Search

Background: There has been significant improvement in treating metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) over the past 2 decades. The aim of this study is to describe the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Qatar. This study focuses on the objective response rate (ORR) and reported adverse drug events (ADEs) of TKIs used for the management of patients with mNSCLC. Methods: This is a descriptive retrospective cohort study. All non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations who received TKIs between 2015 and 2019 in Qatar were included. The TKIs used during this period include EGFR inhibitors such as afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib and ALK inhibitors such as alectinib and crizotinib. The response on each TKI was identified by reporting the ORR (as the sum of the complete response [CR] and the partial response [PR]), in addition stable disease (SD) and disease progression (DP) were reported. While ADEs were reported using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE). Results: A total of 63 patients were included, of which 36 cases (57.1%) expressed EGFR mutation, and 27 patients (42.9%) expressed ALK rearrangement. The ORR in EGFR inhibitors was as follows: osimertinib 40%, gefitinib 33%, afatinib 22%, and erlotinib 18%. However, the response to the ALK-targeted therapy was 43% with alectinib and 40% with crizotinib. A total of 112 ADEs were reported. They were distributed as 63.4% (71 of 112) with the anti-EGFR and 36.6% (41 of 112) ADEs with the ALK inhibitors. In the anti-EGFR group, the most common types of ADEs were dermatological toxicity 30%, whereas, in the anti-ALK group, gastrointestinal toxicity was the most common (29%). Conclusions: The EGFR-targeted and ALK-targeted therapies appear to have acceptable clinical response rate and safety profile in our population. Close and frequent monitoring of adverse events is advised to ensure a good quality of life and prevent serious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osimertinib is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, limited research has compared its clinical effectiveness with second-generation (2nd G) EGFR-TKIs. Materials and methods: This study recruited patients diagnosed with stage IIIb-IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with either 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib and dacomitinib) or osimertinib between April 2020 and April 2023. Results: The final analysis included 168 patients, of whom 113 received 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib or dacomitinib) and 55 received osimertinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between 2nd G EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib (del 19: 17.6 months; L858R: 20.0 months vs. 28.3 months, p = 0.081). In patients with the EGFR exon 19 deletion, osimertinib conferred a longer median PFS (28.3 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.118) and time to treatment failure (30.2 vs. 22.7 months, p = 0.722) than 2nd G EGFR-TKIs. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In patients with with the EGFR exon 19 deletion and central nervous system metastasis, the median PFS did not differ significantly between those treated with osimertinib (14.3 months) and those treated with 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (17.6 months; p = 0.881). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the NSCLC stage was the only independent negative predictor of PFS. The treatment patterns in the second line also differed significantly between groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions: This study found comparable effectiveness between osimertinib and 2nd G EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with only the NSCLC stage identified as a negative predictor of PFS. However, whether the different second-line treatments affect overall survival should be examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are common driver oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Studies have shown that afatinib is beneficial for NSCLC patients with rare EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against the G719X (G719A, G719C and G719S) mutation has not been fully established. Herein, using the CRISPR method, the EGFR G719X mutant cell lines were constructed to assess the sensitivity of the rare mutation G719X in NSCLC. WZ3146, a novel mutation-selective EGFR inhibitor, was conducted transcriptome sequencing and in vitro experiments. The results showed that WZ3146 induced cytotoxic effects, inhibited growth vitality and proliferation via ERK and AKT pathway in the EGFR G719X mutant cells. Our findings suggest that WZ3146 may be a promising treatment option for NSCLC patients with the EGFR exon 18 substitution mutation G719X. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as a leading targeted cancer therapy, reducing the side effects often seen with non-targeted treatments, especially the damage to healthy cells. To tackle resistance, typically caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, four generations of TKIs have been developed. Each generation has shown improved effectiveness and fewer side effects, resulting in better patient outcomes. For example, patients on gefitinib, a first-generation TKI, experienced a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months compared to 5 months with conventional chemotherapy. Second-generation TKI afatinib outperformed erlotinib and extended PFS to 11.1 months compared to 6.9 months with cisplatin. Third-generation TKIs further increased survival to 38.6 months, compared to 31.8 months with first-generation TKIs. This progress demonstrates the ability of newer TKIs to overcome resistance, particularly the T790M mutation, while reducing adverse effects. Ongoing research focuses on overcoming resistance from newer mutations like C797S to further improve patient survival. These developments highlight the significant progress in TKI therapy and the continued effort to refine cancer treatment. Recent research in South Korea shows that third-generation TKIs are ineffective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the C797S mutation. Several trials have started showing promising in vitro and in vivo results, but more trials are needed before clinical approval. This review underscores notable advancements in the field of EGFR TKIs, offering a comprehensive analysis of their mechanisms of action and the progression of various TKI generations in response to resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Four afatinib derivatives were designed and modeled. These derivatives were compared to the known tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in treating Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, i.e., imatinib and ponatinib. The molecules were evaluated through computational methods, including docking studies, the non-covalent interaction index, Electron Localization and Fukui Functions, in silico ADMET analysis, QTAIM, and Heat Map analysis. The AFA(IV) candidate significantly increases the score value compared to afatinib. Furthermore, AFA(IV) was shown to be relatively similar to the ponatinib profile when evaluating a range of molecular descriptors. The addition of a methylpiperazine ring seems to be well distributed in the structure of afatinib when targeting the BCR-ABL enzyme, providing an important hydrogen bond interaction with the Asp381 residue of the DFG-switch of BCR-ABL active site residue and the AFA(IV) new chemical entities. Finally, in silico toxicity predictions show a favorable index, with some molecules presenting the loss of the irritant properties associated with afatinib in theoretical predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

WhatIs Known and Objective. Anti‐EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) drugs are indicated for non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review summarises the information available to date on the first anti‐EGFRs granted market authorisation: erlotinib TARCEVA®, gefitinib IRESSA®, afatinib GIOTRIF®, dacomitinib VIZIMPRO®, and osimertinib TAGRISSO®. Methods. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database including studies published in English using the terms gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib. Furthermore, bibliographies of selected references were also studied for relevant articles. Clinical trial (CT) data were extracted from clinicaltrials.gov (ongoing trials and adverse events (AEs)). Assessment of AEs for these drugs was conducted using global pharmacovigilance data from VigiBase®. Results and Discussion. Erlotinib and gefitinib are first‐generation anti‐EGFR drugs, able to bind competitively and reversibly to the ATP‐ (adenosine triphosphate‐) binding site of the EGFR exon 19 and exon 21 mutations. Afatinib and dacomitinib are second‐generation anti‐EGFRs able to bind covalently and irreversibly to the ATP site and inhibit EGFR and HER (human epidermal growth factor receptor) such as HER2 and HER4 enzyme activity. Osimertinib is a third‐generation PKI and overcomes the EGFR T790M gatekeeper mutation through covalent binding at the ATP site. Medical interactions with these drugs are reported, notably with cytochrome P450 inducers or inhibitors. The most reported AEs in CTs are cutaneous reactions and gastrointestinal disorders. The occurrence of cutaneous reactions is less reported with third generation than with first‐ and second‐generation anti‐EGFR drugs. These results are consistent with the results from the VigiBase® global pharmacovigilance database. What Is New and Conclusion. This review summarises current knowledge regarding five anti‐EGFRs in the literature. The third‐generation anti‐EGFR appears to be more effective than the first and second generations and is indicated as first‐line therapy. This trial is registered with NCT01523587, NCT01466660, NCT01774721, NCT01360554, and NCT02296125. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. This study aims to assess and explore the different effects of national centralized drug procurement (NCDP) on three targeted antitumor drugs' use in clinical practice. Materials and Methods. Clinical drug volume data were collected covering 18 months before, during, and after the seventh round of the NCDP in Inner Mongolia. The interrupted time‐series method was employed to estimate the net effect of policy impact. Results. The volume of generic afatinib (30 mg) increased by 25.78 DDDs, the expenditures decreased by 3641.14 yuan (p = 0.001), and the DDDc decreased by 124.35 yuan (p < 0.001). The volume of generic afatinib (40 mg) increased by 65.19 DDDs (p < 0.001), the expenditures increased by 1304.93 yuan (p < 0.001), and the DDDc decreased by 120.2 yuan (p < 0.001). The volume of generic sunitinib increased by 75.79 DDDs (p < 0.001), the expenditures decreased by 15869.78 yuan (p < 0.001), and the DDDc decreased by 243.28 yuan. There was no significant change trend in volume, expenditures, and DDDc of the three original‐targeted drugs after NCDP intervention. Conclusions. After the policy intervention, generic afatinib (40 mg) successfully aligned with the objectives of NCDP by reducing drug costs and enhancing patient affordability; however, the desired outcomes were not achieved for generic afatinib (30 mg) and generic sunitinib. This discrepancy may be attributed to the inherent clinical efficacy and safety profiles of these drugs. Therefore, in implementing NCDP, it is necessary to enhance the clinical efficacy and safety of generic‐targeted antitumor drugs while considering economic efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are prevalent in about 50% of lung adenocarcinoma patients. Highly effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the EGFR protein have revolutionized treatment for the prevalent and aggressive lung malignancy. However, the emergence of new EGFR mutations and the rapid development of additional drug resistance mechanisms pose substantial challenge to the effective treatment of NSCLC. To investigate the underlying causes of drug resistance, we utilized nextgeneration sequencing data to analyse the genetic alterations in different tumor genomic states under the pressure of drug selection. This study involved a comprehensive analysis of whole exome sequencing data (WES) from NSCLC patients before and after treatment with afatinib and osimertinib with a goal to identify drug resistance mutations from the post-treatment WES data. We identified five EGFR single-point mutations (L718A, G724E, G724K, K745L, V851D) and one double mutation (T790M/L858R) associated with drug resistance. Through molecular docking, we observed that mutations, G724E, K745L, V851D, and T790M/L858R, have negatively affected the binding affinity with the FDA-approved drugs. Further, molecular dynamic simulations revealed the detrimental impact of these mutations on the binding efficacy. Finally, we conducted virtual screening against structurally similar compounds to afatinib and osimertinib and identified three compounds (CID 71496460, 73292362, and 73292545) that showed the potential to selectively inhibit EGFR despite the drugresistance mutations. The WES-based study provides additional insight to understand the drug resistance mechanisms driven by tumor mutations and helps develop potential lead compounds to inhibit EGFR in the presence of drug resistance mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a 70‐year‐old female patient diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutated metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (T4N2M1a), who developed afatinib‐induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We have also performed a PubMed/Medline literature review to detect other possible cases of TEN/Stevens–Johnson syndrome associated with afatinib treatment and found only 5 other cases reported. To our best knowledge, this is the first case of afatinib‐induced TEN successfully treated with cyclosporine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the common adverse events associated with cancer treatment that decreases the quality of life and affects treatment outcomes. However, the medications used to manage OM are generally only palliative, and our knowledge of the syndrome is limited. The etiology of the syndrome is thought to be complex and multifactorial. We investigated the trends and characteristics of OM and estimated molecular initiating events (MIEs) associated with the development of the syndrome using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. The study of trends and characteristics suggested that OM is significantly more likely to occur in females and nonelderly patients and is likely to be induced by protein kinase inhibitors such as afatinib and everolimus. Next, we used Toxicity Predictor, an in-house quantitative structure–activity relationship system, to estimate OM-associated MIEs. The results revealed that the agonist activity of the human pregnane X receptor, thyroid-stimulating hormone-releasing hormone receptor, and androgen receptor may be associated with OM development. Our study findings are expected to help avoid the risk of OM induction during the drug discovery process and clinical use of antineoplastic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Osimertinib is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, limited research has compared its clinical effectiveness with second-generation (2nd G) EGFR-TKIs. Materials and methods This study recruited patients diagnosed with stage IIIb-IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with either 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib and dacomitinib) or osimertinib between April 2020 and April 2023. Results The final analysis included 168 patients, of whom 113 received 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib or dacomitinib) and 55 received osimertinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between 2nd G EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib (del 19: 17.6 months; L858R: 20.0 months vs. 28.3 months, p = 0.081). In patients with the EGFR exon 19 deletion, osimertinib conferred a longer median PFS (28.3 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.118) and time to treatment failure (30.2 vs. 22.7 months, p = 0.722) than 2nd G EGFR-TKIs. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In patients with with the EGFR exon 19 deletion and central nervous system metastasis, the median PFS did not differ significantly between those treated with osimertinib (14.3 months) and those treated with 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (17.6 months; p = 0.881). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the NSCLC stage was the only independent negative predictor of PFS. The treatment patterns in the second line also differed significantly between groups (p = 0.008). Conclusions This study found comparable effectiveness between osimertinib and 2nd G EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with only the NSCLC stage identified as a negative predictor of PFS. However, whether the different second-line treatments affect overall survival should be examined.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer with a low survival rate. Recently, new drugs that target KRASG12D, a common mutation in PDAC, have been developed. We studied one of these compounds, MRTX1133, and found it was specific and effective at low nanomolar concentrations in patient-derived organoid models and cell lines harboring KRASG12D mutations. Treatment with MRTX1133 upregulated the expression and phosphorylation of EGFR and HER2, indicating that inhibition of ERBB signaling may potentiate MRTX1133 antitumor activity. Indeed, the irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, afatinib, potently synergized with MRTX1133 in vitro, and cancer cells with acquired resistance to MRTX1133 in vitro remained sensitive to this combination therapy. Finally, the combination of MRTX1133 and afatinib led to tumor regression and longer survival in orthotopic PDAC mouse models. These results suggest that dual inhibition of ERBB and KRAS signaling may be synergistic and circumvent the rapid development of acquired resistance in patients with KRAS mutant pancreatic cancer.SignificanceKRAS-mutant pancreatic cancer models, including KRAS inhibitor-resistant models, show exquisite sensitivity to combined pan-ERBB and KRAS targeting, which provides the rationale for testing this drug combination in clinical trials.

Afatinib (AT), an FDA-approved aniline-quinazoline derivative, is a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining it with cetuximab (CX), a chimeric human-murine derivative immunoglobulin-G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has shown significant improvements in median progression-free survival. Previously, we developed cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib (AT-MLP) and demonstrated their efficacy against NSCLC cells (A549 and H1975). In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of pulmonary delivery to mitigate adverse effects associated with oral administration and intravenous injection. We formulated AT-MLP dry powders (AT-MLP-DPI) via freeze drying using tert-butanol and mannitol as cryoprotectants in the hydration medium. The physicochemical and aerodynamic properties of dry powders were well analyzed firstly. In vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity study revealed concentration- and time-dependent cellular uptake behavior and antitumor efficacy of AT-MLP-DPI, while Transwell assay demonstrated the superior inhibitory effects on NSCLC cell invasion and migration. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed that pulmonary delivery of AT-MLP-DPI significantly increased bioavailability, prolonged blood circulation time, and exhibited higher lung concentrations compared to alternative administration routes and formulations. The in vivo antitumor efficacy study carried on tumor-bearing nude mice indicated that inhaled AT-MLP-DPI effectively suppressed lung tumor growth. Graphical abstract was created with BioRender software (https://biorender.com/) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]