251. Clinical strategy study on prenatal screening and diagnostic model for Down syndrome.
- Author
-
Luo W, Liu S, He B, Han D, Yuan L, Zhao K, Tang J, Pang L, Zou F, Liu J, Liu H, Bai T, Jing X, Xia T, Deng C, Liu Y, Cheng J, Wei X, Xing L, Luo Y, Zhou Q, Zhu Q, and Liu S
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Adult, China epidemiology, Noninvasive Prenatal Testing methods, Down Syndrome diagnosis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Prenatal Diagnosis methods, Prenatal Diagnosis economics
- Abstract
Exploring efficient and easily implementable prenatal screening strategies aims at birth defect prevention and control. However, there have been limited economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) strategies in China. Furthermore, these studies were predominantly confined to local or geographically proximate provinces and lacked universality and representativeness. This study assesses the health economics of current prenatal screening strategies and NIPS as first-line screening programs, analyzing their efficacy to determine an optimal strategy. From the perspective of health economics, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and single-factor sensitivity were conducted for five different screening strategies using a decision tree model. Among pregnant women aged < 35 years who underwent only one screening for foetal Down syndrome (DS), the detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value of NIPS for foetuses with DS were superior to those of the other four serological screening methods. Although applying NIPS as first-line screening method yields the highest efficacy and benefits, it currently lacks cost-effectiveness when compared to serological screening and sequential NIPS screening strategies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF