Search

Twelve patients with ventricular arrhythmias were given 300-900 mg oral of propafenon daily. We have obtained VT's suppression in 6 of 8 cases (75%) and "complex" VEB's suppression or significant reduction in 6 of 10 cases (60%). Total VEB have been strongly reduced (-91,2%) in 7 of 12 patients (58,3%). The effects of Propafenon on electrocardiographic intervals have not been significant at lower doses and only with 900 mg we have noted a significant (p less than 0,05) lengthening of the P-R (+27,1%) and QTc (+10,2%) intervals. Propafenon has never caused important negative inotropic effects. These results have been confirmed during a follow-up period of 5-19 months. In conclusion we believe that Propafenon must be considered a highly efficient drug for the treatment and prevention of refractory ventricular arrhythmias.

Propafenon's influence on the pharmacokinetic and actions of digitalis and viceversa have been evaluated in 27 patients (25 with ventricular hyperkinetic arrhythmias and 2 with paroxismal atrial fibrillation). Patients were divided in two groups according to whether the drug firstly administered were digoxin or propafenon. Plasmatic digoxin and/or propafenon's concentrations, these last performed only in 12 patients, were determined before and during the association and after propafenon's interruption at 7.55-9-11 and at 3-8 p.m. During drug's association area under the plasmatic digoxin concentration curve (AUC 12h) increased on the average by 13.8% (from 19.27 +/- 6.002 ng hours/ml to 21.94 +/- 6.198 ng hours/ml: P less than 0.05) and by 19% at the first hour. Neverthless individual behaviour was not homogeneous since the plasmatic digoxin concentration (PDC) increased in 22 cases (81.4%) and decreased in 5 (18.6%). In 6 patients mean increase was 38.8% (from 16.72 +/- 3.0 ng hours/ml to 23.21 +/- 5.44 ng hours/ml) without signs of digoxin intoxication. Another patient with congestive heart failure and basal PDC 1.87 ng/ml experienced digoxin poisoning with fatal ventricular fibrillation after propafenon. Digoxin administration in the second group's patients produced a not significant increase of plasmatic propafenon concentration (PPC). There was a good correlation among propafenon's absolute amount and plasmatic concentration and antiarrhythmic effect and no correlation among PPC and body-weight related dose. Propafenon's to digitalis association induced, in propafenon's steady state, significant P-R longation from 170 to 190 ms (P less than 0.01) but HR, QRS and QTc didn't show any important change (P greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The authors previously reported an increase in platelet aggregration in the days after coronary angiography, accompanied at times by worrying cardiovascular disorders (ventricular fibrillation in one case, death in two others). In the present study, ten patients received a platelet antiaggregating drug (ticlopidin) 5 days before their coronary angiography. No significant changes were detected in the test for circulating platelet aggregates (CPA test) in these patients.