229 results on '"Nadeem, Omar"'
Search Results
202. EASIX-guided risk stratification for complications and outcome after CAR T-cell therapy with ide-cel in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Frenking JH, Zhou X, Wagner V, Hielscher T, Kauer J, Mai EK, Friedrich MJ, Michel CS, Hajiyianni M, Breitkreutz I, Costello P, Nadeem O, Weinhold N, Goldschmidt H, Schmitt A, Luft T, Schmitt M, Müller-Tidow C, Topp M, Einsele H, Dreger P, Munshi NC, Sperling AS, Rasche L, Sauer S, and Raab MS
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Risk Assessment, Biological Products therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Cytokine Release Syndrome etiology, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Multiple Myeloma immunology, Immunotherapy, Adoptive adverse effects, Immunotherapy, Adoptive methods
- Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated significant benefits in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, these outcomes can be compromised by severe complications, including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), predisposing for life-threatening infections., Methods: This retrospective observational study examined a total of 129 patients with RRMM who had received idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) at two major myeloma centers in Germany and one center in the USA to assess the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) as a risk marker for an unfavorable clinical course and outcome after CAR T-cell therapy. EASIX is calculated by lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL) / platelets (10
9 cells/L) and was determined before lymphodepletion (baseline) and at the day of CAR T-cell infusion (day 0). The analysis was extended to EASIX derivatives and the CAR-HEMATOTOX score., Results: An elevated baseline EASIX (>median) was identified as a risk marker for severe late ICAHT, manifesting with an impaired hematopoietic reconstitution and pronounced cytopenias during the late post-CAR-T period. Patients with high EASIX levels (>upper quartile) were particularly at risk, as evidenced by an increased rate of an aplastic phenotype of neutrophil recovery, severe late-onset infections and ICANS. Finally, we found associations between baseline EASIX and an inferior progression-free and overall survival. Moreover, the EASIX at day 0 also demonstrated potential to serve as a risk marker for post-CAR-T complications and adverse outcomes., Conclusions: In conclusion, EASIX aids in risk stratification at clinically relevant time points prior to CAR T-cell therapy with ide-cel. Increased EASIX levels might help clinicians to identify vulnerable patients to adapt peri-CAR-T management at an early stage., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JF has received honoraria from BMS and Stemline and travel and congress participation grants from Janssen-Cilag. XZ declares advisory services for and has received travel support from SkylineDx. JK has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. EKM declares a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline and Takeda. He has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, Sanofi, Stemline and Takeda, research funding from BMS/Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi and Takeda and travel support from BMS/Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, Stemline and Takeda. MJF declares consulting activity for Pfizer and Kerna Ventures. CSM has received honoraria and travel support from Janssen-Cilag. IB has received honoraria from Oncopeptide and travel support from Janssen. ON reports receiving consulting fees from Janssen, BMS, Takeda, GPCR therapeutics, Sanofi and Pfizer. AS has received travel grants from Hexal and Jazz Pharmaceuticals and research grants from Therakos/Mallinckrodt. She is a consultant for Janssen-Cilag and BMS and co-founder of TolerogenixX Ltd. AS is part-time employee of TolerogenixX Ltd. MS declares an advisory role or expert testimony for MSD, Novartis, BMS and Pierre Fabre. He is co-founder and shareholder of TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg. He has received financial support for research on biosimilars and travel grants from Hexal, financial support of educational activities and conference participation and travels grants from Kite and BMS, collaborative research grants from Novartis and funding for collaborative research from Apogenix. MT has received research funding from Kite, Regeneron and Roche. He is an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Janssen and Novartis. HE declares a consulting or advisory role for BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis and Roche. He has received research funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi and Novartis, honoraria from BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis and travel support from BMS/Celgene, Janssen and Amgen. PD reports consultancy for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Gilead, Miltenyi, Novartis and Riemser. He is member of the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser and Roche and has received research support from Riemser (all to institution). NCM reports receiving personal fees from BMS, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, OncoPep, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Novartis, Legend, Raqia, Adaptive Biotechnology, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. He has intellectual property licensed to OncoPep and held stocks in C4 Therapeutics. ASp reports receiving consulting fees from Novartis and Roche. LR consulted for Janssen, Amgen, GSK, Pfizer, BMS, Sanofi, and received honoraria from Janssen, GSK, Pfizer, BMS, Sanofi and received research funding from Skyline Dx and BMS. SS has received travel grants or honoraria for presentations from Celgene, BMS, Janssen, Takeda and Amgen. MSR declares a consulting or advisory role for BMS, Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie and Takeda. He has received research funding from BMS, Janssen, Sanofi and Heidelberg Pharma, travel support from BMS, Amgen and Janssen and honoraria from BMS, Janssen, AbbVie and Sanofi., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
203. Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in myeloma clinical trials: an evolving paradigm.
- Author
-
Pawlyn C, Schjesvold FH, Cairns DA, Wei LJ, Davies F, Nadeem O, Abdulhaq H, Mateos MV, Laubach J, Weisel K, Ludwig H, Rajkumar SV, Sonneveld P, Jackson G, Morgan G, and Richardson PG
- Subjects
- Humans, Clinical Trials as Topic, Neoplasm, Residual, Biomarkers, Multiple Myeloma mortality, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Progression-Free Survival
- Abstract
Measurement of overall survival (OS) remains the gold standard for interpreting the impact of new therapies for multiple myeloma in phase 3 trials. However, as outcomes have improved, it is increasingly challenging to use OS as the primary endpoint if timely approval of novel agents is to be ensured to enable maximum benefit for patients. Surrogate endpoints of OS, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and response to treatment, have contributed to approval decisions by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency as endpoints demonstrating clinical benefit, and the FDA has recently supported the use of minimal residual disease (MRD) as an accelerated approval endpoint in multiple myeloma. This review aims to address situations in which the use of PFS as a surrogate endpoint warrants careful interpretation especially for specific subgroups of patients and considers ways to ensure that studies can be designed to account for possible discordance between PFS and OS. The utility of subgroup analyses, including the potential for those not pre-specified, to identify target populations for new agents is also discussed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
204. Absolute Lymphocyte Count and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Idecabtagene Vicleucel: The US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium Real- World Experience.
- Author
-
Khouri J, Dima D, Li H, Hansen D, Sidana S, Shune L, Anwer F, Sborov D, Wagner C, Kocoglu MH, Atrash S, Voorhees P, Peres L, Hovanky V, Simmons G, Williams L, Raza S, Afrough A, Anderson LD Jr, Ferreri C, Hashmi H, Davis J, McGuirk J, Goldsmith S, Borogovac A, Lin Y, Midha S, Nadeem O, Locke FL, Baz R, Hamilton B, Alsina M, Sauter C, Patel K, and Kaur G
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Male, Female, Aged, Lymphocyte Count, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Tissue Extracts therapeutic use, Cancer Vaccines therapeutic use, United States epidemiology, Immunotherapy methods, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Multiple Myeloma mortality, Multiple Myeloma immunology
- Abstract
Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has shown impressive efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study aimed to investigate the impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on the survival outcomes of RRMM patients treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. Data were collected retrospectively from 11 institutions in the U.S. Impact of ALC parameters including pre-apheresis (pre-A), pre-lymphodepletion (pre-LD), absolute and percent difference from pre-A to pre-LD on clinical outcomes after ide-cel were examined using survival analysis. A new ALC profile was created based on univariate analysis that comprises 3 groups: normal (≥1 × 10
9 /L) pre-LD ALC (LDN ), low (<1 × 109 /L) pre-LD ALC (LDL ) + percent reduction <37.5 (%RL ), and LDL ALC + percent reduction ≥37.5 (%RH ). A total of 214 SOC ide-cel recipients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57 to 69 years), median number of prior therapies was 6 (IQR, 5 to 9), and median duration of follow-up was 5.4 months (IQR, 2.1 to 8.3 months). Most patients had both low pre-A ALC (75.3%) and pre-LD ALC (77.2%), and the reduction from pre-A to pre-LD (median, .65 to .55 × 109 /L) was statistically significant. Univariate analysis showed that the LDL + %RH group had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the LDL + %RL and LDN ALC groups (6-month PFS: 40% versus 67.6% and 60.9%; 6-month OS: 69.5% versus 87% and 94.3%). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, performance status, cytogenetic risk, use of bridging therapy, and extramedullary disease, PFS did not maintain its statistical significance; however, OS remained significantly worse for LDL + %RH group compared to the LDN ALC group (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 17), but the difference between the LDL + %RH versus %RL groups was not statistically significant (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, .8 to 4.0). Our findings indicate that low pre-LD ALC with high %R from pre-A to pre-LD was associated with inferior survival outcomes, particularly OS, in patients who received SOC ide-cel., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
205. Targeting Ikaros and Aiolos: reviewing novel protein degraders for the treatment of multiple myeloma, with a focus on iberdomide and mezigdomide.
- Author
-
Liu Y, Mo CC, Hartley-Brown MA, Sperling AS, Midha S, Yee AJ, Bianchi G, Piper C, Tattersall A, Nadeem O, Laubach JP, and Richardson PG
- Subjects
- Humans, Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule Family metabolism, Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule Family antagonists & inhibitors, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases metabolism, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents pharmacology, Proteolysis drug effects, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Immunomodulating Agents therapeutic use, Immunomodulating Agents pharmacology, Clinical Trials as Topic, Animals, Piperidones, Morpholines, Receptors, Interleukin-17, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Phthalimides, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma metabolism, Ikaros Transcription Factor metabolism, Thalidomide therapeutic use, Thalidomide analogs & derivatives, Thalidomide pharmacology
- Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving rapidly. Quadruplet regimens incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and CD38 monoclonal antibodies have emerged as standard-of-care options for newly diagnosed MM, and numerous novel therapies have been approved for relapsed/refractory MM. However, there remains a need for novel options in multiple settings, including refractoriness to frontline standards of care., Areas Covered: Targeting degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 - Ikaros and Aiolos - through modulation of cereblon, an E3 ligase substrate recruiter/receptor, is a key mechanism of action of the IMiDs and the CELMoD agents. Two CELMoD agents, iberdomide and mezigdomide, have demonstrated substantial preclinical and clinical activity in MM and have entered phase 3 investigation. Using a literature search methodology comprising searches of PubMed (unlimited time-frame) and international hematology/oncology conference abstracts (2019-2023), this paper reviews the importance of Ikaros and Aiolos in MM, the mechanism of action of the IMiDs and CELMoD agents and their relative potency for targeting Ikaros and Aiolos, and preclinical and clinical data on iberdomide and mezigdomide., Expert Opinion: Emerging data suggest that iberdomide and mezigdomide have promising activity, including in IMiD-resistant settings and, pending phase 3 findings, may provide additional treatment options for patients with MM.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
206. A CAR enhancer increases the activity and persistence of CAR T cells.
- Author
-
Rakhshandehroo T, Mantri SR, Moravej H, Louis BBV, Salehi Farid A, Munaretto L, Regan K, Khan RMM, Wolff A, Farkash Z, Cong M, Kuhnast A, Nili A, Lee UJ, Allen HH, Berland L, Simkova E, Uslu SC, Tavakolpour S, Rowley JE, Codet E, Shahbazian H, Baral J, Pyrdol J, Jacobson CA, Nadeem O, Nia HT, Wucherpfennig KW, and Rashidian M
- Abstract
Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes, durable remissions remain limited. To extend the efficacy of CAR T cells, we develop a CAR enhancer (CAR-E), comprising a CAR T cell antigen fused to an immunomodulatory molecule. Here we demonstrate this strategy using B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T cells for the treatment of multiple myeloma, with a CAR-E consisting of the BCMA fused to a low-affinity interleukin 2 (IL-2). This selectively induces IL-2 signaling in CAR T cells upon antigen-CAR binding, enhancing T cell activation and antitumor activity while reducing IL-2-associated toxicities. We show that the BCMA CAR-E selectively binds CAR T cells and increases CAR T cell proliferation, clearance of tumor cells and development of memory CAR T cells. The memory cells retain the ability to re-expand upon restimulation, effectively controlling tumor growth upon rechallenge. Mechanistic studies reveal the involvement of both CAR and IL-2 receptor endodomains in the CAR-E mechanism of action. The CAR-E approach avoids the need for specific engineering and enables CAR T cell therapy with lower cell doses., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
207. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma (SKylaRk): a single-arm, phase 2 trial.
- Author
-
O'Donnell E, Mo C, Yee AJ, Nadeem O, Laubach J, Rosenblatt J, Munshi N, Midha S, Cirstea D, Chrysafi P, Horick N, Richardson PG, and Raje N
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Dexamethasone adverse effects, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Lenalidomide administration & dosage, Lenalidomide adverse effects, Oligopeptides therapeutic use, Oligopeptides administration & dosage, Oligopeptides adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Isatuximab is a CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the addition of isatuximab to weekly carfilzomib (K), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d; Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and stratified maintenance by cytogenetic risk., Methods: This single-arm phase 2 trial was done at three cancer centres (two hospitals and a cancer institute) in Boston (MA, USA). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Patients received four 28-day cycles of Isa-KRd, including isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 8 weeks, then every other week for 16 weeks, and every 4 weeks thereafter; carfilzomib 56 mg/m
2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 (20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 day 1); lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally the day of and day after all doses of carfilzomib and isatuximab. Consolidation involved either upfront haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with two additional cycles or deferred HSCT with four additional cycles of treatment. The primary endpoint was complete response after four cycles of treatment. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. All patients who received one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04430894, and has completed enrolment., Findings: Between July 31, 2020 and Jan 31, 2022, 50 patients were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 40-70), 54% (27 of 50 patients) were male, and 44 (88%) were White. 46% (23 of 50) of patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR 20·7-30·1). 32% (16 of 50 patients) achieved a complete response after four cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 90% (45 patients) and 78% (39 patients) achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. After completion of consolidation, 58% (29 patients) achieved a complete response; the ORR was 90% (45 patients) and 86% (43 patients) achieved a VGPR or better. The most common grade 3 or 4 side-effects (≥two patients) included neutropenia (13 [26%] of 50 patients), elevated alanine aminotransferase (six [12%] patients), fatigue (three [6%] patients), thrombocytopenia (three [6%] patients), acute kidney injury (two [4%] patients), anaemia (two [4%] patients), and febrile neutropenia (two [4%] patients). Grade 1-2 infusion-related reactions were seen in 20% (ten patients), with none grade 3. Grade 1-2 hypertension was seen in 14% (seven patients) with one grade 3 (one [2%] patient). There were two deaths assessed as unrelated to treatment., Interpretation: Although the study did not achieve the prespecified complete response threshold, Isa-KRd induced deep and durable responses in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The treatment proved safe and consistent with similar regimens in this setting., Funding: Amgen, Sanofi, and Adaptive., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EO’D: consulting, honororia, travels fees, and participation in the advisory board for Sanofi. CM: consulting fees or honoria from Sanofi, Pfizer, Janssen, Karyopharm, Takeda, and GSK. AJY: grants or contracts from Amgen, BMS, and Janssen; consulting fees from AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sebia, and Takeda. ON: grants or contracts from Janssen; honoraria from Pfizer; and participation on an advisory board for BMS, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, and GPCR therapeutics. JR: research funding from BMS and Sanofi; data safety monitoring committee for Karyopharm; and participation in an advisory board for Janssen. NM: consulting fees from Sanofi, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson. SM: consulting fees and honororia from Pfizer; and stock owned in AbbVie. DC: participation in an advisory board for Sanofi. PR: grants or contracts with Oncopeptides, Celgene and Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, and Takeda; consulting fees from Oncopeptides, Celgene and Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Sanofi, and GSK. NR: consulting fees from Sanofi and Amgen. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
208. Round Table Discussion on Optimal Clinical Trial Design in Precursor Multiple Myeloma.
- Author
-
Ghobrial IM, Gormley N, Kumar SK, Mateos MV, Bergsagel PL, Chesi M, Dhodapkar MV, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, Getz G, Kastritis E, Kristinsson SY, Martinez-Climent JA, Manier S, Marinac CR, Maura F, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Nadeem O, Nuvolone M, Paiva B, O'Donnell E, Prosper F, Shah UA, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Sperling AS, Vassiliou GS, Munshi NC, Castle PE, Anderson KC, and San Miguel JF
- Subjects
- Humans, Research Design, Quality of Life, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic methods
- Abstract
Summary: While the current approach to precursor hematologic conditions is to "watch and wait," this may change with the development of therapies that are safe and extend survival or delay the onset of symptomatic disease. The goal of future therapies in precursor hematologic conditions is to improve survival and prevent or delay the development of symptomatic disease while maximizing safety. Clinical trial considerations in this field include identifying an appropriate at-risk population, safety assessments, dose selection, primary and secondary trial endpoints including surrogate endpoints, control arms, and quality-of-life metrics, all of which may enable more precise benefit-risk assessment., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
209. Long-Term Follow-Up Defines the Population That Benefits from Early Interception in a High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trial Using the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone.
- Author
-
Nadeem O, Aranha MP, Redd R, Timonian M, Magidson S, Lightbody ED, Alberge JB, Bertamini L, Dutta AK, El-Khoury H, Bustoros M, Laubach JP, Bianchi G, O'Donnell E, Wu T, Tsuji J, Anderson K, Getz G, Trippa L, Richardson PG, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, and Ghobrial IM
- Abstract
Background: Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit in previous studies of lenalidomide with or without dexamethasone. Triplets and quadruplet studies have been examined in this same population. However, to date, none of these studies examined the impact of depth of response on long-term outcomes of participants treated with lenalidomide-based therapy, and whether the use of the 20/2/20 model or the addition of genomic alterations can further define the population that would benefit the most from early therapeutic intervention. Here, we present the results of the phase II study of the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with HR-SMM with long-term follow-up and baseline single-cell tumor and immune sequencing that help refine the population to be treated for early intervention studies., Methods: This is a phase II trial of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRD) in HR-SMM. Patients received 9 cycles of induction therapy with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25mg on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by maintenance with ixazomib 4mg on days 1, 8, and 15; and lenalidomide 15mg d1-21 for 15 cycles for 24 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after 2 years of therapy. Secondary endpoints included depth of response, biochemical progression, and correlative studies included single-cell RNA sequencing and/or whole-genome sequencing of the tumor and single-cell sequencing of immune cells at baseline., Results: Fifty-five patients, with a median age of 64, were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate was 93%, with 31% of patients achieving a complete response and 45% achieving a very good partial response or better. The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (16 patients; 29%), leukopenia (10 patients; 18%), lymphocytopenia (8 patients; 15%), and thrombocytopenia (4 patients; 7%). Non-hematologic grade 3 or greater toxicities included hypophosphatemia (7 patients; 13%), rash (5 patients; 9%), and hypokalemia (4 patients; 7%). After a median follow-up of 50 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.6 months (95% CI: 39.9 - not reached; NR) and median overall survival has not been reached. Patients achieving VGPR or better had a significantly better progression-free survival (p<0.001) compared to those who did not achieve VGPR (median PFS 58.2 months vs. 31.3 months). Biochemical progression preceded or was concurrent with the development of SLiM-CRAB criteria in eight patients during follow-up, indicating that biochemical progression is a meaningful endpoint that correlates with the development of end-organ damage. High-risk 20/2/20 participants had the worst PFS compared to low- and intermediate-risk participants. The use of whole genome or single-cell sequencing of tumor cells identified high-risk aberrations that were not identified by FISH alone and aided in the identification of participants at risk of progression. scRNA-seq analysis revealed a positive correlation between MHC class I expression and response to proteasome inhibition and at the same time a decreased proportion of GZMB+ T cells within the clonally expanded CD8+ T cell population correlated with suboptimal response., Conclusions: Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM demonstrates significant clinical activity with an overall favorable safety profile. Achievement of VGPR or greater led to significant improvement in time to progression, suggesting that achieving deep response is beneficial in HR-SMM. Biochemical progression correlates with end-organ damage. Patients with high-risk FISH and lack of deep response had poor outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT02916771)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests ON: Research support from Takeda and Janssen; Advisory board participation: Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda, GPCR therapeutics. Honorarium:Pfizer M.P.A: No conflicts of interest exist. R.A.R.: No conflicts of interest exist. M.T: No conflicts of interest exist. S.M.: No conflicts of interest exist. J.B.A. No conflicts of interest exist. L.B.: No conflicts of interest exist. A.K.D. No conflicts of interest exist. H.E.: No conflicts of interest exist. M.B.: Consultancy with Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Epizyme, Karyopharm, Menarini Biosystems, and Adaptive. E.D.L.: No conflicts of interest exist. J.P.L.: No conflicts of interest exist. G.B.: Consultancy: Prothena E.O.: Advisory Board/Honoraria: Janssen, BMS, Sanofi, Pfizer, Exact Consulting—Takeda Steering Committee: Natera T.W.: No conflicts of interest exist. J.T.: No conflicts of interest exist. K.A.: Consultant: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, Board/ Stock Options: Dynamic Cell Therapies, C4 Therapeutics, Next RNA, Oncopep, Starton, Window G.G.: No conflicts of interest exist. L.T.: No conflicts of interest exist. P.G.R.: Advisory Boards/Consulting: Celgene/BMS, GSK, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda. Research Grants: Oncopeptides, Karyopharm R.S.P.: Co-founder, equity holder, and consultant on pre-seed stage startup. I.M.G.: Consulting/Advisory role: AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Aptitude Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Huron Consulting, Janssen, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sognef, Takeda, The Binding Site, and Window Therapeutics; Speaker fees: Vor Biopharma, Veeva Systems, Inc.; I.M.G.’s spouse is CMO and an equity holder of Disc Medicine.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
210. Real-world impact of bridging therapy on outcomes of ide-cel for myeloma in the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium.
- Author
-
Afrough A, Hashmi H, Hansen DK, Sidana S, Ahn C, Peres LC, Dima D, Freeman CL, Puglianini OC, Kocoglu MH, Atrash S, Voorhees PM, Shune L, McGuirk JP, Simmons G, Sborov DW, Davis JA, Kaur G, Sannareddy A, Ferreri CJ, Gaballa MR, Goldsmith S, Nadeem O, Midha S, Wagner CB, Locke FL, Patel KK, Khouri J, Anderson LD Jr, and Lin Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
211. Mezigdomide-A Novel Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator under Investigation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
- Author
-
Hartley-Brown MA, Mo CC, Nadeem O, Midha S, Laubach JP, and Richardson PG
- Abstract
Mezigomide is an oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) that is under clinical investigation in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). Like other CELMoD compounds, mezigdomide acts by altering the conformation of cereblon within the cullin 4A ring ligase-cereblon (CRL4CRBN) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, thereby recruiting novel protein substrates for selective proteasomal degradation. These include two critical lymphoid transcription factors, Ikaros family zinc finger proteins 1 and 3 (IKZF1 and IKZF3), also known as Ikaros and Aiolos, which have important roles in the development and differentiation of hematopoietic cells, in MM pathobiology, and in suppressing the expression of interferon-stimulating genes and T-cell stimulation. Among the CELMoDs, mezigdomide has the greatest cereblon-binding potency, plus the greatest potency for the degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos and subsequent downstream antimyeloma effects. Preclinical studies of mezigdomide have demonstrated its anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects in MM, along with its immune-stimulatory effects and its synergistic activity with other antimyeloma agents, including in lenalidomide-/pomalidomide-resistant MM cell lines and mouse xenograft models. Early-phase clinical trial data indicate notable activity in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM, including those with triple-class-refractory disease, together with a tolerable and manageable safety profile. This review summarizes current preclinical and clinical findings with mezigdomide and its potential future roles in the treatment of MM.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
212. Design and Rationale of Prolonged Nightly Fasting for Multiple Myeloma Prevention (PROFAST): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
- Author
-
Lee DJ, O'Donnell EK, Raje N, Panaroni C, Redd R, Ligibel J, Sears DD, Nadeem O, Ghobrial IM, and Marinac CR
- Abstract
Background: Obesity is an established, modifiable risk factor of multiple myeloma (MM); yet, no lifestyle interventions are routinely recommended for patients with overweight or obesity with MM precursor conditions. Prolonged nightly fasting is a simple, practical dietary regimen supported by research, suggesting that the synchronization of feeding-fasting timing with sleep-wake cycles favorably affects metabolic pathways implicated in MM. We describe the design and rationale of a randomized controlled pilot trial evaluating the efficacy of a regular, prolonged nighttime fasting schedule among individuals with overweight or obesity at high risk for developing MM or a related lymphoid malignancy., Objective: We aim to investigate the effects of 4-month prolonged nightly fasting on body composition and tumor biomarkers among individuals with overweight or obesity with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or smoldering Waldenström macroglobulinemia (SWM)., Methods: Individuals with MGUS, SMM, or SWM aged ≥18 years and a BMI of ≥25 kg/m
2 are randomized to either a 14-hour nighttime fasting intervention or a healthy lifestyle education control group. Participants' baseline diet and lifestyle patterns are characterized through two 24-hour dietary recalls: questionnaires querying demographic, comorbidity, lifestyle, and quality-of-life information; and wrist actigraphy measurements for 7 days. Fasting intervention participants are supported through one-on-one telephone counseling by a health coach and automated SMS text messaging to support fasting goals. Primary end points of body composition, including visceral and subcutaneous fat (by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry); bone marrow adiposity (by bone marrow histology); and tumor biomarkers, specifically M-proteins and serum free light-chain concentrations (by gel-based and serum free light-chain assays), are assessed at baseline and after the 4-month study period; changes therein from baseline are evaluated using a repeated measures mixed-effects model that accounts for the correlation between baseline and follow-up measures and is generally robust to missing data. Feasibility is assessed as participant retention (percent dropout in each arm) and percentage of days participants achieved a ≥14-hour fast., Results: The PROlonged nightly FASTing (PROFAST) study was funded in June 2022. Participant recruitment commenced in April 2023. As of July 2023, six participants consented to the study. The study is expected to be completed by April 2024, and data analysis and results are expected to be published in the first quarter of 2025., Conclusions: PROFAST serves as an important first step in exploring the premise that prolonged nightly fasting is a strategy to control obesity and obesity-related mechanisms of myelomagenesis. In evaluating the feasibility and impact of prolonged nightly fasting on body composition, bone marrow adipose tissue, and biomarkers of tumor burden, this pilot study may generate hypotheses regarding metabolic mechanisms underlying MM development and ultimately inform clinical and public health strategies for MM prevention., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05565638; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05565638., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/51368., (©David J Lee, Elizabeth K O'Donnell, Noopur Raje, Cristina Panaroni, Robert Redd, Jennifer Ligibel, Dorothy D Sears, Omar Nadeem, Irene M Ghobrial, Catherine R Marinac. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 11.03.2024.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
213. Management of Adverse Events Associated with Pomalidomide-Based Combinations in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
- Author
-
Nadeem O, Ailawadhi S, Khouri J, Williams L, Catamero D, Maples K, and Berdeja J
- Abstract
Multi-agent regimens incorporating immunomodulatory (IMiD
® ) agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have become the preferred standard of care for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in improved survival outcomes. Currently, there are three IMiD agents approved for the treatment of MM: thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. Lenalidomide is commonly used to treat patients with newly diagnosed MM and as maintenance therapy following stem cell transplant or after disease relapse. Pomalidomide, the focus of this review, is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Despite survival benefits, IMiD agents each have different safety profiles requiring consideration both prior to starting therapy and during treatment. Adverse event (AE) management is essential, not only to ensure treatment adherence and thus ensure optimal efficacy but also to maintain patient quality of life. Here, we discuss AEs associated with pomalidomide and present five clinically relevant hypothetical case studies in patients with RRMM to provide scenario-driven guidance regarding treatment selection and AE prevention and management in the clinical setting. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in MM, we also discuss novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agents including iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480).- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
214. Racial and ethnic differences in clinical outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR T-cell therapy.
- Author
-
Peres LC, Oswald LB, Dillard CM, De Avila G, Nishihori T, Blue BJ, Freeman CL, Locke FL, Alsina M, Castaneda Puglianini O, Shune L, Sborov DW, Wagner C, Dima D, Hashmi H, Davis JA, Kocoglu MH, Badros AZ, Atrash S, Simmons G, Kalariya N, Ferreri C, Anderson LD Jr, Afrough A, Kaur G, Lin Y, Liu L, Nadeem O, Voorhees P, Khouri J, McGuirk J, Sidana S, Hansen DK, and Patel K
- Subjects
- United States, Humans, Immunotherapy, Adoptive adverse effects, Ethnicity, Minority Groups, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
- Abstract
Abstract: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The clinical outcomes of standard of care (SOC) ide-cel in racially and ethnically diverse populations have been understudied. This study pooled data from 207 patients with RRMM (28% patients of racial and ethnic minority groups) treated with SOC ide-cel across 11 institutions to examine racial and ethnic differences in the incidence of toxicities and adverse events, response to ide-cel, and survival. This study included 22 (11%) Hispanic, 36 (17%) non-Hispanic Black, and 149 (72%) non-Hispanic White patients with RRMM. Compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher median levels of C-reactive protein (1.0, 0.8, and 3.5 mg/dL, respectively; P = .02) and baseline ferritin (362.0 vs 307.0 vs 680.5, respectively; P = .08) and were more likely to develop cytokine release syndrome (77%, 85%, and 97%, respectively; P = .04). Although best overall response rate was lower among Hispanic patients (59%) than among non-Hispanic Black (86%) and White patients (86%; P = .01), there were no racial and ethnic differences in progression-free or overall survival. We provide, to our knowledge, the first and largest investigation of clinical outcomes of SOC ide-cel by race and ethnicity. Despite differences in safety and response to ide-cel, our findings encourage the use of ide-cel in all patients with RRMM. These findings should be confirmed in larger samples of diverse patients with RRMM, with longer follow-up time., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
