Search

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: Clara Yzet: Abbvie, Takeda, Jansen, Amgen, Galapagos.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: Our institution Hospices civils de Lyon has deposed a patent on this device.

Competing Interests: Clara Yzet received fees from AbbVie, Takeda, Galapagos, Jansen, Pfizer.

Background and study aims What distinguishes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from endoscopic mucosal resection is the need for three foot pedals to activate the electrosurgical unit, flushing and knife injection. The lack of connection between the various pedals of different shapes and brands leads to numerous pedals displacements and potential mistakes. The aim of this study was to evaluate an Innovative PEdal FIXator (IPEFIX) to reduce pedal mistakes during ESD. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Consecutive ESD procedures were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group with the three pedals free and the IPEFIX group in which the three pedals were linked by IPEFIX. The main outcome evaluated was the number of foot mistakes (wrong pedal, foot push beside the pedal). Results A total of 107 ESDs were performed by eight experts in five centers. The median number of mistakes per hour of ESD procedure was 0/h in the IPEFIX group and 1.9/h in the control group ( P <0.001). The mean number of times to look down to control the position of the pedals was 2.2/h the IPEFIX group and 7.7/h in the control group ( P <0.001). Mean replacements of the pedals were 0./h in the IPEFIX group and 1.7/h in the control group ( P <0.001). Similar results were obtained in trainees in simulated ESD on animal models. Conclusions IPEFIX is a simple device to connect different pedals during endoscopic procedures. It helps to reduce the numbers of foot mistakes during ESD and improves operator comfort., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Dr YZET Clara have financial disclosures with ABBVIE, GALAPAGOS and JANSSEN. Pr PIOCHE Mathieu have participated to training session with Olympus, Pentax, Cook Dr RIVORY Jérôme have participated to training session with Olympus, Cook Dr LEPILLEZ Vincent have participated to training session with Olympus. Dr LEBLANC Sarah have participated to training session with Olympus, Norgine and Ovesco, and gave lecture to Alfasigma Pr JACQUES Jérémie have participated to training session with Olympus, Fuji, Erbe, Pentax and Lumendi, and gave lecture to Abbvie, Janssen, Norgine. Dr WALLENHORST Timothée, GRAINVILLE Thomas, LEGROS Romain, FIGUEIREDO Mariana, PERRON Léa, LAFEUILLE Pierre, MOCHET Mikael, VIRELY Mélia, LEPLAT-BONNEVIALE Peggy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose, (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: EUS-guided choledoco-duodenostomy using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (ECE-LAMS) is becoming the gold standard in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography failure for distal malignant obstruction. Long-term data in larger samples are lacking., Methods: This was a prospective monocentric study including all patients who underwent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) between September 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of biliary obstruction during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were technical and clinical success rates, adverse event rates, and identification of risk factors for biliary obstruction., Results: One hundred and twenty-three EUS-guided CDS using ECE-LAMS were performed at Limoges University Hospital were performed during the study period and included in the study. The main cause of obstruction was pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 91 (74.5%) cases. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 91%, respectively. Twenty patients (16.3%) suffered from biliary obstructions during a mean follow-up of 242 days. The clinical success rate for endoscopic desobstruction was 80% (16/20). In uni- and multivariate analyses, only the presence of a duodenal stent (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.2-10.2; P = 0.018) and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm (OR: 3.9, CI 95%: 1.3-11.7; P = 0.015) were the significant risk factors for biliary obstruction during the follow-up., Conclusion: Obstruction of LAMS occurred in 16.3% of cases during follow-up and endoscopic desobstruction is efficacious in 80% of cases. The presence of duodenal stent and a bile duct thinner than 15 mm are the risk factors of obstruction. Except in these situation, EUS-CDS with ECE-LAMS could be proposed in the first intent in case of distal malignant obstruction., Competing Interests: None

Background: Endoscopy is the gold standard for the treatment of postoperative gastric leaks (GL). Large fistulas are associated with high rate of treatment failure. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of a combining technique using a covered stent (CS) crossing through pigtails (PDs) for large postsurgical GL leaks., Methods: All consecutive patients with large (> 10 mm) postsurgical GL treated endoscopically with a combination of a CS and PDs were included in a single-center retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the rate of GL closure., Results: A total of 29 patients were included. Twenty-five patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The fistula (median diameter 15 mm) was diagnosed 6 days (IQR 4-9) after surgery. Technical success was observed in all procedures. After a median follow-up of 10.7 months (IQR 3.8-20.7), GL closure was observed in 82.7% with a median time of 63 days (IQR 40-90). Surgical management was finally necessary in four patients after a median of 186 days (IQR 122-250). No