negative (TN) subtype and HER2-low expression (as mentioned above). Biomarkers, including HER2, were determined in either primary tumor (PT), M1 or in both, PT and M1. Results: This subset of pts make up 37.4% (n=49) of TN pts considered for this analysis (n=131). Their distribution within the three groups (PT, M1 and PT/M1), was 46.9% (n=23), 42.9% (n=21) and 10.2% (n=5), respectively. These pts were diagnosed with early BC (EBC) and at recurrence, 91.7% presented distant metastases. Median time from EBC diagnosis until recurrent disease in terms of ABC was 29.8 months (mo), with the majority of pts recurring at >12 mo (95.9%), similar to the whole TN subset. Most pts were Caucasian (98%), and at diagnosis of ABC, the median age was 60 years (range 31-84) and 65.3% were postmenopausal. A change of BC subtype was documented in 15/49 (30.6%) pts, with the higher rate in M1 group (52.4%); as opposed to the TN subset, a change to HER2+ disease was reported in 6/15 (40.0%) pts and just after the TN subtype in all cases. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 42.9% pts and any genetic test to assess the hereditary risk was performed in 30.6% pts. Similarly to TN subset, lung (36.7%), lymph nodes and bone (34.7% each) and liver (24.5%) were the most frequent metastatic locations; central nervous system metastases were developed by 14.3% pts. Visceral involvement was present in 66.7% pts, being this rate lower in M1 compared to PT and PT/M1 groups. The most frequent 1st-line therapies were chemotherapy (CT) (44.9%) and CT/biological therapy (BT) (36.7%). Type of CT mainly included capecitabine (36.4%), taxanes (27.3%), eribulin (13.6%) and platinum-based combinations (13.6%). Most pts received CT as monotherapy (86.4%). Bevacizumab (BVZ) was the most frequent BT associated to CT (77.8%), mainly with capecitabine and/or paclitaxel (72.2%). Progressive disease to 1st-line therapy in the whole group was reported in 73.5% pts (higher than in TN subset), with a median time to progression (TTP) of 5.7 mo (range 1.7-15.0); PT was the group with a higher PD rate. A 2nd-line therapy was reported in 63.3% pts. Similarly to 1st-line setting, the most frequent 2nd-line therapies were CT (74.2%) and CT/BT (12.9%) (with BVZ in 75.0% pts). CT in monotherapy was reported in 69.6% pts (capecitabine 31.3%, eribulin 25.0%). Median duration of this line therapy was 3.0 mo (range 0.6-15.8), PD has been reported in 96.8% pts (similar between groups), and 3rd-line therapy in 25/49 (51.0%) pts. Conclusions: In TN/HER2-low ABC pts, lung, lymph nodes and bone were the most frequent metastatic locations. As opposed to TN subset, HER2+ disease is part of the subtype changes reported. Although the main 1st- and 2nd-line therapies were CT and CT/BT, similarly to TN subset, the rate of pts with PD to 1st- and 2nd-line therapies is higher, and also those pts treated in the 3rd-line setting. Citation Format: Carlos Jara, Isabel Álvarez, César A Rodríguez, Purificación Martínez, Raquel Andrés, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Diego Malón, Jose Luis Alonso, Encarna Adrover, María José Echarri, Mireia Margeli, Ariadna Tibau, Judith Ramírez, Silvia Antolín, Ruth Campo, Juan José Miralles, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Sara López-Tarruella, Angel Guerrero-Zotano. Geicam/2014-03 (registem): A prospective registry of advanced breast cancer: A subset of triple negative breast cancer patients with her2 low expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-35.

Background: The RegistEM is a non-interventional cohort study enrolling 1,867 patients (pts) (males or females) with advanced breast cancer diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2019, either after recurrence or as first diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. Triple negative BC (TNBC) is clinically defined based on lack of expression of both estrogen and progesterone receptors, and HER2 overexpression, and constitutes approximately 16% of BC cases. It is a particularly proliferative and aggressive BC subtype characterized by higher rates of relapse, greater metastatic potential, and shorter overall survival compared with other BC subtypes. Recent studies have shown hormone receptor status can change from the primary (P) to the recurrence tumor (M) in a proportion of cases, inducing a switch to TNBC in the recurrence, while other remains TNBC both in the P and M setting. This feature might impact survival and treatment options. Methods: We selected TNBC pts from the RegistEM study with ctDNA plasma samples available from the relapse. TNBC pts were classified into 2 groups according to clinical subtype (CS): 1) CS-converted (CS-C), with a discordant phenotype (TN subtype in M but not in P); and 2) CS-non-converted (CS-NC), with TN phenotype in P and M. To compare the mutation profiles of the 2 groups, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using the AVENIO Expanded ctDNA Analysis Kit (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc; 77 genes; SNPs, indels, fusions and CNVs). Genomics alterations at individual level and grouped by pathway were explored for pathogenic and probably pathogenics variants. Genomics findings were correlated with clinicopathological data and outcomes, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and response to first line chemotherapy treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox regression model were used to analyze PFS, and Fisher’s test to analyze contingency tables. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing. Results: NGS data was available from 32 (17%) TNBC pts; 22 (69%) pts CS-NC and 10 (31%) CS-C. The time from diagnosis to relapse was 29.2 months (m) for CS-NC and 60.2m for CS-C (HR=4.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.59-14.59), p=0.0055; adjusted for confounders: menopausal status, grade, stage). In the metastatic setting, CS-NC had similar PFS than CS-C (8.3m CS-C vs 5.3m CS-NC; HR=1.63, 95% CI (0.71-3.72), p=0.2442). A median of 3 genomic alterations were found, similar in both groups. The most frequent somatic alterations were TP53 (50%), MAP2K1 (25%) and APC (25%). CS-C were enriched for MAP2K1 (60% vs. 9% in CS-NC; p=0.0243). No single genomic alteration was associated with outcome. Forty-percent of tumors harbored at least 1 mutation in PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (PIK3CA, PIK3R1, AKT1, AKT2, PTEN or MTOR genes), with similar incidence between CS-NC and CS-C. Pts with an altered PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway had poor PFS (3.9m mutant vs 6.7m wild-type (WT); HR=3.02, 95% CI (1.4-6.56), p=0.0033) and a trend to worse response (complete or parcial response and stable disease: 23% mutant vs 77% WT, p=0.1581). CS-C tumors presented an altered MAPK-ERK pathway (mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, MAP2K1 or RAF1 genes) more frequently in comparison to CS-NC (60% vs 23%, p=0.0557), with no differences in response or PFS. Finally tumors with a high mutation allele frequency (≥mean) showed poor PFS (HR=3.64, 95% CI (1.52-8.75), p=0.0038). Conclusion: Analysis of ctDNA reveals diverse mutational spectrum in metastatic TNBC, suggesting that the presence of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway alterations associates with worse outcome and poor response to standard therapies. The clinical subtype conversions from luminal primary tumor are enriched in MAPK-ERK pathway alterations. Citation Format: Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Carlos Jara, Sara López-Tarruella, César A Rodríguez, Encarna Adrover, Catalina Falo, Purificación Martínez, Silvia Antolín, Mireia Margeli, Josefina Cruz, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Vega Iranzo, César Gómez-Raposo, Jose Juan Illarramendi, Diego Malón, Jose Luis Alonso, Antonio Antón, Raquel Andrés, Jesús Herranz, Susana Bezares, Rosalía Caballero, Isabel Álvarez, Federico Rojo. Mutational profile from circulating tumor DNA in triple negative breast cancer: Results from the prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-22.

Background: Approximately 40% of patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) recur after standard treatment, while the remaining 60% experience long-term disease-free survival (DFS). There are currently no clinical tests to assess the risk of recurrence in TNBC patients. We previously developed and validated an MHCII Immune Activation assay, which measures a gene expression signature that includes the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) pathway genes and markers of activated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The MHCII Immune Activation assay was recently shown to accurately assess the risk of recurrence in Basal-like TNBC patients using FFPE tissues from an institutional cohort. A limitation of the previous study is that the patients’ treatment regimens in the institutional cohort were heterogeneous. The goal of this study was to determine if the MHCII Immune Activation assay can accurately assess the DFS in Basal-like TNBC patients who received uniform chemotherapy regimens in the context of a randomized clinical trial. Methods: The MHCII Immune Activation assay was applied to RNA isolated from 60 Basal-like TNBC FFPE specimens from the GEICAM/9906 clinical trial, a multicenter randomized phase III study evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive operable BC patients. Thirty nine (65%) of the patients were treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC), and 21 (35%) patients received FEC followed by paclitaxel (FEC-P) (median follow-up 9.7 years). The MHCII Immune Activation Score was calculated from the assay using methods described previously, and patients were categorized into a High Risk of Recurrence (High ROR) group using pre-specified thresholds. The association between the MHCII Immune Activation Score and DFS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and cox proportional hazards models. Results: Across both arms, 32/60 (53.3%) patients were classified into the High ROR group based on their Low MHCII Immune Activation Scores. Patients in the High ROR group had significantly shorter DFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.9 (CI95%:1.27-6.66), p-value=0.0081). Cox proportional hazard regression of the log10 transformed MHCII Immune Activation Score confirmed that MHCII Immune Activation Score is significantly associated with DFS (Wald Test p=0.0127). In the FEC arm, there were 22/39 (56.41%) patients classified into the High ROR group (Low MHCII Immune Activation Score). Patients in the High ROR group in the FEC arm showed a trend toward shorter DFS (HR=1.99 (CI95%:0.74-5.31)), but it was not significant (p-value=0.1595). In the FEC-P arm, there were 10/21 (47.62%) patients classified into the High ROR group (Low MHCII Immune Activation Score). Patients in the High ROR group in the FEC-P arm had significantly shorter DFS (HR=6.28 (CI95%:1.28-30.73), p-value=0.0111). Larger cohorts will be needed to confirm if the association between DFS and MHCII Immune Activation Score is stronger when patients are treated with chemotherapy regimens that include paclitaxel. Conclusions: The MHCII Immune Activation assay can be applied to RNA from FFPE tumor specimens to assess risk of recurrence in TNBC patients. The MHCII Immune Activation Score is associated with risk of recurrence in TNBC patients treated with uniform adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Citation Format: Miguel Martín, Katherine L Updike, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Lourdes Calvo, Jesús Herranz, Nuria Martín, Philip S Bernard, Katherine E Varley. The MHCII immune activation assay is prognostic for disease free survival in basal-like TNBC breast cancer patients in the GEICAM/9906 clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-09.

Purpose: The increase in the prevalence "long-term cancer survivor” (LCS) patients is expected to increase the cost of LCS care. The aim of this study was to obtain information that would allow to optimise the current model of health management in Spain to adapt it to one of efficient LCS patient care. Methods: This qualitative study was carried out using Delphi methodology. An advisory committee defined the criteria for participation, select the panel of experts, prepare the questionnaire, interpret the results and draft the final report. Results: 232 people took part in the study (48 oncologists). Absolute consensus was reached in three of the proposed sections: oncological epidemiology, training of health professionals and ICT functions. Conclusion: The role of primary care in the clinical management of LCS patients needs to be upgraded, coordination with the oncologist and hospital care is essential. The funding model needs to be adapted to determine the funding conditions for new drugs and technologies, Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This project was funded by AZ. The funding party did not influence the opinion of the authors. All the authors have accepted the participation as advisers of the ASISTO group and give their consent for the publication of the document

PurposeCentral venous catheters (CVCs) have become common practice in oncology. Besides their benefits, as an invasive procedure, several complications are associated with them. Catheter associated thrombosis (CAT) is one of the most relevant due to their impact in quality of life and mortality, but the prothrombotic risk factors implied have been poorly assessed. The aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) associated to catheter use in patients with solid tumors. Secondary endpoints are to describe the population using CVCs and to evaluate potential risk factors of CAT. MethodsPatients diagnosed of solid tumors assisted at a tertiary level hospital between 2016 and 2019, and using CVCs were included.Results455 patients were enrolled. The incidence of CAT was 5.49% (25) in the whole population. 5.05% (23) was associated with PICC while 0.44% (2) was due to PORT use. Among the factors included in the univariate and multivariate regression models, age ≥50 years and PORT use were identified as protective factors related to the development of CAT.ConclusionCVCs remains a safe approach for the delivering of treatments in patients with solid tumors. Age ≤50 and use of PICC are risk factors for developing CAT. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify additional risk factors of CAT.

GEICAM/2006–10 compared anastrozole (A) versus fulvestrant plus anastrozole (A + F) to test the hypothesis of whether a complete oestrogen blockade is superior to aromatase inhibitors alone in breast cancer patients receiving hormone adjuvant therapy. Multicenter, open label, phase III study. HR+/HER2− EBC postmenopausal patients were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant A (5 years [year]) or A + F (A plus F 250 mg/4 weeks for 3 year followed by 2 year of A). Stratification factors: prior chemotherapy (yes/no); number of positive lymph nodes (0/1–3/≥ 4); HR status (both positive/one positive) and site. Primary objective: disease-free survival (DFS). Planned sample size: 2852 patients. The study has an early stop due to the financer decision with 870 patients (437 randomized to A and 433 to A + F). Patient characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow-up of 6.24y and 111 DFS events (62 in A and 49 in A + F) the Hazard Ratio for DFS (combination vs. anastrozole) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.58–1.22; p = 0.352). The proportion of patients disease-free in arms A and A + F at 5 year and 7 year were 90.8% versus 91% and 83.6% versus 86.7%, respectively. Most relevant G2-4 toxicities (≥ 5% in either arm) with A versus A + F were joint pain (14.7%; 13.7%), fatigue (2.5%; 7.2%), bone pain (3%; 6.5%), hot flushes (3.5%; 5%) and muscle pain (2.8%; 5.1%). The GEICAM/2006–10 study did not show a statistically significant increase in DFS by adding adjuvant F to A, though no firm conclusions can be drawn because of the limited sample size due to the early stop of the trial. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00543127.

