401. Comparison of the short-term surgical outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer using a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach alone or supported by a transanal approach.
- Author
-
Tokunaga, Takuya, Kashihara, Hideya, Yoshikawa, Kozo, Nakao, Toshihiro, Nishi, Masaaki, Takasu, Chie, Wada, Yuma, Yoshimoto, Toshiaki, and Shimada, Mitsuo
- Subjects
- *
ABDOMINAL surgery , *SURGICAL robots , *RISK assessment , *LYMPHADENECTOMY , *PATIENT safety , *CANCER relapse , *FISHER exact test , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *SURGICAL therapeutics , *SURGICAL blood loss , *URINARY organ diseases , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *MANN Whitney U Test , *SURGICAL complications , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DATA analysis software , *DISEASE incidence , *DISEASE risk factors ,ANAL surgery ,RECTUM tumors - Abstract
Background: Lateral lymph node metastases are a major cause of local recurrence after surgery for advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) may reduce the risk of local recurrence in patients with suspected lateral lymph node metastasis. Recent reports have shown that robotic-assisted LLND can help to reduce the postoperative complication rate, such as urinary disturbance. Furthermore, with the advent of transanal total mesorectal excision, a novel LLND procedure that combines a transabdominal approach with a transanal approach has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted LLND supported by a transanal approach for advanced low rectal cancer. Methods: Thirty-nine patients diagnosed to have low rectal cancer between June 2019 and May 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and divided according to whether they underwent LLND via a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach alone (transabdominal group, n = 19) or in combination with a transanal approach (2team group, n = 20). The patient characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The total operation time was significantly shorter in the 2team group than in the transabdominal group (366 min vs. 513 min, P < 0.001), as was the time taken to perform unilateral LLND (64 min vs. 114 min, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was significantly less intraoperative bleeding in the 2team group (30 mL vs. 80 mL, P = 0.004). There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative complications. The incidence of postoperative urinary disturbance was satisfactory at 5% in both groups. Conclusions: The operation time for LLND performed by a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach was shortened when supported by a transanal approach. The frequency of postoperative urinary disturbance was low in both groups. Therefore, robotic-assisted abdominal LLND supported by a transanal approach can be considered a promising treatment option for advanced low rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF