Article 14 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ('UNCRC,' 1989) protects the child's right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, whilst also providing that their parents/guardians have the right to provide direction to support the child's exercise of this right. However, limited research has been undertaken on Article 14 and less still examining the relationship between these two distinct dimensions of the right. The study focuses on the interplay between the two aspects of this provision and how it changes over time, examining children's formation, understanding and expression of their beliefs alongside the ways in which parents/guardians experience and exercise their right and duty to provide direction. Adopting a dyadic research design, individual biographical interviews were conducted with nine parent-child or guardian-child dyads recruited through an Anglican summer programme for children. Biographical interviewing allowed the researcher to identify significant life events and locate specific faith experiences, documenting both how these were understood within the broader context of participants' lives and the extent to which these were affected by the children's evolving capacity over time. The findings indicated that both the parents/guardians and the children in this study felt that religion affected all aspects of their lived experiences. The dyads portrayed both parents/guardians and children as active participants in the co-construction of their individual family faith narrative. Rather than parents/guardians always assuming a particular role in their children's lives, the extent of the direction provided varied depending on the context. Whilst the children generally felt supported by their Christian parents, the parents/guardians all expressed concerns that they were not adequately exercising their right and duty and felt that they were insufficiently balancing the responsibilities detailed in Article 14 of the UNCRC; all wanted to provide religious direction and encourage their children's spiritual development but felt that it was primarily important to respect the child's autonomy in matters of personal conscience. They therefore worried that they had not provided a foundation of faith and feared that their children would abandon their beliefs once they reached adulthood. This was especially true for dyads where only one parent was religious. The children, on the other hand, almost all identified as Christians, and felt they had made this commitment autonomously and without reservation. None expressed any concerns that they would lose or change their beliefs as they got older, indicating a comparison between the children's religious beliefs and their parents'/guardians' perception of those beliefs. A conceptual framework was composed which drew on theories of parents' rights and children's rights. The application of the framework illustrated that, contrary to the assumption that parents/guardians will consistently display either protectionist or liberationist attitudes towards child-rearing, in practice their attitudes vary depending upon the specific decision and context; the style of parenting in moral decision-making tended to differ to the style of parenting concerning participation in religious practices, and parents/guardians adopted protectionist attitudes regarding decisions inside the family home, but were more likely to yield to the child's autonomy regarding decisions at school or at church, for instance. This suggests the need for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between parents/guardians and children with regards to the child's right to freedom of conscience and parents' or guardians' right to guide and provide direction.