INTRODUCTION: Although large randomized trials assessing the benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer have clearly demonstrated a significant improvement in long-term survival, it is necessary to know the impact of the use of trastuzumab adjuvant in the real life population, which includes patients frequently excluded from clinical trials, such as those with very small tumors without node involvement, or advanced age. The objective of this study is to describe the outcomes of women who received adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2+ cáncer since it was approved in 2006, compared with a previous cohort of HER2+ patients not treated with trastuzumab in 7 Spanish centers. METHODS: Women with newly diagnosed stage I-III, HER2+ breast cancer, between 1997 and 2015 were included in the study. Two cohorts were considered: The No-Trastuzumab cohort (No-T), between 1997 and 2005, and the Trastuzumab cohort (T) with trastuzumab-treated women between 2006 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate DFS and OS. Additionally, cohorts were analyzed by pathologic tumour size, lymph node involvement and hormonal receptor status to stratify outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 2134 patients were identified. In 164 cases, data were insufficient or the follow-up incomplete. Therefore, the final analysis included 1970 patients, of whom 539 belong to the "No-T" cohort and 1431 to the "T" cohort. The median follow-up was 81 months. Median age: 53 years [22-98]. A total of 699 patients had T1 tumors [43% in the "No-T" cohort vs 33% in the "T" cohort]. 55% of the cases were N0 [58% and 54% in the "No-T" and "T" cohorts respectively]. The status of the hormonal receptors was well balanced between groups [36% ER negative in both]. Regarding the type of adjuvant treatment administered, in the "T" cohort more patients received adjuvant chemotherapy [65% vs 97%] and also in the “T” group combinations of taxanes and anthracyclines were more frequent [14% vs 72%]. The proportion of adjuvant endocrine therapy was similar in both groups [37% vs 34%]. In the “T” cohort, median Disease Free Survival (DFS) was not-reached, compared with 149 months in the “No-T” group. 5-year DFS was 83% vs 65% respectively [p CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant treatment with Trastuzumab under conditions of real clinical practice in HER2+ early breast cancer, shows a highly significant benefit in terms of DFS and OS, regardless of the stage of the disease or other clinical variables. A very important benefit was reached in patients with small tumors, node-negative disease, or both conditions (T1N0). The benefit was also obtained regardless of the expression of hormonal receptors. Citation Format: Rodriguez CA, Garcia-Gomez J, Ribelles N, Gavila J, Pernas S, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Urrutikoetxea A, Pernaut C, Lopez A, Garcia-Mata J. Impact of the adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancer in the real-world setting. Analysis of two cohorts (1997-2005/2006-2015) in 1970 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-04.

Background: EndoPredict (EPclin) is a validated prognostic test combining expression of 12 cancer-related genes for breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2-negative disease who received 5 years of endocrine therapy (Buus et al., 2017; Dubsky et al. 2012) and for women who received chemotherapy (Martin et al., 2014). Here, we determine the EPclin and 10-year distant recurrence free interval (DRFI) rates for patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy (ET+C) or endocrine therapy alone (ET) using data from five large clinical trials. Methods: A total of 3746 women with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease were included in this analysis. 2630 patients received 5 years of ET alone (ABCSG-6/8, TransATAC) and 1116 patients received ET+C (GEICAM 2003-02/9906). EPclin incorporates tumor size and nodal status and accounts for different EPClin scores between ET+C and ET alone cohorts. The primary objective was to evaluate the 10-year DRFI rates as a continuous function of EPclin separately for patients in ET+C and ET. Secondary objectives included assessing the difference in the prognostic ability of EPclin between ET+C and ET overall (years 0-10) and for specific follow-up periods (years 0-5 and years 5-10). The primary endpoint was DRFI and the secondary endpoint was breast cancer free interval (BCFI). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate 10-year DRFI rates and to assess the prognostic information provided by EPclin. Results: All of the women on ET alone and 49% of those on ET+C were postmenopausal. Women who received ET+C had more node positive disease, more poorly differentiated tumours, and higher EPclin scores than those who received ET alone. Women who received ET+C had significantly smaller increases in 10-year DRFI rates with increasing EPclin score than those receiving ET alone (Table). EPclin was highly prognostic for DRFI in all women who received ET alone (HR=2.79 (2.49-3.13), P Conclusion: In our results from a non-randomized analysis, we observed significantly smaller increases in 10-year DRFI rates with increasing EPclin scores for women who received ET+C compared to those who received ET alone. Our indirect comparisons suggest that a high EPclin score can predict chemotherapy benefit in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease. 10-year DRFI risks (%) (95% CI) according to EPclin score for patients who received ET+C versus ET alone. ET+CETEPclin10-year DR risk (%)10-year DR risk (%)11.1% (0.5-1.7)1.0% (0.6-1.4)22.5% (1.5-3.5)2.8% (2.1-3.5)35.7% (4.1-7.2)7.6% (6.4-8.8)412.4% (10.1-14.6)19.8% (17.6-22.0)525.8% (22.0-29.5)46.1% (40.2-51.4) Citation Format: Sestak I, Martin M, Dubsky P, Rojo F, Cuzick J, Filipits M, Ruiz A, Buus R, Hlauschek D, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Dowsett M, Gnant M. Prediction of distant recurrence by EndoPredict in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy (ET+C) or endocrine therapy alone (ET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-04.

24 p.-10 fig.-3 tab., D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) is an enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of D-amino acids generating H2O2. The enzymatic chimera formed by DAAO bound to the choline-binding domain of N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (CLytA) induces cytotoxicity in several pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma and glioblastoma cell models. In the current work, we determined whether the effect of CLytA-DAAO immobilized in magnetic nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, and alginate capsules offered some advantages as compared to the free CLytA-DAAO. Results indicate that the immobilization of CLytA-DAAO in magnetic nanoparticles increases the stability of the enzyme, extending its time of action. Besides, we compared the effect induced by CLytA-DAAO with the direct addition of hydrogen peroxide, demonstrating that the progressive generation of reactive oxygen species by CLytA-DAAO is more effective in inducing cytotoxicity than the direct addition of H2O2. Furthermore, a pilot study has been initiated in biopsies obtained from pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma and glioblastoma patients to evaluate the expression of the main genes involved in resistance to CLytA-DAAO cytotoxicity. Based on our findings, we propose that CLytA-DAAO immobilized in magnetic nanoparticles could be effective in a high percentage of patients and, therefore, be used as an anti-cancer therapy for pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma and glioblastoma., This research was funded by Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (FISABIO), grant number UGP-19-063, and co-supported by PRECIPITA crowdfunding platform from Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT) and donations from Association of women affected by breast cancer in Elche and the region (AMACMEC) to M.S., Miguel Servet Program from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP19/00095) to C.d.J.R. and grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, grant numbers BIO2013-47684-R and BIO2016-79323-R, and the RETICS-FEDER RICET, RD16/0027/0010, to J.M.S. The CIBER of Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES) is an initiative of the Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Spanish National Research Council (CSIC Grant 201820I132).

Background Young oncologists are at particular risk of professional burnout, and this could have a significant impact on their health and care of their patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced rapid changes in professionals' jobs and training, with the consequent physical and psychological effects. We aimed to characterize burnout levels and determinants in young oncologists, and the effects of the pandemic on their training and health. Methods Two online surveys were conducted among oncology residents and young oncology specialists in Spain. The first addressed professional burnout and its determinants before the COVID-19 pandemic, while the second analyzed the impact of the pandemic on health care organization, training, and physical and psychological health in the same population. Results In total, 243 respondents completed the first survey, and 263 the second; 25.1% reported significant levels of professional burnout. Burnout was more common among medical oncology residents (28.2%), mainly in their second year of training. It was significantly associated with a poor work–life balance, inadequate vacation time, and the burnout score. Nearly three-quarters of respondents (72%) were reassigned to COVID-19 care and 84.3% of residents missed part of their training rotations. Overall, 17.2% of this population reported that they had contracted COVID-19, 37.3% had scores indicating anxiety, and 30.4% moderate to severe depression. Almost a quarter of young oncologists (23.3%) had doubts about their medical vocation. Conclusions Burnout affects a considerable number of young oncologists. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on causes of burnout, making it even more necessary to periodically monitor it to define appropriate detection and prevention strategies., Highlights • Oncologists are susceptible to burnout. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted health care workers' mental health. • This study analyzes professional burnout and its determinants as well as the impact of COVID-19 among young oncologists. • Ensuring specialized training and preventing burnout are essential to ensure quality medical oncology care in the future.

Background Studies evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on public healthcare systems are limited, particularly in cancer management. As no such studies have been carried out in Spain, our objective is to describe and quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients in Spanish hospitals during the first wave of the pandemic. Materials and methods This retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study collected information from hospital departments treating oncology patients. An electronic questionnaire comparing outcomes and management of oncohematological patients for the March-June 2019 and March-June 2020 periods was used. Results Information from 78 departments (36 tertiary hospitals) was analyzed. Forty-four departments implemented adapted protocols during March 2020. Most of these (n = 38/44; 86.4%) carried out COVID-19 triage, while 26 of 44 (59.1%) carried out onsite polymerase chain reaction tests for clinically suspected cases. A shift from in-person to telephone visits was observed in 43 of 44 (97.7%) departments. Comparing the March-June 2019 and March-June 2020 periods, the number of new patients decreased by 20.8% (from 160.2 to 126.4). Decreases were also seen in the mean number of total (2858.2 versus 1686.1) and cancer (465.5 versus 367.2) biopsies, as well as the mean number of bone marrow biopsies (30.5 versus 18.6). Concerning the number of patients visiting specific cancer care departments, a decrease from 2019 to 2020 was seen for mean number of chemotherapy treatments (712.7 versus 643.8) and radiation therapy (2169.9 versus 2139.9). Finally, a reduction from 2019 to 2020 of 12.9% (from 8.6 to 7.4) in the mean number of patients included in clinical trials was noted. Conclusions This study provides the first comprehensive data concerning the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care in Spain. The pandemic caused a 20.8% decrease in newly diagnosed patients, which may impact future outcomes. Measures must be taken to ensure cancer management receives priority in times of healthcare emergencies., Highlights • The number of new cancer patients decreased 20.8% • Assistance protocols were adapted • Inclusion in clinical trials decreased by 12.9%

Cancer during pregnancy is a challenge for multi- and interdisciplinary collaboration due to the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, the need for an integrated harmonization of medical action for the pregnant patient and the embryo or foetus and the characteristics of each gestational period, which will determine the protocol to be proposed and its limitations. For this reason, a group of experts appointed by participating scientific societies, which includes the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica—SEOM), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (Asociación Española de Cirujanos—AEC), the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia—SEGO), the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular—SEMNIM), the Spanish Society of Oncological Radiotherapy (Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica—SEOR) and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica—SERAM), have worked together to establish consensus recommendations that allow the harmonization of management and ultimately the optimization of the healthcare of pregnant patients with cancer. When cancer is detected in a pregnant woman, the week of gestation in which the diagnosis is made must be considered, as well as the characteristics of the tumour. It is strongly recommended that a multidisciplinary team assesses the situation and guides the patient and her family during the informing, diagnosis and treatment process. Likewise, the foetus should be monitored and managed by specialized obstetricians who are part of a multidisciplinary cancer committee.

Background: The ever-growing complexity of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), with new antineoplastic drugs and anticoagulants, distinctive characteristics, and decisions with low levels of evidence, justifies this registry. Method: TESEO is a prospective registry promoted by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology to which 34 centers contribute cases. It seeks to provide an epidemiological description of CAT in Spain. Results: Participants (N=939) with CAT diagnosed between July 2018 and December 2019 were recruited. Most subjects had advanced colon (21.4%), non-small cell lung (19.2%), and breast (11.1%) cancers, treated with dual-agent chemotherapy (28.4%), monochemotherapy (14.4%), or immune checkpoint inhibitors (3.6%). Half (51%) were unsuspected events, albeit only 57.1% were truly asymptomatic. Pulmonary embolism (PE) was recorded in 571 (58.3%); in 120/571 (21.0%), there was a concurrent deep venous thromboembolism (VTE). Most initially received low molecular weight heparin (89.7%). Suspected and unsuspected VTE had an OS rate of 9.9 (95% CI, 7.3-non-computable) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.6-non-computable) (p=0.00038). Six-month survival was 80.9%, 55.9%, and 55.5% for unsuspected PE, unsuspected PE admitted for another reason, and suspected PE, respectively (p

Elevated markers of host inflammation, a hallmark of cancer, have been associated with worse outcomes in several solid tumors. Here, we explore the prognostic role of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), across different tumor subtypes, in patients with early breast cancer. This was a retrospective analysis of 1246 patients with lymph node-positive, operable early breast cancer enrolled in the GEICAM/9906 trial, a multicenter randomized phase 3 study evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy. dNLR was calculated as the ratio of neutrophils and the difference between total leukocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood before chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were explored using a Cox proportional hazard analysis. The analysis comprised 1243 (99.8%) patients with dNLR data, with a median follow-up of 10 years. Data on intrinsic subtypes were available from 818 (66%) patients (luminal A 34%, luminal B 32%, HER2-enriched 21% and basal-like 9%). Median dNLR was 1.35 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.08–1.71]. In the whole population, dNLR was not prognostic after adjustment for clinico-pathological factors. However, dNLR ≥ 1.35 was independently associated with worse DFS in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2+ population (HR 2.86; p = 0.038) and in patients with one to three lymph node metastases (HR 1.32, p = 0.032). There was a non-significant association with worse DFS in non-luminal and in HER2-enriched tumors (HR 1.40, p = 0.085 and HR 1.53, p = 0.067). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment arm and dNLR. Elevated dNLR appears to be an adverse prognostic factor in hormone receptor-negative early breast cancer. EudraCT: 2005-003108-12 (retrospectively registered 28/06/2005). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129922 (retrospectively registered 10/08/2005). Results of this study were presented in part at the 2016 ESMO conference October 7–11, 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark (oral presentation).

Background: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have a greater risk of relapse than non-TNBC. New therapeutic approaches are needed for these patients (pts). CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 is a multinational, randomized phase III trial exploring adjuvant capecitabine (X) after completion of standard treatment in early TNBC pts. Materials and Methods: Patients with operable, node-positive (or node-negative with tumor size ≥ 1 cm), centrally confirmed hormone receptor-negative, HER2-negative early BC, who had received 6–8 cycles (cy) of standard anthracycline and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy or 4 cy of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (for node-negative disease) in the (neo)adjuvant setting, were eligible. Patients were randomized to either 8 cy of X (1,000 mg/m2 bid, days 1–14, every 3 weeks) or observation. Stratification factors included center, prior taxane-based therapy, number of involved axillary lymph nodes and phenotype (basal vs non-basal, according to cytokeratins 5/6 and/or EGFR positivity). The primary objective was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between both treatment arms, and secondary objectives included the comparison in terms of 5-year DFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. Assuming a 30% risk reduction in DFS rate at 5 years (from 64.7% to 73.7%, hazard ratio 0.70) with 80% power and a two-tailed log-rank test at 0.05, 834 evaluable pts were needed. 876 pts had to be finally enrolled considering a drop-out rate of 5%. Results: Recruitment of 876 pts from 8 countries was completed in September 2011. Median age was 49 years; 68.5% of pts were postmenopausal, 55.5% were lymph node negative, 71.7% had a basal phenotype, 67.5% received chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range 0.0 to 11.1). DFS was not significantly prolonged with X vs observation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63 to 1.06; P=0.1353). Five-year DFS was 79.6% (95% CI, 75.8% to 83.4%) with X and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.7% to 80.9%) with observation. OS was not statistically different between treatment arms (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.28; P=0.6228). In subgroup analysis for DFS, we found no statistically significant interaction between X treatment and different subgroups, with the exception of basal vs non-basal phenotypes (basal HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.32, P=0.8620; non-basal HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.86, P=0.0101; interaction P=0.0357). Similar results were found for OS (basal HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.77, P=0.3684; non-basal HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.91, P=0.0205; interaction P=0.0155). 75.2% of pts completed 8 cy of X, with a median relative dose intensity of 86.3%. Grade (G) 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 40.4% of pts in X arm. In 9.6% of pts the AEs were related with X. Hand-foot syndrome was the most common AE in X arm (G3 on 18.8% of pts). Conclusions: In our study, the addition of adjuvant X after standard (neo) adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant improvement of DFS or OS compared to observation in pts with early TNBC. However, in a subgroup analysis a significant DFS and OS improvement was observed with X in pts with non-basal phenotype. Sponsor: CIBOMA. Citation Format: Martín M, Barrios CH, Torrecillas L, Ruiz-Borrego M, Bines J, Segalla J, Ruiz A, García-Sáenz JA, Torres R, de la Haba J, García E, Gómez HL, Llombart A, Rodríguez de la Borbolla M, Baena JM, Barnadas A, Calvo L, Pérez-Michel L, Ramos M, Castellanos J, Rodríguez-Lescure A, Cárdenas J, Vinholes J, Martínez de Dueñas E, Godes MJ, Seguí MA, Antón A, López-Álvarez P, Moncayo J, Amorim G, Villar E, Reyes S, Sampaio C, Cardemil B, Escudero MJ, Bezares S, Carrasco E, Lluch A. Efficacy results from CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 study: A randomized phase III trial assessing adjuvant capecitabine after standard chemotherapy for patients with early triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-04.

Background: There is limited prospective data for advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts), unresectable locally or metastatic, treated as per clinical practice. RegistEM, an academic study conducted by a non-profit collaborative group, will provide epidemiological, pathological and clinical data as per routine practice, including treatments for different disease settings, collected from pts’ medical records. Understanding the real distribution of BC subtypes is the primary objective. This is a non-interventional cohort study that will enroll approximately 1,867 pts with advanced disease diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2019, either after recurrence or as first diagnosis (de novo), in 38 Spanish sites representative of the whole country geography and whose investigators are GEICAM members. Biological samples (primary and/or metastatic tumor tissue, and blood) collection is part of study procedures. Methods: In this analysis we describe the characteristics of 229 pts with HR+/HER2- BC documented in a metastatic tumor lesion after disease recurrence and who received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). This subpopulation has been identify as an interesting group from a clinical perspective for detailed analysis. Three subgroups of pts have been considered for this analysis based on their disease-free interval (DFI) since the diagnosis of early disease: 50% pts recurring at ≥84 mo and only 1.3% pts at ≤12 mo. Most pts were Caucasian (99.1%) and female (99.6%), and at ABC diagnosis, 75.5% were postmenopausal and their median age was 59 years (33-88); median age was higher in pts with DFI ≥60 mo. Family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer was reported in 31.4% pts, with a slightly higher percentage in pts with DFI 50% pts recurred at ≥84 mo. Bone is the most frequent metastatic location in all DFI subgroups. The most common 1st- and 2nd-line therapies were the ET/BT combination, with AI/CDKi and FUL/CDKi, respectively. The median TTP to 1st-line therapy was superior in pts with DFI ≥60 mo. Citation Format: Isabel Alvarez, Angel Guerrero- Zotano, Sara López-Tarruella, Purificación Martínez, Marta Mori, Catalina Falo, Silvia Antolin, Cesar A. Rodríguez, Mireia Margeli, Isabel Garau, Ariadna Tibau, Diana Moreno, Josefina Cruz, M. Jose Echarri, Juan Lao, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Juan Jose Miralles, Susana Bezares, Federico Rojo, Carlos Jara. Characteristics of HR+/HER2- patients with recurrent disease from a prospective registry of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-08.