215. Clinical Outcomes of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance Without Detectable Clones.
- Author
-
Terashita M, Selamet U, Midha S, Nadeem O, Laubach J, Rennke HG, and Murakami N
- Abstract
Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is characterized by monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition in kidneys. However, monoclonal immunoglobulin and responsible clone(s) are not always detectable. Treatment response and kidney outcome of MGRS without detectable clones remain unclear., Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we identified MGRS without detectable clones from our biopsy repository between 2010 and 2022. We investigated the correlations between treatment regimens and kidney outcomes defined by proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the impact of repeat kidney biopsy., Results: Our study cohort included 29 cases (27 native kidney and 2 transplant allograft biopsies) of MGRS without detectable clones. At diagnosis, median serum creatinine was 1.8 mg/dl (interquartile range [IQR] 1.3-2.7), with proteinuria 4.6 g/gCr (IQR 2.3-7.9). Treatment regimens were variable: 6 (21%) received conservative therapy, 13 (45%) received plasma cell clone-directed therapy, 8 (28%) received lymphocytic clone-directed therapy, and 2 (7%) received nonclone-directed immunosuppressive therapy. Of 24 patients with proteinuria >0.5 g/gCr at diagnosis, 9 (38%) and 6 (25%) achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. If interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) was >50% at the initial biopsy, less proportion of patients achieved CR. Six of 7 repeat biopsies showed progression of chronic changes (e.g., IFTA) but provided limited information on treatment response., Conclusion: Treatment regimens and outcomes of MGRS without detectable clones were extremely variable. Repeat biopsy provided limited information to assess disease activity or the need for additional treatment. More sensitive tools are needed to detect clones and to assess treatment response., (© 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
216. Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy.
- Author
-
Ferreri CJ, Hildebrandt MAT, Hashmi H, Shune LO, McGuirk JP, Sborov DW, Wagner CB, Kocoglu MH, Rapoport A, Atrash S, Voorhees PM, Khouri J, Dima D, Afrough A, Kaur G, Anderson LD Jr, Simmons G, Davis JA, Kalariya N, Peres LC, Lin Y, Janakiram M, Nadeem O, Alsina M, Locke FL, Sidana S, Hansen DK, Patel KK, and Castaneda Puglianini OA
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Multiple Myeloma therapy, B-Cell Maturation Antigen antagonists & inhibitors, Immunotherapy, Adoptive methods, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen therapeutic use
- Abstract
Most patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited. We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0.021), median duration of response (7.4 versus 9.6 months; p = 0.03), and median progression-free survival (3.2 months versus 9.0 months; p = 0.0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup. In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
217. Bispecific Monoclonal Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: Data from ASH 2022: A Podcast.
- Author
-
Landgren O and Nadeem O
- Subjects
- Humans, T-Lymphocytes, Immunotherapy methods, Antibodies, Bispecific therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Antineoplastic Agents
- Abstract
The introduction of novel immunotherapies has transformed the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma (MM). The addition of these agents has significantly improved patient outcomes; however, MM remains largely incurable, with heavily pretreated patients suffering from shorter survival times. To address this unmet need, the focus has shifted toward novel mode of action therapies, such as bispecific antibodies (BsAb), which simultaneously bind to immune effector cells and myeloma cells. Currently, there are several T cell-redirecting BsAb being developed that target BCMA, GPRC5D, and FcRH5. These BsAb show impressive clinical activity for the relapsed/refractory population targeted and will likely become an essential part of MM treatment protocols in the future. In this podcast, the authors summarize and highlight some of the T cell-redirecting BsAb currently in development for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM with a focus on the data reported at the oral session for BsAb at the American Society of Hematology's 2022 meeting from clinical phase 1 and 2 studies. The six presentations reported the latest safety and efficacy data for the BsAb: talquetamab, elranatamab, teclistamab, forimtamig, and alnuctamab., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
218. A safety review of recently approved and emerging drugs for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Midha S, Hartley-Brown MA, Mo CC, Hossain S, Nadeem O, O'Donnell EK, Bianchi G, Sperling AS, Laubach JP, and Richardson PG
- Subjects
- Humans, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Antibodies, Bispecific
- Abstract
Introduction: Multiple new drugs have been approved over the past 5 years for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and these are being increasingly widely used. Clinicians need to familiarize themselves with common toxicities associated with these drugs and with novel toxicities requiring specific management and supportive care., Areas Covered: We review common toxicities associated with agents approved for RRMM in the past 5 years, including the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab, the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin, the bispecific antibody teclistamab, the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, the selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound selinexor, and the drug-peptide conjugate melflufen, as well as toxicities associated with emerging agents for RRMM including additional bispecific antibodies, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, and the cereblon E3 ligase modulators iberdomide and mezigdomide. We searched the published literature using PubMed, plus congress abstracts, for the above list of drug names or classes and 'myeloma.', Expert Opinion: Optimal management of toxicities associated with these recently approved and emerging therapies will be critical in maximizing clinical benefit and aiding widespread adoption in routine clinical practice. We summarize current recommendations and guidelines and provide expert insights into supportive care requirements.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
219. Selinexor: Targeting a novel pathway in multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Mo CC, Yee AJ, Midha S, Hartley-Brown MA, Nadeem O, O'Donnell EK, Bianchi G, Sperling AS, Laubach JP, and Richardson PG
- Abstract
Selinexor is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound that inhibits exportin-1 (XPO1), a novel therapeutic target that is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM) and is responsible for the transport of ∼220 nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm, including tumour suppressor proteins. Inhibition of this process has demonstrated substantial antimyeloma activity in preclinical studies, both alone and in combination with established MM therapeutics. Based on a clinical trial programme encompassing multiple combination regimens, selinexor-based therapy has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), with selinexor-dexamethasone approved in the later-relapse setting for penta-refractory patients and selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone approved for patients who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical data on selinexor-based regimens, including recent updates from the 2022 American Society of Hematology annual meeting, and summarise ongoing studies of this novel targeted agent in newly diagnosed MM and RRMM., Competing Interests: Clifton C. Mo: Advisory Boards for AbbVie, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda. Consulting for AbbVie, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi. Andrew J. Yee: Consulting for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda. Research funding from Amgen, BMS, Janssen. Shonali Midha: No conflict of interest to declare. Monique A. Hartley‐Brown: Advisory board participation for Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi. Research funding from BMS /Celgene, GSK, Sanofi. Omar Nadeem: Advisory board participation for BMS, Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, GPCR Therapeutics. Research funding from Takeda, Janssen. Elizabeth K. O'Donnell: No conflict of interests to declare. Giada Bianchi: No conflict of interests to declare. Adam S. Sperling: Consulting for Novartis, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Roche. Jacob P. Laubach: No conflict of interest to declare. Paul G. Richardson: Grants to institution for clinical trials from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, and Takeda. Service on advisory committees for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, GSK, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi and Takeda., (© 2023 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
220. Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study.
- Author
-
Cowan A, Ferrari F, Freeman SS, Redd R, El-Khoury H, Perry J, Patel V, Kaur P, Barr H, Lee DJ, Lightbody E, Downey K, Argyelan D, Theodorakakou F, Fotiou D, Liacos CI, Kanellias N, Chavda SJ, Ainley L, Sandecká V, Pospíšilová L, Minarik J, Jungova A, Radocha J, Spicka I, Nadeem O, Yong K, Hájek R, Kastritis E, Marinac CR, Dimopoulos MA, Get G, Trippa L, and Ghobrial IM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Retrospective Studies, Algorithms, Creatinine, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Multiple Myeloma
- Abstract
Background: Patients with precursors to multiple myeloma are dichotomised as having monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma on the basis of monoclonal protein concentrations or bone marrow plasma cell percentage. Current risk stratifications use laboratory measurements at diagnosis and do not incorporate time-varying biomarkers. Our goal was to develop a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma stratification algorithm that utilised accessible, time-varying biomarkers to model risk of progression to multiple myeloma., Methods: In this retrospective, multicohort study, we included patients who were 18 years or older with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma. We evaluated several modelling approaches for predicting disease progression to multiple myeloma using a training cohort (with patients at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; annotated from Nov, 13, 2019, to April, 13, 2022). We created the PANGEA models, which used data on biomarkers (monoclonal protein concentration, free light chain ratio, age, creatinine concentration, and bone marrow plasma cell percentage) and haemoglobin trajectories from medical records to predict progression from precursor disease to multiple myeloma. The models were validated in two independent validation cohorts from National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Athens, Greece; from Jan 26, 2020, to Feb 7, 2022; validation cohort 1), University College London (London, UK; from June 9, 2020, to April 10, 2022; validation cohort 1), and Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (Czech Republic, Czech Republic; Jan 5, 2004, to March 10, 2022; validation cohort 2). We compared the PANGEA models (with bone marrow [BM] data and without bone marrow [no BM] data) to current criteria (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 20/2/20 smouldering multiple myeloma risk criteria)., Findings: We included 6441 patients, 4931 (77%) with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 1510 (23%) with smouldering multiple myeloma. 3430 (53%) of 6441 participants were female. The PANGEA model (BM) improved prediction of progression from smouldering multiple myeloma to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model, with a C-statistic increase from 0·533 (0·480-0·709) to 0·756 (0·629-0·785) at patient visit 1 to the clinic, 0·613 (0·504-0·704) to 0·720 (0·592-0·775) at visit 2, and 0·637 (0·386-0·841) to 0·756 (0·547-0·830) at visit three in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA model (no BM) improved prediction of smouldering multiple myeloma progression to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model with a C-statistic increase from 0·534 (0·501-0·672) to 0·692 (0·614-0·736) at visit 1, 0·573 (0·518-0·647) to 0·693 (0·605-0·734) at visit 2, and 0·560 (0·497-0·645) to 0·692 (0·570-0·708) at visit 3 in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA models improved prediction of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance progression to multiple myeloma compared with the IMWG rolling model at visit 1 in validation cohort 2, with C-statistics increases from 0·640 (0·518-0·718) to 0·729 (0·643-0·941) for the PANGEA model (BM) and 0·670 (0·523-0·729) to 0·879 (0·586-0·938) for the PANGEA model (no BM)., Interpretation: Use of the PANGEA models in clinical practice will allow patients with precursor disease to receive more accurate measures of their risk of progression to multiple myeloma, thus prompting for more appropriate treatment strategies., Funding: SU2C Dream Team and Cancer Research UK., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests This study was previously presented on April 12, 2022, at the 2022 American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting and on Aug 25, 2022, at the International Myeloma Society Annual Meeting. AC declares grants from the International Myeloma Society for travel and conference expenses. FF is employed by Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co. SSF declares that their salary is partly supported by research funding from International Business Machines (IBM) and has patent applications (EP14807512·0A and US16/084 890) and a provisional patent application (62/866 261). LA declares grants from the International Myeloma Society for travel and conference expenses. JR declares honoraria from Sanofi, Janssen, Amgen, GSK, and Bristol Myers Squibb; travel grants from BMS, Janssen, and Amgen; and funding from a consulting or advisory role from Sanofi, Janssen, Amgen, GSK, and BMS. EK reports honoraria from Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Genesis Pharma, Pfizer, and GSK; travel grants from Janssen; and is an advisory board member at Janssen and Prothena. MAD declares honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Takeda, and Janssen and is an advisory board member at Amgen, BMS, Takeda, and Janssen. CRM reports research funding from GRAIL. GG declares honoraria for lectures from Society for Neuro-oncology, Society of Tumor Oncology, and MD Anderson; honoraria as a Paul C Zamecnik Chair in Oncology; research funding from IBM and Pharmacyclics; patents, royalties, other intellectual property as Inventor on patent applications related to MSMuTect, MSMutSig, MSIDetect, POLYSOLVER, and SignatureAnalyzer-GPU; and stock and other ownership interests from Founder as a consultant and has privately-held equity in Scorpion Therapeutics. IMG declares honoraria from Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen, and Vor Biopharma; consulting or advisory roles at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Celgene, Cellectar, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, The Binding Site, GSK, AbbVie, Adaptive, and 10xGenomics; and a spouse who is the Chief Medical Officer at Disc Medicine and holds equity in the company. AC, FF, SSF, GG, LT, and IMG have applied for a patent for the application of the PANGEA models described in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
221. MinimuMM-seq: Genome Sequencing of Circulating Tumor Cells for Minimally Invasive Molecular Characterization of Multiple Myeloma Pathology.
- Author
-
Dutta AK, Alberge JB, Lightbody ED, Boehner CJ, Dunford A, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Mouhieddine TH, Cowan AN, Su NK, Horowitz EM, Barr H, Hevenor L, Beckwith JB, Perry J, Cao A, Lin Z, Kuhr FK, Mastro RGD, Nadeem O, Greipp PT, Stewart C, Auclair D, Getz G, and Ghobrial IM
- Subjects
- Humans, Base Sequence, Bone Marrow, Whole Genome Sequencing, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating pathology, Multiple Myeloma genetics, Multiple Myeloma pathology
- Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) develops from well-defined precursor stages; however, invasive bone marrow (BM) biopsy limits screening and monitoring strategies for patients. We enumerated circulating tumor cells (CTC) from 261 patients (84 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 155 smoldering multiple myeloma, and 22 MM), with neoplastic cells detected in 84%. We developed a novel approach, MinimuMM-seq, which enables the detection of translocations and copy-number abnormalities through whole-genome sequencing of highly pure CTCs. Application to CTCs in a cohort of 51 patients, 24 with paired BM, was able to detect 100% of clinically reported BM biopsy events and could replace molecular cytogenetics for diagnostic yield and risk classification. Longitudinal sampling of CTCs in 8 patients revealed major clones could be tracked in the blood, with clonal evolution and shifting dynamics of subclones over time. Our findings provide proof of concept that CTC detection and genomic profiling could be used clinically for monitoring and managing disease in MM., Significance: In this study, we established an approach enabling the enumeration and sequencing of CTCs to replace standard molecular cytogenetics. CTCs harbored the same pathognomonic MM abnormalities as BM plasma cells. Longitudinal sampling of serial CTCs was able to track clonal dynamics over time and detect the emergence of high-risk genetic subclones. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 247., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
