Search

Introduction: Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-bup) formulations have advantages over transmucosal buprenorphine (TM-bup), but barriers may limit their utilization. Several policies shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic to promote buprenorphine access. The federal government expanded telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and Kentucky (KY) Medicaid lifted prior authorization requirements (PAs) for LAI-bup (i.e., Sublocade®). This retrospective cohort study evaluated changes in LAI-bup access, utilization, and retention before and after these policy changes in KY., Methods: Individual-level TM-bup and LAI-bup dispensing record data from KY's prescription drug monitoring program examined LAI-bup utilization and retention, without a >30-day gap in coverage, for patients starting a new episode of LAI-bup treatment. Two key time periods were examined: pre-policy changes (Apr 1, 2019 - Dec 31, 2019) and post-policy changes (Apr 1, 2020 - Dec 31, 2020). Data on PA requests among Medicaid managed care organizations and availability of LAI-bup Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)-certified pharmacies were also obtained. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis compared pre- versus post-policy period treatment discontinuation., Results: The number of patients initiating LAI-bup increased from 211 to 481 over the two periods. By the end of the post-policy period, 24.3 % of eligible patients were retained on LAI-bup, versus 12.5 % in the pre-policy change period. The adjusted hazard ratio, comparing discontinuation during the post- versus pre-policy change periods, was 0.70 (95 % confidence interval: 0.55-0.89). There were also more REMS-certified pharmacies and providers in the post-policy change period., Conclusions: LAI-bup access, utilization, and retention increased after several policy changes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sharon Walsh reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Lindsey Hammerslag reports administrative support and data access were provided by Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (KASPER Data Access). Michelle Lofwall reports a relationship with Berkshire Biomedical that includes: consulting or advisory. Michelle Lofwall reports a relationship with Braeburn Pharmaceuticals Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Michelle Lofwall reports a relationship with Journey Colab that includes: consulting or advisory. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Braeburn Pharmaceuticals Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Astra Zeneca that includes: consulting or advisory. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Cerevel Therapeutics Inc. that includes:. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Opiant Pharmaceuticals Inc. that includes: consulting or advisory. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Pocket Naloxone that includes: consulting or advisory. Sharon Walsh reports a relationship with Titan Pharmaceuticals that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Trauma screening is recommended for pregnant persons with opioid use disorder (OUD), but there is limited literature on screening results from buprenorphine treatment. This study's objectives were to 1) describe the types, and severity, of traumatic events reported and 2) evaluate the associations between trauma and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Methods: Baseline data from an ongoing trial were analyzed. Participants were 155 pregnant persons with OUD receiving, or enrolling in, buprenorphine treatment at one of 13 sites. The experience, and relative severity, of 14 high magnitude stressors were assessed with the trauma history screen. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29+2 was used to assess 8 HRQoL domains., Results: Traumatic stressors were reported by 91% of the sample (n = 155), with 54.8% reporting a lifetime persisting posttraumatic distress (PPD) event and 29.7% reporting a childhood PPD event. The most prevalent lifetime PPD event was sudden death of a close family/friend (25.8%); physical abuse was the most prevalent childhood PPD event (10.3%). Participants with lifetime PPD, relative to no PPD, reported significantly greater pain interference (P = 0.02). Participants with childhood PPD, relative to no PPD, had significantly worse HRQoL overall (P = 0.01), and worse pain intensity (P = 0.002), anxiety (P = 0.003), depression (P = 0.007), fatigue (P = 0.002), and pain interference (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: A majority of pregnant persons enrolled/enrolling in buprenorphine treatment reported persisting posttraumatic distress with sudden death of close family/friend being the most prevalent originating event; clinicians should consider the impact that the opioid-overdose epidemic may be having in increasing trauma exposure in patients with OUD., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: AD reports royalties for academic books from OUP, Springer, PESI Publishing and from Oakstone CME. AJD reports receiving an honorarium for an online chapter on alcohol management in the perioperative period from the UpToDate online reference and serving pro bono on 3 non-for-profit Board of Directors of national/international organizations, with none of the efforts being related to the contents of this manuscript. EEK reports being an investigator on grants to Magee-Womens Research Institute from the National Institutes of Health, Gilead, and Merck outside of the submitted work. MRL reports being a research consultant for Berkshire Biomedical, Braeburn, Journey Colab, and Titan Pharmaceuticals in the last 3 years. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Addiction Medicine.)

