Leonelli, C., Zucchini, E., Messora, A., Sartini, S., Fontana, L., and Parazza, S.
Introduction: Cervical radiculopathy is a suffering of 1 or more nerve roots, due to compression of herniated discs, osteophytes or reduction of the neural foramen. This disease causes pain from the neck to the hand with a dermatomal distribution, tingling, hypothesia and weakness. In diagnosis are used instrumental exams (electromyography) and a good physical examination, including provocative tests. The guidelines of the North American Spine Society (2011) has not yet validated a unique physiotherapy approach for cervical radiculopathy. In fact, in the literature, although there are numerous studies that confirm the effectiveness of conservative than surgery treatments, there is still a lack of randomized controlled trials that compare the different methods of physiotherapy treatment. The neurodynamic is a method for influencing pain by mechanical treatment of nervous tissue and structures around to it; this approach uses techniques of “sliding” and “tensioning”, together with active and passive movements. Materials and methods: This randomized single-blind study was carried out from October 2010 to February 2011 in the Rehabilitation Unit of Vignola Hospital. 26 adult patients, who met the inclusion criteria, were selected and randomly distributed into 2 treatment groups: 24 women and 2 men, all between 32 and 65 years, with an average of 48.4 years. Objectives: Check the efficacy of the addition of neurodynamic techniques to the manual traction in a group of patients with clinical diagnosis of chronic cervical radiculopathy. Evaluation: At the 1st treatment session, the 10th session and 2 months with an evaluation board that evaluates: cervical pain (VAS), paresthesia, disability (NDI: Neck Disability Index) and compliance. Treatment: 10 consecutive sessions of half an hour made by an operator other than the one that evaluated the outcomes. Group A: Manual traction, exercises of self cervical mobilization from the 5th session and ergonomic and postural advice. Group B: Manual traction, neurodynamic treatment and from the 5th session neurodynamic exercises, plus postural and ergonomic advice. Results: In the sample there weren’t significant differences between the 2 groups for age (p = 0.96), NDI (p = 0.22), VAS (p = 0.31) and distribution of paresthesias (p = 0.61). However, higher values of NDI were present in group A while the group B had a higher frequency of severe paresthesia compared to group A. Significant decrease in VAS over time in group A (cervical manual traction, exercise self cervical mobilization, postural and ergonomic advice) but not in group B (cervical manual traction, passive treatment neurodynamic of the upper limb, neuro dynamic exercises, postural and ergonomic advice). Significant reduction of the NDI in both groups, without significant differences between the two. Significant decrease in the percentage of moderate/ severe paraesthesia and consequent increase in percentage of patients with no paresthesia or at minimum level. Conclusion: Using the manual traction, with the addition or not of neurodynamic, improvements are obtained for all parameters in almost all subjects. This suggests that conservative treatment with manual therapy is effective in the relief of symptoms of chronic cervical radiculopathy. In addition, at 2 months, the group treated with neurodynamic techniques has also maintained the improvement of disability, (assessed with the Neck Disability Index) obtained after the physiotherapeutic treatment (T2), in contrast to the group treated only with manual traction, in which at T3, disability is significantly deteriorated compared to T2. Further studies are needed with larger samples and longer follow-up to verify the effectiveness of neurodynamics in chronic cervical radiculopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]