301. Therapeutic and epidemiologic recommendations to reduce the spread of type-I beta-lactamase resistance.
- Author
-
Neu HC, Duma RJ, Jones RN, McGowan JE Jr, O'Brien TF, Sabath LD, Sanders CC, Schaffner W, Tenover FC, and Young LS
- Subjects
- Cross Infection drug therapy, Cross Infection epidemiology, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Penicillinase, beta-Lactams, Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology, Cross Infection microbiology
- Abstract
The objectives of this United States Consensus Panel meeting were to evaluate the effectiveness of current surveillance systems for the detection of bacterial resistance as well as to formulate recommendations that can assist hospitals in determining actions that should be taken when a resistance problem is detected. These recommendations may be particularly helpful in controlling the emergence and spread of type-I beta-lactamase resistance. Numerous case reports of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens known to produce type-I beta-lactamases have appeared in the literature since the introduction of the newer "third-generation" cephalosporins. The widespread use of these newer antimicrobial agents, often selected as standard therapy for serious hospital-acquired infections, has been associated with a corresponding increase in resistance to them. The failure of hospitalwide surveillance methods to describe the scope of this problem, especially among the most critically ill patients, may have resulted in a false sense of security among some infectious disease specialists and clinicians prescribing these antimicrobials as empiric therapy. High-level resistance in individual hospital units may be masked in hospitalwide antibiograms. A variety of conclusions and recommendations were formulated based on the collective experiences of the Consensus Panel members. Microbiology laboratories must make it a high priority to identify markers that will assist in rapidly identifying resistant organisms. Cooperative efforts are needed among users of commercial and automated microbiology test instruments to standardize results and to improve quality control, thereby making the data more directly comparable between laboratories.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
- Published
- 1992