complications related to combined endoscopic treatment were observed especially stent migration during the follow-up., Conclusion: An endoscopic strategy combining CS crossing through PDs appears to be effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of large GL., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Background: Among patients with limited ulcerative colitis (UC), 30% ultimately extend to pancolitis and are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Risk of endoscopic extension has been found to correlate with clinical features such as early age of onset., Aims: We sought to determine whether histologic features correlate with disease extension., Methods: The study population consisted of 40 patients with UC from two large academic centers diagnosed between 2006 and 2017. Eligible cases had a diagnosis of endoscopically limited UC (Montreal E1 or E2) at baseline and ≥ 2 subsequent endoscopic examinations with biopsies. Severity of inflammation was scored using both the Mount Sinai Activity Index and Nancy Histological Index., Results: Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who progressed to pancolitis (Montreal E3) were defined as "Extenders" (n = 21), whereas "Non-extenders" (n = 19) were cases without progression in the follow-up period. The median follow-up time was 58.4 months. The histologic scores in the endoscopically involved mucosa of the index biopsies were not associated with subsequent extension of disease, overall. However, among extender cohort, the index histology scores correlated with biopsy scores at extension (r = 0.455, P = 0.044) and index severity was associated with a shorter time to extension (r =  - 0.611, P = 0.003). Furthermore, female patients had a shorter time to extension (P = 0.013)., Conclusions: Histological severity of limited UC is not an independent predictor of extension in UC. However, among patients who subsequently extend, severe inflammation at baseline correlates with shorter progression time and severe inflammation when extension occurs. Patients with limited UC but severe histologic inflammation may warrant more frequent endoscopic surveillance., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Crohn's disease (CD) has a significant impact on health status and quality of life, affecting physical and emotional well-being and impairing social and functional abilities. In the era of the treat-to-target concept, endoscopic healing has emerged as the goal to achieve to prevent intestinal damage and disability. It is not clear what level of endoscopic healing is associated with lower disability. We therefore aimed to compare disability associated with complete endoscopic healing to disability with partial endoscopic healing in patients with CD., Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study, between September 2019 and November 2020, in one university hospital, one general hospital, and one private practice center. Consecutive patients with CD in clinical remission were included, having either complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) or partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS >0 and <4). The 10-item IBD-Disk self-assessment questionnaire was used to assess disability. Moderate to severe disability was defined as an overall IBD-Disk score ≥40., Results: A total of 82 patients were included. Forty-four (53%) were women, the median age and disease duration were respectively 35.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 28.6-45.2) and 8.0 years (IQR, 3.0-17.0). The median overall IBD-Disk score was 26.5 (IQR, 9 -45.0), and 30 (36.6%) patients had moderate to severe disability. Complete endoscopic healing was observed in 48 patients (57.3%). The median IBD-Disk score was respectively 24 (IQR, 9.0-40.5) and 34 (IQR, 9.5-51.5) for patients with complete and partial endoscopic healing (p = 0.068). Respectively, 13/48 (27%) and 17/34 (50%) of patients with complete and partial endoscopic healing had moderate to severe disability (p = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, partial endoscopic healing (OR=5.82, 95% CI [1.65, 24.69], p = 0.0009), female gender (OR=4.0, 95%CI [1.13, 16.58], p = 0.04), and smoking (OR=8.33, 95% CI [1.96, 50.0] p = 0.006) were significantly associated with moderate to severe disability. Among the IBD-Disk sub scores, the defecation score (median, IQR) (0.0 [0.0-3.0] vs 4.0 [0.0-7.5], p = 0.028) and energy score (4.0 [0.0-6.0] vs 6.0 [2.5-8.0], p = 0.023) were significantly lower with complete endoscopic healing., Conclusions: One-third of patient with endoscopic healing reported moderate to severe disability. Complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) was associated with lower disability than partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS >0 and <4). Deeper endoscopic healing may be needed to reduce the risk of disability in CD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background and Aims: The identification of Crohn's disease (CD)-associated adherent and invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) is time-consuming and requires ileal biopsies. We aimed to identify a faster and less invasive methods to detect ileal colonization by AIEC in CD patients., Methods: CD patients requiring ileo-colonoscopy were consecutively enrolled in this prospective multicenter study. Samples from saliva, serum, stools, and ileal biopsies of CD patients were collected., Results: Among 102 CD patients, the prevalence of AIEC on ileal biopsies was 24.5%. The abundance and global invasive ability of ileal-associated total E. coli were respectively ten-fold (p = 0.0065) and two-fold (p = 0.0007) higher in AIEC-positive (vs. AIEC-negative), while abundance of total E. coli in the feces was not correlated with AIEC status in the ileum. The best threshold of ileal total E. coli was 60 cfu/biopsy to detect AIEC-positive patients, with high negative predictive value (NPV) (94.1%[80.3-99.3]), while the global invasive ability (>9000 internalized bacteria) was able to detect the presence of AIEC with high positive predictive value (80.0% [55.2-100.0]). Overall, 78.1% of the AIEC + patients were colonized by two or less different AIEC strains. The level of serum anti-total E. coli antibodies (AEcAb) was higher in AIEC-positive patients (p = 0.038) with a very high negative predictive value (96.6% [89.9-100.0]) (p = 0.038) for a cut-off value > 1.9 × 10 -3 ., Conclusions: More than two thirds of AIEC-positive CD patients were colonized by two or less AIEC strains. While stools samples are not accurate to screen AIEC status, the AEcAb level appears to be an attractive, rapid and easier biomarker to identify patients with Crohn's disease harboring AIEC., (© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: While endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is widely used to manage ileal strictures, EBD of colorectal strictures remains poorly investigated in Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: We performed a retrospective study that included all consecutive CD patients who underwent EBD for native or anastomotic colorectal strictures in 9 tertiary centers between 1999 and 2018. Factors associated with EBD failure were also investigated by logistic regression., Results: Fifty-seven patients (25 women, median age: 36 years (InterQuartile Range, 31-48) were included. Among the 60 strictures, 52 (87%) were native, 39 (65%) measured < 5 cm and the most frequent location was the left colon (27%). Fifty-seven (95%) were non-passable by the scope and 35 (58%) were ulcerated. Among the 161 EBDs performed (median number of dilations per stricture: 2, IQR 1-3), technical and clinical success were achieved for 79% (n = 116/147) and 77% (n = 88/115), respectively. One perforation occurred (0.6% per EDB and 2% per patient). After a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR 2.0-8.4), 24 patients (42%) underwent colonic resection and 24 (42%) were asymptomatic without surgery. One colon lymphoma and one colorectal cancer were diagnosed (3.5% of patients) from endoscopic biopsies and at the time of surgery, respectively. No factor was associated with technical or clinical success., Conclusion: EDB of CD-associated colorectal strictures is feasible, efficient and safe, with more than 40% becoming asymptomatic without surgery., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: Surgical resection is not curative in Crohn's disease (CD) and, recurrence after surgery is a common situation. The identification of patients at high risk of recurrence remains disappointing in clinical practice., Objective: To evaluate the impact of residual microscopic disease on margins on the risk of recurrence after ileocaecal resection in CD., Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent ileocaecal resection between January 1992 and December 2016 were prospectively identified. Demographic data, clinical, surgical and histological variables were retrospectively collected. Positive histologic margin was assessed prospectively and defined by the presence of acute inflammatory lesions on margins: erosion, ulceration, chorion infiltration by neutrophils, cryptic abscesses or cryptitis., Results: One hundred twenty five patients were included, with a median follow-up of 8 years (Interquartile Range (IQR), 4.3-15.2). Half (49.6%, n = 62) were women, and the median age at surgery was 33 years (IQR, 24-42). Fifty-six (44.8%) had positive inflammatory margins. Five years after surgery, respectively 29 (51%) and 23 (34%) patients with positive and negative margins had clinical recurrence (p = 0.034). At the end of the follow-up, respectively 60% (n = 34) and 47% (n = 33) patients had clinical recurrence (p = 0.07). CD-related hospitalizations were observed in respectively 37.5% (n = 21) and 18.8% (n = 13) with positive and negative margins (p = 0.02). Fourteen patients (25%) with positive intestinal margins had surgical recurrence at the end of the follow-up compared to 5 patients (7%) with negative margins (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed that positive intestinal margin was independently associated with surgical recurrence (OR, 4.7 (CI95%, 1.4-15.3), p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Positive histologic margin was associated with an increased risk of clinical and surgical recurrence after ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility and safety of PTE-RV performed in a single session., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of a prospective database on ERCP between January 2014 and December 2018. PTE-RV was performed in case of second ERCP failure. Technical success was defined as the establishment of an intestinal access to the biliary tract using a PTE-RV procedure allowing an immediate internal biliary drainage. Safety endpoints included intra-operative complications, morbidity and mortality occurring within 30 days after the procedure., Results: Eighty-four patients (44 M/40F) with a median age of 69 years (range 40-91 years) underwent combined PTE-RV. The PTE-RVs were successfully performed in the same session in 80 subjects, resulting in an overall technical success rate of 95.2%. Adverse events were observed in 19% (16/84) of cases. The mortality rate within 30 days after the procedure was 9.5%., Conclusion: Percutaneous transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous technique is feasible in a single session with acceptable level of risk. A randomized trial is required to compare EUBD and PTE-RV.

Background & Aims: There is debate over whether patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) treated with biologics that are not tumor necrosis factor antagonists (such as vedolizumab or ustekinumab) should receive concomitant treatment with immunomodulators. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulator therapy vs vedolizumab or ustekinumab monotherapy., Methods: In a systematic search of publications, through July 31, 2019, we identified 33 studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 27 cohort studies) of patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The primary outcome was clinical benefit, including clinical remission, clinical response, or physician global assessment in patients who did vs did not receive combination therapy with an immunomodulator. Secondary outcomes were endoscopic improvement and safety. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs., Results: Overall, combination therapy was not associated with better clinical outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (16 studies: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.05; I2=13.9%; Q test P = .17) or ustekinumab (15 studies: OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.87-1.38; I2 = 11%; Q test P = .28). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses, with no difference in clinical remission or response in induction vs maintenance studies or in patients with Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis in studies of vedolizumab. Combination therapy was not associated with better endoscopic outcomes in patients receiving vedolizumab (3 studies: OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.48-2.68; I2 = 0; Q test P=.96) or ustekinumab (2 studies: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16; I2 = 47%; Q test P = .17). Combination therapy was not associated with an increase in adverse events during vedolizumab therapy (4 studies: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.75-1.84; I2 = 0; Q test P = .110)., Conclusions: In a meta-analysis of data from studies of patients with IBD, we found that combining vedolizumab or ustekinumab with an immunomodulator is no more effective than monotherapy in induction or maintenance of remission., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Most anal fistulas are crypto-glandular. Nevertheless, anal fistulas can reveal Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk of developing CD in patients undergoing surgery for anal fistula., Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing surgery for anal fistula in our center between January 1, 2008 and January 31, 2017 were identified through a prospective administrative database. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were retrospectively collected., Results: Ninety-three patients underwent anal exploration under general anesthesia. The median age at diagnosis of fistula was 43 years (IQR, 34-56) and 27% (n=29) were women. Twenty-seven percent (n=16) had had at least one previous fistula episode. After a median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR, 7.2-42.0), seven (7.4%) patients were diagnosed with CD. The median time between the diagnosis of fistula and that of CD was 7.6 months (IQR, 2.7, 26.1). Chronic diarrhea (P=0.0003), weight loss (P=0.001), and chronic abdominal pain (P=0.002) were associated with the diagnosis of CD. Characteristics of the fistulas (number, simple/complex, abscess), smoking, extra-digestive manifestations of CD, or a family history of IBD were not associated with the diagnosis of CD., Conclusion: A medical history of anal fistula surgery resulted in the diagnosis of CD in 7% of cases. Weight loss and the presence of digestive symptoms were associated with the diagnosis of CD. These elements could be used to select patients requiring endoscopic exploration after anal fistula., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Mucosal healing (MH) has been associated with good outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). It is not clear what levels of endoscopic healing, based on CD endoscopic index score (CDEIS), associate with different courses of disease progression. We assessed long-term outcomes of patients with CD according to different levels of MH., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 84 patients with CD and MH who received biologic therapy (80% with infliximab) from 2008 through 2015 at 2 university hospitals in France and compared outcomes of patients with CD endoscopic index scores (CDEISs) of 0 vs CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4. Patients were followed until treatment failure or through June 2016. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, defined by the need for biologic optimization, initiation of corticosteroids, or a Harvey-Bradshaw score above 4 associated with change in treatment, CD-related hospitalization, and/or intestinal resection., Results: After a median follow-up time of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.1-7.2), 27 patients (32%) had treatment failure and 3 patients (3.6%) underwent an intestinal resection. Rates of treatment failure were 25% in patients with a CDEIS of 0 and 48% in patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (P = .045). Median times to treatment failure were 21 months (interquartile range, 5-43 months) in patients with a CDEIS of 0 and 13 months (interquartile range, 3.6-35 months) in patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (P = .047). None of the patients with a CEDIS of 0 underwent intestinal resection whereas 11% patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 required intestinal resection (P = .031). Patients with a CDEIS of 0 also had a significant lower rate of CD-related hospitalizations than patients with CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (3.5% vs 18%; P = .013). In multivariate analysis, CDEISs greater than 0 but less than 4 (vs CDEIS = 0) was the only factor associated with treatment failure (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.8; P = .02)., Conclusions: Complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) is associated with better long-term outcomes than partial endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 1-4) in patients with CD, as well as fewer surgeries and hospitalizations and an overall decreased risk of treatment failure., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: We investigated the effects of inducing deep remission in patients with early Crohn's disease (CD)., Methods: We collected follow-up data from 122 patients (mean age, 31.2 ± 11.3 y) with early, moderate to severe CD (median duration, 0.2 years; interquartile range, 0.1-0.5) who participated in the Effect of Tight Control Management on CD (CALM) study, at 31 sites, representing 50% of the original CALM patient population. Fifty percent of patients (n = 61) were randomly assigned to a tight control strategy (increased therapy based on fecal level of calprotectin, serum level of C-reactive protein, and symptoms), and 50% were assigned to conventional management. We categorized patients as those who were vs were not in deep remission (CD endoscopic index of severity scores below 4, with no deep ulcerations or steroid treatment, for 8 or more weeks) at the end of the follow-up period (median, 3.02 years; range, 0.05-6.26 years). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse outcomes that indicate CD progression during the follow-up period: new internal fistulas or abscesses, strictures, perianal fistulas or abscesses, or hospitalization or surgery for CD. Kaplan-Meier and penalized Cox regression with bootstrapping were used to compare composite rates between patients who achieved or did not achieve remission at the end of the follow-up period., Results: Major adverse outcomes were reported for 34 patients (27.9%) during the follow-up period. Significantly fewer patients in deep remission at the end of the CALM study had major adverse outcomes during the follow-up period (P = .01). When we adjusted for potential confounders, deep remission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.31) was significantly associated with a lower risk of major adverse outcome., Conclusions: In an analysis of follow-up data from the CALM study, we associated induction of deep remission in early, moderate to severe CD with decreased risk of disease progression over a median time of 3 years, regardless of tight control or conventional management strategy., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease. The aim of this study was to report the rates and risk factors of inflammatory pouch conditions., Methods: This was a retrospective review of UC or IBD unspecified (IBDU) patients who underwent TPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017. Pouchoscopy data were used to calculate rates of inflammatory pouch conditions. Factors associated with outcomes in univariable analysis were investigated in multivariable analysis., Results: Of the 621 patients more than 18 years of age who underwent TPC with IPAA between January 2008 and December 2017, pouchoscopy data were available for 386 patients during a median follow-up period of 4 years. Acute pouchitis occurred in 205 patients (53%), 60 of whom (30%) progressed to chronic pouchitis. Cuffitis and Crohn's disease-like condition (CDLC) of the pouch occurred in 119 (30%) patients and 46 (12%) patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with a decreased risk of acute pouchitis, and pre-operative steroid use and medically refractory disease were associated with an increased risk; IBDU was associated with chronic pouchitis; rectal cuff length ≥2 cm and medically refractory disease were associated with cuffitis; age 45-54 at colectomy was associated with CDLC. Rates of pouch failure were similar in chronic pouchitis and CDLC patients treated with biologics and those who were not., Conclusions: Inflammatory pouch conditions are common. Biologic use for chronic pouchitis and CDLC does not impact the rate of pouch failure., (© 2019 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background & Aims: Little is known about the effects of discontinuing mesalamine therapy for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who initiate therapy with an anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent. We analyzed data from 2 national population cohorts to compare outcomes of patients with CD already on mesalamine therapy who started treatment with an anti-TNF agent and then either stopped or continued mesalamine., Methods: The primary outcome was any adverse clinical event, defined as a composite of new corticosteroid use or CD-related hospitalization or surgery. We collected data from the Truven MarketScan (IBM, Armonk, NY) health claims database in the United States and the Danish