1. Displacement's Botanical Roots: The Racial Rhetoric of Transplantation in Early Modern Thought.
- Author
-
Biggie, Roya
- Subjects
- *
ABSCISSION (Botany) , *ACCLIMATIZATION (Plants) , *SEVENTEENTH century , *INTRODUCED plants , *SIXTEENTH century , *TEMPERAMENT - Abstract
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the trade in and cultivation of exotic plant life proliferated at a rapid rate. Horticulturalists analogized plant acclimatization to human travel and acculturation, arguing that transplantation could ameliorate both species. Despite anxieties surrounding the influence of foreign environments, unfamiliar soil was thought to bring about "civility" and provoke both plants and humans to shed their "ill qualit[ies]." As I show, horticulturalists, such as John Parkinson and John Evelyn, distinguish plants that embody this myth from those that resist foreign soil, attributing their decline to their affective dispositions, their "peevish" or "impatient" temperaments, for example. Not only does this anthropomorphic impulse ignore the harsh climatological conditions to which plants were exposed, but it also contributes to an emerging racial discourse that differentiates human populations by their perceived cultivability, whether or not they can become more "civil." I argue that English polemicists, writing on the supposed savagery of the Irish, reappropriate this fantasy to authorize subjugation and forcible displacement. In drawing attention to the horticultural rhetoric that justified these imperial ventures, this essay proffers new avenues for examining the ideologies that underwrote colonial violence in Africa, the Indian subcontinent, and the Americas. [R.B.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF