251. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of PM 10 over Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP), adjoining regions and Indo-Himalayan Range (IHR) during a winter 2014 campaign.
- Author
-
Sen A, Karapurkar SG, Saxena M, Shenoy DM, Chaterjee A, Choudhuri AK, Das T, Khan AH, Kuniyal JC, Pal S, Singh DP, Sharma SK, Kotnala RK, and Mandal TK
- Subjects
- Aerosols analysis, Air Pollutants analysis, Air Pollution analysis, Biomass, Carbon analysis, Desert Climate, Environmental Monitoring, India, Nitrogen, Seasons, Carbon Isotopes analysis, Nitrogen Isotopes analysis, Particulate Matter analysis
- Abstract
For source identification, a field campaign involving simultaneous sampling of particulate matter (PM
10 ) was conducted at eight sampling sites in the Indian mainland during winter 2014. The sampling sites include Delhi (upper IGP), Lucknow (middle IGP), and Kolkata (lower IGP) in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP); Mohal-Kullu and Darjeeling in the Indo-Himalayan Range (IHR). In addition, Ajmer, located upwind of the IGP in NW-India and Giridih and Bhubaneswar, in the downwind to the IGP has also been chosen. To characterize the sources of the ambient PM10 , stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13 CTC ) and nitrogen (δ15 NTN ) for the total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) fractions have been considered. Ancillary chemical parameters, such as organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and water-soluble ionic components (WSIC) mass concentrations are also presented in this paper. There was very small variation in the daily average δ13 CTC ratios (- 24.8 to - 25.9‰) among the sites. Comparison with end-member stable C isotopic signatures of major typical sources suggests that the PM10 at the sites was mainly from fossil fuel and biofuel and biomass combustion. Daily average δ15 NTN ratios were not observed to vary much between sites either (8.3 to 11.0‰), and the low δ15 NTN levels also indicate substantial contributions from biofuel and biomass burning of primarily C3 andC4 plant matter. Graphical abstract Scatter plot of the average (± 1 standard deviation (SD)) δ13 CTC (‰) compared to δ15 NTN (‰) at the sampling sites.- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF