Search

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of initial platelet reactivity on the benefit of switched strategy., Background: TOPIC (Timing Of Platelet Inhibition after acute Coronary Syndrome) study suggested that switched dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) could improve net clinical benefit after acute coronary syndrome by preventing bleeding., Methods: Acute coronary syndrome patients, 1 month after coronary stenting and event free, were randomly assigned to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) or continuation of drug regimen (unchanged DAPT). All patients underwent platelet function testing at this time and were classified as low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) (platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein ≤20%) or non-LTPR (platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein >20%). The primary endpoint aimed to evaluate the impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes and benefit of switched DAPT strategy., Results: A total of 645 patients were included, 305 (47%) of whom were classified as LTPR. LTPR patients were less often diabetic (p = 0.01), had lower body mass index (p < 0.01), and were more often on ticagrelor (p < 0.01). Patients defined as LTPR and randomized to unchanged DAPT were at the highest risk of primary endpoint occurrence (31%; p < 0.01). Conversely, in the switched arm, LTPR patients had no significant difference in primary outcome incidence compared with non-LTPR patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40 to 1.49; p = 0.45). The switched strategy was associated with important reduction in primary endpoint incidence in LTPR patients (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.51; p < 0.01) and only numerically lower incidence in non-LTPR patients (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.35; p = 0.39)., Conclusions: Switched DAPT was superior regardless of initial platelet reactivity but the benefit was greater in LTPR patients. Indeed, the switched strategy was highly effective in this group, which had impaired prognosis with unchanged DAPT but similar prognosis after switching., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score >140, coronary angiography (CAG) is recommended by European and American guidelines within 24 hours. We sought to study the association of very early (ie, ≤12 hours), early (12-24 hours), and delayed (>24 hours) CAG in patients with NSTEMI with GRACE score >140 with ischemic outcomes., Methods: The TAO trial (Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome With Otamixaban) randomized patients with NSTEMI and CAG scheduled within 72 hours to heparin plus eptifibatide versus otamixaban. In this post hoc analysis, patients with a GRACE score >140 were categorized into 3 groups according to timing of CAG from admission (<12, ≥12-<24, and ≥24 hours). The primary ischemic outcome was the composite of all-cause death and myocardial infarction within 180 days of randomization., Results: CAG was performed in 4071 patients (<12 hours, n=1648 [40.5%]; 12-24 hours, n=1420 [34.9%]; ≥24 hours, n=1003 [24.6%]). With CAG ≥24 hours as a reference, CAG from 12 to 24 hours was not associated with a lower risk of primary ischemic outcome at 180 days (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.23), whereas CAG <12 hours was associated with a lower risk of death and myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.91). Performing CAG <12 hours was also associated with a lower risk of death and myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.94; P =0.01) compared with CAG performed at 12 to 24 hours. No difference was observed in bleeding complications., Conclusions: In patients with high-risk NSTEMI, undergoing CAG within the initial 12 hours after admission (as opposed to later, either 12-24 or ≥24 hours) was associated with lower risk of ischemic outcomes at 180 days., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Aims: Newer P2Y12 blockers (prasugrel and ticagrelor) demonstrated significant ischaemic benefit over clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, both drugs are associated with an increase in bleeding complications. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the benefit of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) from aspirin plus a newer P2Y12 blocker to aspirin plus clopidogrel 1 month after ACS., Methods and Results: We performed an open-label, monocentric, and randomized trial. From March 2014 to April 2016, patients admitted with ACS requiring coronary intervention, on aspirin and a newer P2Y12 blocker and without adverse event at 1 month, were assigned to switch to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) or continuation of their drug regimen (unchanged DAPT). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, urgent revascularization, stroke and bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥2 at 1 year post ACS. Six hundred and forty six patients were randomized and 645 analysed, corresponding to 322 patients in the switched DAPT and 323 in the unchanged DAPT group. The primary endpoint occurred in 43 (13.4%) patients in the switched DAPT group and in 85 (26.3%) patients in the unchanged DAPT (HR 95%CI 0.48 (0.34-0.68), P < 0.01). No significant differences were reported on ischaemic endpoints, while BARC ≥ 2 bleeding occurred in 13 (4.0%) patients in the switched DAPT and in 48 (14.9%) in the unchanged DAPT group (HR 95%CI 0.30 (0.18-0.50), P < 0.01)., Conclusion: A switched DAPT is superior to an unchanged DAPT strategy to prevent bleeding complications without increase in ischaemic events following ACS., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Delay from the last intake of drug could be an important and unexplored variable in the biological response to antiplatelet agents after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discharge. The objective was to define the impact of the delay from P2Y12 blocker intake on the platelet inhibition level. We compared ticagrelor-, prasugrel-, and clopidogrel-treated patients. All consecutive patients, who had been addressed between 2013 and 2014 for ACS, treated with aspirin and a P2Y12 blocker as maintenance dose, were eligible. One month after discharge, blood sample and a questionnaire were proposed to the patient by a nurse blinded to the protocol. On this questionnaire, three questions about name of the drug, regularity of the intakes, and hour of the last intake were collected. The response to antiplatelet therapy was assessed using platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (PRI VASP) and % of adenosine-5'-diphosphate-induced aggregation (%ADP).The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between platelet inhibition and delay from drug intake. We enrolled 474 ACS treated with clopidogrel 75 mg in 182 cases (38% patients), prasugrel in 190 cases (40%), or ticagrelor in 102 patients (22%). We observed a significant correlation between delay from intake and PRI VASP and %ADP for ticagrelor (r = 0.25, p = 0.01; r = 0.21, p = 0.03; respectively). On clopidogrel (r = 0.09, p = 0.24; r = 0.02, p = 0.80; respectively) and prasugrel (r = 0.02, p = 0.82; r = 0.11, p = 0.12 respectively), no correlation exists. In conclusion, ticagrelor, unlike thienopyridines, is associated with a significant correlation between delay from the last intake and platelet inhibition.

High homocysteine (HCy) levels are associated with lymphocyte-mediated inflammatory responses that are sometimes in turn related to hypoxia. Because adenosine is a potent lymphocyte suppressor produced in hypoxic conditions and shares metabolic pathways with HCy, we addressed the influence of high HCy levels on the hypoxia-induced, adenosine-mediated, alteration of lymphocyte viability. We treated mitogen-stimulated human lymphocytes isolated from healthy individuals and the human lymphoma T-cell line CEM with cobalt chloride (CoCl2 )to reproduce hypoxia. We found that CoCl2 -altered cell viability was dose-dependently reversed using HCy. In turn, the HCy effect was inhibited using DL-propargylglycine, a specific inhibitor of the hydrogen sulphide (H2 S)-synthesizing enzyme cystathionine-γ-lyase involved in HCy catabolism. We then addressed the intracellular metabolic pathway of adenosine and HCy, and the role of the adenosine A2A receptor (A2 A R). We observed that: (i) hypoxic conditions lowered the intracellular concentration of HCy by increasing adenosine production, which resulted in high A2 A R expression and 3', 5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate production; (ii) increasing intracellular HCy concentration reversed the hypoxia-induced adenosinergic signalling despite high adenosine concentration by promoting both S-adenosylhomocysteine and H2 S production; (iii) DL-propargylglycine that inhibits H2 S production abolished the HCy effect. Together, these data suggest that high HCy levels prevent, via H2 S production and the resulting down-regulation of A2 A R expression, the hypoxia-induced adenosinergic alteration of lymphocyte viability. We point out the relevance of these mechanisms in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases., (© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine.)

The pharmacological management of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) poses a significant challenge to the clinician. While mechanical reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has proved its superiority over fibrinolysis, the best antithrombotic strategy surrounding the procedure remains a matter of debate. Due to the high risk of bleeding induced by antithrombotic drugs, the pharmacological management of STEMI needs to focus on an optimal strategy that reduces the rate of coronary thrombotic events without leading to excess bleeding. Intravenous anticoagulants are recommended for all patients presenting with STEMI. Low molecular heparin may be preferred over unfractionated heparin in the setting of PPCI. Recent data suggest that anticoagulation with bivalirudin can be utilized as an alternative strategy to heparin and Gp2b3a but this should be limited to patients at high risk of bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor represents the cornerstone treatment for STEMI. New P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have restricted clopidogrel use to situations where these potent agents are contraindicated. Whilst all oral antiplatelet agents have been used with an initial loading dose in STEMI, the time of their administration remains a controversial issue. In everyday practice, intravenous antiplatelet agents appear less consensual. While Gp2b3a receptor inhibitors use has been restricted to bailout situations, the place of cangrelor is not yet defined in real life daily practice.

The role of hyperhomocysteinemia in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients remains unclear. The present study evaluated the relationship between homocysteine (HCys), adenosine plasma concentration (APC), plasma uric acid, and CAD severity evaluated using the SYNTAX score. We also evaluated in vitro the influence of adenosine on HCys production by hepatoma cultured cells (HuH7). Seventy-eight patients (mean age ± SD: 66.3 ± 11.3; mean SYNTAX score: 19.9 ± 12.3) and 30 healthy subjects (mean age: 61 ± 13) were included. We incubated HuH7 cells with increasing concentrations of adenosine and addressed the effect on HCys level in cell culture supernatant. Patients vs. controls had higher APC (0.82 ± 0.5 μmol/L vs 0.53 ± 0.14 μmol/L; p < 0.01), HCys (15 ± 7.6 μmol/L vs 6.8 ± 3 μmol/L, p < 0.0001), and uric acid (242.6 ± 97 vs 202 ± 59, p < 0.05) levels. APC was correlated with HCys and uric acid concentrations in patients (Pearson's R = 0.65 and 0.52; p < 0.0001, respectively). The SYNTAX score was correlated with HCys concentration. Adenosine induced a time- and dose-dependent increase in HCys in cell culture. Our data suggest that high APC is associated with HCys and uric acid concentrations in CAD patients. Whether the increased APC participates in atherosclerosis or, conversely, is part of a protective regulation process needs further investigations.

Background: Statin therapy is a cornerstone therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the use of these drugs can be limited by side effects, mainly muscular pain. Ezetimibe is a newer lipid-lowering agent, with fewer side effects., Aims: The present study was designed to compare a commercially available association of ezetimibe and simvastatin (E-S) to high dose Rosuvastatin on cholesterol and muscular enzyme levels and occurrence of muscular pain., Methods: All consecutive ACS statin-naïve patients with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)>100mg/dL randomly received either high dose statin (Rosuvastatin 20mg) or E-S 10/40-mg. All patients had one-month follow-up with biological testing and clinical examination. We compared the two groups on the biological efficiency and incidence of muscular pain., Results: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were randomized; 64 received E-S and 64 Rosuvastatin. In the two groups, the lowering of LDL-C level (Δ=51%) at one month was significant (P<0.01) without any difference in the rate of lowering on LDL-C or HDL-C suggesting that E-S is as effective as high dose Rosuvastatin (P=0.77 and P=0.99). The rate of patients reaching the objective of LDL-C<100mg/dL (45%) and LDL-C<70mg/dL (51%) was not different in the two clusters (P=0.65). Incidence of muscular pain was 15% higher in patients treated with Rosuvastatin (P=0.01) without any difference on CPK level (P=0.6)., Conclusion: Using an association of E-S in an effective alternative strategy to high dose Rosuvastatin with a lower incidence of muscular pain, which might impact adherence to medication after ACS., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to analyze the impact of body mass index (BMI) and the metabolic syndrome (MS) on responses to clopidogrel or prasugrel and bleeding risk after acute coronary syndrome. The study included 1,542 consecutive patients who underwent coronary stenting (287 clopidogrel 75 mg, 868 clopidogrel 150 mg, and 387 prasugrel 10 mg). Platelet reactivity was assessed 1 month after discharge using platelet reactivity index vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (PRI VASP). Three hundred thirty-six patients (21.8%) were obese (BMI ≥30), and we observed higher platelet reactivity associated with higher BMI across thienopyridine regimens. Incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (PRI VASP >50%) was higher in obese than nonobese patients (p <0.05 for all regimens). Conversely, incidence of low on-treatment platelet reactivity with prasugrel therapy (PRI VASP <20%) was lower in obese than nonobese patients: 13% (12 of 93) versus 33% (97 of 294); odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.58; p <0.001. Accordingly, incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding complications was higher in nonobese than in obese patients: 10% (119 of 1,206) versus 6% (20 of 336); odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.8; p = 0.03. This impaired response was only observed in obese patients with the MS, and obese with the MS had significantly higher platelet reactivity than other obese patients with all regimens (p <0.01). Obese patients without the MS had no significant difference in platelet reactivity compared with nonobese patients. In conclusion, the present study confirmed that BMI has a strong impact on response to clopidogrel and prasugrel with higher incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, lower incidence of low on-treatment platelet reactivity, and lower bleeding complication in obese patients. However, among obese patients, the presence of the MS strongly affects response to antiplatelet agents, indicating that the metabolic status might be a better predictor of platelet inhibition than BMI., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)