An HCV treatment trial was initiated in September 2019 to address the opioid/hepatitis C virus (HCV) syndemic in rural Kentucky. The focus of the current analysis is on participation in diagnostic screening for the trial. Initial eligibility (≥18 years of age, county resident) was established by phone followed by in-person HCV viremia testing. 900 rural residents met the inclusion criteria and comprised the analytic sample. Generalized linear models were specified to estimate the relative risk of non-attendance at the in-person visit determining HCV eligibility. Approximately one-quarter (22.1%) of scheduled participants were no-shows. People who inject drugs were no more likely than people not injecting drugs to be a no-show; however, participants ≤35 years of age were significantly less likely to attend. While the median time between phone screening and scheduled in-person screening was only 2 days, each additional day increased the odds of no-show by 3% (95% confidence interval: 2%-3%). Finally, unknown HCV status predicted no-show even after adjustment for age, gender, days between screenings and injection status. We found that drug injection did not predict no-show, further justifying expanded access to HCV treatment among people who inject drugs. Those 35 years and younger were more likely to no-show, suggesting that younger individuals may require targeted strategies for increasing testing and treatment uptake. Finally, streamlining the treatment cascade may also improve outcomes, as participants in the current study were more likely to attend if there were fewer days between phone screening and scheduled in-person screening., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The U.S. opioid overdose crisis persists. Outpatient behavioral health services (BHS) are essential components of a comprehensive response to opioid use disorder and overdose fatalities. The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term® (HEALing) Communities Study developed the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention to reduce opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities in Kentucky, Ohio, New York, and Massachusetts through the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs), including BHS. This paper compares the rate of individuals receiving outpatient BHS in Wave 1 intervention communities (n = 34) to waitlisted Wave 2 communities (n = 33)., Methods: Medicaid data included individuals ≥18 years of age receiving any of five BHS categories: intensive outpatient, outpatient, case management, peer support, and case management or peer support. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate of receiving each BHS for Wave 1 and Wave 2. Effect modification analyses evaluated changes in the effect of the CTH intervention between Wave 1 and Wave 2 by research site, rurality, age, sex, and race/ethnicity., Results: No significant differences were detected between intervention and waitlisted communities in the rate of individuals receiving any of the five BHS categories. None of the interaction effects used to test the effect modification were significant., Conclusions: Several factors should be considered when interpreting results-no significant intervention effects were observed through Medicaid claims data, the best available data source but limited in terms of capturing individuals reached by the intervention. Also, the 12-month evaluation window may have been too brief to see improved outcomes considering the time required to stand-up BHS., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov: Identifier: NCT04111939., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest In last three years, MRL has served as a scientific consultant for treatments in development for substance use disorders to Journey Colab, Titan, Braeburn, and Berkshire Biomedical. RDW has consulted to Alkermes., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Buprenorphine is a medication for opioid use disorder that reduces mortality. This study aims to investigate the less well-understood relationship between the dose in the early stages of treatment and the subsequent risk of death., Methods: We used Kentucky prescription monitoring data to identify adult Kentucky residents initiating transmucosal buprenorphine medication for opioid use disorder (January 2017 to November 2019). Average daily buprenorphine dose for days covered in the first 30 days of treatment was categorized as ≤8 mg, >8 to ≤16 mg, and >16 mg. Patients were followed for 365 days after the first 30 days of buprenorphine treatment. Endpoints were opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes. Causes and dates of death were obtained using Kentucky death certificate records. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Fine and Gray models adjusting for patient baseline characteristics., Results: In the cohort of 49,857 patients, there were 227 opioid-involved overdose deaths and 459 deaths from other causes. Compared with ≤8 mg, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR) of opioid-involved overdose death decreased by 55% (aSHR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.60) and 64% (aSHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52) for patients receiving doses of >8 to ≤16 mg and >16 mg, respectively. The incidence of death from other causes was lower in patients receiving >8 to ≤16 mg (aSHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98) and >16 mg (aSHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) versus ≤8 mg dose., Conclusions: Higher first 30-day buprenorphine doses were associated with reduced opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes, supporting benefit of higher dosing in reducing mortality., (Copyright © 2024 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.)

Introduction: US federal policies are evolving to expand the provision of mobile treatment units (MTUs) offering medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Mobile MOUD services are critical for rural areas with poor geographic access to fixed-site treatment providers. This study explored willingness to utilize an MTU among a sample of people who use opioids in rural Eastern Kentucky counties at the epicenter of the US opioid epidemic., Methods: The study analyzed Cross-sectional survey data from the Kentucky Communities and Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic (CARE2HOPE) study covering five rural counties in the state. Logistic regression models investigated the association between willingness to utilize an MTU providing buprenorphine and naltrexone and potential correlates of willingness, identified using the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations., Results: The analytic sample comprised 174 people who used opioids within the past six months. Willingness to utilize an MTU was high; 76.5 % of participants endorsed being willing. Those who had recently received MOUD treatment, compared to those who had not received any form of treatment or recovery support services, had six-fold higher odds of willingness to use an MTU. However, odds of being willing to utilize an MTU were 73 % lower among those who were under community supervision (e.g., parole, probation) and 81 % lower among participants who experienced an overdose within the past six months., Conclusions: There was high acceptability of MTUs offering buprenorphine and naltrexone within this sample, highlighting the potential for MTUs to alleviate opioid-related harms in underserved rural areas. However, the finding that people who were recently under community supervision or had overdosed were significantly less willing to seek mobile MOUD treatment suggest barriers (e.g., stigma) to mobile MOUD at individual and systemic levels, which may prevent improving opioid-related outcomes in these rural communities given their high rates of criminal-legal involvement and overdose., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) decreases opioid overdose risk and is the standard of care for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Recovery coach (RC)-led programs and associated training curriculums to improve outcomes around MOUD are limited. We describe our comprehensive training curriculum including instruction and pedagogy for novel RC-led MOUD linkage and retention programs and report on its feasibility., Methods–pedagogy and Training Development: The Kentucky HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM ) Communities Study (HCS) created the Linkage and Retention RC Programs with a local recovery community organization, Voices of Hope-Lexington. RCs worked to reduce participant barriers to entering or continuing MOUD, destigmatize and educate on MOUD and harm reduction (e.g., safe injection practices), increase recovery capital, and provide opioid overdose education with naloxone distribution (OEND). An extensive hybrid (in-person and online, both synchronous and asynchronous), inclusive learning-focused curriculum to support the programs (e.g., motivational interviewing sessions, role plays, MOUD competency assessment, etc.,) was created to ensure RCs developed the necessary skills and could demonstrate competency before deployment in the field. The curriculum, pedagogy, learning environment, and numbers of RCs trained and community venues receiving a trained RC are reported, along with interviews from three RCs about the training program experience., Results: The curriculum provides approximately 150 h of training to RCs. From December 2020 to February 2023, 93 RCs and 16 supervisors completed the training program; two were unable to pass a final competency check. RCs were deployed at 45 agencies in eight Kentucky HCS counties. Most agencies (72%) sustained RC services after the study period ended through other funding sources. RCs interviewed reported that the training helped them better explain and dispel myths around MOUD., Conclusion: Our novel training and MOUD programs met a current unmet need for the RC workforce and for community agencies. We were able to train and deploy RCs successfully in these new programs aimed at saving lives through improving MOUD linkage and retention. This paper addresses a need to enhance the training requirements around MOUD for peer support specialists., Competing Interests: AF-B is a co-founder of Voices of Hope. JB is a contracted trainer for Voices of Hope and employed by Arthur Street Hotel, a non-profit harm reduction informed housing program for marginalized populations. SW has served as a scientific advisor/consulting related to novel MOUD development to Astra Zeneca, Cerevel, Titan Pharmaceuticals, and Braeburn Pharmaceuticals. ML has served as a research consultant to Berkshire Biomedical, Braeburn, Journey Colab and Titan Pharmaceuticals in the last 3 years. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Moffitt, Fallin-Bennett, Fanucchi, Walsh, Cook, Oller, Ross, Gallivan, Lauckner, Byard, Wheeler-Crum and Lofwall.)

In a case example from the Kentucky HEALing Communities Study, extensive resources were deployed to address structural barriers and facilitate the provision of medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) in an urban county jail. However, implementation was unsuccessful, and this case example emphasizes the importance of including evidence-based medication for OUD (MOUD) treatment in the scope of work of jails' contracted medical providers. The privatization of correctional health care services allows local governments with opioid abatement funds to incorporate requirements into medical provider contracts to screen all people entering jails for OUD and to offer MOUD at intake, throughout incarceration, and upon release to everyone for whom it is clinically indicated. We provide sample contractual language that can be added to requests for medical provider proposals to help drive the private correctional health care market toward integrating MOUD treatment into their standard of care. This approach also could expedite efforts to scale up broad MOUD access across U.S. jails through sharing of workflows and best practices among the small group of national correctional health care companies contracted with jails in states with broad mandates, such as Massachusetts. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04111939.

Weekly and monthly CAM2038 (Brixadi ® ) extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine (XR bup) has been available in Europe and Australia for several years and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2023. Little is known about the clinical experience of patients and providers using this new medication during prenatal care. Two cases of pregnant persons with opioid use disorder receiving weekly XR bup in an ongoing randomized multi-site outpatient clinical trial are presented along with a brief review of the pharmacology and literature on XR bup formulations. The cases in pregnancy illustrate how treatment with the weekly formulation is initiated including how to make dose adjustments, which may be necessary given the longer half-life; it takes 1 month to achieve steady state. Injection site pain with medication administration was time limited and managed readily. Other injection site reactions experienced included subcutaneous erythema and induration that was delayed in onset and typically mild, resolving with minimal intervention. Delivery management and breastfeeding recommendations while on weekly XR bup were not different compared to sublingual buprenorphine (SL bup). Weekly XR bup is a new treatment for opioid use disorder that may be used in the obstetric population. Obstetric and addiction medicine clinicians should be aware of this new formulation as its use is expected to increase., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Lofwall: research consultant for treatments in development for substance use disorder for Titan Pharmaceuticals, Journey Colab, Berkshire Biomedical and Braeburn. Wilder: none. Young: none. Gray: none. Guille: Visiting Scientist and Research Consultant for Maven Clinic. Leeman: none. Charles: serves as a medical consultant for Gilead Science Inc for hepatitis C treatment in pregnancy and RH Capital. Winhusen: none. Hansen: none. Wachman: none.

As the opioid overdose epidemic escalates, there is an urgent need for treatment innovations to address both patient and clinician barriers when initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED). These include insurance status, logistical challenges such as the ability to fill a prescription and transportation, concerns regarding diversion, and availability of urgent referral sites. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) preparations such as a new 7-day injectable could potentially solve some of these issues. We describe the pharmacokinetics of a new 7-day XR-BUP formulation and the feasibility of its use in the ED setting. We report our early experiences with this medication (investigational drug CAM2038), in the context of an ongoing clinical trial entitled Emergency Department-Initiated BUP VAlidaTION (ED INNOVATION), to inform emergency clinicians as they consider incorporating this medication into their practice. The medication was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2018 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2023 for those 18 years or older for the treatment of moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD). We report our experience with approximately 800 ED patients with OUD who received the 7-day XR-BUP preparation in the ED between June 2020 and July 2023., (© 2023 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Importance: Early COVID-19 mitigation strategies placed an additional burden on individuals seeking care for opioid use disorder (OUD). Telemedicine provided a way to initiate and maintain transmucosal buprenorphine treatment of OUD., Objective: To examine associations between transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment modality (telemedicine vs traditional) during the COVID-19 public health emergency and the health outcomes of treatment retention and opioid-related nonfatal overdose., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using Medicaid claims and enrollment data from November 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, for individuals aged 18 to 64 years from Kentucky and Ohio. Data were collected and analyzed in June 2022, with data updated during revision in August 2023., Exposures: The primary exposure of interest was the modality of the transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment initiation. Relevant patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics were included in regression models., Main Outcomes and Measures: There were 2 main outcomes of interest: retention in treatment after initiation and opioid-related nonfatal overdose after initiation. For outcomes measured after initiation, a 90-day follow-up period was used. The main analysis used a new-user study design; transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment initiation was defined as initiation after more than a 60-day gap in buprenorphine treatment. In addition, uptake of telemedicine for buprenorphine was examined, overall and within patients initiating treatment, across quarters in 2020., Results: This study included 41 266 individuals in Kentucky (21 269 women [51.5%]; mean [SD] age, 37.9 [9.0] years) and 50 648 individuals in Ohio (26 425 women [52.2%]; mean [SD] age, 37.1 [9.3] years) who received buprenorphine in 2020, with 18 250 and 24 741 people initiating buprenorphine in Kentucky and Ohio, respectively. Telemedicine buprenorphine initiations increased sharply at the beginning of 2020. Compared with nontelemedicine initiation, telemedicine initiation was associated with better odds of 90-day retention with buprenorphine in both states (Kentucky: adjusted odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.27]; Ohio: adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]) in a regression analysis adjusting for patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics. Telemedicine initiation was not associated with opioid-related nonfatal overdose (Kentucky: adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.56-1.40]; Ohio: adjusted odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.83-1.41])., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicaid enrollees receiving buprenorphine for OUD, telemedicine buprenorphine initiation was associated with retention in treatment early during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings add to the literature demonstrating positive outcomes associated with the use of telemedicine for treatment of OUD.

Introduction: Pregnant individuals with substance use disorders face complex issues that may serve as barriers to treatment entry and retention. Several professional organizations have established recommendations on comprehensive, collaborative approaches to treatment to meet the needs of this population, but information on real-world application is lacking. Sites participating in the NIDA CTN0080 "Medication treatment for Opioid use disorder in expectant Mothers (MOMs)"-a randomized clinical trial of extended release compared to sublingual buprenorphine among pregnant and postpartum individuals (PPI)-were selected, in part, because they have a collaborative approach to treating PPI with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, organizational differences among sites and how they implement expert recommendations for collaborative care could impact study outcomes., Methods: Prior to study launch at each of the 13 MOMs sites, investigators used the Pregnancy and Addiction Services Assessment (PAASA) to collect information about organizational factors. Input from a team of addiction, perinatal, and economic evaluation experts guided the development of the PAASA. Investigators programmed the PAASA into a web-based data system and summarized the resultant site data using descriptive statistics., Results: Study sites represented four US census regions. Most sites were specialty obstetrics & gynecology (OB/GYN) programs providing OUD services (n = 9, 69.2 %), were affiliated with an academic institution (n = 11, 84.6 %), and prescribed buprenorphine in an ambulatory/outpatient setting (n = 11, 84.6 %); all sites offered access to naloxone. Sites reported that their population was primarily White, utilized public insurance, and faced numerous psychosocial barriers to treatment. Although all sites offered many services recommended by expert consensus groups, they varied in how they coordinated these services., Conclusions: By providing the organizational characteristics of sites participating in the MOMs study, this report assists in filling the current gap in knowledge regarding similar programs providing services to PPI with OUD. Collaborative care programs such as those participating in MOMs are uniquely positioned to participate in research to determine the most effective models of care and to determine how research can be integrated into those clinical care settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Smid serves as a medical consultant for Gilead Science Inc. for hepatitis C treatment in pregnancy and Organon on postpartum hemorrhage management in a low resource setting. Her institution received funding from Alydia Health/Organon for research activities. She receives research support from the CDC and NIDA. Dr. Lofwall reports having consulted for Titan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Camurus, and Dr. Murphy reports having consulted for Sandoz Inc., Nature Sacred Inc., and West Virginia Perinatal Partnership Inc. outside of the submitted work. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services released guidelines allowing waiver-eligible providers seeking to treat up to 30 patients to be exempt from waiver training (WT) and the counseling and other ancillary services (CAS) attestation. This study evaluates if states and the District of Columbia had more restrictive policies preventing adoption of the 2021 federal guidelines., Methods: First, the Westlaw database was searched for buprenorphine regulations. Second, state medical, osteopathic, physician assistant, nursing boards, and single state agencies (SSA) were surveyed to assess for the WT and CAS requirements and if they were discussing the 2021 guidelines. Results were recorded and compared by state and waiver-eligible provider types., Results: The Westlaw search revealed seven states with regulations requiring the WT and ten states requiring CAS. Survey results showed ten state boards/SSAs required WT for at least one waiver-eligible practitioner type and eleven state boards/SSAs required CAS. In some states, the WT and CAS requirements only applied in special circumstances. Eleven states had discrepancies between the Westlaw and survey results among three waiver-eligible provider types., Conclusions: Despite the 2021 federal change intended to increase access to buprenorphine, several states had regulations and/or provider boards and SSAs that were not supportive. Now, the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act of 2022 eliminated the federal x-waiver requirement to prescribe buprenorphine. However, these states may continue to have barriers to treatment access despite the MAT Act. Strategies to engage states with these restrictive policies are needed to improve buprenorphine treatment capacity., Competing Interests: All authors have no conflicts to declare., (© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Expanding access to naloxone is one of the most impactful interventions in decreasing opioid-related mortality. However, state distribution rates of naloxone are insufficient to meet community need. The current study sought to better understand this gap by focusing on state policies that may facilitate or impede naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses - Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio., Methods: We provide a descriptive analysis of the policy landscape impacting naloxone distribution through pharmacy and community channels in the four states participating in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Publicly available data and the expertise of the research team were used to describe each state's naloxone access laws (NALs), Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and community overdose education and naloxone distribution infrastructure. Data presented in this study represent the most current policy landscape through September 2022., Results: Variation exists between specific components of the NALs of each state, the structure of Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and the community distribution infrastructure networks. Massachusetts and New York have a statewide standing order, but other states use different strategies short of a statewide standing order to expand access to naloxone. Quantity limits specific to naloxone may limit access to Medicaid beneficiaries in some states., Conclusion: States participating in the HCS have developed innovative but different mechanisms to ensure naloxone access. Policies were dynamic and moved towards greater access. Research should consider the policy landscape in the implementation and sustainability of interventions as well as the analysis of outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflicts declared.

Objective: To describe the process of establishing a Methadone Central Registry (MCR) as part of the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM ) Communities Study (HCS) and to support recommendations with evidence of its functionality relative to Medicaid claims data for monitoring utilization of methadone, an evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder., Design and Participants: The manuscript authors were active participants in establishing the MCR and include representation from state government, Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs), and HCS university partners. Secondary data were obtained from Kentucky's (KY's) MCR and Medicaid claims from July 2020 through June 2021. The functionality of data obtained from the MCR, as measured by data completeness and timeliness, is compared with Medicaid claims, the current standard., Main Outcomes: Central registry and Medicaid data were each aggregated statewide and at the HCS-KY county level. Dual levels of analysis were selected to inform stakeholders at the study and state levels. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number of patients in methadone treatment., Results: Statewide, the MCR provided a daily record of all individuals receiving methadone through an OTP within 72 hours. In contrast, Medicaid claims processing lagged 9 months and captured 57-62 percent of patients in the MCR., Conclusions: Replacing a fax-based system, an MCR meets the converging need of providers, regulatory authorities, and researchers to monitor utilization, patient dual enrollment, and treatment outcomes. Implementation strategies included key stakeholder engagement, state partner leadership, training, and federal funding. Adoption of an MCR is recommended.

The opioid epidemic continues with escalating overdose deaths further exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic, despite having efficacious medication treatments for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Most persons with OUD remain undiagnosed, without ever receiving MOUD, and even among those who initiate MOUD, retention is infrequently longer than 6 months (Williams et al., 2019). Treatment access remains particularly problematic in rural areas that often have few providers and limited resources (Ghertner, 2019). There are two new injectable long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) formulations recently approved in the United States and abroad (Lofwall et al., 2018; Walsh et al., 2017; Haight et al., 2019). They hold promise to improve treatment access and retention by decreasing risks of nonadherence, diversion and misuse and may be particularly attractive during a pandemic in order to minimize provider and pharmacy contacts (Roberts et al., 2020) and help improve access to care in rural areas. There are several ongoing evaluations of LAB injectables in large multi-site randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Veterans Administration Office of Research and Development in settings with special populations that exist in both urban and rural settings. Understanding the potential clinical benefits of LAB injectables along the care continuum, particularly for rural areas is essential to successful implementation in the complex healthcare system., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Intravenous (IV) misuse of the µ opioid analgesic oxymorphone has caused significant public health harms; however, no controlled data on its IV abuse potential are available. The primary aims of this pilot study were to directly compare IV oxymorphone to IV oxycodone, morphine, and hydromorphone on a subjective measure of drug liking and to assess relative potency., Methods: Participants (n = 6) with opioid use disorder, physical dependence, and current IV use completed this two-site, within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient pilot study. During each session, one IV dose (mg/70 kg) was administered: oxymorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18, 32), hydromorphone (1.8, 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18), oxycodone (18, 32, 56), morphine (18, 32), and placebo. Data were collected before and for 6 h after dosing. Primary outcomes included safety/physiological effects, subjective reports of drug liking, and relative potency estimates., Results: All active test drugs produced prototypical, dose-related µ opioid agonist effects (e.g., miosis). Oxymorphone was more potent than the comparator opioids on several measures, including drug liking and respiratory depression (p < 0.05). Across abuse-related subjective outcomes, oxymorphone was 2.3-2.8-fold more potent than hydromorphone and 12.5-14-fold more potent than oxycodone (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Despite the relatively small sample size, this pilot study detected robust oxymorphone effects. Oxymorphone was far more potent than the comparator opioids, particularly on abuse potential outcomes. Overall, these findings may help explain surveillance reports that demonstrate, after adjusting for prescription availability, oxymorphone is injected at the highest frequency, relative to other prescription opioids., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Rationale: Preclinical studies demonstrate that the NK1 receptor is involved in opioid reinforcement and withdrawal expression. Few studies have examined the impact of treatment with NK1 antagonists on opioid response in humans., Objective: To explore the potential for a selective NK1 antagonist, tradipitant, to attenuate the abuse liability and reinforcing and analgesic effects of oxycodone in opioid-experienced individuals., Methods: Participants with recreational opioid use, but without opioid physical dependence, were enrolled as inpatients for ~6 weeks (n = 8). A within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design was employed. The pharmacodynamic response to intranasal oxycodone across a range of doses (0 to 30 mg) was examined during two counterbalanced maintenance periods (tradipitant 0 or 85 mg/bid). Oxycodone self-administration was assessed with a modified progressive ratio procedure, and analgesia was assessed with the cold pressor test., Results: Oxycodone produced significant and dose-related increases on a broad array of prototypic opioid measures, including subjective ratings related to abuse liability (e.g., liking) and physiological outcomes (i.e., expired CO 2 ). Oxycodone self-administration increased with increasing dose, as did analgesia. Tradipitant largely did not alter any of these effects of oxycodone, with the exception of producing a reduction in ratings of desire for opioids., Conclusions: Given that the vast majority of oxycodone effects were unchanged by tradipitant, these data do not provide support for the utility of NK1 antagonists as a potential treatment for opioid use disorder.

Rationale: Epidemiological data indicate that drivers testing positive for an opioid drug are twice as likely to cause a fatal car crash; however, there are limited controlled data available., Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of a therapeutic dose range of oxycodone alone and in combination with alcohol on simulated driving performance., Methods: Healthy participants (n = 10) completed this within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized outpatient study. Six 7-h sessions were completed during which oxycodone (0, 5, 10 mg, p.o.) was administered 30 min before alcohol (0, 0.8 g/kg (15% less for women), p.o.) for a total of 6 test conditions. Driving assessments and participant-, observer-rated, psychomotor and physiological measures were collected in regular intervals before and after drug administration., Results: Oxycodone alone (5, 10 mg) did not produce any changes in driving outcomes or psychomotor task performance, relative to placebo (p > 0.05); however, 10 mg oxycodone produced increases in an array of subjective ratings, including sedation and impairment (p < 0.05). Alcohol alone produced driving impairment (e.g., decreased lateral control) (p < 0.05); however, oxycodone did not potentiate alcohol-related driving or subjective effects., Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that acute doses of oxycodone (5, 10 mg) do not significantly impair acuity on laboratory-based simulated driving models; however, 10 mg oxycodone produced increases in self-reported outcomes that are not compatible with safe driving behavior (e.g., sedation, impairment). Additional controlled research is needed to determine how opioid misuse (higher doses; parenteral routes of administration) impacts driving risk.

Rationale: Dozens of preclinical studies have reported cannabinoid agonist potentiation of the analgesic effects of μ-opioid agonists., Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine if a cannabinoid agonist could potentiate opioid analgesia in humans using several laboratory pain models., Methods: Healthy participants (n = 10) with/out current drug use/pain conditions completed this within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized outpatient study. Nine 8-h sessions were completed during which dronabinol (0, 2.5, 5 mg, p.o.) was administered 1 h before oxycodone (0, 5, 10 mg, p.o.) for a total of 9 test conditions. Outcomes included sensory threshold and tolerance from four experimental pain models (cold pressor, pressure algometer, hot thermode, cold hyperalgesia), along with participant- and observer-rated, performance and physiological effects., Results: Oxycodone produced miosis (p < 0.05) and analgesic responses (e.g., pressure algometer [p < 0.05]), while dronabinol did not (p > 0.05). Depending on the dose combination, dronabinol attenuated or did not alter oxycodone analgesia; for example, dronabinol (2.5 mg) decreased the analgesic effects of oxycodone (10 mg) on pressure tolerance. Conversely, dronabinol increased oxycodone subjective effects (e.g., drug liking) (p < 0.05); oxycodone (5 mg) ratings of "high" were potentiated by 5 mg dronabinol (p < 0.05; placebo = 1.1 [± 0.7]; 5 mg oxycodone = 4.7 [± 2.2]; 5 mg dronabinol = 9.9 [± 8.4]; 5 mg oxycodone + 5 mg dronabinol = 37.4 [± 11.3])., Conclusions: This study indicates that dronabinol did not enhance the analgesic effects of oxycodone and increased abuse- and impairment-related subjective effects. These data suggest that dronabinol may not be an effective or appropriate opioid adjuvant; it could potentially increase opioid dose requirements, while increasing psychoactive opioid effects.

Background: Research on how US physicians individualize buprenorphine-naloxone treatment is limited. The current study uses conjoint analysis to examine the importance of current dose, visit frequency, clinical indicators, and payment type on office visit and dose adjustments during buprenorphine-naloxone treatment., Methods: A national random sample of 776 US buprenorphine-prescribing physicians participated in a mailed survey between October 2015 and July 2018. The survey contained 16 patient vignettes describing: (1) current dose, (2) urine drug test (UDT) results and opioid blockade, (3) recent intravenous use, (4) visit attendance, (5) counseling adherence, (6) payment, and (7) visit schedule. Physicians rated how they would adjust office visits (0=definitely decrease to 5=no change to 10=definitely increase) and the dose (0=definitely decrease to 5=no change to 10=definitely increase). Descriptive statistics were calculated for the vignette responses. Conjoint analysis was used to estimate relative importance scores and part-worth utilities., Results: Across the vignettes, the mean response for adjusting office visits was 7.43 (SD = 1.69), indicating a tendency to increase the frequency of visits. UDT results/opioid blockade, intravenous use, and current visit schedule had the greatest importance scores for office visit adjustments. The mean response for adjusting the dose was 5.48 (SD = 1.69), corresponding with a tendency toward not changing dose. Current dose, UDT results/opioid blockade, and intravenous use had the largest importance scores for dose adjustment., Conclusions: Physicians individualized buprenorphine-naloxone treatment in response to hypothetical patient attributes by changing visit frequency and, to a lesser extent, modifying maintenance dose, in a manner generally consistent with current practice guidelines., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study describes changes in weight and cardiovascular risk factors over time among individuals enrolled in methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder. Demographic and clinical predictors of weight gain were also evaluated., Design: This study was a retrospective chart review evaluating data over a period of 3 years., Setting: Medical records of individuals enrolled in an academic research outpatient methadone maintenance treatment program were reviewed., Patients: Seventy-four individuals who were admitted and retained in methadone maintenance treatment for at least 3 consecutive years were included., Outcome Measures: Annual weight was assessed by calculating body mass index (BMI). Changes over time in cardiovascular risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were also assessed., Results: The percentage of patients categorized as overweight, obese, or morbidly obese BMI increased from 42 percent (n = 31) at admission to 76 percent (n = 56), 82 percent (n = 61), and 88 percent (n = 65) at 1, 2, and 3 years post-admission, respectively. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia also tended to increase following admission. BMI increases tended to be greater for those with a higher dose of methadone, as well as for females and Black/African American individuals. No other predictors of weight gain were identified., Conclusions: These data indicate that methadone maintenance treatment is associated with clinically meaningful weight gain and increases in cardiovascular risk factors. Given the importance of methadone maintenance for treatment of opioid use disorder, future research should examine additional predictors and potential mechanisms of weight gain among methadone patients and develop tailored interventions including nutritional knowledge and lifestyle recommendations.

Background: Health insurance improves health and reduces mortality. Expanding insurance is a central feature of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Persons who use drugs (PWUDs) have historically been at high risk of being uninsured. It is unknown if Appalachian PWUDs, who live in an extremely economically distressed region, are more likely to be insured since implementation of the ACA., Methods: Data from a cohort of 503 PWUDs from eastern Appalachian Kentucky, who were interviewed at seven time-points between 2008 and 2017, were analysed using mixed effects regression models., Results: At baseline, only 33.8% of participants were insured, which increased to 87.3% of the cohort at the last follow-up interview. The final multivariate model, which included baseline characteristics and interactions by time, indicated there were significant baseline differences in insurance status by gender, age, education, income, and history of injection. Differences in the predictive margin probabilities of being insured across these groups had dissipated by the final follow-up interview., Conclusions: After Kentucky's implementation of the ACA, this cohort of Appalachian PWUDs made substantial gains in obtaining insurance that far exceeded the increases reported in national studies., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To conduct a pilot needs assessment of underlying substance use disorders (SUD), motivation for SUD treatment, and willingness to enter residential SUD treatment in hospitalized adults who inject drugs with complex infections requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and to assess the presence of in-hospital illicit substance use., Patients and Methods: From March 8, 2016 through August 25, 2016 hospitalized, English-speaking, adult patients not currently in SUD treatment with a history of injection drug use and a current infection requiring treatment with IV antibiotics, were prospectively enrolled. Participants were followed weekly during the hospitalization and for 60 days after discharge via interview and medical record review., Results: Of the 42 participants, 8 (19.0%) accepted discharge to residential SUD treatment, 16 (38.0%) completed at least one follow-up research visit after hospital discharge, and 3 (7.1%) died during the 5-month study period. The majority (33; 78%) were hospitalized with endocarditis, and 37 (88.0%) had an opioid use disorder (DSM-5). Mean days of self-reported IV opioid use in the 30 days before hospitalization compared to 30 days after discharge decreased significantly (16.5 to 1.5, P = .001) despite not receiving SUD treatment. Illicit in-hospital drug use was identified in 17 (40.5%) participants, with opioids most commonly detected., Conclusion: Hospitalization is a 'reachable moment' and critical opportunity to initiate evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. The ongoing in-hospital illicit drug use and high short-term mortality observed in this study contribute to the mandate to expand access to effective pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder and integrate it into health care settings., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While there has been a dramatic increase in prescribing of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder in the US, little is known about prescribers' attitudes and practices regarding buprenorphine diversion and how they relate to prescriber characteristics., Methods: A national random sample of buprenorphine prescribers (N = 1174) completed surveys from July 2014 to January 2017. Analyses examined relationships between prescriber and practice characteristics and prescriber perceptions and approaches regarding diversion., Results: Among this sample of buprenorphine prescribers, 79.0% (N = 898) reported assessing all patients for risk of buprenorphine diversion and misuse. A third of prescribers described diversion as a significant or very significant concern in their community. The majority of prescribers reported seeing patients on average at least every other week during the first 60 days of treatment, and the majority reported testing urine for buprenorphine to assess for diversion. Perceptions of diversion being a greater problem in their community (AOR 1.212, 95% CI 1.073-1.369) and use of medication counts (AOR 1.006, 95% CI 1.003-1.009) were associated with increased likelihood of terminating patients when diversion was suspected, while having expertise in addiction (AOR 0.526, 95% CI 0.406-0.682) or psychiatry (AOR 0.714, 95% CI 0.558-0.914) were associated with decreased odds of terminating treatment for suspected diversion., Conclusions: Buprenorphine prescribers report diversion is an important issue, and most prescribers report that they assess patients for diversion, though specific practices differ based on prescriber and practice characteristics., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

A common clinical problem with opioid analgesics is the loss of analgesic efficacy after repeated dosing; when this occurs, it is not clear what principles should guide providing effective analgesia among opioid-dependent individuals. This within-subject inpatient study aimed to determine if physically dependent opioid abusers (n = 11) experience changes in oxycodone-induced analgesia during 2 oxycodone maintenance (30 mg orally 4 times per day) phases: initial stabilization (days 1-3) and after 6 weeks of chronic dosing. Six sessions (3 each phase), measured threshold, tolerance, and pain ratings for a Pressure Pain Test and Cold Pressor Test after a single double-blind dose of oxycodone 30 mg (initial stabilization) and 0, 30, and 60 mg (chronic dosing) given in place of a scheduled maintenance dose. Physiologic and opioid agonist effects were assessed during chronic dosing sessions. There was no analgesic response to oxycodone 30 mg. Oxycodone (60 mg) produced a 25% increase in peak Cold Pressor Test threshold compared with placebo, and significantly increased expired breath CO2, miosis, and ratings of abuse liability measures. These data suggest that more than twice the acute oxycodone maintenance dose is needed to produce robust acute analgesia, although adverse effects (eg, respiratory depression and abuse signals) may occur with lower doses., Perspective: To understand sensitivity to opioid analgesia in opioid-dependent individuals, this article describes experimental pain, subjective and physiological responses during stabilization and after 6 weeks of oxycodone maintenance. Oxycodone produced euphoric effects and miosis with limited evidence of analgesia., (Copyright © 2017 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The cannabinoid (CB) system is a rational novel target for treating opioid dependence, a significant public health problem around the world. This proof-of-concept study examined the potential efficacy of a CB1 receptor partial agonist, dronabinol, in relieving signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal., Methods: Twelve opioid dependent adults participated in this 5-week, inpatient, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Volunteers were maintained on double-blind oxycodone (30mg oral, four times/day) and participated in a training session followed by 7 experimental sessions, each testing a single oral test dose (placebo, oxycodone 30 and 60mg, dronabinol 5, 10, 20, and 30mg [decreased from 40mg]). Placebo was substituted for oxycodone maintenance doses for 21h before each session in order to produce measurable opioid withdrawal. Outcomes included observer- and participant-ratings of opioid agonist, opioid withdrawal and psychomotor/cognitive performance., Results: Oxycodone produced prototypic opioid agonist effects (i.e. suppressing withdrawal and increasing subjective effects indicative of abuse liability). Dronabinol 5 and 10mg produced effects most similar to placebo, while the 20 and 30mg doses produced modest signals of withdrawal suppression that were accompanied by dose-related increases in high, sedation, bad effects, feelings of heart racing, and tachycardia. Dronabinol was not liked more than placebo, showed some impairment in cognitive performance, and was identified as marijuana with increasing dose., Conclusion: CB1 receptor activation is a reasonable strategy to pursue for the treatment of opioid withdrawal; however, dronabinol is not a likely candidate given its modest withdrawal suppression effects of limited duration and previously reported tachycardia during opioid withdrawal., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)