GEICAM/2006-10 compared anastrozole (A) versus fulvestrant plus anastrozole (A + F) to test the hypothesis of whether a complete oestrogen blockade is superior to aromatase inhibitors alone in breast cancer patients receiving hormone adjuvant therapy.Multicenter, open label, phase III study. HR+/HER2- EBC postmenopausal patients were randomized 1:1 to adjuvant A (5 years [year]) or A + F (A plus F 250 mg/4 weeks for 3 year followed by 2 year of A). Stratification factors: prior chemotherapy (yes/no); number of positive lymph nodes (0/1-3/≥ 4); HR status (both positive/one positive) and site.disease-free survival (DFS). Planned sample size: 2852 patients.The study has an early stop due to the financer decision with 870 patients (437 randomized to A and 433 to A + F). Patient characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow-up of 6.24y and 111 DFS events (62 in A and 49 in A + F) the Hazard Ratio for DFS (combination vs. anastrozole) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.58-1.22; p = 0.352). The proportion of patients disease-free in arms A and A + F at 5 year and 7 year were 90.8% versus 91% and 83.6% versus 86.7%, respectively. Most relevant G2-4 toxicities (≥ 5% in either arm) with A versus A + F were joint pain (14.7%; 13.7%), fatigue (2.5%; 7.2%), bone pain (3%; 6.5%), hot flushes (3.5%; 5%) and muscle pain (2.8%; 5.1%).The GEICAM/2006-10 study did not show a statistically significant increase in DFS by adding adjuvant F to A, though no firm conclusions can be drawn because of the limited sample size due to the early stop of the trial. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00543127.

Purpose EndoPredict (EPclin) is a prognostic test validated to inform decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy alone for patients with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Here, we determine the performance of EPclin for estimating 10-year distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) rates for those who received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) alone compared to those with chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET + C). Methods A total of 3746 women were included in this joint analysis. 2630 patients received 5 years of ET alone (ABCSG-6/8, TransATAC) and 1116 patients received ET + C (GEICAM 2003-02/9906). The primary objective was to evaluate the ability of EPclin to provide an estimate of the 10-year DR rate as a continuous function of EPclin separately for ET alone and ET + C. Cox proportional hazard models were used for these analyses. Results EPclin was highly prognostic for DR in women who received ET alone (HR 2.79 (2.49–3.13), P

Background: The addition of H to chemotherapy improved disease outcome in HER2+ MBC. The combination of H and L with chemotherapy improved event free survival (EFS) in the neo-adjuvant setting but not in the adjuvant setting. However, improved EFS did not translate to overall survival benefit. This international trial (ICORG (CTRIAL-IE) 11-10/NCT01526369) compared the efficacy of TH vs. THL in first line treatment of HER2+ MBC. The primary aim of this study was to assess any benefit for the addition of L to TH in an advanced HER2+ breast cancer patient population. Target accrual was not met due to changes to standard of care mid-study. Methods: Patients (Pts) (n= 75 enrolled, randomized 1:1) received weekly T (80mg/m², for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle) + H (8mg/kg loading dose on cycle 1 day 1 and 4mg/kg every 2 weeks) + L (1,000 mg daily)) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Eligibility criteria included: Female > 18 years, invasive MBC, measurable disease by RECIST criteria V1.1, HER2+ by testing of the primary tumour and if available the biopsied metastatic lesion. No prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease (except one line of hormonal therapy for metastatic disease without H). No recurrence within 12 months (mo) from completion of adjuvant chemotherapy to the development of metastatic disease. No recurrence within 6 mo from completion of adjuvant H to the development of metastatic disease and no prior L treatment. Results: Of the 75 pts enrolled, n=65 (TH n=34, THL n=31) were included in the PFS analysis. Median PFS (95% CI) was numerically higher, but not statistically significant, in THL (24.0 mo (9.5, 34.5)) vs TH (19.3 mo (8.7, 22.7)), HR 0.827, p= 0.601. For OS analysis, n=69 (TH n=35 and THL n=34) were included. 41/69 (59.4%) had no prior therapy. No statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in OS (Median (95% CI)) was observed (TH 53.8 mo (41.8, -) vs. THL 45.6 mo (29.7, -), HR 1.048, p=0.891). Analysis of the safety set (n=70 (TH n= 36, THL n=34)) revealed a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 AEs in THL (61.8%) vs. TH (50%), p=0.322. There were 2 on-treatment fatalities due to adverse events (AEs) in the THL arm, one due to respiratory failure, the other due to central nervous system metastasis. There were no on-treatment fatalities in the TH arm. GI disorders were the most prevalent AE, with the incidence of diarrhea significantly higher in the THL arm (88% vs. 42%, p Citation Format: John Crown, William Jacot, Denis M. Collins, Linda Coate, Anna Saetersdal, M John Kennedy, Catherine Kelly, Blanca Cantos Sanchez De Ibarguen, Raquel Andrés Conejero, Luis Costa, Margarida Brito, Maccon Keane, Pedro Sanchez Rovira, Miguel Martin, Miriam O'Connor, Manuel Ramos Vazquez, Elena Alvarez, Seamus O'Reilly, Johanna Mattson, Laura Jolis Lopez, Alvaro Rodriguez Lescure, Esperanza Blanco, Coralia Bueno Muino, Brian Moulton, Norma O'Donovan, Andres Hernando, Marc Nolan, Imelda Parker, Giuseppe Gullo, Bryan Hennessy. A phase III randomized study of paclitaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H) versus T, H and lapatinib (L) in first line treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT212.

Glioblastomas are highly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy. Currently, there are no effective therapies for this type of tumor. Signaling mechanisms initiated by PDGFR and IGF-1R are important in glioblastoma, and inhibition of the signal transduction pathways initiated by these receptors could be a useful alternative strategy for glioblastoma treatment. We have studied the effects of the PDGFR inhibitor JNJ-10198409 (JNJ) and the IGF-1R inhibitor picropodophyllin (PPP) in glioblastoma cell lines as well as in primary cultures derived from patients affected by this type of tumor. JNJ and PPP treatment blocked PDGFR and IGF-1R signaling respectively and reduced Akt and Erk 1/2 phosphorylation. Both inhibitors diminished cell proliferation, inducing a G2/M block of the cell cycle. Cell death induced by JNJ was caspase-dependent, Annexin-V positive and caused PARP cleavage, especially in T98 cells, suggesting an apoptotic mechanism. However, cell death induced by PPP was not completely inhibited by caspase inhibitors in all cell lines apart from LN-229 cells, indicating a caspase-independent mechanism. Several inhibitors targeted against different cell death pathways could not block this caspase-independent component, which may be a non-programmed necrotic mechanism. Apoptotic arrays performed in T98 and LN-229 cells upon JNJ and PPP treatment revealed that procaspase 3 levels were augmented by both drugs in T98 cells and only by JNJ in LN229-cells. Furthermore, XIAP and survivin levels were much higher in LN-229 cells than in T98 cells, revealing that LN-229 cells are more susceptible to undergo caspase-independent cell death mechanisms. JNJ and PPP combination was more effective than each treatment alone.

Purpose Capecitabine is an active drug in metastatic breast cancer (BC). GEICAM/2003-10 is an adjuvant trial to investigate the integration of capecitabine into a regimen of epirubicin and docetaxel for node-positive early BC. Patients and Methods Patients with operable node-positive BC (T1-3/N1-3) were eligible. After surgery, 1,384 patients were randomly assigned to receive epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC; 90 and 600 mg/m2, respectively, × four cycles), followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2 × four cycles; EC-T) or epirubicin plus docetaxel (ET; 90 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, × four cycles), followed by capecitabine (1,250 mg/m2 twice a day on days 1 to 14, × four cycles; ET-X); all regimens were given every 3 weeks. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival. Secondary end points included safety (with an alopecia-specific study) and overall survival (OS). Results After a median follow-up of 6.6 years and 297 events, 86% of patients who received EC-T and 82% of those who received ET-X were invasive disease free at 5 years (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.64; log-rank P = .03). The OS difference between arms was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.55; log-rank P = .46). The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the EC-T versus ET-X arms were neutropenia (19% v 10%), with 7% febrile neutropenia across arms; fatigue (13% v 11%); diarrhea (3% v 11%); hand-foot syndrome (2% v 20%); mucositis (6% v 5%); vomiting (both, 5%); and myalgia (4.5% v 1%). Incomplete scalp hair recovery was more frequent in the EC-T than ET-X arm (30% v 14%), and patients who received EC-T wore wigs significantly longer than those who received ET-X (8.35 v 6.03 months). Conclusion Invasive disease-free survival, but not OS, was significantly superior for patients with node-positive early BC who received the adjuvant standard schedule EC-T than for those who received the experimental ET-X regimen. Toxicity profiles differed substantially across arms.

Background: Vertical dual blockade with L and T in heavily pretreated HER2+ MBC patients has shown consistent survival gain in a phase III trial (Blackwell KL et al. 2012), justifying an EMA approval for the hormone-negative subgroup. However, there is very limited information about the futility of the combination in clinical practice, mostly in patients progressing also on prior L regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis among patients treated in Spain by compassionate uses for the combination of T-L. The study was approved by the regulatory authorities and ethics committees from the 14 participating centers. Major inclusion criteria were (1) HER2+ MBC; (2) progression on at least one prior line of T for advanced disease; and (3) T-L treatment started between JAN/2005 and DEC/2012. Concomitant endocrine therapy for HR+ patients as well as prior exposure to L was allowed. Chemotherapy combinations were excluded. A total of 111 patients were predefined for the primary outcome: clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. 114 women were included and externally monitored. Results: The median age was 60 years (34 - 89); 64% HR+; 77% visceral disease; 32% CNS disease (37 patients); 47% with ≥3 organs involved. Mean number of prior T lines 4 (range 0-13); 64% previously treated with L. A total of 40 patients (35%) achieved a CBR (95%CI 26–44%); 6 CR, 19 PR and 15 SD lasting >24 weeks. The median time to progression was 3.8 months (95%CI 3.3–5.1) and the median overall survival 21.6 months (95%CI 17.1–27.3). CBR, median TTP and median OS achieved in patients with CNS disease were 32.4% (95%CI 17.3–47.5%), 3.6 (95%CI 2.8–5.9) and 15.4 (95%CI 10.9–27.3) months, respectively. The CBR was independent of L treatment (41.5% L naïve vs. 31.5% L pretreated, p=0.285) and HR status (39% HR- vs. 32.9% HR+, p=0.509). Patients with Conclusions: The combination of T-L seems safe and active in heavily pretreated patients. The combination remains active among patients progressing on prior L. Future research may focus on the ability of endocrine therapy to increase activity among HER2+/HR+ patients. REFERENCES: 1 Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al: Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(21):2585-2592. Citation Format: Joaquin Gavilá, Begoña Bermejo, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Juan Lao Romera, Luis Manso, Joan Brunet, Eva Muñoz, Marta Santisteban, César A Rodríguez, Ana Santaballa, Juan de la Haba, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Jose Ángel García-Saenz, Javier Cortés, Antonio Llombart. TRASTYVERE study: A retrospective analysis of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated in Spain with lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-21.

Purpose. To determine intrinsic breast cancer subtypes represented within categories defined by quantitative hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 expression. Methods. We merged 1,557 cases from three randomized phase III trials into a single data set. These breast tumors were centrally reviewed in each trial for quantitative ER, PR, and HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) stain and by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), with intrinsic subtyping by research-based PAM50 RT-qPCR assay. Results. Among 283 HER2-negative tumors with 10%) expression, only 69 (54%) were HER2-enriched and 55 (43%) were luminal (39 luminal B, 16 luminal A). Quantitative HR expression by RT-qPCR gave similar results. Regardless of methodology, basal-like cases seldom expressed ER/ESR1 or PR/PGR and were associated with the lowest expression level of HER2/ERBB2 relative to other subtypes. Conclusion. Significant discordance remains between clinical assay-defined subsets and intrinsic subtype. For identifying basal-like breast cancer, the optimal HR IHC cut point was

Resumen El ejercicio de una practica clinica basada en la evidencia exige unas competencias basicas para valorar e interpretar la literatura biomedica. En este articulo se revisan los puntos criticos para determinar la calidad de la evidencia global y formular recomendaciones.

Resumen El ejercicio de una practica clinica basada en la evidencia exige unas competencias basicas para valorar e interpretar la literatura biomedica. En este articulo se revisan los puntos criticos para determinar la validez de los resultados de un ensayo clinico, circunscribiendonos al ensayo ACOSOG-Z0011.

Purpose To determine the frequency of breast cancer (BC) patients with hereditary risk features in a wide retrospective cohort of patients in Spain. Methods a retrospective analysis was conducted from 10,638 BC patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2001 in the GEICAM registry ªElAÂ lamo IIIº, dividing them into four groups according to modified ESMO and SEOM hereditary cancer risk criteria: Sporadic breast cancer group (R0); Individual risk group (IR); Familial risk group (FR); Individual and familial risk group (IFR) with both individual and familial risk criteria. Results 7,641 patients were evaluable. Of them, 2,252 patients (29.5%) had at least one hereditary risk criteria, being subclassified in: FR 1.105 (14.5%), IR 970 (12.7%), IFR 177 (2.3%). There was a higher frequency of newly diagnosed metastatic patients in the IR group (5.1% vs 3.2%, p = 0.02). In contrast, in RO were lower proportion of big tumors (> T2) (43.8% vs 47.4%, p = 0.023), nodal involvement (43.4% vs 48.1%, p = 0.004) and lower histological grades (20.9% G3 for the R0 vs 29.8%) when compared to patients with any risk criteria. Conclusions Almost three out of ten BC patients have at least one hereditary risk cancer feature that would warrant further genetic counseling. Patients with hereditary cancer risk seems to be diagnosed with worse prognosis factors

1077 Background: In Spain there is limited prospective data for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (ULABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) treated as per clinical practice. RegistEM study will provide epidemiological, pathological and clinical data, including treatments given for different disease stages. Understanding the real distribution of the different BC subtypes is the primary objective. Methods: This is a non-interventional cohort study enrolling approximately 1,400 pts with advanced disease diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2018, either after recurrence or as first diagnosis, in 38 Spanish sites. Biological samples (primary tumor, metastatic lesions, blood) are currently being collected. In this first analysis, we include 489 pts who met study criteria before October 31, 2017. All data are described in two subgroups: on the most recent tumor lesion or on the primary breast tumor. Results: At first diagnosis, 67.9%, 31.5% and 0.6% of pts had early BC (EBC), MBC and ULABC, respectively. In the total analysis population, median age at diagnosis of advanced disease was 59.6 years, most of pts were white (98.2%), female (99.4%) and postmenopausal (70%). Family history of BC and ovarian cancer was reported in 5.7% pts. In ~390 pts BC clinical subtypes distribution was luminal B(HER2-)-like (~55%), luminal B(HER2+)-like (~16%), luminal A-like or triple negative (TN) (~10% each) and HER2 enriched-like (~8%). Median time to recurrence (years) in EBC pts was: luminal A-like 5.8, luminal B(HER2-)-like 5.1, luminal B(HER2+)-like 3.9, HER2 enriched-like 2.7 and TN 1.7. Bone (59%), visceral (58%) and lymph node (27%) lesions were the most frequent metastatic locations. The two most frequent therapies in first line consisted in: endocrine therapy (ET) (47%) and ET+biological therapy (BT) (29%) for luminal A-like; ET (32%) and ET+BT (32%) for luminal B(HER2-)-like; chemotherapy (CT)+ET+BT (43%) and CT+BT (24%) for luminal B(HER2+)-like; CT+BT (68%) and CT (16%) for HER2 enriched-like; CT (59%) and CT+BT (34%) for TN. Conclusions: These first data confirm that luminal B (HER2-)-like subtype is the most predominant in MBC.

Background: Several prognostic multigene tests are available for the management of breast cancer patients, but so far there is little data available directly comparing the classification performance of different breast cancer tests in the same patient cohort. Here, we compared the prognostic performance of two second generation multigene tests in ER+/HER2- early node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy. Patients and methods: The EndoPredict (EP) score and two research laboratory-based versions of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR based on subtype [ROR-S] and based on subtype and proliferation [ROR-P]) score were compared in 536 ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients who participated in the GEICAM/ 9906 trial. Patients had either been treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel (FEC-P), and endocrine therapy. ROR and EP scores were combined with clinical information to obtain the following hybrid scores as published before: a) ROR-T score (subtype and tumor size), b) ROR-PT score (subtype, proliferation and tumor size) scores, and c) EPclin score (EP Score plus tumor size and nodal status). Each patient was assigned to risk categories according to pre-specified cut-off levels for the scores. The primary endpoint was distant metastasis. Metastasis rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. C-index analysis was used to estimate the performance of the different scores. Results: The PAM50 ROR-S and ROR-P scores, and the EP score were prognostic in patients with ER+/HER2- tumors and consistently identified a low-risk group with a particular good outcome (10 year MFS rate - ROR-S: 81.7%, ROR-P: 82.9% and EP: 89.4%). Combining the molecular signatures with clinical information, improved the prognostic performance of all signatures (10 year MFS rate - ROR-T: 83.4%, ROR-PT: 87.3% and EPclin: 100%). All signatures added prognostic information to common clinical parameters. Among the signatures evaluated only EPclin added a significantly improved prediction of distant metastasis to ROR-T (p < 0.001) and ROR-PT (p < 0.001), which may be due to the feature that EPClin includes a term for node status, but which is not included in any ROR-based model. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PAM50 ROR and EP can be used to reliably predict risk of distant metastasis in node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the molecular signatures in terms of low risk classification. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-11-06.

Background: The EndoPredict (EP) score is an RNA-based multigene test to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence in ER-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Results from two large randomized phase III trials involving endocrine therapy only (n > 1700) demonstrated a prognostic power of the EP score beyond what can be achieved by combining the commonly used clinicopathological parameters (Filipits M, 2011). The performance of the EP in chemotherapy-treated patients has not been evaluated yet. Here, we analyzed the EndoPredict score in node-positive ER+/HER2− BC patients from the GEICAM-9906 trial, treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy. Methods: Patients included in this study participated in the GEICAM/9906 trial and were either treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel (FEC-P) (Martin M, 2008). ESR1 and ERBB2 gene expression were assessed by qRT-PCR in 800 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples out of 1246 patients included in the GEICAM/9906 trial. The EndoPredict score (including eight prognostic genes) was successfully determined in 555 out of the 566 ER+/HER2− patients. Patients were assigned into two categories (high/low), according to the predefined EP cut-off value (Filipits M, 2011). The primary endpoint for the analysis was distant metastasis. Metastasis rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression. Interaction between treatment effects and EP was tested as well. Results: Twenty-five percent of patients (n = 141) were classified as EP-low-risk. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that the metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 92% in the EP-low risk vs. 69% in the EP-high-risk group (absolute difference of 23%, HR 4.4 (2.3–8.4) p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that EP is an independent prognostic parameter after adjustment for age, grade, lymph node status and tumor size. EP was found to be prognostic in pre- (p = 0.0002, HR = 5.5 (2.2–13.6)) and postmenopausal (p = 0.0129, HR = 3.3 (1.3–8.2)) BC patients. There were not statistically significant differences in MFS between treatment arms (FEC vs. FEC-P) neither in the high nor in the low-risk groups. Interaction test between chemotherapy arm and EP score was not significant. Conclusions: The results of this study shows that the EndoPredict score is an independent prognostic parameter in node-positive, ER+/HER2− BC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy. EndoPredict was not found to be predictive of weekly paclitaxel efficacy. Novel predictive biomarkers are needed to identify the small subset of patients with ER+/HER2− tumors that actually benefit from weekly paclitaxel-containing regimens. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-11.