health registers. Our analysis included patients with CD who started anti-TNF therapy after at least 90 days of oral mesalamine therapy. Patients were classified as stopping mesalamine if therapy was discontinued within 90 days of starting anti-TNF. We performed multivariable Cox regression models controlling for demographics, clinical factors, and health care utilization. Adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CIs were calculated, comparing stopping mesalamine with continuing mesalamine., Results: A total of 3178 patients with CD were included in our final analysis (2960 in the United States and 218 in Denmark). Stopping mesalamine after initiating anti-TNF therapy was not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events in the US cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.03; P = .13) or in the Danish cohort (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.68-1.87; P = .63). Similar results were obtained from sensitivity analyses of concomitant immunomodulator use and duration of mesalamine treatment before initiation of anti-TNF therapy., Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of 2 national databases, we found that stopping mesalamine therapy for patients with CD who were starting anti-TNF therapy did not increase their risk of adverse clinical events. These results should be validated in a prospective study., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Data on long-term natural history of microscopic colitis (MC), including collagenous (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC), are lacking., Methods: All new cases of MC diagnosed in the Somme area, France, between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, were prospectively included. Colonic biopsies from all patients were reviewed by a group of 4 gastrointestinal pathologist experts to assess the diagnosis of CC or LC. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from diagnosis to February 28, 2017., Results: One hundred thirty cases of MC, 87 CC and 43 LC, were included (median age at diagnosis: 70 [interquartile range, 61-77] and 48 [IQR, 40-61] years, respectively). The median follow-up was 9.6 years (7.6; 10.6). By the end of the follow-up, 37 patients (28%) relapsed after a median time of 3.9 years (1.2; 5.0) since diagnosis, without significant difference between CC and LC (30% vs 26%; P = 0.47). Twenty patients (15%) were hospitalized for a disease flare, and 32 patients (25%) presented another autoimmune disease. Budesonide was the most widely used treatment (n = 74, 59%), followed by 5-aminosalicylic acid (n = 31, 25%). The median duration of budesonide treatment was 92 days (70; 168), and no adverse event to budesonide was reported. Sixteen patients (22%) developed steroid dependency and 4 (5%) were corticoresistant. No difference in the risk of digestive and extradigestive cancer was observed compared with the general population. None of the death (n = 25) observed during the follow-up were linked to MC. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis (HR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.06; P = 0.02) and budesonide exposure (HR, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-5.55; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with relapse., Discussion: This population-based study showed that after diagnosis, two-third of the patients with MC observed long-term clinical remission. Age at diagnosis and budesonide exposure were associated with a risk of relapse.

Introduction: Up to 25% of patients treated with infliximab experience hypersensitivity reactions. Prophylactic premedication prior to infliximab infusion, comprising corticosteroids and/or antihistamines, is widely used in clinical practice but its efficacy has recently been called into question due to the lack of pathophysiological rationale and validation by controlled trials., Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple electronic databases from inception to June 2017 to identify studies reporting the impact of corticosteroid and/or antihistamine premedication on the risk of acute (<24 h) hypersensitivity reaction to infliximab in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed., Results: Ten studies, eight observational studies and two randomized control trials, were identified including a total of 3892 patients with IMIDs, and 1,385 patients with IBD. Corticosteroid premedication was not associated with a decreased risk of hypersensitivity reaction in either IMIDs (7 studies; OR, 1.07, 95%CI, 0.64-1.78; I 2  = 57.5%) or IBD (3 studies; OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.52-2.07; I 2  = 57%). Antihistamine premedication was not associated with a decreased risk of hypersensitivity reaction in IMIDs (3 studies: OR, 1.39, 95% CI, 0.70-2.73; I 2  = 85%). The combination of corticosteroids and antihistamines did not decrease the risk of acute infliximab infusion reaction in IMIDs (6 studies; OR, 2.12, 95% CI, 0.61-7.35; I 2  = 94%), but was associated with an increased risk in IBD (4 studies, OR, 4.17, 95% CI, 1.61-10.78; I 2  = 77%)., Conclusion: Corticosteroid and/or antihistamine premedication is not associated with a decreased risk of acute hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab in patients with IMIDs. We believe that these premedications should no longer be part of standard protocols., (Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)