401. Shape--but not size--codivergence between male and female copulatory structures in Onthophagus beetles
- Author
-
Harald F. Parzer, Claudia Palestrini, Armin P. Moczek, Astrid Pizzo, Anna L. M. Macagno, and Antonio Rolando
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Male ,Sexual Selection ,lcsh:Medicine ,Copulatory structures ,01 natural sciences ,Sexual conflict ,Size ,Pleiotropy ,Copulation ,Concerted Evolution ,Mating ,lcsh:Science ,0303 health sciences ,Principal Component Analysis ,Multidisciplinary ,biology ,Genitalia ,Geometric morphometrics ,Shape ,Onthophagus beetles ,Organ Size ,Biological Evolution ,Coleoptera ,Female sperm storage ,Sexual selection ,Macroevolution ,Female ,Research Article ,Evolutionary Processes ,Zoology ,Forms of Evolution ,010603 evolutionary biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Species Specificity ,Animals ,Microevolution ,Sex organ ,Biology ,030304 developmental biology ,Evolutionary Biology ,Human evolutionary genetics ,Evolutionary Developmental Biology ,lcsh:R ,Animal Structures ,biology.organism_classification ,Organismal Evolution ,Onthophagus ,lcsh:Q ,Developmental Biology - Abstract
Genitalia are among the fastest evolving morphological traits in arthropods. Among the many hypotheses aimed at explaining this observation, some explicitly or implicitly predict concomitant male and female changes of genital traits that interact during copulation (i.e., lock and key, sexual conflict, cryptic female choice and pleiotropy). Testing these hypotheses requires insights into whether male and female copulatory structures that physically interact during mating also affect each other's evolution and patterns of diversification. Here we compare and contrast size and shape evolution of male and female structures that are known to interact tightly during copulation using two model systems: (a) the sister species O. taurus (1 native, 3 recently established populations) and O. illyricus, and (b) the species-complex O. fracticornis-similis-opacicollis. Partial Least Squares analyses indicated very little to no correlation between size and shape of copulatory structures, both in males and females. Accordingly, comparing shape and size diversification patterns of genitalia within each sex showed that the two components diversify readily - though largely independently of each other - within and between species. Similarly, comparing patterns of divergence across sexes showed that relative sizes of male and female copulatory organs diversify largely independent of each other. However, performing this analysis for genital shape revealed a signature of parallel divergence. Our results therefore suggest that male and female copulatory structures that are linked mechanically during copulation may diverge in concert with respect to their shapes. Furthermore, our results suggest that genital divergence in general, and co-divergence of male and female genital shape in particular, can evolve over an extraordinarily short time frame. Results are discussed in the framework of the hypotheses that assume or predict concomitant evolutionary changes in male and female copulatory organs.
- Published
- 2011