Search

Significant advances have been made in all aspects of care relating to colorectal cancer. Although surgery will likely remain the mainstay of definitive treatment for the majority of colorectal malignancies, a better understanding of tumor progression and biology will help guide the choice of surgical therapy to best achieve a curative resection. Additionally, advances in the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies should continue to increase disease-free and overall survival when combined with appropriate operative resection. Although TNM staging remains our strongest tool at this point for establishing prognosis and directing therapy, expansion of our knowledge of the molecular events underlying colorectal tumorigenesis undoubtedly will lead to the refinement of our current staging and prognostic systems.

Purpose: Retrorectal tumors are a diverse group of masses derived from a variety of embryologic origins. Because of this, some confusion is associated with their diagnosis and management. Although rare, a basic understanding of the etiology, presentation, work-up, and treatment of retrorectal masses is essential., Methods: The incidence, classification, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of these masses are presented. A comprehensive review of the literature is included in our analysis., Results: Retrorectal lesions can be classified as congenital, inflammatory, neurogenic, osseous, or miscellaneous. Benign and malignant lesions behave similarly. The most common presentation is an asymptomatic mass discovered on routine rectal examination, but certain nonspecific symptoms can be elicited by careful history. Biopsy of these lesions should be avoided to prevent tumor seeding, fecal fistula, meningitis, and abscess formation. Complete surgical resection, usually after appropriate specialized imaging, remains the cornerstone of their treatment. Three approaches commonly used for resection are abdominal, transsacral, or a combined abdominosacral approach. Prognosis is directly related primarily to local control, which often is difficult to achieve for malignant lesions., Conclusions: Retrorectal masses present a challenging surgical problem from diagnosis to treatment. A high index of suspicion and resultant early diagnosis, followed by thorough preoperative planning, is required for optimal management and outcome.

Unlike common malignancies, such as breast and colorectal carcinoma, where treatment modalities can be investigated with large prospective randomized trials, such an endeavor has been hampered with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) due to its rarity. In absence of such randomized clinical trials, controversy exists with regards to numerous clinically relevant questions and clinicians are left with single institutional experiences gathered either in a retrospective or prospective fashion. Some of these frequently encountered issues in the management of STS include (1) whether poorly executed biopsies affect outcome? (2) Do all unplanned excisions require re-excisions? (3) Is MRI a superior imaging modality? (4) Whether radiation should be provided pre- or post-operatively? (5) Does extent of surgical margin influence local control? (6) Is adjuvant radiation therapy necessary for stage IIB STS? (7) Does adjuvant chemotherapy influence local control? (8) Does local recurrence influence survival? We will address these topics in this review.