Search

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is one of the most common chronic bacterial infections in humans, affecting half of world's population. Therapy for H. pylori infection has proven to be both effective and safe. The one-week triple therapy including proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole is still recommended as a first-line treatment to eradicate H. pylori infection in countries with low clarithromycin resistance. Generally, this therapy is well-tolerated, with only a few and usually minor side effects. However, rare but severe adverse effects such as pseudomembranous colitis have been reported, Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection being the main causative factor in all cases. We report the cases of two women who developed pseudomembranous colitis after a 1-wk triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin 1 g bid to eradicate H. pylori infection. A limited colonoscopy showed typical appearance of pseudomembranous colitis, and the stool test for C. difficile toxins was positive. Rapid resolution of symptoms and negative C. difficile toxins were obtained in both patients with oral vancomycin. No relapse occurred during a four and eleven-month, respectively, follow up. These cases suggest that physicians should have a high index of suspicion for pseudomembranous colitis when evaluate patients with diarrhea following H. pylori eradication therapy.

Unlabelled: Cirrhosis is characterized by an increased susceptibility to infection. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the most common infectious complication, the main causes being the bowel bacterial overpopulation, the increased intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation. Antibiotic prophylaxis with Norfloxacin increases the rate of PBS with G+ multiresistant bacteria., Purpose: To demonstrate the advantage of using rifaximin, nonresorbable broad spectrum antibiotic, in SBP prophylaxy., Material and Methods: The study is a prospective case-control, which included 46 patients diagnosed with Child class C cirrhosis and refractory ascites, based on clinical, biological, ultrasound and endoscopic findings, followed over a period of 6 months. Protein level in ascitic fluid (AF) was higher 14 g/dl. SBP was defined as the presence of > 250 PMN/mm3. Patients were divided into 2 groups, group 1 comprised 22 patients who received rifaximin treatment during the study for a previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and group 2 consisted of 24 patients who did not receive antibiotic treatment during follow-up., Results: Rifaximin significantly decreases the polymorpho-nucleares (PMN) in ascitic fluid from patients, one single case of neutroascitic SBP with negative cultures were recorded in this group, with a net improvement of the general condition. In group 2 who did not follow any antibiotic treatment, SBP was recorded in 4 patients, an increase of PMN in ascitic fluid at 14 patients, an approximately constant value in 4 patients, a decrease in 2 subjects., Conclusions: The study suggests that rifaximin causes a significant decrease in PMN in AF, producing a decrease in SBP frequency and improvement of life in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. In this study, the effects of rifaximin on intestinal bacterial overpopulation and bacterial translocation, decisive factors in SBP, are consistent with literature data. Use of rifaximin as an alternative method to prevent SBP deserves more attention.

Liver cirrhosis is a major cause of mortality worldwide, often with severe sepsis as the terminal event. Over the last two decades, several studies have reported that in septic patients the adrenal glands respond inappropriately to stimulation, and that the treatment with corticosteroids decreases mortality in such patients. Both cirrhosis and septic shock share many hemodynamic abnormalities such as hyperdynamic circulatory failure, decreased peripheral vascular resistance, increased cardiac output, hypo-responsiveness to vasopressors, increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines [interleukine(IL)-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha] and it has, consequently, been reported that adrenal insufficiency (AI) is common in critically ill cirrhotic patients. AI may also be present in patients with stable cirrhosis without sepsis and in those undergoing liver transplantation. The term hepato-adrenal syndrome defines AI in patients with advanced liver disease with sepsis and/or other complications, and it suggests that it could be a feature of liver disease per se, with a different pathogenesis from that of septic shock. Relative AI is the term given to inadequate cortisol response to stress. More recently, another term is used, namely "critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency" to define "an inadequate cellular corticosteroid activity for the severity of the patient's illness". The mechanisms of AI in liver cirrhosis are not completely understood, although decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and circulatory endotoxin have been suggested. The prevalence of AI in cirrhotic patients varies widely according to the stage of the liver disease (compensated or decompensated, with or without sepsis), the diagnostic criteria defining AI and the methodology used. The effects of corticosteroid therapy on cirrhotic patients with septic shock and AI are controversial. This review aims to summarize the existing published information regarding AI in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Liver biopsy (LB) has traditionally been considered the gold standard for pretreatment evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). However, LB is an invasive procedure with several shortcomings (intra- and interobserver variability of histopathological interpretation, sampling errors, high cost) and the risk of rare but potentially life-threatening complications. In addition, LB is poorly accepted by patients and it is not suitable for repeated evaluation. Furthermore, the prevalence of CHC makes LB unrealistic to be performed in all patients with this disease who are candidates for antiviral therapy. The above-mentioned drawbacks of LB have led to the development of noninvasive methods for the assessment of liver fibrosis. Several noninvasive methods, ranging from serum marker assays to advanced imaging techniques, have proved to be excellent tools for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with CHC, whereas the value of LB as a gold standard for staging fibrosis prior to antiviral therapy has become questionable for clinicians. Despite significant resistance from those in favor of LB, noninvasive methods for pretreatment assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with CHC have become part of routine clinical practice. With protease inhibitors-based triple therapy already available and substantial improvement in sustained virological response, the time has come to move forward to noninvasiveness, with no risks for the patient and, thus, no need for LB in the assessment of liver fibrosis in the decision making for antiviral therapy in CHC.

Background: FibroTest(®) (FT), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) are the most validated techniques for the non-invasive assessment of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The combination between FibroTest(®) and LSM has never been assessed using methods assuming that biopsy is not a perfect gold standard., Aim: The aim was to assess the performance of a new test the Elasto-FibroTest(®) (EFT) combining FibroTest(®) and LSM., Methods: An integrated data base of 1289 patients with biopsy and 604 healthy volunteers was analyzed. EFT took into account the applicability of both tests, included two algorithms taking one for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis (EFT-F2) and one for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (EFT-F4). Performances of EFTs were assessed by three methods: area under the ROC curve (AUROC), "Obuchowski method" (OBU) and 1 TAGS the "Latent class with random factor"., Results: For the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis EFT-F2 performances (specificity=0.99 and sensitivity=0.83) were not greater than the performances of FibroTest(®) alone (specificity=0.93 and sensitivity=0.99). For the diagnosis of cirrhosis, EFT-F4 performances were greater than those of FibroTest(®) alone, particularly for the sensitivity (0.88 vs. 0.74); when compared with LSM, EFT-F4 performances (specificity=0.99 and sensitivity=0.99) were also greater than those of LSM alone particularly because of its lower specificity (0.92)., Conclusion: For the diagnosis of cirrhosis the Elasto-FibroTest(®) has higher performances than FibroTest(®) or FibroScan(®) alone. No improvement in performance has been observed for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis vs. FibroTest(®) alone., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To compare histological endpoint assessment using noninvasive alternatives to biopsy during treatment in a chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) cohort., Methods: Patients with chronic HCV were randomized to receive interferon-based therapy for 24 (genotypes 2/3) or 48 (genotype 1) wk. FibroSURE™ (FS) was assessed at baseline and at week-12 post-treatment follow-up. Baseline biopsy for METAVIR was assessed by a single pathologist. FibroScan(®) transient elastography (TE) was performed during treatment in a patient subset., Results: Two thousand and sixty patients (n = 253 in Asia) were classified as METAVIR F0-1 (n = 1682) or F2-4 (n = 378). For F2-4, FS (n = 2055) had sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.61, respectively, with area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.82; corresponding values for TE (n = 214) and combined FS/TE (n = 209) were 0.77, 0.88 and 0.88, and 0.93, 0.68 and 0.88. Overall FS/TE agreement for F2-4 was 71% (κ = 0.41) and higher in Asians vs non-Asians (κ = 0.86 vs 0.35; P < 0.001). Combined FS/TE had 97% accuracy in Asians (n = 33). Baseline FS (0.38 vs 0.51, P < 0.001) and TE (8.0 kPa vs 11.9 kPa, P = 0.006) scores were lower in patients with sustained virological response than in nonresponders, and were maintained through follow-up., Conclusion: FS and TE may reliably differentiate mild from moderate-advanced disease, with a potential for high diagnostic accuracy in Asians with chronic HCV.

Background & Aims: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, body weight ≥85 kg, and high baseline viral load respond poorly to standard doses of pegylated interferon (peginterferon) and ribavirin. We evaluated intensified therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin., Methods: This double-blind randomized trial included HCV genotype 1-infected outpatients from hepatology clinics with body weight ≥85 kg and HCV RNA titer ≥400,000 IU/mL. Patients were randomized to 180 μg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 48 weeks plus 1200 mg/day ribavirin (standard of care) (group A, n = 191) or 1400/1600 mg/day ribavirin (group B, n = 189). Additional groups included 360 μg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 12 weeks then 180 μg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 36 weeks plus 1200 mg/day ribavirin (group C, n = 382) or 1400/1600 mg/day ribavirin (group D, n = 383). Follow-up lasted 24 weeks after treatment., Results: Sustained virologic response rates (HCV RNA level <15 IU/mL at end of follow-up) in groups A, B, C, and D were 38%, 43%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. There were no significant differences among the 4 groups or between pooled peginterferon alfa-2a regimens (A + B vs C + D: odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.39; P = .584) or pooled ribavirin regimens (A + C vs B + D: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79-1.28; P = .974)., Conclusions: In patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who are difficult to treat (high viral load, body weight ≥85 kg), a 12-week induction regimen of peginterferon alfa-2a and/or higher-dose ribavirin is not more effective than the standard regimen., (Copyright © 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreato-graphy (ERCP) is a procedure used in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases, more preferable to open surgery in terms of a lower risk of morbidity and mortality and costing much less., Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study, in which we tried to involve the largest medical centers in Romania. They were asked to complete a questionnaire detailing the number of ERCPs performed in 2006, the type of and accessibility to radiology equipment, indications for ERCP, the availability of skilled endoscopists for ERCP and if there were any training pro-grammes., Results: The number of ERCP procedures performed in 2006 by the participating centers was 2647. There was a strong correlation between the availability of radiology equipment, the number of days allocated by the radiology department for the procedure, and the number of ERCPs performed. Gallstone removal accounted for most (50%) of the therapeutic ERCP indications., Conclusions: For a large country such as Romania, a total number of 2647 ERCPs for 2006 is too low. Various important factors such as lack of access to equipment and few skilled ERCP endosco-pists were identified as possible causes. The number of ERCPs performed in Romania should be reorganized to perform 20000 per year in 5 years from now (2012) and give our population access to proper intervention endoscopy. The National Gastroenterology Society should actively encou-rage training in interventional endoscopy, and collaborate with Ministry of Health to have a National Task-force for Endoscop.