222. Immune biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma.
- Author
-
Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Aranha MP, Redd RA, Baginska J, Haradhvala NJ, Hallisey M, Dutta AK, Savell A, Varmeh S, Heilpern-Mallory D, Ujwary S, Zavidij O, Aguet F, Su NK, Lightbody ED, Bustoros M, Tahri S, Mouhieddine TH, Wu T, Flechon L, Anand S, Rosenblatt JM, Zonder J, Vredenburgh JJ, Boruchov A, Bhutani M, Usmani SZ, Matous J, Yee AJ, Jakubowiak A, Laubach J, Manier S, Nadeem O, Richardson P, Badros AZ, Mateos MV, Trippa L, Getz G, and Ghobrial IM
- Subjects
- Humans, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Immunologic Factors, Immunotherapy, Lenalidomide adverse effects, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Smoldering Multiple Myeloma therapy
- Abstract
Patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are observed until progression, but early treatment may improve outcomes. We conducted a phase II trial of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloLenDex) in patients with high-risk SMM and performed single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing on 149 bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples from patients and healthy donors (HDs). We find that early treatment with EloLenDex is safe and effective and provide a comprehensive characterization of alterations in immune cell composition and TCR repertoire diversity in patients. We show that the similarity of a patient's immune cell composition to that of HDs may have prognostic relevance at diagnosis and after treatment and that the abundance of granzyme K (GZMK)
+ CD8+ effector memory T (TEM) cells may be associated with treatment response. Last, we uncover similarities between immune alterations observed in the BM and PB, suggesting that PB-based immune profiling may have diagnostic and prognostic utility., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests N.J.H. is a consultant for Constellation Pharmaceuticals. F.A. is an employee of Illumina Inc. O.Z. is an employee of Ikena Oncology and a stockholder in Ikena Oncology and Morphosys AG. G.G. receives research funds from IBM and Pharmacyclics and is an inventor on patent applications filed by the Broad Institute related to MSMuTect, MSMutSig, POLYSOLVER, SignatureAnalyzer-GPU, and MSIDetect. He is also a founder and consultant of and holds privately held equity in Scorpion Therapeutics. I.M.G. has a consulting or advisory role with AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Aptitude Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Huron Consulting, Janssen, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sognef, Takeda, The Binding Site, and Window Therapeutics and has received speaker fees from Vor Biopharma and Veeva Systems, Inc., and her spouse is the CMO and equity holder of Disc Medicine. S.M. has a consulting role with Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Roche, and Takeda and has received research funding from Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Roche, and Takeda. A.J.Y. has a consulting role with Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda and has received research funding from Amgen, Janssen, and Takeda. M.B. is a consultant for Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen and has received research funding from MedImmune, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Amgen, Celularity, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Bluebird bio, Millennium, Takeda, Cerecor (currently Avalo Therapeutics), and C4 Therapeutics. M.B has an advisory role and received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Janssen, and Menarini. T.H.M. received advisory board fees from Legend Biotech. R.S.-P., G.G., and I.M.G. are co-inventors on a patent application related to this work (PCT/US22/74839)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
223. Quality of life, psychological distress, and prognostic perceptions in caregivers of patients with multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
O'Donnell EK, Shapiro YN, Yee AJ, Nadeem O, Laubach JP, Branagan AR, Anderson KC, Mo CC, Munshi NC, Ghobrial IM, Sperling AS, Agyemang EA, Burke JN, Harrington CC, Hu BY, Richardson PG, Raje NS, and El-Jawahri A
- Subjects
- Caregivers psychology, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression etiology, Depression psychology, Humans, Prognosis, Quality of Life psychology, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Psychological Distress
- Abstract
Although caregivers of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) play a critical role in supporting their loved ones throughout the illness course, studies examining caregiver quality of life (QOL), psychological distress, and prognostic awareness are lacking. We conducted a cross-sectional, multisite study of patients undergoing treatment with MM and their caregivers. Eligible caregivers were enrolled to 1 of 3 cohorts based on lines of therapy. Caregivers completed validated questionnaires to assess their QOL, psychological distress, and perceptions of prognosis. We enrolled 127 caregivers of patients with MM (newly diagnosed [n = 43], 2-3 lines of therapy [n = 40], and ≥4 lines of therapy [n = 44]). Caregiver QOL and psychological distress did not differ by line of therapy. The rate of clinically significant anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms were 44.1% (56/127), 15.8% (20/127), and 24.4% (31/127), respectively. When examined in dyads, caregivers reported higher rates of clinically significant anxiety (44.4% [55/124] vs 22.5% [28/124]) compared with patients with MM. Most caregivers (84.2%, 101/120) reported that the oncologist had informed them that the patient's cancer was incurable; however, only 50.9% (58/114) and 53.6% (59/110) of caregivers acknowledged the patient's cancer was terminal and incurable, respectively. Caregivers of patients undergoing treatment for MM experience substantial psychological distress across the disease continuum, particularly anxiety. The majority of caregivers of patients with MM report that knowing the patient's prognosis is extremely important and report that the oncologist told them that the patient was incurable. Nevertheless, a significant portion of caregivers believe that the patient's MM is curable., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
224. Melphalan flufenamide for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Nadeem O, Mateos MV, Efebera YA, Paner A, Larocca A, Rodríguez-Otero P, Leleu X, and Richardson PG
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Humans, Melphalan adverse effects, Melphalan analogs & derivatives, Phenylalanine analogs & derivatives, Phenylalanine pharmacology, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy
- Abstract
Despite therapeutic advances and improved patient outcomes in recent years, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a mostly incurable hematologic malignancy. Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), especially those with triple-class-refractory disease or poor-prognostic features, have substantially unmet needs for new therapies with novel mechanisms of action. Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is the first alkylating peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases to show efficacy and manageable safety, in combination with dexamethasone, in patients with RRMM who had received at least 4 prior lines of therapy, including at least 1 immunomodulatory drug, at least 1 proteasome inhibitor and at least 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in early 2021 for use in this patient population. Initial analyses of the phase III OCEAN study data led to melflufen being voluntarily withdrawn from the U.S. market in late 2021, but subsequent analyses have prompted the manufacturer to rescind its voluntary withdrawal to allow further discussions with the U.S. FDA and the regulatory review with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is also ongoing. Here, we provide a review of the novel mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of melflufen, as well as key efficacy and safety from clinical studies that supported its initial approval, and discuss the nuances of the OCEAN study data. Melflufen demonstrates the potential of novel peptide-drug conjugates to positively impact the treatment landscape in RRMM., (Copyright 2022 Clarivate.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
225. Triplet Therapy, Transplantation, and Maintenance until Progression in Myeloma.
- Author
-
Richardson PG, Jacobus SJ, Weller EA, Hassoun H, Lonial S, Raje NS, Medvedova E, McCarthy PL, Libby EN, Voorhees PM, Orlowski RZ, Anderson LD Jr, Zonder JA, Milner CP, Gasparetto C, Agha ME, Khan AM, Hurd DD, Gowin K, Kamble RT, Jagannath S, Nathwani N, Alsina M, Cornell RF, Hashmi H, Campagnaro EL, Andreescu AC, Gentile T, Liedtke M, Godby KN, Cohen AD, Openshaw TH, Pasquini MC, Giralt SA, Kaufman JL, Yee AJ, Scott E, Torka P, Foley A, Fulciniti M, Hebert K, Samur MK, Masone K, Maglio ME, Zeytoonjian AA, Nadeem O, Schlossman RL, Laubach JP, Paba-Prada C, Ghobrial IM, Perrot A, Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Anderson KC, and Munshi NC
- Subjects
- Adult, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Bortezomib administration & dosage, Bortezomib adverse effects, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Dexamethasone adverse effects, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Lenalidomide administration & dosage, Lenalidomide adverse effects, Melphalan administration & dosage, Transplantation, Autologous, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Maintenance Chemotherapy methods, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma surgery, Stem Cell Transplantation
- Abstract
Background: In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the effect of adding autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [RVD]), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until disease progression, is unknown., Methods: In this phase 3 trial, adults (18 to 65 years of age) with symptomatic myeloma received one cycle of RVD. We randomly assigned these patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization, followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Both groups received lenalidomide until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both. The primary end point was progression-free survival., Results: Among 357 patients in the RVD-alone group and 365 in the transplantation group, at a median follow-up of 76.0 months, 328 events of disease progression or death occurred; the risk was 53% higher in the RVD-alone group than in the transplantation group (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.91; P<0.001); median progression-free survival was 46.2 months and 67.5 months. The percentage of patients with a partial response or better was 95.0% in the RVD-alone group and 97.5% in the transplantation group (P = 0.55); 42.0% and 46.8%, respectively, had a complete response or better (P = 0.99). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 78.2% and 94.2%, respectively; 5-year survival was 79.2% and 80.7% (hazard ratio for death, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65)., Conclusions: Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD plus ASCT was associated with longer progression-free survival than RVD alone. No overall survival benefit was observed. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; DETERMINATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01208662.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
226. Melflufen for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
- Author
-
Ocio EM, Nadeem O, Schjesvold F, Gay F, Touzeau C, Dimopoulos MA, Richardson PG, and Mateos MV
- Subjects
- Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Europe, Phenylalanine analogs & derivatives, Melphalan analogs & derivatives, Melphalan pharmacology, Melphalan therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma chemically induced, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma pathology
- Abstract
Introduction: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that takes advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity inside tumor cells to rapidly release alkylating agents therein. Melflufen in combination with dexamethasone has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)., Areas Covered: This profile covers the unique mechanism of action of melflufen, the preclinical results supporting its activity in cellular models of resistance to chemotherapy, its activity in animal models of MM, and the clinical pharmacokinetics of melflufen. Findings from clinical trials evaluating melflufen, including the pivotal phase II HORIZON study and the phase III OCEAN study, are discussed., Expert Opinion: Although MM treatment has improved, patients with disease refractory to multiple standard-of-care drug classes face a dismal prognosis. Melflufen demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in select populations, with an initial approval in the United States in patients with ≥ four previous lines of therapy and triple-class-refractory MM. Results from the phase III OCEAN study - currently under discussion with regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe - are more complex and have been put into context herein. Lastly, melflufen provides a proof-of-concept for the utility of the peptide-drug conjugate platform in relapsed/refractory MM.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
227. Digital Health for Patients With Multiple Myeloma: An Unmet Need.
- Author
-
Jagannath S, Mikhael J, Nadeem O, and Raje N
- Subjects
- Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Pandemics, Quality of Life, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma epidemiology, Multiple Myeloma therapy
- Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with the highest symptom burden and lowest health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with hematologic malignancies. HRQoL in MM is heterogeneous, varying over the course of disease, with the highest burden at diagnosis and relapse. Patients with MM are increasingly being treated with oral maintenance medications at home. As a result, longitudinal monitoring of medication adherence and patient-reported outcomes, including HRQoL, could inform on disease status, therapeutic tolerability, and satisfaction with care. Digital health technologies, including telemedicine, mobile health, and wearable devices, are poised to become an integral part of modern health care, in part due to the surge in telemedicine necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the literature has many reports on the use of digital health technologies in other types of cancers, fewer studies report on their application to MM. In the current narrative review, we survey the applications of digital health for MM. Although there is evidence that some are associated with improved health outcomes, challenges exist that must be met to ensure more widespread adoption. These include the need for increased awareness by patients and health care providers, lack of access by the typical older patient with MM, absence of randomized clinical trials, and low integration with current workflows such as electronic health records. Following our summary of technologies that could benefit patients with MM, we end by describing our vision for how they can be integrated into each phase of the patient journey., Competing Interests: Sundar JagannathConsulting or Advisory Role: BioMED Corp, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Merck & Co, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Sanofi Joseph MikhaelHonoraria: Amgen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sanofi, Janssen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda Omar NadeemConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi, Takeda, Adaptive Biotechnologies Noopur RajeConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers SquibbNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
228. miR-15a/16-1 deletion in activated B cells promotes plasma cell and mature B-cell neoplasms.
- Author
-
Sewastianik T, Straubhaar JR, Zhao JJ, Samur MK, Adler K, Tanton HE, Shanmugam V, Nadeem O, Dennis PS, Pillai V, Wang J, Jiang M, Lin J, Huang Y, Brooks D, Bouxsein M, Dorfman DM, Pinkus GS, Robbiani DF, Ghobrial IM, Budnik B, Jarolim P, Munshi NC, Anderson KC, and Carrasco RD
- Subjects
- Animals, B-Lymphocytes metabolism, B-Lymphocytes pathology, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosome Disorders genetics, Chromosome Disorders pathology, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13 genetics, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse pathology, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Multigene Family, Multiple Myeloma genetics, Multiple Myeloma pathology, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell pathology, Plasma Cells metabolism, Plasma Cells pathology, Plasmacytoma genetics, Plasmacytoma pathology, Mice, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse genetics, MicroRNAs genetics, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell genetics
- Abstract
Chromosome 13q deletion [del(13q)], harboring the miR-15a/16-1 cluster, is one of the most common genetic alterations in mature B-cell malignancies, which originate from germinal center (GC) and post-GC B cells. Moreover, miR-15a/16 expression is frequently reduced in lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM) cells without del(13q), suggesting important tumor-suppressor activity. However, the role of miR-15a/16-1 in B-cell activation and initiation of mature B-cell neoplasms remains to be determined. We show that conditional deletion of the miR-15a/16-1 cluster in murine GC B cells induces moderate but widespread molecular and functional changes including an increased number of GC B cells, percentage of dark zone B cells, and maturation into plasma cells. With time, this leads to development of mature B-cell neoplasms resembling human extramedullary plasmacytoma (EP) as well as follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. The indolent nature and lack of bone marrow involvement of EP in our murine model resembles human primary EP rather than MM that has progressed to extramedullary disease. We corroborate human primary EP having low levels of miR-15a/16 expression, with del(13q) being the most common genetic loss. Additionally, we show that, although the mutational profile of human EP is similar to MM, there are some exceptions such as the low frequency of hyperdiploidy in EP, which could account for different disease presentation. Taken together, our studies highlight the significant role of the miR-15a/16-1 cluster in the regulation of the GC reaction and its fundamental context-dependent tumor-suppression function in plasma cell and B-cell malignancies., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
229. A clinical perspective on plasma cell leukemia; current status and future directions.
- Author
-
Tuazon SA, Holmberg LA, Nadeem O, and Richardson PG
- Subjects
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Disease Management, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Induction Chemotherapy, Leukemia, Plasma Cell pathology, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Palliative Care, Prognosis, Leukemia, Plasma Cell diagnosis, Leukemia, Plasma Cell therapy
- Abstract
Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an aggressive plasma cell disorder with a guarded prognosis. The diagnosis is confirmed when peripheral blood plasma cells (PCs) exceed 20% of white blood cells or 2000/μL. Emerging data demonstrates that patients with lower levels of circulating (PCs) have the same adverse prognosis, challenging the clinical disease definition, but supporting the adverse impact of circulating PCs. The cornerstone of treatment consists of combination therapy incorporating a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, steroids, and/or anthracyclines and alkylators as part of more-intensive chemotherapy, followed by consolidative autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in eligible patients and then maintenance therapy. Monoclonal antibodies are also currently being evaluated in this setting with a strong rationale for their use based on their activity in multiple myeloma (MM). Due to limited therapeutic studies specifically evaluating pPCL, patients with pPCL should be considered for clinical trials. In contrast to MM, the outcomes of patients with pPCL have only modestly improved with novel therapies, and secondary PCL arising from MM in particular is associated with a dismal outlook. Newer drug combinations, immunotherapy, and cellular therapy are under investigation, and these approaches hopefully will demonstrate efficacy to improve the prognosis of pPCL.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.